I was once accosted by radical right-wing antisemitic republicans - as we were visiting Congress - who quipped that the New York Times should be more appropriately called "The Jew York Times".
The New York Times has often adopted a dubious objectivity on such issues as the Mideast and Israel. At times, it seemed to follow official US administration's policies and stances, although it gave a platform to opposing viewpoints.But Israel's ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing in Palestine has taken its toll on American public opinion now slowly but inexorably anti-Israel. What made it worse is Trump's idiotic and pedestrian support of Israel, which makes adhering to official US policy very difficult (not to mention the lawsuits and threats with which Trump regularly attacks the press). With shifting public opinion, struggling newspapers and media have had to adjust.
The New York Times for the first time ever is calling the Israeli Zionist lobby in the US, the America-Israel Political Action Committee or AIPAC as a 'hard-right' group. Wikipedia itself has also designated the other Zionist American lobby group, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) led by Jonathan Goldblatt, as a biased and unreliable source of information regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the intersection of antisemitism with that conflict. In 2024, ADL consistently conflated criticism of the Israeli government with antisemitism.
Just these two developments indicate a shifting ground for Israel support in the US. The ready availability of information on the Internet and the fast-paced dissemination of such information, including archives long hidden from the public, has lifted the veil of silence on the truth and the facts of the existence of Israel as a colonial rapist of Palestine. Entities like AIPAC and ADL are now struggling to continue convincing US public opinion of the actual worth of Israel to the US.
As a result, for example, the House of Representatives voted on a bill to cut military and humanitarian aid funding to Israel, which failed to pass but earned majority support among Democratic lawmakers. The bill was brought by outgoing Republican Rep. Thomas Massie from Kentucky who dared break through the Zionist omerta and aimed to cut military and humanitarian aid funding to Israel.
As the New York Times (NYT) reported on the vote, it highlighted how Democrats have increasingly vowed not to accept donations from AIPAC. Now the Zionist lobby curry favors from both sides of the aisle, giving money to both Democrats and Republicans to guarantee an unflinching blind support to the Zionist colony in Palestime.
Among those who have committed not to accept AIPAC money is Rep. Seth Moulton, Democrat from Massachusetts. The NYT wrote, "Mr. Moulton, who is running for Senate, has also said he would no longer accept donations from AIPAC, the hard-right pro-Israel lobbying group that has recently become a toxic brand among Democrats".
Founded in 1954, AIPAC says its mission is to "encourage and persuade the U.S. government to enact specific policies that create a strong, enduring and mutually beneficial relationship with our ally Israel," and that it helps "elect Democrats and Republicans who support the alliance."
Prominent Democrats are increasingly comfortable publicly criticizing the stranglehold the Zionist lobbies have had over decades. For example, former Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California has voted in favor of the anti-Israel funding bill, yet was not long ago still a featured speaker at AIPAC's annual policy conference in 2019.
In the post-Oct. 7 political climate, support for Israel has dropped dramatically among Democrats while maintaining a significant swath among Republicans, although it has been losing ground among extremist radical right groups and prominent "repentant" figures in the GOP-MAGA world like Tucker Carlson and others. AIPAC has long been known as the sacred cow of the anti-Palestine lobby in the US since it supports Israel's genocide in Palestine, opposes an independent state of Palestine as a solution to the festering canker that Israel has been ever since its artificial creation with the rape of historic Palestine, and has been forever buying influence by giving money to both Democrats and Republicans. AIPAC is largely credited for making the US the only country around the world to support Israel's barbarity in Palestine and to block any international effort to find a suitable solution for both peoples.
Standing for a free and independent Palestine has become a standard platform of the Democratic Party (repeatedly adopting the two-state solution since the 1990s), and now has gained more momentum with the rise of the progressive base of the Democrats. Continued blind - and AIPAC-purchased - support for Israel against the will of the majority of the American people will be a significant liability for GOP-MAGA candidates in the 2026 and 2028 elections.
Founded in 1954, AIPAC says its mission is to "encourage and persuade the U.S. government to enact specific policies that create a strong, enduring and mutually beneficial relationship with our ally Israel," and that it helps "elect Democrats and Republicans who support the alliance."
Prominent Democrats are increasingly comfortable publicly criticizing the stranglehold the Zionist lobbies have had over decades. For example, former Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California has voted in favor of the anti-Israel funding bill, yet was not long ago still a featured speaker at AIPAC's annual policy conference in 2019.
In the post-Oct. 7 political climate, support for Israel has dropped dramatically among Democrats while maintaining a significant swath among Republicans, although it has been losing ground among extremist radical right groups and prominent "repentant" figures in the GOP-MAGA world like Tucker Carlson and others. AIPAC has long been known as the sacred cow of the anti-Palestine lobby in the US since it supports Israel's genocide in Palestine, opposes an independent state of Palestine as a solution to the festering canker that Israel has been ever since its artificial creation with the rape of historic Palestine, and has been forever buying influence by giving money to both Democrats and Republicans. AIPAC is largely credited for making the US the only country around the world to support Israel's barbarity in Palestine and to block any international effort to find a suitable solution for both peoples.
Standing for a free and independent Palestine has become a standard platform of the Democratic Party (repeatedly adopting the two-state solution since the 1990s), and now has gained more momentum with the rise of the progressive base of the Democrats. Continued blind - and AIPAC-purchased - support for Israel against the will of the majority of the American people will be a significant liability for GOP-MAGA candidates in the 2026 and 2028 elections.
