Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Endemic Corruption in MAGA-GOP World: Impeached Criminals for Public Office

Like they did on the national level with Donald Dumb, the twice-impeached criminal felon, the MAGA-GOP morons of the backward state of Texas want the impeached "Biblical Sharia Law" veteran adulterer, corrupt, and sleepy-eye Ken Paxton to be their next senator.

They can't help it. Conservatism has always been intimately tied up with corruption and bad management. Trump is the textbook example, almost a caricature, of that conservative corruption.

Throughout the history of the country, Republicans would ruin the economy of the country with tax breaks for the rich and deregulation, which they try to fix with warmongering foreign adventures that always end bad, and the cycle of bad management and corruption is broken when the American people wake up from the torpor of GOP-fed nationalist and religious bullshit and elect a Democrat who fixes the economy and gives relief to the American people. It happened with Carter, with Clinton and with Obama, all of whom balanced the budget and healed the economy that had been mismanaged under their republican predecessors.

The earlier Great Moron republican president Ronald Reagan secretly sold weapons to Iran and funneled the money to the terrorist Contra rebels in Nicaragua. His heir to the presidency, his VP George H.W. Bush played a big role in the Iran-Contra affair, then in the Iraqgate scandal in which U.S. agricultural loans to Iraq were diverted to purchase weapons, not to forget the multiple sexual misconduct accusations made against him, albeit later in 2017.

===========================================


Texas Republicans once impeached Paxton. Now his Senate run splits them
Mateo Rosiles, USA TODAY NETWORK
Tue, June 2, 2026 

Three years after a majority of Texas House Republicans voted to impeach Attorney General Ken Paxton, the divisions from that vote are resurfacing as he runs for U.S. Senate.

Paxton’s runoff victory over Sen. John Cornyn, backed by President Donald Trump, has prompted varied responses from Republican lawmakers. Some who voted to impeach him now support his campaign, while others have raised concerns about his candidacy.

The race comes as Republicans revisit the political impact of Paxton’s 2023 impeachment.

In that vote, 60 Republicans joined 61 Democrats in the Texas House to approve articles of impeachment against Paxton, making him the third state official in Texas history to be impeached — the others being District Judge O.P. Carrillo and Gov. James "Pa" Ferguson. Twenty-three Republicans voted against impeachment. The articles included allegations of abuse of office, bribery and misuse of taxpayer funds, but Paxton was later acquitted by the Texas Senate.

Now, as Paxton is the Republican nominee for Senate, House Republicans who supported impeachment have taken differing positions. One is supporting his campaign. Another has publicly questioned the implications of his candidacy. A third has raised the possibility of subpoenaing Paxton over a recent plea deal involving a man convicted of sexually abusing a child.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks to supporters after winning the Republican runoff election for U.S. Senate in Texas, defeating incumbent U.S. Senator John Cornyn, in Plano, Texas, May 26, 2026. Paxton will face Democrat James Talarico in the November general election.

Burrows sings a different tune for Paxton after impeaching him

Dustin Burrows was not yet speaker in 2023. At the time, he represented House District 83 in Lubbock and was chairman of the House Calendars Committee.

On May 27, 2023, Burrows was among 60 Republican representatives who voted to impeach Paxton, saying it was a decision he did not take lightly, noting that the impeachment simply meant there was enough evidence for members to believe the issues needed to be tried by the Texas Senate.

In a statement on social media in May 2023, Burrows said: "The facts presented are serious and the laws that were allegedly broken serious enough to warrant his removal from office."

"The allegations, (which everyone I know believes to be true), suggest a pattern of him selling the power of his office for personal gain, including the issuing of subpoenas for someone who employed his mistress. Is this the conduct and character that Texans deserve as their representation?" Burrows asked.

At the time, Burrows said he knew Paxton personally and applauded everything he had done as attorney general up to that point, but said the ends don't always justify the means.

Paxton did not take kindly to Burrows voting to impeach him. As the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, part of USA TODAY Network, reported at the time, Paxton launched a revenge tour to replace Burrows — and other state lawmakers who voted to impeach him. Paxton ultimately failed to replace Burrows.

They have taken shots at each other since the impeachment, but Burrows has changed his tune about Paxton since he defeated Cornyn in the Republican runoff.

On Election Day on May 26, as results were coming in, Burrows posted to social media congratulating Paxton on his win — 30 minutes before the Associated Press called the race for Paxton.

In that social media post, Burrows called Paxton "a steadfast conservative fighter for Texas" and signaled his willingness to support Paxton in the months leading up to the November general election.

Texas state House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, at the Texas Tech University groundbreaking ceremony of its Critical Infrastructure Security Site at the Reese National Security Complex on Tuesday, May 19, 2026 in Lubbock, Texas.

"With so much at stake for our state and our country, Republicans are united and ready for the fight ahead. Looking forward to supporting Ken Paxton as we work to protect the values and freedoms that make Texas exceptional," read the post.

Leach won't move on from Paxton — and a Waco plea deal

If Burrows flipped, Rep. Jeff Leach did so out of party loyalty.

The Plano Republican, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee — which has jurisdiction over Paxton's office — voted to impeach Paxton and survived Paxton's attempt to replace him in the House with another candidate in his 2024 election.

He backed Cornyn in the runoff and threatened to subpoena Paxton over a plea deal unrelated to the Senate race. Instead, Leach raised the question days before the runoff of what kind of attorney general the party would nominate for the U.S. Senate and asked voters to "vote accordingly."

During the runoff election, Paxton was taking heat from Cornyn's camp over a "sweetheart" deal his office had given to Waco attorney Adam Hoffman.

In that case, as the El Paso Times, part of USA TODAY Network, reported, Hoffman was facing a life sentence for the sexual abuse of a child that lasted three years. However, Paxton's office intervened and offered a plea deal:
- 60 days in county jail.
- No mandatory registration as a sex offender.
- No permanent loss of Hoffman’s law license.

Republican Texas State Representative Jeff Leach sits during a session as Democratic lawmakers, who left the state to deny Republicans the opportunity to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts, begin returning to the Texas State Capitol in Austin, Texas, U.S. August 20, 2025.

Leach called the deal "incomprehensible" and sent a letter to Paxton on May 6 demanding answers about how it came about.

"This inquiry is not about politics. It is about accountability, transparency, and restoring public confidence in a justice system that victims are asked to trust during the most painful moments of their lives," Leach wrote.

As KWTX in Waco reported, Hoffman was released early from McLennan County Jail on May 25 after serving 29 days of his 60-day sentence.

In a post later that day, Leach again demanded answers from Paxton.

"If my House Judiciary Committee has to subpoena Ken Paxton himself to explain this — be assured that we will do so. We deserve answers. And this is not going away," Leach said in his post.

After Paxton won the runoff, Leach posted on social media saying, "You can be sure I’ll be supporting every Republican from top to bottom this November."

"Bottom line: We Republicans must quickly heal and unite from these bruising primaries — and I promise to do my part to help make that happen. The Texas we know and love is worth it," read the post.

Phelan warns Paxton could cost Republicans the state

Former Speaker Dade Phelan led the House during the Paxton impeachment.

But he lost his bid to remain speaker after backlash from hard-line conservatives over the impeachment trial, among other reasons. Burrows was elected to the role in his place.

Phelan still serves in the House as the representative for District 21 in Beaumont, Texas.

During the trial, Phelan led the chamber through the impeachment, defended the process and survived Paxton's attempt to replace him in the House and the Texas Republican Party's censure. Phelan even backed Cornyn during the runoff.

AUSTIN, TX - JULY 13: Speaker of the Texas House U.S. Rep. Dade Phelan (R-TX) (C) listens to U.S. Rep. Will Metcalf (R-TX) (L) move to issue a call of the House to try to regain a quorum on July 13, 2021 in Austin, Texas. The Texas House voted to arrest Democrats who fled the state to deny a quorum in protest of Republicans' controversial voting bill.

