Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Sunday, May 24, 2026

MAGA Allies Cruz & Graham: Purported Iran Deal is a Trump Failure

As often argued in these pages, Trump's "deal" with Iran looks like a dud, plus-or-minus closer to Obama's JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), except Obama reached his without a war and with the consensus of allies.

MAGA morons, especially Ted Cruz from the backward state of Texas, have smelled the stench of a Trump retreat on Iran and are not happy. Remember when Trump, during his first administration, raised hell about NAFTA (1994 North American Free Trade Agreement between US, Mexico and Canada), which he labeled in his explicit and sophisticated English language as a "bad deal" for the US ? He then re-negotiated it (USMCA) in 2020 with barely a gain in it. He never mentioned it again. USMCA maintained NAFTA's free trade zone intact among the three nations but introduced slightly modified rules for the automotive industry, labor standards, and intellectual property, all of which have been trashed by his tariffs.

Trump is doing the exact same thing with Obama's JCPOA. He went to war and promoted the big lie about an imminent nuclear threat that justified going to war, spending billions, disrupting international trade and oil supplies, promising to wipe Iran off the map and completely eliminate its nuclear program.

Now, terrified at the crushing defeat he faces in the November midterms, he is beginning to retreat on Iran. He is running out of time and is increasingly desperate. The "new deal" he is bragging about today looks more like an appeasement of MAGA's domestic wrath because the dumb jackass promised "no foreign wars" during his campaign.

Even his diehard MAGA morons, like Ted Cruz, are upset at what they see coming on Iran: A big cowardly retreat to something more or less like Obama's JCPOA. This is what Cruz posted yesterday:

“If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake,”

================================================


Ted Cruz, Trump ally battle online over criticism of Iran deal
Sophie Brams
Sun, May 24, 2026 




Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) sparred with one of President Trump’s outside advisers on social media Saturday after indicating he was “deeply concerned” about the terms of an emerging deal between the U.S. and Iran.

“I am deeply concerned about what we are hearing about an Iran ‘deal,’ being pushed by some voices in the administration,” Cruz wrote on the social platform X.

Trump announced earlier in the day that a peace agreement with Tehran had been “largely negotiated” and would include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, but offered few details otherwise.

“Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

He notably made no mention of what would happen with Iran’s nuclear program or its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which had long been a sticking point in stalled negotiations. Senior Trump administration officials justified the initial strikes in late February by claiming the country posed an imminent nuclear threat to the U.S.

Cruz called that February decision “the most consequential” of Trump’s second term, arguing it had achieved “extraordinary military results,” including the purported destruction of Iran’s missiles, drones and navy.

“If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake,” the senator wrote.

His criticism echoed that of several other hawkish Senate Republicans who also argued on Saturday that any deal that allows the current Iranian regime to remain in power could embolden them — a rare moment of discord between the president and his usually steadfast GOP allies.

That assessment did not sit well with Alex Bruesewitz, an outside adviser who was the architect of Trump’s podcast strategy in the 2024 presidential campaign.

“Cool, Ted. No one asked you, bro,” Bruesewitz responded on X, accusing Cruz of trying to undermine the president and his administration.

“Hush, child. The adults are talking,” Cruz shot back. “I’m not your ‘bro.’ And young political grifters pushing Iran appeasement are not remotely helping the President.”

Bruesewitz labeled the Texas Republican a “clown” in a separate post, saying he had “zero clue” what is in the deal.

“Ted is a do-nothing Senator rushing out ahead of the potential deal because he’s already positioning for 2028 and plans to use this as a wedge against our candidate,” he wrote. “The deal could be the greatest deal in the world (which it might be!) and he would still complain about it.”

The proposed deal framework would officially declare an end to the nearly three-month conflict and establish 60 days of negotiation on Iran’s nuclear program, a regional official with direct knowledge of the Pakistan-led mediation efforts told The Associated Press.

It would also see the Strait of Hormuz reopened and the U.S. lift its naval blockade of Iranian ports, according to the outlet.
===============================================
Even Lady Lindsey Graham of the equally backward state of Georgia is upset at the Iran deal:
===============================================
The Hill

GOP Sens. Lindsey Graham, Roger Wicker blast reports of 60-day ceasefire deal with Iran
Finya Swai
Sat, May 23, 2026

Key Senate Republicans are raising concerns about a reported peace deal being negotiated with Iran, arguing it would be a disaster for the United States that would make meaningless the war launched by President Trump nearly three months ago.

The rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster,” Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote in a post on social platform X.

He said the effects of the joint military operation between the U.S. and Israel titled “Operation Epic Fury” would “be for naught” if the deal as he understood it went forward.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of President Trump who for years has pushed for U.S. military action against the Iranian regime, said a premature deal could fundamentally shift the balance of power in the Middle East in Iran’s favor.

If a deal is struck to end the Iranian conflict because it is believed that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be protected from Iranian terrorism and Iran still possesses the capability to destroy major Gulf oil infrastructure, then Iran will be perceived as being a dominate force requiring a diplomatic solution,” Graham wrote Saturday in a post on X.

The South Carolina Republican added that such a perception would become a “nightmare for Israel” over time, questioning the rationale behind the war entirely.

He also noted his skepticism that Iran could be denied the ability to threaten global oil supply by blocking the Strait of Hormuz again in the future.

“I personally am a skeptic of the idea that Iran cannot be denied the ability to terrorize the Strait and the region cannot protect itself against Iranian military capability,” he wrote, adding: “It is important we get this right.”

The criticisms from the two GOP senators was remarkable given the GOP Senate has generally avoided stark criticism of Trump.

The comments from both men came before President Trump announced a deal with Iran was close.

“An Agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization between the United States of America, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the various other Countries,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, adding that final details of the deal will be “announced shortly.”

Trump offered no details of the deal, but a regional official with direct knowledge of the Pakistan-led mediation efforts told The Associated Press that the potential deal would officially declare an end to the war and establish a 60-day period of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program.

The concerns from Graham and Wicker seemed largely related to Iran’s nuclear program. The deal being discussed does not seem to include any specific comments from Iran on its nuclear program, though Trump and U.S. officials have long said preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is a reason for the war.

According to a report in The New York Times, Tehran had agreed to stop the fighting on all fronts, including in Lebanon, where the Iranian-backed group Hezbollah has been fighting Israel. The Times, citing three Iranian sources, also said the deal would re-open, without tolls, the Strait of Hormuz, a key for Trump as it could gradually offer relief on sky-high gas prices in the U.S. that has led to mounting political pressure on the GOP. The Times said the deal would also end the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports.

The Times added it was not clear the deal referred to by its sources was the same one Trump described in his Truth Social post.

The prospect of a deal had been foreshadowed by developments over the last day.

Wicker on Friday also offered a message that indicated he was wary of what he was hearing on the negotiations. He wrote in a Friday post on X that it would be “ill advised” to pursue a deal.

“Further pursuit of an agreement with Iran’s Islamist regime risks a perception of weakness,” he wrote in a post on X Friday. “We must finish what we started.”

Trump announced Friday he would not be attending his son Donald Trump, Jr.’s wedding, and the White House said he would be in Washington, not in Mar-a-Lago, where he frequently travels on weekends. Trump indicated he was not going to the wedding because of his presidential duties and specifically mentioned Iran.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who served in that role in the first Trump administration, also harshly criticized what he understood as the deal. He wrote in a post on X that it sounded as if it had been negotiated by officials working for the Obama administration. Both Trump and Pompeo have criticized the Iran deal negotiated by that administration as being too weak.

The deal being floated is “Not remotely America First,” Pompeo wrote.

He said any effective deal would be “straightforward.”

“Open the damned strait. Deny Iran access to money. Take out enough Iranian capability so it cannot threaten our allies in the region. Overdue. Let’s go,” he wrote.

