It is his signature, when he signs only his first name. Any graphologist will see the same patterns of handwriting of his full name signature.
The drawing is really bad. Looks like something a horny 11-year old would draw.
The contents of the card are all of such pedestrian level that only the ignorant brain of a spoiled rich man who never grew up could write.
1- JE: "There must be more to life than having everything". - Jeffrey Epstein (the wealthy Jewish man convicted and jailed for fucking underage girls and serving them to his equallt wealthy friends like Donald Dumb). Epstein admits to having everything as a rich man, and that he finds that fucking underage girls is that "more" he seek.
2- DT: "Yes there is but I won't tell you what it is" - Donald Dumb agrees but is perhaps too scared to write it down on this card.
3- JE: "Nor will I, since I also know what it is". the two pedophiles share the secret of engaging in the sexual abuse of minor females.
4- DD: "We have certain things in common, Jeffrey". Still in full agreement over their common hobby of fucking underage women.
5- JE: "Yes, we do, come to think off it". Further mutual reinforcement of their common hobby.
6- DT: "Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?" Some have deciphered that Trump's use of "enigmas" is an anagram for "gamines" (i.e. underage girls) because once a gamine ages, other gamines replace them. They never age because the supply of underage girls is assured by Epstein's roper Ghislaine Maxwell. [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/enigmas-never-age-was-trumps-alleged-note-to-epstein-hiding-an-anagram-for-gamines/ar-AA1IRRth]
7- JE: "As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you". Epstein further corroborates that Donald Dumb actually had sex with an underage girl, and that it happened in front of Epstein, and that Trump is lying all the way about his sordid friendship and relationship with Epstein.
8-DT: "A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday, and may every day be anopther wonderful secret".
9- Signed: " Donald J. Trump" and his typical handwriting in a first-name signature with lots of phallic surges of the pen over a lawn of pubic hair placed exactly where a girl's vagina would be. DONALD HIMSELF IS THE C---/PUBIC HAIR ON THE DRAWING.
10- The drawing of a female silhouette around the entire exchange is mediocre to say the least, again something an 11-year old would draw. Donald Dumb is not an artist, he can only draw like an 11-year old.
The persistence of the notion of "secrets" and un-namable things is truly revealing of their deliberate partaking in illegal activities they qualify as "secrets" the two men shared. 
Per the Atlantic:
The Epstein Letter Is Real, and It’s Bad
The president’s initial strategy of denying that the document exists leaves him with few options now that it has been made public.
By Jonathan Chait
September 8, 2025, 6:04 PM ET
This story was updated on September 8, 2025, at 8:49pm ET.
When The Wall Street Journal reported two months ago that Donald Trump had written a suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein in celebration of the notorious child abuser’s 50th birthday, in 2003, the administration had a choice of available responses. The strategy it went with was indignant denial.
“Democrats and Fake News media desperately tried to coordinate a despicable hoax,” said the White House spokesperson Liz Huston. “Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit,” Vice President J. D. Vance wrote on X. “The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it. Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?” Trump sued the Journal’s parent company and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, for defamation, seeking $10 billion in damages. In the legal complaint, Trump’s lawyers accused the paper of “malicious, deliberate, and despicable actions,” including publishing “a series of quotes from the nonexistent letter.”
Now that Democrats on the House Oversight Committee have obtained and shared the letter, which is very much existent, that approach appears to have been shortsighted. (White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the latest revelation: “As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it.”)
Buying Trump’s denial always required accepting some shaky premises. First, that the Journal, a highly regarded newspaper, would report an incriminating story, without evidence, about a famously litigious man with essentially infinite resources. Second, that a newspaper owned by Murdoch, a famous conservative, is in fact a partisan Democratic rag that would say anything to hurt a member of the opposing party without ascertaining its truth. (This is an extension of a long-standing conservative belief that the mainstream media follow the same journalistic principles, or lack thereof, as partisan conservative media). And, third, that the suggestion that Trump might engage in sexual gratification of a morally dubious nature is completely out of line.