Recently, the former speaker spoke to Newsweek about Paxton taking on Talarico, issuing a warning to Texans and the state's Republican party.

"I've said this a million times—Paxton’s lazy. So, with this Talarico-Paxton as the matchup, we have a problem in Texas because the guy's never been at the top of the ticket and had to run a major race. He's always been coattails,” Phelan said to Newsweek.

Phelan also suggested that there is a faction of Republicans who would not vote for Paxton under any circumstances, and warned that under those conditions, Republicans could lose their edge in the state's legislature and judiciary.

The split among Burrows, Phelan and Leach reflects a Republican Party in Texas that has tried over the past three years to put the Paxton impeachment and allegations behind it, only to confront them head-on once more in a race Republicans thought they could coast through.

Mateo Rosiles is the Texas Connect reporter for USA TODAY and its regional papers in Texas. Got a news tip for him? Email him at mrosiles@usatodayco.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Texas Republicans remain split over Paxton as US Senate race looms

=================================================
Semafor
Emanuel dings Democrats for missing corruption messaging 'gem'
Nicholas Wu
Tue, June 2, 2026 



For Rahm Emanuel, it’s more than the economy, stupid.

The likely 2028 presidential candidate, who served as House Democratic campaigns chief during the party’s successful 2006 midterms, told Semafor that Democrats should sharpen their arguments about President Donald Trump’s self-dealing while in office — by hitching them to affordability-focused messaging.

“This is a gem sitting there. I think the Democrats … have been episodic in touching it, rather than front and center,” Emanuel said. “Corruption as part of the affordability narrative is more chess, where affordability alone is more checkers.

Many Democratic candidates have homed in on inflation and affordability-focused messaging this cycle, especially after some in the party chalked up their 2024 losses to voters punishing them for the post-pandemic spike in inflation.

With polling generally showing cost-of-living issues rank among voters’ top concerns, Democrats are confident they can turn this fall’s midterm elections into a referendum on Trump and Republicans’ handling of the economy.

Top Hill Democrats contend that they’re already pairing the arguments together. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has targeted Trump’s $1.8 billion fund of taxpayer money for people allegedly victimized by the government and has singled out purple-district Republicans like Reps. Rob Bresnahan of Pennsylvania and Mike Lawler of New York for alleged ethical issues.

Vulnerable Republicans have destroyed the economy and raised costs on almost everyone, all while self-dealing and lining their own pockets,” said DCCC spokesperson Viet Shelton. “Republicans will lose the House majority, because the DCCC and House Democrats are exposing their shameless corruption and failure to deliver on their central campaign promise to lower the high cost of living.”

Still, Emanuel is betting that voters could also reward Democrats for further highlighting alleged malfeasance in the Trump administration, like the controversy around the White House ballroom renovation or business deals that have benefited the president’s family — and for reminding voters how those misdeeds affect them.

“At the end of the day, this is a referendum election on the president and a rubber-stamp Congress,” he said. “Yes, it’s about groceries, but it’s about the fact that they’re not paying attention to your bread costs while they’re making millions and billions of dollars for themselves.”
===============================================
AP

How Trump has used the presidency to benefit himself and his allies
WILL WEISSERT and MICHELLE L. PRICE
Updated Tue, June 2, 2026 


President Donald Trump pumps his fist as he arrives at the White House, Sunday, May 31, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump tried to create a near $1.8 billion fund that could be funneled to his supporters as a means of settling a lawsuit he filed against his own government — even arguing that he “gave up a lot of money in allowing" it.

After drawing outcry in Congress and the courts, however, the White House is reconsidering the fund. That potentially means the suit — and the possibility that the president could still cash in — might be back on.

Trump hasn’t been shy about turning the presidency into a major source of personal benefit, involving everything from merchandising deals to crypto ventures to high-dollar political and official events at his properties.

Asked about possible self-dealing by the president, the White House called such suggestions “the same, tired narrative that Democrats have pushed against President Trump, his family, and his administration for a decade.”

"President Trump only acts in the best interests of the American public — which is why they overwhelmingly re-elected him to this office, despite years of lies and false accusations against him and his businesses from the fake news media," spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. “There are no conflicts of interest.”

Here are some key ways Trump has reaped rewards for himself, his children and allies in his second term:
Suing his own government and deals favoring his family

Last year, the president submitted a claim seeking $230 million in compensation from the Justice Department for a FBI search of his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as part of an investigation into whether he took classified records from the White House.

In January this year, Trump, his two eldest sons and the family's business, the Trump Organization, filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and Treasury Department after a former IRS contractor illegally leaked Trump's tax returns.

In an attempt to resolve those cases, Trump's government agreed that $1.776 billion in taxpayer funds be distributed to people who believe they were targeted by past administrations for prosecution for political purposes — including the Trump supporters imprisoned for attacking police while overrunning the U.S. Capitol in 2021.

After blowback from even some congressional Republicans, the Justice Department now says it will comply with a ruling temporarily blocking the fund.

But there was less clamor about another part of the deal allowing the government to drop pending IRS audits into Trump and his relatives.


Separately, the Air Force has agreed to purchase interceptor drones from Powerus, a Florida-based company linked to Trump’s family. And ProPublica reported that direct intervention from the White House preceded the Pentagon agreeing to loan $620 million to Vulcan Elements, a North Carolina startup linked to Donald Trump Jr.

Trump Organization spokesperson Kimberly Benza denied any ethical conflicts between the White House and the family business.

“The Trump Organization operates completely separate from the presidency and is in full compliance with all ethics and conflict-of-interest laws,” Benza said in a statement.

As for Powerus, Benza said Eric Trump was “a passive investor in a vehicle that, among many others, holds an interest” in the company, but wasn't involved in its decision-making or management.
Trading in financial markets he can help move
Trump has traded stocks and bonds in unprecedented ways for a sitting U.S. president.

Office of Government Ethics filings show Trump made more than 3,600 stock trades in the first quarter of 2026 alone — transactions far exceeding $100 million in value.

Many of those trades involved sizable purchases of shares of technology and artificial intelligence giants like Nvidia, Dell, Oracle and Palantir before Trump's administration took policy actions favoring those firms.

Similar disclosures last year show that Trump bought up more than $300 million in bonds issued by companies, states and municipalities even as he repeatedly pressed the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates — a move that could help drive up the value of his holdings.
Crypto ventures

Trump's family has raked in big profits in the crypto sector since he was reelected. A key driver has been the $TRUMP meme coin, announced the day before Trump took office. Some 220 of the top investors were invited to a subsequent, private reception with the president.

Trump's family also has a controlling stake in World Liberty Financial, a crypto firm co-founded with the president's special envoy Steve Witkoff and run by his son Zach. It has its own stablecoin, USD1, and got a major boost when, just before Trump took office, an investment fund linked to the United Arab Emirates bought a large stake in it.

An Abu Dhabi state-backed investment firm, MGX, subsequently pledged to use $2 billion worth of USD1 to purchase a stake in Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange — a move that further bolstered World Liberty Financial.
Trump-branded bonanza
Beyond the digital realm, scores of companies pay to license the president's name for physical products, from Bibles, guitars and sneakers to watches, fragrances and a gold-hued cellphone.

Trump has promoted many such goods on social media, particularly during his 2024 campaign, but they've also made conspicuous appearances at the White House.

When French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited last summer, Trump showed them a merchandise room off the Oval Office stocked with goods for sale on his website. A few months later, video emerged of Trump at the White House spraying Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa with bottles of his “Victory 47” cologne and perfume, which he gave him as a gift.