Later on Saturday, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung wrote on X that Pompeo “has no idea what … he’s talking about,” adding that Pompeo is “not read into anything that’s happening.”

The president is facing growing pressure on multiple fronts to take measures to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as Americans face four-year record high gas prices, which hit a national average of almost $4.53 ahead of Memorial Day.

Republicans fear they could lose their House majority in this fall’s elections amid falling approval ratings for Trump, and the Senate majority is also now seen as being within reach of Democrats.

Trump said he discussed Iran’s proposed framework with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a phone call that he described as one that “went very well.”

The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.

Saturday, May 23, 2026

Trump's GOP Slaves are Tired of His Corruption: Midterms Looming?

It may be that they are really tired of his corruption antics or they are fearing their own massive rout in the anti-MAGA landslide projected for the midterms in November. Either case, the GOP-MAGA members of Congress who have licked Trump's boots dry for the past several years have finally remembered they have a spine.
============================================
Republican defiance over 'anti-weaponization' fund sets up confrontation with Trump
By Richard Cowan and Nolan D. McCaskill
May 23, 2026


U.S. President Donald Trump leaves Marine One to board Air Force One en route to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, as he departs Morristown Airport in Morristown, New Jersey, U.S., May 22, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper

Some Senate Republicans demand restrictions or elimination of Trump’s $1.776 billion compensation fund

Critics label the money a 'slush fund' and raise concerns over payouts to January 6 rioters
Conflict between Trump and Republican lawmakers could intensify when Congress returns next month
Democrats plan amendments to force difficult votes on the fund for Republicans

WASHINGTON, May 23 (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S. Congress have revolted over President Donald Trump's $1.776 billion fund for people he says ​were victims of government "weaponization," setting the stage for a searing battle less than six months before midterm elections.

On Thursday, the Senate called timeout on a $72 billion spending bill on immigration enforcement, which ‌has become a battleground over the "anti-weaponization" fund, after many Republican senators demanded that it either be killed or subjected to tough guardrails.

Democrats, meanwhile, have also pledged to use the immigration bill to stage an attack on the fund.
Just one day earlier, Senate Majority Leader John Thune blocked $1 billion in federal funding for a lavish White House ballroom that Trump has already begun building. He said he did not have the Republican votes for it.

On Friday, Trump shot back.

"I am helping others, who were so badly abused by an evil, ​corrupt, and weaponized Biden Administration, receive, at long last, JUSTICE!" the president wrote on his social media platform.
This battle of wills between the president and his party, stoked by recent primary election victories of Trump-endorsed ​challengers over sitting lawmakers, threatens to intensify when Congress returns from recess next month, and could reverberate into the November midterms.

"The American people are going to reject this ⁠out of hand," Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said of the anti-weaponization fund, whose beneficiaries could include those convicted in connection with the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

While many Republican senators were uncharacteristically ​mum coming out of a Thursday meeting on the spending bill, Tillis and others were clear on just how politically unpalatable the president's demands had become.

"(The fund) could potentially compensate someone who assaulted a police officer, admitted their guilt, ​got convicted, got pardoned and now we're going to pay them for that? That's absurd," Tillis, who is not running for reelection, said in a Thursday interview with Spectrum News.

LAWMAKERS MANEUVER OVER 'ANTI-WEAPONIZATION' FUND

Republican Representative Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who faces a tough reelection battle this fall, teamed up with Democratic Representative Tom Suozzi of New York on legislation to prohibit the payment of any claims submitted to the fund.

Retiring Representative Don Bacon of Nebraska said the ballroom and anti-weaponization funds in the immigration spending bill had become "poison ​pills" for House Republicans who face tough reelection campaigns.

With Republicans holding only slim majorities in both houses of Congress, it would only take a handful of defiant lawmakers to defeat Trump's proposals.

But skepticism runs deep that congressional Republicans, who ​until recently have been loyal to the president on matters from tariffs to spending cuts to the Iran war, were ready to break ranks. "We've heard this talk for 10 years now of rebellion and cracks in the coalition. It has never ‌happened," said Doug ⁠Heye, a longtime Republican strategist.

He said Republicans are "constantly capitulating" on matters important to Trump, and that any revolt would be "light years" away.

Many of Trump's backers in Congress, including Republican Representatives Abraham Hamadeh of Arizona and John Rose of Tennessee, have stepped up to defend him. "Not a single congressional Republican was elected to oppose President Trump," Hamadeh posted on X, adding: "Yet an insurgency is already brewing" in the Senate. "STOP slamming the brakes on the America First agenda."

Peter Ticktin, an attorney representing more than 400 January 6 defendants, said he was confident his clients will receive payouts despite congressional pushback. "They're fools if they think this is going to work," Ticktin said of Senate Republicans who oppose the fund. "It's still ​going to go through, and those opposing the fund ​will suffer in future elections."

DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS WILL ⁠FORCE DIFFICULT VOTES

Meanwhile the Democrats, while largely powerless as the minority party in both houses of Congress, are seizing on what they see as the president's politically tone-deaf proposals. They have contrasted the plight of U.S. consumers struggling amid inflation to pay their bills, with Trump's lavish ballroom plans and the large sums of government money he might direct to the ​January 6 rioters or other allies.

"Is it possible on May 21, 2026, Republicans finally found an ethical bridge too far?" Senator Dick Durbin, the second-highest-ranking member of ​the Democrats' Senate leadership, said ⁠at a Thursday press conference.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday portrayed Republicans as being in the throes of a "meltdown" over the ballroom and what they call a Trump "slush fund."
One possibility for congressional Republicans after they return from recess on June 1 is to seek some sort of middle ground.

One source familiar with the maneuverings, who asked not to be identified, said there are discussions about proposed guardrails on the fund, such as standards for who would serve on a commission overseeing ⁠it, or requiring ​judicial review of it.

At the very least, Democrats will likely do what they can to force their opponents to cast politically difficult ​votes on amendments to the spending bill.

Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware this week told reporters he had drafted 13 such amendments. One would bar payments to January 6 rioters who assaulted law enforcement at the Capitol, while others would prohibit the use of any taxpayer money ​to make payments, and require all payments to be made public if the fund survives, a spokesperson for the senator said.

Reporting by Nolan D. McCaskill, Richard Cowan, Jacob Bogage and David Morgan; Editing by Michael Learmonth and Edmund Klamann

Zionist Terrorist Itamar Ben-Gvir Banned from European Soil

This is not enough. Punishing Ben-Gvir for mistreating European volunteers on the aid flotilla is a slap on the hand when compared to his Zionist inventory of crimes against thousands of Palestinian villagers being  killed, raped and uprooted from their ancestral villages. For several decades, the international response to Zionist terrorism in Palestine has been slow and timid. Zionist terror squads and settlers have been stealing and confiscating Palestinian lands from way back in the 1990s, in addition to terror raids (burnings, killings, demolitions, uprooting of olive trees...) against innocent Palestinian villagers reeling under a brutal and illegal Israeli occupation that condones settler terrorism.

The EU should declare all Zionist settler terrorist organizations and the Zionist banks and donors that fund their racist policies of genocide and ethnic cleansing as TERRORIST ORGNANIZATIONS. Sanctions should be slapped and products manufactured by Zionists in occupied Palestine be banned from European markets.

The charade of managing Israel's feelings because of the European Holocaust should end. The current generation of European leaders were born way after the Holocaust and the guilt of previous generations has faded. Israel should be treated like any other country. It should be held to the same standards as anyone else. Its nuclear stockpile should be submitted to inspections by international bodies. Israeli exceptionalism is despicable because it has been exploited by ultra-religious barbarians to commit untold crimes against the indigenous Palestinian population and not be held accountable.