Even so, on much of the political right, the truth of these premises appeared incontrovertible. Indeed, many conservatives claimed to consider the fakeness of the Journal story so obvious that they expected its publication to only help Trump.
At the time of publication, the Epstein story had opened a small but notable fissure between the president and his cult following. Now, however, thanks to the Journal, Trump was once again the victim. By publishing a clearly fake report designed to smear the president, the logic went, the mainstream media had driven his erstwhile supporters back into Trump’s arms. “Embattled MAGA Rallies Behind Trump After Leak of Alleged Epstein Letter,” reported Axios.
This was not merely the observation of cynical politics reporters. Conservatives were loudly declaring that the story had caused them to reflexively defend the president’s moral character. “Thank God for Dems and media overreach on this,” an anonymous Trump ally told Politico. Jack Posobiec, who had briefly wavered, declared to Steve Bannon, “We’re so back. Everyone is firing on all cylinders. The MAGA movement is completely united behind this fight.”
The most puzzling aspect of the total-denial approach is that it robbed Trump’s supporters of any fallback defense. The Epstein letter is eyebrow-raising—“We have certain things in common,” Trump writes, closing with the wish, “May every day be another wonderful secret”—but it is not an explicit confession. Trump could have admitted to being its author while arguing that the commonalities and secrets alluded to mundane, or at least legal, activities. Instead, he described the letter as “false, malicious, and defamatory”—conceding that, if it were real, it would be pretty bad.
Guess what? It’s real. And it’s bad.
When the Journal story first broke, Vance demanded, “Will the people who have bought into every hoax against President Trump show an ounce of skepticism before buying into this bizarre story?”
The episode certainly does tell us something about Trump and the need for appropriate levels of skepticism. Don’t count on the president’s cultists to draw the right conclusion.
=========================================
Epstein 'Birthday Book' Depicts Shocking Joke About Selling Woman To Trump
Ben Blanchet
Tue, September 9, 2025
Epstein 'Birthday Book' Depicts Shocking Joke About Selling Woman To Trump
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee on Monday highlighted another disturbing page out of Jeffrey Epstein’s so-called 2003 “birthday book” that features a joke about Epstein selling a woman to President Donald Trump.
“Jeffrey showing early talents with money + women! Sells ‘fully depreciated’ [name redacted] to Donald Trump for $22,500,” reads a handwritten caption on the page, which includes a photo of Epstein and longtime Mar-a-Lago member Joel Pashcow holding a massive “check.”
The caption goes on, “Showed early ‘people skills’ too. Even though I handled the deal I didn’t get any of the money on the girl!”
Two faces — as well as the woman’s name on the check— are redacted from the snap. The check also features a “DJ Trump” signature, but it doesn’t resemble the president’s handwriting as seen on documents over the years.
The joke takes aim at a woman whom the president and Epstein “socialized with” in the 1990s, sources told The Wall Street Journal.
The “birthday book” drop comes as Trump dismisses talk of his relationship with — and his administration’s handling of files tied to — the late convicted sex offender, calling a bipartisan push to release the so-called Epstein files in their entirety a “Democrat hoax.”
NEW PAGE FROM EPSTEIN’S BIRTHDAY BOOK: Epstein and a longtime Mar-a-Lago member joking about selling a "fully depreciated" woman to Donald Trump for $22,500. pic.twitter.com/iEMNSRX7X8
— Oversight Dems (@OversightDems) September 8, 2025
Pashcow and his attorney didn’t respond to the WSJ’s requests for comment, while a lawyer for the woman said she didn’t know the longtime Mar-a-Lago member and had “no knowledge of the letter,” with the lawyer referring to it as a “disgusting and deeply disturbing hoax.”
The page arrives on the same day that the House panel released a trove of documents from Epstein’s estate, including what appears to be the “birthday book” in its entirety.
Among the documents shared by Democrats on Monday is an image of Trump’s alleged birthday message to Epstein, which he has denied writing inside of a crude drawing of an outline of a woman’s body.
The White House has claimed that the letter is fake based on the appearance of Trump’s signature, though social media users, including George Conway, have pointed out that the president has previously used a similar “Donald” signature.
No comments:
Post a Comment