The president displayed hats emblazoned with “Trump 2028” on the Resolute Desk while meeting with congressional Democrats last year. And, during a televised Cabinet meeting in May, at every seat was a red hat commemorating America's 250th anniversary.

Each hat sells for $55 on Trump's website.
Paydays for the president's properties
The Republican National Committee and various political groups associated with Trump and the GOP have held fundraisers and political events at Mar-a-Lago, as well as Trump's estate in Bedminster, New Jersey, and his golf clubs in Doral, Florida, and Sterling, Virginia.

The LIV Golf league, controlled by the Saudi Public Investment Fund, which is helmed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has held events at Doral. Trump will host the G20 summit there in November.

That means world leaders, support staff, business executives, journalists and the bevies of others involved will be paying the Trump Organization, which purchased Doral in 2012, to attend. The president has already tried to head off criticism of self-dealing around the summit, saying that government attendees will be billed “at-cost" and “We will not make any money on it."

Meanwhile, conservative groups and Republican committees have spent at least $26 million at Trump properties since 2015. The actual figure is likely higher since some groups don’t have to detail their spending.
Renovation and construction projects

Qatar gave Trump a $400 million jet that he intends to employ as Air Force One, then store at his presidential library after he leaves office. The gift has undergone extensive taxpayer-funded rebuilding and security upgrades that lawmakers estimate may exceed $1 billion.

Trump has also ordered up scores of renovation projects meant to leave his mark on Washington while passing on the costs to taxpayers.

He long insisted that wealthy donors would pay for the $400 million ballroom he demolished the White House's East Wing to build — only to seek $1 billion in federal funding for security upgrades he says the military and Secret Service have sought as part of the project.

At least $15 million in public funds is going for the ceremonial arch Trump wants built at an entrance to the nation’s capital. The National Park Service is also paying a contractor $13.1 million to carry out the Trump-directed renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Trump Upset at His Zionist Whisperer for Dragging Him into Losing War

The Zionist whisperer of the dumb American president has gone too far. Netanyahu's jackass target, one DONALD DUMB, seems to still have a few functioning neurons in his vacuous brain to realize he is being "handled" like a moron. 

BUT. By giving Hezbollah credibility - he says he had a "conversation with Representatives of the Leaders of Hezbollah", the Iranian terrorist organization operating in Lebanon - instead of finishing the job, Donald Dumb is re-starting the 45-year-old vicious cycle of violence in southern Lebanon between Hezbollah and Israel. Which means that Lebanon will, again, be at the mercy of Hezbollah's Quixotic "resistance" against Israel on behalf of the barbarian regime in Tehran, and at the mercy of the equally barbarian Zionist colony in Palestine. 

Did Donald Dumb violate anti-terrorism laws by speaking with a terrorist organization? 

Donald Dumb continues a long history of Republican Administrations that began with a braggard approach to the torment of Lebanon, only to back down and stab the small country in the back by abandoning it to its enemies. 
- Eisenhower sent some 10,000 US marines to Beirut in 1958 (Operation Blue Bat) to protect Lebanon against Arab dictatorial revolutions in Iraq and Egypt. This is the only and last US intervention that did help Lebanon.
- Nixon dispatched Henry Kissinger to Damascus after the October 1973 war with Israel. The 1974 agreement between Assad and Kissinger consisted of Assad pledging to accept Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights in exchange for raping Lebanon, which Assad did for thirty long years between 1974 and 2005. 
- Reagan dispatched US marines to Beirut in 1982 to supervise the evacuation of the Palestinian militias that had been crushed by the Israeli invasion. When Hezbollah, a few-days-old Iranian mercenary militia bombed the Marines Headquarters, killing 241 US Marines, Ronald Reagan the "great" republican asshole withdrew the remainder of his troops, abandoning Lebanon to Syria and Iran. Had Reagan stood his ground in 1983, Lebanon would have been spared the four decades of violence since. 
- George H.W. Bush made another deal with the Syrian dictatorship during the 1980s: Assad and Iran's proxy Hezbollah had seized US hostages, so the jackass Bush Sr. imposed a Syrian-approved puppet candidate for the Lebanese presidency against the wishes of the Lebanese people just to get the hostages back. 
- Later in 1990-1991, the same jackass Bush Sr. and his Secretary of State James Baker the Turd, forced Israel to ignore its red line (Syrian air force jets were prohibited from flying over Lebanese air space) for just one day and allow the Syrian air force to bomb the presidential palace in Beirut and dislodge the legitimate government of Lebanon. The reason? Bush and Baker needed Stalinist Syria, which topped the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism, to join the coalition against Saddam Hussein of Iraq. 
- Then, post 9-11, Republican Bush Jr. (George W Bush) did help get Syria's occupation army out of Lebanon in 2005, but only reluctantly and in exchange for re-installing the criminal warlords and Hezbollah in power. 

The gist of all these republican administrations' policies on Lebanon is that genuinely assisting the Christian-dominated tiny country in exiting the Sunni Arab-Jewish Israeli-Shiite Iranian cycle of violence would upset the Sunni Muslim - and often Islamist - Saudis, Kuwaitis, Egyptians. Libyans and other oil-rich Arabs. The Bush family has substantial oil interests and friendships with the Sunni Muslim Arab countries, and helping a semi-Christian Lebanon would disturb the oil-lubed friendship between the Republican Americans and the Saudis (whose 16 terrorists were responsible for the September 11, 2001 bombing in new York). 

Lovely, isn't it?
================================================


Report: Trump upbraids Netanyahu over Lebanon, asking, ‘What the f— are you doing?’
Max Rego
Mon, June 1, 2026



President Trump reportedly took Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to task during a Monday phone call over the latter’s military campaign in Lebanon.

Axios reported, citing two U.S. officials and a third source briefed on the call, that Trump called Netanyahu “crazy” and accused him of ingratitude.

At one point, Trump reportedly yelled at Netanyahu, “What the f— are you doing?”

The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.

Earlier Monday, Netanyahu ordered the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to strike Hezbollah targets in the Dahiyeh (Arabic for suburb) district of Beirut. Israel and Hezbollah have engaged in fighting since October 2023, despite a ceasefire that began in November 2024.

Officials in Iran, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, have said that Israeli strikes in Lebanon constitute a violation of the ceasefire that Washington and Tehran agreed to on April 7. Trump said Monday that talks between his administration and the Islamic Republic on a lasting peace are ongoing.

“The ceasefire between Iran and the US is unequivocally a ceasefire on all fronts, including in Lebanon,” Araghchi wrote Monday on the social platform X. “Its violation on one front is a violation of the ceasefire on all fronts. The US and Israel are responsible for the consequences of any violation.”

After the phone call with Netanyahu, which he touted as “productive,” Trump said that no Israeli troops will head to Beirut.

“I had a conversation with Bibi Netanyahu today, asking him not to go into a major raid of Beirut, Lebanon,” the president wrote on his Truth Social platform. “He turned his Troops around. Thank you Bibi!”

Trump added, “I also had a conversation with Representatives of the Leaders of Hezbollah, and they agreed to stop shooting at Israel, and its soldiers. Likewise, Israel agreed to stop shooting at them. Let’s see how long that lasts — Hopefully it will be for ETERNITY!”

Later Monday, Netanyahu wrote on X that he told Trump, “that if Hezbollah does not cease attacking our cities and citizens—Israel will attack terror targets in Beirut.”

Netanyahu added that the IDF “will continue to operate as planned” in southern Lebanon. Beirut, the capital, is on the eastern [sic] coast of Lebanon — in line with the center of the country. [Correction from LI: Beirut is on the western coast of Lebanon along the eastern Mediterranean].

Monday, June 1, 2026

Will Hezbollah Mount a Coup Against the Lebanese State to Seize Power?