Instead of a homeland for Jews, Israel has become a rogue thug of a nation imposing its Fascist supremacist will by sheer violence and brutality. When will the world draw a line?

Ben-Gvir intends to demolish the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem and build a Jewish temple in its stead. The ramifications of such a Fascist replacement of one indigenous culture by a foreign colonial invader are incalculable. 
=============================================



Israeli minister Ben-Gvir banned from access to French territory
Reuters
Sat, May 23, 2026


Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir attends his party faction meeting at the Knesset, Israel's parliament, in Jerusalem June 3, 2024 REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

PARIS, May 23 (Reuters) - France has decided to ban Israel's far-right police minister Itamar ‌Ben-Gvir from access to French territory, ‌Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Saturday, adding that the ​decision reflected growing anger among many governments across the world over the treatment of Gaza flotilla activists.

"As from today, Itamar Ben-Gvir is banned ‌from entering French ⁠territory," wrote Barrot on X.

"Along with my Italian counterpart, I am asking ⁠the European Union to also take sanctions against Itamar Ben-Gvir," he added.

Western governments have voiced ​outrage after ​Ben-Gvir posted a video ​of himself taunting ‌Gaza-bound flotilla activists being pinned to the ground, with some of them later alleging they were physically assaulted in detention.

Ben-Gvir's conduct was rebuked by both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ‌the United States, Israel's ​staunchest ally. Netanyahu said Ben-Gvir's ​conduct was "not in ​line with Israel's values and norms".

The ‌flotilla's activists, whose vessel ​was intercepted ​this week in international waters by Israeli naval forces as they tried to deliver ​humanitarian aid to ‌Gaza, have been subsequently deported from ​Israel following their initial detention.

(Reporting by Sudip ​Kar-Gupta. Editing by Tomasz Janowski)

Typical Ignorant Religious and Conspiracy-Prone MAGA Moron

This moron probably believes the earth is flat, that it is at the center of the universe, that "God" created the universe some 6,000 years ago including dinosaurs (that in reality existed between 245 million years ago and 66 million years ago). But the Creationist morons say that dinosaurs could not embark on Noah's Ark because they were too big and so drowned in the Flood.

That's what is being taught at a majority of "Christian" schools across America that are producing cohorts of dumb Americans who go and vote for who else? The Great Moron Dozy Don.

By the way, this sort of self-inflicted "Christian" American ignorance is a clone of the self-inflicted "Muslim" ignorance instilled by radical Islamist regimes across the Muslim world. The "Biblical Law" that the Texas nitwits are imposing on that backward Christian state is the same as the "Sharia Law" imposed on backward Islamist countries. Slap a turban, an abbaya and a beard on them, and you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between Trump's Evangelicals and the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia or the Taliban of Afghanistan or the Ayatollahs of Iran.
============================================


Man Berates Artemis II Crew at US Capitol, Accuses Them of Faking Moon Mission: ‘I See Through Your Lies!’
Ahmad Austin Jr.
Thu, May 21, 2026 


Victor Glover, Artemis II

A man showed up at the U.S. Capitol to accost the crew of the Artemis II and accuse them of faking their recent mission to the Moon.

The four astronauts were in space for more than 10 days in a mission that sent them around the moon and back. It was the farthest from Earth any human has traveled in history, with the crew documenting the far side of the Moon and even naming previously unnamed craters on the lunar surface.

The journey, which was streamed live throughout nearly its entire duration, captured the attention of the country and turned the astronauts into celebrities. The four have done countless interviews and were even invited to the White House.

In a viral video published Wednesday, one man was not as thrilled about seeing the crew.

“Stop lying! Stop acting!” the man said just feet away from the crew. “Y'all never went to space!”

Pilot Victor Glover took a quick glance at the man before looking ahead. Christina Koch, one of the mission specialists in the crew, continued looking ahead and never acknowledged him. The other two crew members — commander Reid Wiseman and mission specialist Jeremy Hansen — did the same.

“Follow Jesus! God’s watching you all!” the man continued.

A security member then got between the crew and the man as they walked ahead.

“Stop lying to the public!” he said as Glover looked back and gave him a wave. “Your psyop isn’t working on millions of us! NASA’s a joke! Repent before God, y’all! I see through your lies! I know you never went to space! God’s watching you all!”

Eventually, a staffer told him, “That’s enough,” and prevented him from following the crew.

The post Man Berates Artemis II Crew at US Capitol, Accuses Them of Faking Moon Mission: ‘I See Through Your Lies!’ first appeared on Mediaite.

Incompetent Pete Hegseth Mistook Poland for Germany and Ordered US Troop Reductions

One popular American song captures the ignorant yet proud mindset of the American people in general. "Don't know much about geography, Don't know much about history
Don't know much biology....". Americans are proud to hate knowledge and intellectuals whom they disparage with the "nerd" qualifier. They prefer ignorant empty-headed brutes who play rugby (stupidly misnamed 'football' by Americans) and are traded between clubs like cattle. They even have a saying, "Brawn over Brain".

So, when our senile demented dumb president Trump appointed an equally dumb, but a member of the white trash American nobility, a TV entertainer by the name of Pete Hegseth, to lead the Pentagon and Department of Defense, his only criterion was personal loyalty to the Idiot-in-Chief and not brains or intellect or experience.

So when the alcohol-brained-and-drained Hegseth heard Donald Dumb saying he wants 5,000 US troops out of Germany, he immediately obeyed like the good poodle that he is. But he doesn't know any geography or history, he is a bad listener, and like the other conservative goofball from Texas George W who often confused Australia for Austria, Hegseth confused Poland for Germany and ordered that 5,000 troops not be deployed to Poland instead of removing them from Germany.

And these imbeciles are in charge of the country's military and nuclear arsenal.

The decaying old geezer president Dozy Don is mad at Hegseth for such a monumental mistake.
=======================================



Trump Tears Into Hegseth for Targeting Wrong Country
Julia Ornedo
Fri, May 22, 2026



Pete Hegseth apparently created a huge mess for Donald Trump in his rush to keep the 79-year-old president happy.

Insiders have revealed that the defense secretary’s abrupt maneuver to cancel the deployment of U.S. troops to Poland triggered an angry phone call from Trump, who was forced to explain that Poland was not one of the European allies that had earned his wrath.

Hegseth, 45, blindsided officials on both sides of the Atlantic last week when he canceled the deployment of 4,000 troops to Poland at the eleventh hour. The decision stirred confusion within the Pentagon and quickly sparked a firestorm of criticism from American lawmakers and European allies.

The self-styled "War Secretary" Pete Hegseth

Even the president was stumped by the move, a current and a former U.S. official told The Wall Street Journal.

Trump phoned Hegseth to demand an explanation for his decision to cancel the troop deployment, according to the outlet. During the conversation, Trump also told Hegseth that the U.S. shouldn’t treat Poland poorly, given its close ties to the White House.

An armored brigade from Fort Hood, Texas was supposed to go on a nine-month rotation to Poland, but Hegseth abruptly canceled that deployment in an effort to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Europe after Trump whined about European allies’ lack of support for his Iran war, according to CNN.

But Hegseth’s decision was a headscratcher for some officials because it was Germany—not Poland—that had criticized Trump’s war, the Journal reports.

Last month, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz drew Trump’s ire when he said “the Iranians are clearly stronger than expected, and the Americans clearly have no truly convincing strategy in the negotiations either,” adding that “a whole nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast on Friday.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told the Journal that “President Trump appreciates all the secretary has done—and will continue to do—in executing the America First agenda within our military and prioritizing our warfighters like never before.”

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, meanwhile, said Trump and Hegseth “communicate constantly and are in lockstep regarding U.S. troop movements in Europe.”

“This is a slap in the face to Poland. It’s a slap in the face to our Baltic friends,” Nebraska Republican Don Bacon scolded Army leaders in a budget hearing last week.