Israel has, as we write these lines, taken the entirety of the Lebanese Southern District. It is razing all the Shiite villages and towns to the ground south of the Litani and Zahrani rivers, such that, given enough time, nature would have re-asserted itself and all the boundaries, markers and hallmarks between villages and houses would have disappeared. Unless of course, Israel organizes a land rush for all the Yahweh-crazy Zionist settlers and invites them to build their kibbutzim and settlements. 


During antiquity, the city of Tyre in particular was both a friend and an enemy of the invading Hebrew nomads and their kings David and Solomon circa 800 BC. King Hiram of Tyre did help the Hebrew kings who, as nomadic desert-dwelling people, admitted to him to living in miserable goat-skin tents and being ignorant of masonry. Hiram sent cedar wood, engineers and masons to Jerusalem and built them palaces and the first Hebrew Temple in Jerusalem (modeled on the Melkart Temple of the Tyrian superpower). But when Phoenician Princess Jezebel, daughter of King Ithobaal of Tyre married King Ahab of Israel, she brought with her the worship of the Phoenician deities (Baal, Adonis, Asherah) and displaced the worship of Yahweh. The Hebrew religious conservatives of the time panicked and rebelled against her and killed her. From that point forward, ultra-powerful Tyre became a much maligned neighbor for the Hebrews and the Torah is replete with curses and hateful comments against it. It is even suggested that this breakup of the Hebrew-Phoenician alliance and the threat of the Assyrian empire invasion of the region is what prompted the Phoenicians of Tyre to create their mighty colony in Carthage in today's Tunisia.  

Back to May 2026. Israel appears to have no intention of withdrawing any time soon, if at all, which means that the Lebanese Shiites who have fled north and are now sheltering among the other communities (Maronites, Sunnis, Druze...) would need to find a more "permanent" place to settle in the near future. The other communities have been welcoming them on humanitarian grounds, even though there is a deep political resentment at Hezbollah's waging wars despite the objections of these other communities.

Back in the 1980s-1990s, Israel occupied a strip along the border with the help of local residents (both Maronites and Shiites) who had been cut off from the central government by the Palestinians first, then by Hezbollah. In that situation, Shiite villages remained relatively intact and became incubators of a guerilla warfare by Hezbollah which forced the Israelis to withdraw in 2000, turning the whole charade into a victory for the Iranian terrorist militia. 

This time, the Israelis seem to have learned from that bitter experience. This time, Israel is completely erasing villages and towns from the map, eliminating any hope for the Shiite villager supporters of Hezbollah to ever return, let alone wage a guerilla war against the new Israeli occupation. Israel is thus managing a minimalist occupation, leaving troops briefly on the ground only for operational purposes and relying mostly on air assaults. 

The question on the minds of the Lebanese is: What is Hezbollah going to do now that it has been deprived of its most valuable asset, the Shiite villages bordering Israel? 

The welcome mat of the other communities will sooner or later have to be removed. Schools, churches, official buildings... will have to be taken back. Tent camps for the refugees are typically installed on open terrain often belonging to the State or to religious orders. Residents of some neighborhoods are already contesting setting up these camps in the middle of residential neighborhoods, fearing a repeat of the Palestinian exodus of 1948 and 1967 during which refugees set up camps initially temporarily, thinking they'd be returning to their villages and towns that the Zionists ethnically cleansed. The 1975 War in Lebanon was essentially fought to prevent Yasser Arafat's PLO from taking over of the state, and the refugee camps around Beirut that he had turned into fortified and heavily armed holdouts were dislodged at great cost: Sabra, Shatila, Tel Zaatar, Jisr El-Pasha, Dbayyieh and others. No one wants a repeat of those events, and the otherwise jaded Lebanese have been adamant at preventing the creation of such camps.

Where will the Shiites go? They still have a dominating presence in the eastern Bekaa Valley and in the Hermel further north. They could conceivably end up settling there among other pro-Hezbollah Shiites. There are rumors, mostly from radical right-wing pro-Trump Maronites in the US (who vehicle Zionist-inspired ideas), that go much farther and whose tenor seems to fit well with the Zionist plan of redrawing the maps of the region: The Lebanese Shiites may be somehow "induced" to leave Lebanon altogether, perhaps settle in Shiite-friendly areas of Syria, Iraq and even further afield in Iran. If these ideas have any currency, it is in the hope by these Zionizing Maronites that a Lebanon emptied or truncated of its Shiites would by default revert to the Maronite-dominated Lebanon that existed between WWI and 1975. Just like an Israel voided of its Palestinians would by default become a purely "Jewish" state. An amputated Greater Lebanon that would shrink back to the majority Maronite, semi-independent, Mount Lebanon Governorate , a.k.a. "Smaller Lebanon", that existed between 1860 and 1914 is something many Christians in Lebanon seem to be longing for after bitter decades of coexisting with Muslims. To begin with, the latter wanted to be part of Syria and never wanted to be part of that Maronite-dominated Lebanon. They spent most of the post-1943 independence decades betraying and undermining the agreed-upon coexistence formula - neutrality, no East-no West - by shoving Lebanon into "Arab nationalist" causes that were given precedence over the agreed upon neutrality: Nasser of Egypt's revolution (the US landed 10,000 US Marines in 1958 in Beirut to protect Lebanon against Nasser), the Syrian Socialist Nationalist Party (SSNP) of Syria that mounted a coup in 1961), the Baath Party of Syria's Assad regime that struck a deal with Kissinger in 1974 to protect Israel's seizure of the Golan and destabilize Lebanon, the Palestinian Liberation Organization of Yasser Arafat that waged a war against the Lebanese state (1973), and finally the Iranian terror militia of Hezbollah (beginning in 1982) that continues to this day to dislocate Lebanon into a dysfunctional degraded State. 

For now, the bigger question is what will Hezbollah do "politically" now that it is deprived of its territorial asset? It is the only sectarian militia that is openly operational in the country. Neither the Sunni Muslims, nor the Maronite Catholics, nor the Druze exhibit signs of militarization: As far as one can tell, no one has a militia other than Hezbollah. But everyone fears Hezbollah. So, a civil war between the communities is possible but unlikely.

What is more likely is that Hezbollah might seize power by toppling the Lebanese government of Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam, split the army by calling on the Shiite soldiers of the regular army to quit and join its ranks, something the Sunni Muslims, then allied with the PLO against their own government, did in 1976 when a Sunni Lieutenant by the name of Ahmed Khatib led a sedition, created the Arab Army of Lebanon allied with the PLO and Syria, and proceeded to attack regular army barracks across the country.

The Lebanese army is poorly equipped, even though the Americans have been bragging for the last two decades about gifting it useless scrap and junk leftovers of ancient wars' vintage. So any resistance or opposition by the State and its army to a Hezbollah takeover is unlikely to turn things around. Hezbollah's existence rests upon its anointing itself as a "resistance" movement. By seizing power, it would re-constitute for itself a new resistance front against Israel's new and improved occupation, this time across the new "border" along the Litani and Zahrani rivers, assuming the Israelis stop their advance there.

But without its own Shiite community and villages, Hezbollah can only launch this new front if it has sole power over the country. Sunni, Maronite or Druze villages and towns would not willingly welcome a Hezbollah resistance from within their districts. 

One thing is certain: Israel will not abandon the Lebanese south this time; it may even annex it as it has done with the Syrian Golan. There will have to be a rearrangement of the pawns inside the Lebanese chessboard. For now, the Lebanese wait and see. 