Pawel Zalewski, Poland’s deputy defense minister, told the Journal that the U.S. was going to present Warsaw with options on ways “not to decrease American engagement in Poland.”

“We have offered to the Pentagon to host American soldiers on a permanent basis, and we understand what it means,” he said. “It means that we have to build a small city for this unit, and we are ready for that. We will cover the cost.”

While Trump may have had a change of heart on Poland, the Pentagon announced plans to pull 5,000 troops from Germany earlier this month, after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz issued a withering assessment of Trump’s Iran war. 

Trump changed course on the deployment of troops to Poland in a bizarre Truth Social post on Thursday night that invoked the election win of Polish President Karol Nawrocki—which occurred almost a year ago.

“Based on the successful Election of the now President of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, who I was proud to Endorse, and our relationship with him, I am pleased to announce that the United States will be sending an additional 5,000 Troops to Poland,” he wrote.

Friday, May 22, 2026

Archives: The 2004 Testimony of a Lebanese Detainee Held in Syria

In 1975, the Syrian regime of Hafez Assad invaded neighboring Lebanon under permission from the Nixon administration whose sinister Sate Dept Secretary, the war criminal Henry Kissinger, made the following deal with the Stalinist regime in Damascus less than a year earlier in 1974. 

Per the Truce Agreement that followed the 1973 October War, Kissinger promised Assad that his regime could invade and seize Lebanon in exchange of which Assad would not contest Israel's sovereignty of the Syrian Golan Heights that Israel had seized during the war. 

The Syrian invasion of Lebanon began in earnest during the 1974-1975 period as soon as the Assad-Kissinger deal was made: Syrian-sponsored militias and gangs (Al-Saiqa, Al-Asifa, etc.) began infiltrating into Lebanon across the lawless border and attack remote Christian villages with small scale massacres. The purpose was to trigger a reaction from the Lebanese Christians and thus plunge the country into chaos and civil unrest, which would in turn justify a Syrian invasion supposedly to preserve order and stability with the backing of the United States. Indeed, up until March 2003 the US State Department refused to label the Syrian occupation as an "occupation", preferring the neutral term of "presence" and using the formula of "Syria as a factor of stability" in Lebanon.  It took September 11, 2001 and a reassessment of US policy for Secretary of State Colin Powell to use the term "occupation" for the first time in March 2003 because Syria was assisting Saddam Hussein in Iraq against the American invasion.

As 1974-1975 went by, and absent any reaction by the Lebanese government and army against the Syrian-Palestinian-Leftist alliance that was slowly coalescing, the Lebanese Christians began forming their own militias in self-defense. Because of the diseased sectarian structure of the Lebanese government, the latter could not use its army for fear it might splinter along sectarian lines, which it ultimately did in 1976 when a Sunni Muslim traitor lieutenant of the Lebanese Army by the name of Ahmad Khatib led a sedition (The Arab Army of Lebanon) against his own government and army and began attacking regular army barracks with the help of Palestinian guerilla groups led by Yasser Arafat's PLO and other affiliated Sunni Muslim and Druze militias.

For 30 long years (1975-2005) Assad (father Hafez, then son Bashar) maintained a tight grip on Lebanon, shelling various regions and cities during bursts of fighting with Lebanese militias (mostly Christian militias, but also Muslim, Druze and Palestinian militias, depending on the prevailing political circumstances), kidnapping people, assassinating political and religious leaders, journalists and foreign envoys and ambassadors. All of this with the blessing of successive US administrations whose sole concern was to protect Israel and its annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights. The US sacrificed interest-free and insignificant Lebanon and allied itself with a brutal Stalinist regime in order to shield Israel from a repeat of the October 1973 war in which Israel displayed serious vulnerabilities: Israel initially lost on both the Egyptian and Syrian fronts then recouped, but the psychological impact was huge. 

Per the Kissinger-Assad 1974 deal, Assad faithfully did his part, earning him praise by successive US administration who repeatedly qualified Assad as an honorable and cunning man who kept his word. Every year, US presidents would meet with him in Geneva and/or have their secretaries of state visit him in Damascus. All of this while Syria was the inaugural member of the State Department's list of State Sponsors of Terrorism because Syria was behind a long list of terror attacks and assassinations in Lebanon and in Europe.

Not one "resistance" shot was ever fired from Syria soil by either regular Syrian troops or affiliated militias against Israel's occupation of the Golan which Israel subsequently annexed. In contrast, the Syrian regime incited, funded and armed a slew of "resistance" organizations in occupied Lebanon, beginning with the various Palestinian groups (PLO, PFLP, etc.) together with an incongruous assortment of Sunni Nasserists-Islamists-Fascists-Communists, etc. including the feudal barbarian Jumblatt family's fake Socialist militia, the Fascists of the Syrian Socialist Nationalist Party, the Baath Party, the Communist Party etc.) into attacking Israel from Lebanese soil (but never from Syria soil) on the claim of "liberating" Palestine from South Lebanon and culminating today with Hezbollah's replacing the PLO in the premeditated torment of South Lebanon. Syria thus shielded itself from Israeli retaliations, while Lebanon took the brunt of Israeli retaliatory attacks. The tacit understanding between Israel and Syria was as follows: Syria did whatever it wanted in Lebanon, but could not fly its air force over Lebanese airspace; Syria's occupation army in Lebanon was forbidden from responding to Israel's retaliatory strikes against Lebanon; and Israel was allowed to strike at will inside Lebanon. Both sides agreed to use only Lebanon as their voodoo doll against one another, and refrained from direct confrontations between one another.

Why did Syria NOT sponsor any "resistance" activity from its own soil (like the one it backed from Lebanese soil) against Israel's annexation of its Golan is evidence that the point of its occupation of Lebanon was to destabilize the country and not pacify it, and that the "liberation" of Palestine was just a slogan used by Syrian propaganda. What is more striking is that Syria's support of "resistance" militias in Lebanon served to incite Israel into aggressing Lebanon and give it the pretexts it needed to invade and occupy Lebanese territory. The Syrians were mad at Lebanon for not joining the wars against Israel in 1967 and 1973 and not losing territory like Syria and Egypt did. In fact, up to its 1978 invasion of south Lebanon, Israel never seized or occupied any Lebanese territory, so no "liberation" of Lebanese soil was actually needed. And when in 1978, Israel carried out its first invasion (Operation Litani), it quickly withdrew but struck an alliance with the Christian towns and villages along the border that had been isolated and separated from the central government by Ahmad Khatib's seditious Arab Army of Lebanon. That strip of south Lebanon that became a forced ally of Israel became the "occupation" pretext upon which Hezbollah - beginning in 1982, after the eviction of the PLO by the Israeli 1982 invasion - would later claim its legitimacy as a resistance movement. In other words, the dissident anti-Lebanese-State political and military movements and organizations, led by the Sunni Muslims of Lebanon (who felt kinship with the Sunni Muslim Palestinians), caused the very Israeli occupation of the south that they and Hezbollah claimed to be fighting.

I will not go further into the rest of a very complicated Lebanese War that began in 1974 and that has yet to conclude. The recent (2024) fall of the Assad regime in Damascus in the hands of former Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorists has opened the archives and records of the brutality of Assad against his own people, particularly during the 2011-2024 Syrian civil war. The West and the world rightfully expressed outrage at what Assad had done to his own people before and during those years. 

But my own question is why did that same West and international community decide to ignore the same exactions, abuses, killings, shellings, assassinations and massacres it carried out during Lebanon's thirty long years under the Syrian occupation, even though the Lebanese continued to demand justice for what Assad was doing in Lebanon. No one listened. The reply was always, "Syria's 'presence' is a factor of stability in Lebanon". Several Lebanese human rights organizations spent years documenting Syria's abuses. One of them was "Support for Lebanese Detained Arbitrarily" (SOLIDA) which undertook to record the testimonials of the few Lebanese prisoners who were released from Syria after their abduction and torture. 