Sunday, May 31, 2026

You'd Have to Be an Idiot to Still Think that Donald Dumb is not Racist

Conservative African-Americans who vote for Trump should be on notice. Trump is NOT conservative. He is a fake, pretend-conservative, a false Christian, a non-family-values adulterer and cheater, a man without any principles whose sole concern is to enrich himself at the expense of others and his country. Perhaps he's not smart enough - as many in his former entourage keep reminding us, like the diehard respected conservative John Bolton and others - to understand conservative values, but he exploits those values, your values, to promote racism and hatred of anyone who is not a white trash American like him.

All African-American women are "low IQ", according to the absolute moron Trump as his former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson described him as he was slamming the door on his way out of the White House. Frequently labeled an idiot and a moron, (https://atlantablackstar.com/2026/04/23/idiot-trump-stumbled-through-a-three-minute-reading-thinking-no-one-would-zoom-in-they-did-and-what-they-found-was-exactly-what-you-think/), Trump has done more damage to the Republican Party than any Democrat could dream of. The GOP will never recover from the Trump era.

There is only one token African American in the 24-member Trump cabinet. Black officers of the US army have been dismissed by Trump's racist henchman Hegseth. His administration was waged war against Diversity Equity Inclusion (DEI) programs that have opened doors historically shuttered for African Americans.

In November, vote your conscience, not your superficial preference for a liar, a bigot and a con man. He and his MAGA minions have done everything they can to prevent Black African Americans from voting this November. Their redistricting in several states has already curtailed Black African American representation in the next Congress. And that is not because African Americans lean Democrat; it is simply because he and his white trash Republican gangsters are racists to the bone, with KKK blood running in their veins. They'd legalize lynching if they could.

Do you really want to keep playing "Uncle Tom" for Trump and his racist cabal?
============================================================



Opinion
Trump has turned Republicans into the anti-Black party
A. Scott Bolden, opinion contributor
Sun, May 31, 2026




Led by President Trump, the Republican Party has disgracefully embraced white Christian nationalists and is working to turn back the clock on progress America has made in the struggle against racism and other bigotry.

Some 83 percent of Black voters are Democrats or lean Democratic, according to the Pew Research Center. Because of this, Trump has demanded Republican officials make it harder for African Americans to vote and elect candidates of their choosing.

Trump has successfully pressured Republican-controlled states to engage in mid-decade congressional redistricting that could enable the GOP to gain more than a dozen House seats and reduce the number of Black House members.

Redistricting approved by California voters could enable Democrats to win up to five more House seats, and a court order will likely enable Democrats to win one more House seat in Utah.

Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), who chairs the Congressional Black Caucus, recently said that 19 of the 59 Black Democrats now in the House are in danger of losing their seats in the November elections because of Republican redistricting. In addition, none of the four Black Republicans in the House is seeking reelection. (Two are running for governor, one ran unsuccessfully for Senate, and one is retiring after the Utah court decision mentioned above redrew his seat.)

The redistricting that could reduce the number of Black House members was made possible by a historic 6-3 ruling by the Republican appointees on the Supreme Court. The ruling removed protections the 1965 Voting Rights Act gave to racial minorities in voting districts where they are a majority of the population.

The Supreme Court decision allows partisan gerrymandering of such districts as long as it is not motivated by intentional racial discrimination. But it is almost impossible to prove that redistricting is intentionally motivated by racism.

The Voting Rights Act, which removed many barriers that prevented African Americans from voting in the South, dramatically increased the number of Black officials elected to local, state and federal office. According to Sherrilyn Ifill, a Howard University law professor, there were only about 1,500 Black elected officials nationwide in 1970, but there are more than 10,000 today.

Having more African Americans in elected office makes government more understanding of and responsive to the needs of the Black community. White officials elected from jurisdictions with many Black voters also know they must represent the needs of their constituents if they hope to be reelected. This is how representative democracy is supposed to work.

Rather than splitting up Black communities into multiple congressional districts to dilute their voting power and reduce the number of African American elected officials, Republicans ought to adopt policies to attract more Black voters.

Instead, Trump and his fellow Republicans are doing all they can to win the support of white voters who resent advances African Americans have made in education, employment and elected office. As a result, Republicans have solidified their shameful and un-American status as the anti-Black party.

Trump has issued executive orders declaring DEI programs to be illegal discrimination and has succeeded in reducing the number of such programs.

The president has demanded that Congress pass legislation that would disproportionately reduce the ability of African Americans to vote and cut funding for social programs that benefit many Black people. He has fired Black federal officials, appointed only one Black person to his 24-person second-term Cabinet, and ordered federal museums and national parks to whitewash America’s ugly history of racism.

Under Trump, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has radically shifted its focus from investigating and prosecuting discrimination against people of color and women to combating supposed discrimination against white men and preventing extremely rare instances of non-citizens voting.

Trump has repeatedly insulted Black people who criticize him by calling them “low-IQ” and with other slurs about their intelligence, such as referring to then-Vice President Kamala Harris as “dumb,” “mentally unfit,” “slow” and “stupid” when she ran against him in 2024.

On top of this, Trump has said Black immigrants come to the U.S. from “s—hole countries.” And he falsely accused Black immigrants from Haiti of stealing and eating pet dogs and cats from families in Springfield, Ohio, despite denials from local officials.

Trump even outrageously posted an AI-generated racist video on the social media site he owns that portrayed Barack and Michelle Obama — America’s only Black president and first lady — as apes. Trump refused to apologize, unconvincingly claiming he had not seen the final seconds of the video that was only 62 seconds long.

These and other racist attacks Trump has directed against African Americans are the sort of things you would expect to see from the leader of the Ku Klux Klan or a neo-Nazi — not a U.S. president in the 21st century.

The Republican Party was founded in 1854 to oppose the spread of slavery. The first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln, waged a Civil War that finally abolished the barbaric and immoral institution.

As the descendant of enslaved African Americans, I believe that Trump will succeed only temporarily in slowing our nation’s long journey that began under Lincoln to bring about equal rights for all and end racism. We will all be better off when the journey resumes.

A. Scott Bolden is an attorney, NewsNation contributor, former chair of the Washington, D.C. Democratic Party and a former New York state prosecutor.

Knesset Member Dudi Amsalem: If We Fail in Iran, We Will Take Down Half of Beirut

Again, the specter of a Lebanon serving as the sacrificial lamb when the warmongers around the country fail to achieve their objectives.

The Zionists are irritated by their ally, the idiot Donald Dumb who they pushed into war but who is becoming incontinent and panic-stricken and wants out of the war at any cost because he is losing big time with the American people, only a few months ahead of the November midterms.

With the "American-Zionist Alliance" in disarray, all the stakeholders are preparing themselves for the aftermath of a failed American and Israeli war. In Israel, the extremist terrorists of Netanyahu's Likud are so enraged that they are flailing about, foaming at the mouth and threatening even more violence and brutality.

As I have previously argued many times, Lebanon is the cheapest chip on the table as no one stands to lose anything from tormenting this tiny country. So, when grand plans of grand states led by great men fail, everyone turns to vent their anger in Lebanon where there are no grand plans and certainly no great men. 

Remember that Lebanon is a very small country, smaller than Israel. It is made up of a mosaic of sects and ethnicities, forced into stability by "mutual deterrence". No sect dares attack the other sects, so a precarious equilibrium always exists... unless an outsider jumps into the cesspool and stirs the pot. 

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Saudis, Egyptians, Libyans, Kuwaitis and other Arabs used to be displeased, they would prod the PLO to lob a couple of silly rockets into Israel which obliged by assassinating people or bombing targets - airport, villages, bridges etc.- in Lebanon. Nowadays, when the Iranians get upset, they prod their Hezbollah militia into stirring the Zionist hornet's nest which, again, lashes out at anything that moves in Lebanon. Israel too would, on its own, whip Lebanon every time it failed in its colonial expansionist grand plans. That burlesque show has been going on for nearly 6 decades - two with Arafat's PLO (1960s - 1980s) and four with Hezbollah (1980s-to date).