Below is one such testimony translated from Arabic into English. There are an estimated 17,000 Lebanese citizens who were abducted in Lebanon and illegally transferred to Syria during the 1975-2005 period and whose whereabouts remain unknown. The numbers of those who returned is puny in comparison to that number and I do not have those numbers. The testimony below is from 2004.

================================================== 

Lebanon’s Golgotha in the Prisons of Syria:

The Testimony of a Former Lebanese Detainee 

From the archives of the Syrian War Against Lebanon (1975-2005), the testimony of one among thousands of Lebanese citizens who were arbitrarily detained in Lebanon by Syrian Intelligence and transferred to, and incarcerated in, the notorious prisons of the Assad regime.

April 12, 2004 – Reporter News

I am a Lebanese citizen from Beirut who was imprisoned in 1991 by the Syrian occupation army. I spent five years at the Syrian prison of Mazze. This testimony is intended for the Lebanese, Arab, and international public opinions so that they are aware of the suffering of the Lebanese under the Syrian occupation: brutal repression and unparalleled terror, not unlike those of the Nazi concentration camps and fascist terror.

I would like this testimony to make its way into the hands of Lebanese, Arab, and international media, and of embassies and non-governmental organizations in order to prompt them to campaign for the release of hundreds of Lebanese prisoners who suffer daily in the prisons of Syria for no other reason than having called for the freedom, independence, and sovereignty for Lebanon.

I would also like for the leaders of the free world to read this testimony and use it to take action for the liberation of Lebanese detainees in Syria, and most importantly to bring an end to the Syrian occupation that suffocates Lebanon and its unfortunate people who reel under the rule of collaborators working for Syria against their own people.

The reader will forgive me for not using my name since I still live in Lebanon and do not want to be the target of reprisals or another detention or even be “skinned alive”, a threat I received from the head of the Syrian Intelligence Services (Mukhabarat) in Lebanon, Major-General Ghazi Kanaan, before my release.

My ordeal began one day as I was driving to work in my own car. As I parked in front of my office, a group of Kalashnikov-wielding men in civilian clothes surrounded me and said: “Don’t move. We are Syrian Mukhabarat. You are our prisoner.” The group’s leader had barely finished these words, and two of the men approached me quickly, covered my head with a black bag, and handcuffed me before throwing me in the trunk of their car and speeding away.

I was wondering what they could possibly want from a man like me, a two-year veteran of the Lebanese army who no longer was involved with the military. My only affiliation was with a local association working for the development of my native region and the improvement of its standard of living. As for my political opinions, I opposed the Syrian occupation of my country like most of my fellow Lebanese. I was as well an activist in the movement of General Michel Aoun in both regions of North and South Metn.

The answer to my question soon came when the car stopped and the armed men took me out of the trunk and pushed me, handcuffed and with the bag over my head, down a long stairway that led into a humid and moldy underground dungeon. I could smell the ocean, and I concluded that I must be at the Hotel Beau Rivage prison that I have heard so much about and which the Syrians had converted into their primary prison in Beirut and the headquarters of their Mukhabarat services under the orders of Colonel Rustom Ghazaleh and his aides.

The hitting, kicking, and insults did not stop from the moment they removed me from the trunk of the car and until I was shoved into a tiny cell – 1.5 meters long by 80 cm wide (4.9 by 2.7 ft). They kept on hurling Lebanese swearwords at me but with a Syrian accent: “We’re going to fuck the greatest of the Lebanese. We will walk over the Lebanese with our boots. Who do you think you are, you motherfuckers, to oppose us?” and other similar hair-raising insults.

They then threw me in the dark cell that was really like a tomb. Two hours later, the door opened and a couple of bullies came in, placed the bag again over my head, and pushed me into the narrow passage between the cells, then again up the stairs and into an interrogation room. There, they sat me in a special interrogation chair made of metal and resumed the swearing and cussing, but this time it was directed at prominent Lebanese figures that included, among others, the Maronite Patriarch whom they called a senile idiot. In fact, they did not spare a single Lebanese Christian leader, saying: “You motherfuckers do not want the Syrians?… We will take care of you. By God we will skin you alive…”

Suddenly the room fell silent, as some higher-ranking people walked into the room. I knew that the newcomers were high-ranking because the bullies addressed them with “Sidna” (Sir, or Lord).

The guards took my clothes off (they actually tore them off) without removing the bag off my head or the handcuffs from my wrists. Then they poured very cold water on me, punched me, and hit me with clubs to the point where I lost track of the count of blows. Blood was pouring out of my nose and mouth, while the dirty black bag over my head prevented me from seeing where the blows were coming from: I was like a cat in a bag.

They showered me with questions accusing me of spying on the Syrian army for Israel and every time I denied the spying charges they would fly into a rage and the blows multiplied. They would repeatedly interrogate me then take me back to the cell till I lost any sense of time and place. It was only when my guards and investigators informed me that I will be transferred to Anjar (headquarters of the Syrian Mukhabarat in Lebanon) for additional investigations after the preliminary 3-day phase of the investigation at the Beau Rivage compound that I realized that this circus had lasted for three days.

They put me in a truck with eight others from different regions of Lebanon. Our heads were covered with bags and our hands and feet were cuffed. It was extremely cold and Beirut was under a heavy downpour. By the time we arrived at Dahr El Baydar (the mountain pass on the highway to Damascus) we were shivering from the cold which made our wounds hurt even more.

We arrived at the central prison of Anjar in the Bekaa Valley where all the Lebanese prisoners converge from the South, Beirut, and the North of Lebanon before being transferred to prisons across the border in Syria.

The prison at Anjar was originally a stable that was confiscated by the Syrians when they invaded Lebanon: they transformed it into a penitentiary without making any changes to it except for the room where the horses were shoed which they converted it into a torture room decorating it with the most horrible and dreadful instruments of torture. Anjar’s penitentiary is not very big because, as I mentioned earlier, it is a gathering place for detainees who are then either released and on their way home, or are transferred to the horrific prisons of Syria across the border.

The Anjar penitentiary is under the personal direction of the head of the Syrian Mukhabarat in Lebanon, General Ghazi Kanaan, and his deputy, Major Adnan Balloul nicknamed “the ferocious beast”. They are both assisted by the chief of the Anjar prison guards, Lieutenant Sleiman Salameh, who leads the throng of Alawi investigators always thirsting for Lebanese blood.

At Anjar they lined us up against a wall and took the bags off ours heads so that General Ghazi Kanaan can see our faces up close. In effect, he got close to us and every time he looked into a face he would ask: “Who is this one?”, and a Mukhabarat agent would answer with a list of names in hand: “This is so-and-so.”

Kanaan inspected us for about fifteen minutes then made this political speech: “Anyone who says anything against Syria will be skinned alive (the expression “to skin alive” is one the Syrians use frequently.) We will presently send you to Syria where we will continue our investigation and I advise you to tell all in order to shorten your suffering. Otherwise, you will never see your families again in Lebanon…”

Kanaan said many things, but I do not remember all of the things he said since it happened a while ago. I remember, though, that one of the detainees tried to answer but a Syrian Mukhabarat officer hit him repeatedly with his rifle butt. Then they replaced the bags over our heads and put us back on the truck that took us to Syria.

“Whoever enters it is doomed, and whoever leaves it is reborn.” That is the slogan inscribed at Mazze prison and in the investigation centers of the Palestinian branches of the Syrian military intelligence services. This prison is the reception center for the Lebanese. Thousands of them have entered it but have disappeared without a trace.

There were nine of us from different regions of Lebanon to leave the truck. They took the bags off our heads and put us in line one behind the other. We were received by the Syrian Colonel Mounir Abrass, the head of intelligence in the Palestine Section. Around him were some twenty soldiers with batons and whips who were staring at us with eyes full of hate as if we were long time enemies or Israeli soldiers. When the truck and its escort car left, Abrass’s men stood around us and immediately began to beat us, shouting insults like: “we are going to fuck your dignity and humiliate you. We will step with our boots on the greatest of the Lebanese …”, followed by a stream of swearing that displayed a deep hatred for all that is Lebanese, as if the Lebanese were insects that needed to be eliminated for the glory and survival of Syria…

The beating session ended and we were assembled in the courtyard bleeding from all over. It was night and the cold was unbearable in Damascus. I will never forget that night. We appealed to all the saints and prophets imploring their mercy but to no avail. Ferocious wolves show more compassion towards their victims than the Syrian guards. A few moments later, they drenched us with very cold water. Maybe they wanted to wash us, I do not know. But after spending years at Mazze I came to know that that was the reception accorded to all the new detainees, especially when it is a large group like ours.

Then they replaced the bags over our heads to lead us to the solitary cells located 40 meters (approx. 44 yards) under the ground and measuring 80 cm (2.7 ft) wide by 180 cm (5.9 ft) long. The detainee cannot fully stand up. The doors were made out of steel and they gave us what they called “food” through a slot that the guards opened from outside.

It was the head of the Palestine Section, Colonel Mezher Fares and his group who led my investigation. Every day they took me from my cell to the investigation area with my head covered with the black bag. Once in the investigation room they removed the bag off my head and I found Fares in a chair, either smoking a cigar or sipping coffee with guards around him. He would usually start off with an abundant stream of swears directed at the Lebanese, accusing us of collaborating with Israel. Then, and without any warning, the blows would start pouring down.

There are no words to describe how much I suffered in that Syrian prison:

  • They whipped me with what is called a “bull’s tail” whip, which is a terrible instrument of torture.
  • They pulled off my fingernails and toenails.
  • They hit me in on my genital area and inserted sharp objects in my anus.
  • They gave me electric shocks on my nose, ears, and throat.
  • They burned me with cigars and cigarettes.
  • They put me in the “German chair” (A metal chair with moving parts that cause an extreme extension of the spinal column, which leads to quasi-asphyxiation and sometimes fracture of the vertebrae and paralysis of the lower limbs)
  • They hung me on a tire
  • They hung me to a hoist for nine days with my head covered.
  • They put salt on my wounds and I screamed and suffered till I lost consciousness. I would regain consciousness when they would wake me up with a spray of cold water, and then to start beating me again.

The investigation period lasted for 150 days that I spent in solitary confinement in my cell – or “tomb” as the detainees would call it. I would eat what they gave me with my hands like the animals we see in movies. I did not know what I was given to eat but I was able to identify breadcrumbs and some olives.

Sometimes, in a state of exhaustion, I would sleep for long hours and I would defecate and urinate in my raggedy clothes.

I will never forget the chief of the Mazze prison, Captain Bassam Hassan who weighed 150 kilos (330 pounds). He would pounce on me like a beast to beat what was left of my body. I learned later from old prisoners that they (the Syrians) learned sophisticated methods of torture from movies they watched.

Many Lebanese prisoners died at Mazze under the torture inflicted by captain Bassam Hassan and his hangmen who numbered 14 and amomg whom I recall Salah Zoghbi, Abdel Razzaq Halabi, Bassam Mustapha, Hissam Succar, and Muhammad Mufleh, in addition to a number of assistants and soldiers whom we called “the guards”.

Finally, they forced me to sign a written statement whose contents I did not know.

Then I was allowed to take a bath. They shaved my head and gave me clothes similar to a Syrian soldiers’ uniform. Later, one of the guards told me: “We gave you a new name which will be your name until you get out of here. Be careful not to use your real name in front of other prisoners. You must completely forget it, otherwise we will send you back to the tomb, understood?”

Swapping my name for another meant that I did not exist for the Syrian authorities and that I never entered a Syrian prison. It is actually the case for all Lebanese prisoners in Syrian jails whose parents search in vain for information about them because they do not exist on the lists of detainees. The Syrian authorities have to be forced to reveal their true names.

I was then transferred to a bigger cell with a number of young Lebanese and Jordanian men, all accused of threatening Syrian security! We were approximately 25 prisoners and the subterranean cell was no larger than 12 square meters (39 sq ft). In the summer we suffocated from the heat and humidity, and in winter we shivered from the cold. And from time to time, they remembered us with a torture session so we do not forget where we are.

Nighttime at Mazze is a terrifying experience, so horrific that no horror movie can match it: Absolute silence punctuated with gut-wrenching screams and howls of pain that take one’s breath away as the electric torture sessions or other civilized methods employed by the Syrian Mukhabarat. After an occasional pause, the cries and howls would resume even more terrifying than before, and on through the night! My God, we asked ourselves, will this night ever end? During those moments, Moslem prisoners would quietly utter the Allah Akbar (God is Great) chant while the Christians among us would pray to the Holy Virgin even more quietly! My God! Will this night ever end?

I later learned that my parents tried to reach the prison after bribing a Syrian officer and locating my whereabouts. They reported to the prison gate but the warden Bassam Hassan constantly refused to admit to the presence of Lebanese detainees all the while trying, with his assistants, to extort money from the detainees’ parents with the collaboration of Syrian Mukhabarat agents in Lebanon, starting with Ghazi Kanaan, Rustom Ghazaleh, and Adnan Balloul.

There were about 150 Lebanese detainees at Mazze, yet our jailers refused to admit to the presence of a single Lebanese. They even forced us to talk with a Syrian accent to eliminate any trace of us.

There were no medical services in the Syrian prisons and no judicial process for most of the detainees.  As for the court that heard the cases of some of the Lebanese, it was the “Third Field Court of the Syrian Expeditionary Force occupying Lebanon”, which means that the Syrian Army in fact applied Martial Law on the Lebanese even as the collaborator regime in Beirut claimed to be a sovereign government! What a shame!

Our daily diet consisted of potatoes, olives, ground wheat and cauliflower. We spent the time crying, exchanging stories from the country and listening to new stories brought in by the new detainees as we dressed their injuries with water and pieces of fabric ripped from the uniforms left behind by the released detainees. We were handled by Syrian army deserters who were serving their prison sentence in one of the wings of the Mazze compound. We called them the Deserters.

As to those who were deathly ill they were sent to Al-Muassat Hospital located close to the prison and where the Military Police stood guard. One time, one of the detainees died among us from severe torture because he was accused of collaborating with the Lebanese Forces. After an electric torture session, they sent him back to solitary confinement. But realizing that he was dying they brought him back to us in the large cell as he was turning blue and drooling, with blood oozing out of his ears and nose. We told the jailers that he was dying and that there was nothing we could do for him, and they replied: “Let him die. May God never bring him back to life! May God take you all as well!”

We tried to resuscitate him by massaging him and wiping his face with water, but he soon started to pant and in one last burst and virtually unconscious, he looked at us and gave us a sad smile and died. We started yelling for our jailers for help. When we told them that he had died, they started insulting us and then came in and took him to Al-Muassat Hospital, but it was already too late. We later learned that he joined the long list of Lebanese buried in mass graves near the prison where the Syrian Special Forces stood guard to prevent anyone from getting near without special permission.

The ordeal at Mazze prison pales in comparison to the prisons at Sabeh-Bahrat in Damascus, of the Syrian Air Force Intelligence Services, or that of Palmyra where starving dogs are used to terrorize the prisoners and where death row inmates are impaled. Snakes and rats are used during torture sessions, in addition to other hair-raising methods of horror movie vintage.