At this time, with the Iran war in a stalemate, Benyamin Netanyahu is upset at his buddy Donald Dumb, the village idiot he pushed into mischief and who is now angry at having fallen for Netanyahu's illusions of a crumbling Iranian regime within a few days. Having only dumb American conservatives as their "friends" around the world, the Zionists so far had an easy time manipulating the American conservative morons with a syrupy attachment to the biblical bullshit. 

But having a moron for a friend is more dangerous than having a smart enemy. The growing isolation and strategic failure of Israel on the international stage is causing some of the ultra-religious neanderthal right-wing barbarians in Israel to catch a figurative rabies virus. One of them is Knesset member Dudi Amsalem.

According to Ynet, Amsalem has stated that if negotiations do not succeed in removing Iran's enriched uranium, it could leads to a "spectacular diplomatic failure". A failure he is feeling right up his caudal aperture and all the way up to his oral one... "Impaled", "Shafted" are the terms that come to mind. Therefore, the neanderthal Zionist barbarian contends that, in reaction to that gigantic failure, Israel should take "decisive military action" in Lebanon. 

Wait a minute! You fail on Iran's uranium, and you lash out at Lebanon? That's cowardice. The Iranian uranium is in Iran, not in Lebanon. What would be the point of leveling Lebanon to the ground one more time if the goal is a non-nuclear Iran?

Amsalem promised to destroy half of Beirut, half or three-quarters of Lebanon, even if his Zionist terrorist militia has to go all the way to Jounieh, in the Christian heartland of the country. 

Vengeance. Pure vengeance on the part of incompetent cowards whose sole existence rests on purveying violence that, truth be told, has netted them nothing. In effect, they don't want anything (perhaps stealing more land), but the Zionist colony cannot exist without violence because it was born out of the largest episode of ethnic cleansing of the 20th and 21st centuries. Israel's DNA is nothing but violence, cruelty, brutality, and savagery. The moment Israel ceases to be violent, i.e. becomes a peaceful neighbor, it would lose its raison d'être. Israel cannot by definition be at peace.

I asked AI what did Amsalem say today on Iran and Lebanon. It replied:

Dudi Amsalem's Statements on Iran and Lebanon

Comments on Iran Negotiations: Dudi Amsalem expressed concerns regarding the ongoing negotiations with Iran. He warned that if these talks do not succeed in removing enriched uranium from Iran, it could result in a "spectacular diplomatic failure." Amsalem advocated for a strong military response to Hezbollah's threats. He suggested that Israel should consider significant military action, stating that the country might need to "take down half of Beirut" to effectively address the challenges posed by Hezbollah.


Saturday, May 30, 2026

White Supremacist MAGA Hoodlums Disrupt Peaceful Anti-ICE Protests in NJ

Peaceful anti-ICE-GESTAPO protests in New Jersey disrupted by extremist right-wing white supremacist MAGA instigators who converged on the state

NEWARK, N.J. — The peaceful protests outside Delaney Hall's ICE-GESTAPO detention prison in Newark, New Jersey, took on a distinctly ideological tone on Saturday when extremist neo-Nazi radical-right groups affiliated with Donald Trump's MAGA movement infiltrated the protests in defense of ICE-GESTAPO's lamentable detention conditions.

The protests had begun more than a week ago, when immigrant detainees wrote an open letter describing physical and psychological torture in terms recalling Zionist Israeli mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners, including denial of medical care and food and forcing detainees to self-incriminate and sign false papers. 

Gov. Mikie Sherrill had earlier ordered the New Jersey State Police to take over security, claiming the move was necessary to protect the demonstrators from an "ICE surge" and from right-wing Fascist agitators. By Saturday morning, the immigrant prison had been transformed into a fortified zone surrounded by large orange plastic barricades and metal fencing.

State officials admitted the chaos is being driven by outside right-wing neo-Nazi instigators rather than local residents, with state Attorney General Jennifer Davenport confirming five of the six people arrested by state police this week were not from New Jersey.

The radical right-wing extremists were seen facing off Saturday with the peaceful protesters in front of the Delaney Hall immigrant prison center in Newark, N.J. A peaceful crowd of roughly 200 anti-ICE demonstrators was heard chanting, "Stop ICE Gestapo!".

ICE supporters, including members of the often-armed extreme right-wing fascist neo-Nazi MAGA-affiliated Proud Boys, arrived on the scene of the protest Saturday carrying racist and anti-immigrant pro-ICE flags and placards.  Their arrival sent a shockwave through the crowd of peaceful protesters and immediately rushed toward the barriers, screaming profanities and xenophobic and racist chants.

During a news conference Saturday afternoon, Sherrill said that ICE's presence "creates an incredibly dangerous situation," adding she refuses to "back down in fighting the Trump administration and the threats they've made."

Sherrill acknowledged that "national extremist groups" have infiltrated the protests to create chaos, warning out-of-state actors that they are endangering the public and not helping the detainees.

"You're not helping detainee families, and you're certainly not keeping New Jersey safe today," the governor said. "Going forward, I urge those protesting outside of Delaney Hall to bring the temperature down so we can focus on the detainees and their families. Comply with the lawful orders from local and state law enforcement and let advocates, faith leaders and members of this community continue their work here in America."

She added state health inspectors were recently blocked by ICE from viewing anything other than the facility's kitchen, and called on the Department of Homeland Security to stop forcing prisoners into signing deportation documents.


The Governor said she found common ground with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief Markwayne Mullin after she deployed state police to maintain order outside the Newark immigration prison - Delaney Hall -  that has been the site of anti-ICE protests.

Sherrill said the New Jersey police officers responded to protests taking place outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) prison in Newark and that she was denied access to the prison earlier this week. The governor announced the creation of designated protest zones to “avoid escalation from ICE.”

“My top priority is keeping New Jerseyans and our communities safe – and an increased ICE surge in the area outside of Delaney Hall is a threat to public safety,” she wrote on the social platform X Saturday morning. “As Americans, we have a right to protest – and we will continue to ensure New Jersey residents can peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights.”

Sherrill has repeatedly called for the closure of the 1,000-bed prison facility.

“Today and going forward, I urge everyone to work together to bring the temperature down. We need to focus on advocating for better conditions for the detainees, for their families, and ultimately, for the closure of Delaney Hall.”

But Trump-appointee Mullin on Saturday welcomed the governor’s decision, thanking her “for cooperating with us to help restore law and order,” in a post on X. “We support every Americans constitutional right to peacefully protest. No one has the right to RIOT and ASSAULT law enforcement. We hope to build on this partnership and work together to remove the worst of the worst from New Jersey communities.”

Communities across the country are increasingly outraged at the violations of immigrants' human rights by Trump's ICE-GESTAPO police. 

Donald Dumb's Accusing Opponents of Treason and Sedition is a Confession

Judge for yourselves if whatever crimes Donald Dumb has committed fit the below definitions. He constantly accuses anyone who bothers him of TREASON and SEDITION, which means HE KNOWS HE IS THE TRAITOR and the SEDITIOUS, because Roy Cohn taught him to turn rightful accusations against him on his accusers.

TREASON:

Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution says "treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort." It adds that "no person shall be convicted of treason" unless two witnesses testify to "the same overt act" or the defendant confesses "in open court."

That stringent definition of treason was a response to historical abuses, which extended the concept to include thought crimes, offensive remarks, religious dissent, and other nonviolent conduct that did not entail armed rebellion or siding with the nation's wartime enemies. The statutory definition of treason tracks the language of the Constitution.