Among the stories of Mazze, where I spent five years of my life, is the story of the former Lebanese Member of Parliament, the late Dr. Farid Serhal, who was imprisoned in 1989 after being kidnapped by the Syrians. In addition to light beatings, they forced him to clean the toilets and mop the floors in order to humiliate him because he was once a candidate for the Presidency in Lebanon. They called him “the dog”.

As for Butros Khawand (Phalange Party member who was kidnapped in the early 1990s), he was at Wing 601 in Mazze. He had become skin and bones because of humiliation and torture.

I will never forget the torture inflicted by the Syrian jailers on a young Lebanese soldier they accused of having fought against the Syrian occupation: They crucified him on a big wooden cross – because he was Christian, said Captain Bassam Hassan – then they forced him to run in a circle while beating him like a horse, then they hoisted up his cross and left him out in the sun for nine days. He was bleeding from his mouth, ears and everywhere else.

When Bassel Assad (son of Syrian president Hafez Assad) died, our torturers attacked us like furious bulls. They beat us and left us without food for one whole week because they thought we were happy for his death!

After spending five years in prison without a sentence like all the Lebanese detainees here, and in response to friendly interventions, they decided to let me go. They transported me in a truck to Anjar where I was made to sit on the floor waiting for General Ghazi Kanaan who told me upon his arrival: “I hope you learned your lesson and I warn you that next time I will grind your flesh and bones, and you and those who support you must know that you will always live under our boots and no matter what you do, your destiny is Syria.”

Then they transferred me to Anjar prison where Adnan Dalloul and his jailers received me with a flurry of goodbye blows while waiting to deliver me to the Lebanese intelligence services that are under their control. And again, as if all the torture of the past five years was not enough for them, they savagely beat me. I will never forget the chief of the torturers at Anjar, Captain Sleiman Salameh. All those who went through this prison agree that he is the most brutal man on earth.

The collaborator Lebanese intelligence services took custody of me at ten in the evening. The head of the Investigations Service at the Lebanese Defense Ministry’s holding center, Imad Kaakur, immediately beat me under pretense of carrying out an investigation. I told him: “Five years of torture in Syria are not enough? What more do you want from me? I forgot how to speak Lebanese. I even forgot the names of my parents. What more do you want from me?”

My words were useless because he wanted to hit me and draw up a written investigation statement in order to present it to his superior, collaborator Jamil Es-Sayyed. They forced me to put my fingerprint on a blank piece of paper, then transferred me to the Military Police prison at Noura Palace where I spent three days before the intervention of a collaborator Lebanese politician who told them: “Five years in Syria are enough to discipline him. What else do you want? He is no more than a shadow of a man…”

And just like that, I was freed.

I would like to point out that Hussein Tlaiss, the escaped prisoner from the Lebanese prison of Rumieh and who is accused of the murder of the French Military Attaché in Hazmieh (Beirut suburb), of the assassination attempt on the late President Camille Chamoun, and of dozens of car bombings in East-Beirut, is one of the main investigators at Mazze and the one in charge of the Lebanese prisoners. He enlisted in the Syrian Mukhabarat – Lebanon Section – and is in charge of the execution of major Syrian security operations in Lebanon. It is said that he is behind many crimes. He lives with his family in Damascus in the Abu Remmaneh neighborhood under an assumed name.

 

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Harbinger of Midterms Tsunami: Tuesday's Primaries in Pittsburgh

The sewage pumps and the street sweepers have begun to clean up Donald Dumb's MAGA-GOP excrement and garbage from America's towns and cities.

================================================ 


Democrats sweep Pittsburgh, oust Republican incumbents in PA election
Finch Walker, USA TODAY NETWORK
Updated Wed, May 20, 2026


Democrats sweep Pittsburgh, oust Republican incumbents in PA election

Pittsburgh residents cast their votes in Pennsylvania's primary election on May 19, electing numerous incumbents and making way for several new leaders in state positions.

Democrats overwhelming took the vote, winning 26 of 27 key races in Allegheny County. Most notably, voters backed Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, who will attempt to win a second term this fall, while several newcomers unseated incumbents as state representatives.

Voter turnout was relatively low, with 22.7% of Allegheny's 915,194 registered voters casting their votes, according to the county. In total, there were 207,755 ballots cast.

Here are the unofficial results in key races in Allegheny County as of May 20 morning, with 1,322 of 1,327 precincts reporting. Not every race had both a Democratic and Republican candidate.

Governor
Josh Shapiro (D, incumbent) - 151,505
Stacy Garrity (R) - 41,257

Lt. Governor
Austin Davis (D, incumbent) - 149,271
Jason Richey (R) - 37,342
John Ventre (R) - 7,600

U.S. Representative, 12th District
Summer Lee (D, incumbent) - 67,818
William Parker (D) - 15,393
James Hayes (R) - 381

U.S. Representative, 17th District
Chris Deluzio (D, incumbent) - 69,904
Jesse James Vodvarka (R) - 15,940
Tony Guy (R) - 10,772

PA Senate, District 38
Lindsey Williams (D, incumbent) - 239,547
Thomas West (R) - 11,266

PA Senate, District 42
Wayne D. Fontana (D, incumbent) - 23,888
Paul Steenkiste (D) - 9,192

PA Representative, District 19
Aerion Andrew Abney (D, incumbent) - 6,285

PA Representative, District 20
Emily Kinkead (D, incumbent) - 7,723
PA Representative, District 21
Lindsay Powell (D, incumbent) - 8,149

PA Representative, District 23
Dan Frankel (D, incumbent) - 9,766

PA Representative, District 24
La'Tasha D. Mayes (D, incumbent) - 8,860
Will Anderson (D) - 1,202PA 

Representative, District 25
Brandon J. Markosek (D, incumbent) - 6,870
Amy Noone (R) - 2,383

PA Representative, District 27
Dan Deasy (D, incumbent) - 7,163

PA Representative, District 28
Jeremy Shaffer (R, incumbent) - 4,057
Jeremy Ferderber (D) - 3,838
Robert Bertha (D) - 1,880

PA Representative, District 30
Arvind Venkat (D, incumbent) - 7,002 

PA Representative, District 32
Joe McAndrew (D, incumbent) - 8,600

PA Representative, District 33
Mandy Steele (D, incumbent) - 6,304
Mike Hammill (R) - 2,439

PA Representative, District 34
Abigail Salisbury (D, incumbent) - 10,373

PA Representative, District 35
Dan Goughnour (D, incumbent) - 6,521
Jim Edwards (R) - 1,563 

PA Representative, District 36
Jessican Benham (D, incumbent) - 6,783
Timothy McCune (R) - 1,071

PA Representative, District 38
John Inglis (D, incumbent) - 7,303

PA Representative, District 39
Dylan Altemara (D) - 3,062
Andrew Kuzma (R, incumbent) - 2,742
Kellianne Frketic (D) - 1,780 

PA Representative, District 40
Jon Lloyd (D) - 4,699
Natalie Mihalek (R, incumbent) - 2,919

PA Representative, District 42
Jen Mazzocco (D, incumbent) - 8,775

PA Representative, District 44
Hadley Haas (D) - 5,864
Valerie Gaydos (R, incumbent) - 3,424

PA Representative, District 45
Brittany Bloam (D) - 5,142
Patrick J. Catena, Jr. (D) - 2,994
James Julius (R) - 2,334

 PA Representative, District 46
Mike Crossey (D) - 1,548
Jason Ortitay (R, incumbent) - 766

Voters also selected members for the state Democrat and Republican committees, as well as hundreds of members for local committees. Full election results can be viewed on Allegheny County's website.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Democrats win big in Pittsburgh in PA primary election 2026



Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Trump's Corrupt Hedging of HIS Iran War



While Trump insisted the Iran war would end ‘soon,’ an account in his name was buying millions in oil, defense, and gold
Eva Roytburg
Updated Mon, May 18, 2026


President Donald Trump speaks to the media aboard Air Force One on May 15, 2026.(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

On the morning of Monday, March 23, President Trump pulled his first “TACO” of the Iran war. After four weeks of fighting, with oil prices already up 55%, Trump had given Iran an ultimatum on Friday: Make a deal within 48 hours, or the U.S. would strike its power plants and energy infrastructure.