Donald Dumb is the traitor. He gave aid and comfort to the Russian enemy by praising Putin, withholding aid to Ukraine, and encouraging him in attacking Ukraine. Donald Dumb has repeatedly accused his Democrat opponents of treason, particularly last November, when six members of Congress posted a video reminding U.S. military personnel of their duty to "refuse illegal orders." That well-established principle, clearly stated in the Defense Department's Law of War Manual, is legally uncontroversial. Yet, the jackass wrote in one of his posts, "It's called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL ... Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL.... [because they] had engaged in "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR which is punishable by DEATH!"
--------------------------------------------

SEDITION:

Federal law defines "seditious conspiracy" as a plot to "overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof.

The January 6, 2021 events during which Donald Dumb levied a mob against Congress with the stated objectives of executing all the underlined items above. 

Reparations to Palestine by Europe Should Match Numbers of Exterminated Jews during WWII

According to [https://247wallst.com/special-report/2023/08/25/countries-with-the-highest-percentage-of-jewish-deaths-from-the-holocaust/], below is a list of European countries that murdered the highest percentage of their own Jewish citizens during WWII who, in turn, fled to Palestine where they have been murdering Palestinian citizens and stealing Palestinian lands. THE PRESENT TRAGEDY OF PALESTINE HAS, THEREFORE, BEEN PERPETRATED BY PROXY BY THE EUROPEAN JEWISH CITIZENS WHO FLED THEIR OWN EXTERMINATORS IN EUROPE.  

Because the creation of Israel in 1948 at the expense of the sovereignty and security of the State of Palestine came as a result of the Holocaust, and since these murderous antisemitic European countries have spent most of the past 70 years “atoning” for their crimes against their own Jewish citizens and paying compensations to present-day Israelis, they have a direct responsibility in the ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people by the European Jewish Holocaust survivors. Europe murdered its Jewish population and dumped the survivors in Palestine.

Palestine must officially demand compensations from the EU for its historic role as the bedrock of antisemitism leading to the Holocaust and to the subsequent rape and attempted elimination of the State of Palestine. If Jews are eligible for compensations from their European butchers, shouldn’t Palestinians be eligible for compensations from those same European butchers who dumped their remaining unwanted Jews on Palestine?

Compensations don’t have to be monetary. They could potentially include re-settlement in Europe for those Palestinians that Israel is displacing as it steals more land from the Palestinian West Bank and Gaza. Israelis are proceeding in their ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people; but who is ultimately responsible for the tragedy of Palestine? If it is not the Israelis who claim they created Israel as a refuge for the European Holocaust survivors, then shouldn’t the responsibility fall on those European countries that perpetrated the Holocaust, murdered 6 million European Jews, and evicted the remaining survivors to Palestine where these former victims of European barbarity themselves became the butchers and rapists of Palestine?

According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 6.6 million Jews perished in the Holocaust – some 63% of the 10.4 million in Europe at the time. Germany and 22 other colluding European Nazi nations implemented their “Final Solution” to the Jewish question – the complete extermination of the Jewish population.  Under international law, the responsibility of each criminal European state that participated in the Holocaust should be proportionally reflected in the amount of compensation paid to their victims. By extension, the compensations owed the Palestinians for losing their country to the fleeing Jewish survivors should be proportionally required of both Israel and the former Jewish-killing European countries, now Israel’s guilt-ridden allies.  Despite being victims of European fascism and antisemitism, the Israelis have now themselves become fascists butchers in their own mass-murder of the Palestinian people.

According to the report cited above, the information gathered is for the period 1937-1941 and is based on estimates and does not take into account the unknown number of Holocaust victims whose bodies were never recovered or for whom there were no records. Hence, the prejudicial stealing and rape of Palestine by those Jewish survivors of the Holocaust remains an underestimate as well.

In nine of the countries on the published list, the percentage of Jewish deaths exceeded 68%. Six of these nations were in Eastern and Central Europe, where antisemitism was prevalent long before WWII and where Jewish pogroms were ongoing from the Middle Ages up to at least the middle of the 19th century. In fact, a majority of Ashkenazi Jews who became fascist Zionist settlers and ethnic cleansers of Palestine came from Eastern and Central Europe.

The list is in ascending order, beginning with the “least” murderous antisemitic European country whose hands are soaked in Jewish blood.

19. Denmark
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 0.69%-1.55% (52-116)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 7,500
> Total pre-war population: 3.8 million

Denmark put up little resistance to the invading German forces in 1940. The Danish government was a strong ally of Nazi Germany that planned to deport and exterminate the country’s 7,500 Jews. Their usual practice in other countries was to raid Jewish homes around the Jewish holidays.

18. Italy
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 13.5% (7,858)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 58,412
> Total pre-war population: 43.4 million

Benito Mussolini’s fascists took over Italy a decade before the Nazis seized power in Germany. Italian antisemitism was rooted in ancient Catholic Church’s anti-Jewish hatred. Mussolini imposed racial laws in 1938, and by 1943 his fascists began confiscating Jewish property and deporting Jews to the death camps.

17. Estonia
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 21.4% (963)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 4,500
> Total pre-war population: 1.1 million

Soviet Estonia deported about 10% of its Jewish population to Siberia just before the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Many of those who remained fled Estonia after the German invasion. The Estonian Nazis – through their Home Guard and Auxiliary Police – executed nearly all the Jews in the country. The Germans were so satisfied with Estonia’s efficient persecution of Jews that the Nazis declared Estonia to be Judenfrei – free of Jews.

16. France
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 24.3%-22.4% (72,900-74,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 300,000-330,000
> Total pre-war population: 42 million

Despite granting in 1791 its Jews equal rights under the law, antisemitism was rampant in Catholic France, as exhibited by the way the Dreyfus affair was conducted in the early 20th century. French antisemitism flourished when France was overrun by the German army in 1940. From that point forward, the Nazi Vichy government targeted Jewish refugees for arrest, murder, deportation and property confiscations.

15. Belgium
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 27.10% (24,387)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 90,000
> Total pre-war population: 8.4 million

Same as France. Belgium officially recognized Judaism as a religion while popular sentiment was definitely antisemitic. With the German occupation in May 1940 that undercurrent antisemitism became official policy.  

The Belgian Nazis started deporting their Jews to internment camps in southern France then to the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration and death camp.

14. Romania
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 28%-34.4% (211,214–260,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 756,930
> Total pre-war population: 15.6 million

Fascist leader General Ion Antonescu took power in 1940 and Romania officially became a Nazi bastion. Antonescu began implementing the antisemitic laws passed by prior Romanian governments. His regime seized Jewish businesses, restricted travel, excluded Jews from professions, and banned them from owning property. The Romanian Nazi army and police forces tracked down and murdered thousands of Jews and in July 1941, Romania opened its first concentration camp.

13. Luxembourg
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 34.3% (1,200)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 3,500-5,000
> Total pre-war population: 300,000

The Jewish population in tiny Luxembourg numbered 5,000 at the most, some of them refugees from other countries. Germany occupied Luxembourg in May 1940 and between August of that year and October 1941 more than 2,500 Jews fled while the remaining Jews were deported to concentration camps in Lodz, Auschwitz-Birkenau, and Theresienstadt between October 1941 and April 1943.

12. Austria
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 35.4% (65,459)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 185,026
> Total pre-war population: 6.8 million

In March 1938, Germany annexed Austria in the so-called Anschluss. In November, pogroms began in Vienna on the same day that Kristallnacht, or the “Night of Broken Glass” took place in Germany. Austrian mobs destroyed synagogues and vandalized Jewish businesses, and thousands of Jews were arrested and deported to concentration camps. Between 1938 and 1940, 117,000 Jews fled the country. Then mass deportations from Vienna became systematic as of October 1941. About 35,000 Jews were deported from Vienna to ghettos in Eastern Europe, and many were executed by the Einsatzgruppen, or death squads, shortly after their arrival.

11. Norway
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 42.2% (758)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 1,800
> Total pre-war population: 2.9 million

Norway was invaded by Germany in April 1940. Restrictions on Jews existed but were not strictly enforced until Germany invaded the Soviet Union, when arrests and assassinations of Jews became commonplace. At the hands of Norwegian police and paramilitary Nazi groups. Norwegian Jews were deported to the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp.

10. Soviet Union
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 44.3% (1,340,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 3,028,538
> Total pre-war population: 167 million

The German invasion of the Soviet Union began on June 22, 1941. In the Nazi ideology’s western version, the southern and eastern Slavs were deemed an inferior people. The Soviet Union was home to more than three million Jews before the war who were a central target of the Germans in their invasion plans of Russia.

The Germans and their local Nazi death squads known as the Einsatzgruppen conducted mass shootings of Jews, communists, and others deemed undesirable. The systematic slaughter of Jews during the invasion of the Soviet Union was the first stage in Germany’s “Final Solution” for eliminating all the Jews in Europe. Almost half of the more than 3 million Jews in the Soviet Union would perish.

9. Hungary
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 68.5% (564,507)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 825,007
> Total pre-war population: 9.2 million

Hungary was a devout Nazi state and ally of Germany. In 1941, the Hungarian government deported about 20,000 Jews to Ukraine where they were murdered by Ukrainian Nazi death squads. In March of 1944, Adolf Eichmann, SS officer and one of the chief organizers of the Holocaust, was sent to Hungary to carry out the extermination of the country’s Jewish population of over 800,000 people. Together with the Hungarian Nazis, Eichmann set up more than 200 camps and ghettos. More than 437,000 Hungarian Jews were deported in 56 days between May and July 1944, mostly to Auschwitz. Three quarters of them were killed on arrival.

8. Germany
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 69.5% (165,200)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 237,723
> Total pre-war population: 68.6 million

In January 1933, there were 523,000 Jews living in Germany, half of them in the 10 biggest German cities. By 1939, after restrictive laws, pogroms, destruction of synagogues and Jewish businesses, deportations of thousands of Jews to concentration camps, the Jewish population in Germany fell to less than 238,000. In 1942, top German officials met in Berlin to discuss how the so-called “Final Solution” would address “the Jewish question” through the establishment of a network of concentration camps in Germany and other countries including Bergen-Belsen, Dachau, Buchenwald, and Ravensbrück. Almost 70% of Germany’s Jews died in the Holocaust.

7. Netherlands
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 72.8% (102,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 140,245
> Total pre-war population: 8.7 million

Netherlands was seized by the Germans in May 1940. They banned Jews from civil service and required them to register their business assets. The systematic deportation of the Jews began in the summer of 1942 and continued until September 1944. Most of the 107,000 who were deported were sent to Auschwitz and Sobibor, where they were murdered. Nearly 73% of the Jews in the Netherlands were killed.

6. Czechoslovakia
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 73.5% (260,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 354,000
> Total pre-war population: 10.5 million

Parts of Czechoslovakia were taken over by Germany before the start of WWII, and other sections of the Central European nation were annexed by Hungary and Poland. After the German takeover, Jews became subject to the discriminatory laws that mirrored those in Germany. In November 1941, SS officer Reinhard Heydrich ordered the creation of the Theresienstadt Ghetto north of Prague to serve as a transit camp. About 88,000 people were deported from there to Auschwitz, and another 33,000 died from the unsanitary conditions and starvation in Theresienstadt. Nearly three-quarters of Czechoslovakia’s Jews died in the Holocaust.

5. Latvia
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 74.9% (70,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 93,479
> Total pre-war population: 1.9 million

 In 1935, about 94,000 Jews lived in Latvia – about 5% of the total population – roughly half of them in the capital city of Riga, and they were well integrated into Latvian society. After the Germans invaded in 1941, Einsatzgruppen death squads began murdering Latvian Jews with the aid of Latvian and Lithuanian Nazi auxiliaries. Thousands of German and Austrian Jews were interned in the Riga ghetto in 1941 and were exterminated there. In 1944 the Red Army returned to Latvia and expelled the Nazis.  In 2021, Latvia’s parliament voted to pay $46 million to the country’s Jewish community for property stolen from it during the Holocaust.

4. Yugoslavia
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 81.8% (67,228)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 82,242
> Total pre-war population: 16.1 million

After Yugoslavia was invaded by Germany in 1941, the Nazis partitioned it into Serbia and parts of Slovenia; Italy annexed southern and eastern Slovenia; Croatia became a separate fascist state backed by Germany and Italy; and other areas of Yugoslavia were occupied by Bulgaria and Hungary.

Jews in all parts suffered. German military and police authorities in Serbia interned most Jews in detention camps during the summer of 1941, and in one episode, the German military shot virtually all male Serbian Jews, about 8,000 of them. Between March and May 1942, they killed around 6,280 people, virtually all Jews and mostly women and children. By the summer of 1942, the only Jews remaining in Serbia were in hiding. The brutality in fascist Croatia was just as terrible. By the end of 1941, Croat authorities had incarcerated about two-thirds of the roughly 32,000 Jews of Croatia in camps throughout the country. The fascist Ustashe regime murdered between 12,000 and 20,000 Jews in the camps 60 miles outside of the Croatian capital of Zagreb.

3. Greece
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 82.2%-90.1% (58,800-65,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 71,611
> Total pre-war population: 7.1 million

Jews have been in Greece since at least 1492 when they were expelled from Spain and came to the city of Thessaloniki. The community, 72,000 strong, was almost wiped out after the Germans invaded Greece in 1941.  Under German occupation, Thessaloniki was home to 43,000 Jews, of whom 40,000 died at the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp.

2. Poland
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 82.7%-89.6% (2,770,000-3,000,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 3,350,000
> Total pre-war population: 35.1 million

As many as three million of Polish Jews died during the Holocaust, far more than those of any other nation. About 10% of Poland’s pre-war population was Jewish, one of the highest in Europe. It became home to the most notorious concentration camps: Auschwitz-Birkenau, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka. The systematic slaughter of Jews in the country did not start until June 1941. It was in German-occupied Poland that the Nazis first began killing Jews in gas vans. More Jews were murdered in Poland, where they had lived for 1,000 years, than anywhere else. Just 10% of Poland’s Jewish population survived.

1. Lithuania
> Share of Jewish population who died in the Holocaust: 85.0% (130,000)
> Pre-war Jewish population: 153,000
> Total pre-war population: 2.4 million

Lithuania did not have the largest Jewish population in Europe – before World War II, Jews made up only about 7% of the country’s total – but relative to the country’s small size, more Jewish people were killed in this Baltic nation than anywhere else during the Holocaust.  After Germany invaded the Soviet Union and the Baltic states, detachments of Lithuanian death squads backed by German Nazis began murdering the Jews of Lithuania. By the end of August 1941, most Jews in rural Lithuania had been slain. Three months later, most of the Jews herded into ghettos in larger cities were massacred. Some Lithuanian Jews were also deported to labor camps in Latvia and Estonia. Others were sent to killing centers in German-occupied Poland. Even as German forces were reeling from Soviet offensives on the Eastern Front, they deported Lithuanian Jews to concentration camps in Germany. By the time the Soviet Union had expelled the Nazis from Lithuania in 1944, at least 85% of Lithuanian Jews had been killed.

In conclusion, reparations to the Palestinians for losing their country and millions of their fellow citizens should be commensurate with the proportion of Europe’s total Jewish population that was murdered in each European country. There is a mathematical logic to this, since the more Jews a European country murdered, the more responsible it is for the extermination and displacement of Palestinians by that country's surviving European Jews who fled to Palestine. Bottom of Form