But on Monday morning, Trump reversed course. In an all-caps Truth Social post, he announced the U.S. and Iran had been having “very good and productive conversations” and that he would extend the deadline for a deal by five days.

Wall Street, for the first time since the war began, exhaled. Stocks rose. Brent crude plunged nearly 11%. Energy stocks—one of the few reliable winners of the conflict—sold off with oil.

The brokerage account in Trump’s name spent the day buying them. 

A first look at a president’s trading

According to the 113-page periodic transaction report released by the Office of Government Ethics on May 14, Trump’s brokerage account spent that same day buying a sweep of petroleum and gas stocks, including Phillips 66, Exxon Mobil, and Chevron, along with defense and aerospace names like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics: the companies that stood to profit if the war dragged on.

Trump’s huge trades in tech and oil

Ethics disclosures show Trump made big bets on Apple, Google and defense stocks as he discussed the Iran war and U.S. tech policy, raising fresh questions about personal profit and presidential power overlapping. Investors and voters both want to know: who benefits?

The day wasn’t an outlier. The filing, which covers January through March, shows a consistent posture through the Iran conflict: As Trump prosecuted the war and told Americans it would end “soon,” the account in his name was hedging it, buying gold, Treasuries, and cash.

A spokesperson for the Trump Organization, the family’s privately held conglomerate, told Fortune the brokerage accounts are operated by third-party financial institutions that have “sole and exclusive authority over all investment decisions.” Trades, the spokesperson wrote in a statement, are executed through “automated investment processes and systems administered by those institutions,” and neither Trump, his family, nor the Trump Organization “plays any role in selecting, directing, or approving specific investments.”

Davis Ingle, a White House spokesperson, told Fortune that Trump’s assets are in a trust “managed by his children” and that “there are no conflicts of interest.” Asked about the apparent tension between that statement and the Trump Organization’s claim that the third-party institutions have “sole” authority over the trades, Ingle told Fortune to “defer to Trump Org.”

There is nothing inherently illegal about a sitting president holding stocks—the criminal conflict-of-interest law that binds nearly every other executive branch official exempts the president.

But for more than half a century, presidents have voluntarily steered clear of the appearance of a conflict, using blind trusts, index funds, or, in Jimmy Carter’s case, liquidation. So what’s notable here isn’t that Trump holds securities, but that the account in his name has been actively trading them.

“It’s an unusual position for a president to be in,” Richard Painter, a securities law professor at the University of Minnesota and former chief White House ethics counsel under George W. Bush, told Fortune.

Trump’s new filing appears to offer the first public look in modern presidential history at an active public-markets portfolio in a sitting president’s name. The Office of Government Ethics report documents 3,642 individual trades made through the account in the first three months of 2026—between $220 million and $750 million in volume at a pace of roughly 60 trades per day. The filing doesn’t always specify whether a given transaction is a stock, bond, or ETF.

“I’ve gone through every president,” Painter said. “I don’t think we’ve had any president trade in the stock market.”

Since Lyndon Johnson pioneered the use of a presidential blind trust in 1963, every modern president has either placed their assets in a blind trust managed by independent trustees, held them in index funds and Treasuries, or, in Carter’s case, liquidated all their assets (notoriously, his peanut farm). None have actively traded individual securities while in office. Until recently.

In Trump’s first term, his assets were held in the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, which controlled his business empire, and the periodic transaction reports it produced drew little attention. Through the first year of his second term, the account traded almost exclusively in municipal and corporate bonds.

But even before the stock trading began, the arrangement drew immediate backlash from federal ethics officials.

Walter Shaub, then the director of the Office of Government Ethics, called Trump’s original trust arrangement “not even halfway blind” in a January 2017 speech at the Brookings Institution. He resigned in July of that same year after clashing with Trump over the president’s refusal to divest from his businesses.

Hedging the war he was prosecuting

The accumulation began the same day the war did. The disclosure reports trades only in ranges, not exact dollar figures, with purchases falling between $50,000 and $5 million depending on the position.

Markets generally divide into two camps: the risk-on assets—U.S. stocks, growth, tech—that investors buy when they’re confident the economy will grow , and the safe havens—gold, Treasuries, cash—they retreat to when they’re not. Through the Iran war, the account moved steadily from the first camp to the second, even as Trump told Americans the conflict was nearly over.

On March 2, the first trading day of the war, the account bought Newmont, the gold miner, for $50,000 to $100,000. On March 4, the day Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, it bought the iShares US Treasury Bond ETF for $250,000 to $500,000. The next day, it bought $500,000 to $1 million of the iShares Gold Trust.

The buying continued even as Trump publicly insisted the war was under control. On March 7, he announced that Iran had “apologized and surrendered.” On March 10, the account bought a sweep of international and emerging-markets exposure: Europe, Japan, Canada, and, in its largest single move of the day, an emerging-markets ETF in the $500,000 to $1 million band.

The next day, Trump told Axios the war would end “soon” because there was “practically nothing left to target,” and that it would end “any time I want it to end.”

The next week, the account bought cash worth $1 million to $5 million. The Strait of Hormuz has still not opened as of time of writing.

=============================================


Jamie Raskin Says Trump's Gone From 'Brick And Mortar Corruption' To Something So Much Worse
Kelby Vera
Tue, May 19, 2026
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) thinks President Donald Trump has gone from old school, “brick and mortar corruption” to a type of brazen profiteering that once seemed impossible now that he’s in his second term.

Fresh after news that Trump’s Department of Justice plans to create a $1.7 billion “anti-weaponization fund” to sponsor so-called victims of political “lawfare,” Raskin told The Daily Beast there is nothing more critical than cracking down on the administration’s array of grifts during the site’s Sunday podcast.

“We’ve never seen abuse like the kind of abuse that has taken place under Donald Trump,” he said, accusing the president of using legal loopholes and a “shadow government” to help his “personal wealth skyrocket during the second term.”

Representative Jamie Raskin, here on Feb. 11, accused President Donald Trump of unprecedented levels of corruption in a new interview with the Daily Beast. Bloomberg via Getty Images

According to a March report from Forbes, Trump’s net worth has swelled by a full $1.4 billion since his January 2025 inauguration, largely from his cryptocurrency holdings.

Noting how unregulated digital assets now make it easier than ever for “corrupt foreign governments” to channel funds [to] the president, Raskin accused Trump of being at the top of “a completely lawless situation.”

According to Raskin, Trump, here at the White House on May 18, has seen his "personal wealth skyrocket" through a number of schemes going down during his second term in office. KENT NISHIMURA via Getty Images

He also urged something be done about what he described as the executive branch’s “pay-to-play pardon” schemes and called the recently created Board of Peace its own kind of hustle.

Trump-IRS settlement fund debate
 
Senators argue over who can claim from the fund, which Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced as part of Trump’s IRS settlement. The deal permanently bars the IRS from pursuing old tax audits against Trump or his family, raising questions about eligibility.

Raskin was ready to admit Congress’s failure to put up guardrails during Trump’s first term “set the stage” for today, but promised that Democrats would do whatever it takes to stop the scamming as soon as they take back a majority in this November’s midterms.

Warning how Trump has made it clear he has no qualms about following norms, rules or even legal statutes, Raskin recalled how the president once said the only limit he considers when it comes to wielding power was his “own morality.”

“So you can be a judge for yourself of how much of a real limit that is,” the congressman said.