Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Thursday, July 2, 2026

American Working Class and Middle Class Love the Democratic Socialists

The conservative Neanderthals on the right keep claiming that the Democratic Socialist candidates who are making headway in the primaries are "communists" or other such dirty words in the dumb brainwashed wasteland of America. This is the same sort of discourse and propaganda that was unleashed against President Franklin D. Roosevelt when he struggled and won the New Deal battle against the corrupt capitalists that had brought down the US and the world with the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Whenever the time comes to clean up the mess after the hard right fossil Republicans ruin the economy, a hysteria seizes the right wing conservative dinosaur pundits. Remember that Roosevelt had to fight real hard to effect changes in the deteriorating social, economic and political status quo because the Communist threat was alive and real back then.

But today, there is no Communist threat. We even have "friends" who are Communists (China, Vietnam, etc.). Democratic Socialists' rise inside the Democrat party is nothing more than a push to repair the damage being done by Donald Dumb and take actions and enact policies for the working class and the middle class, to bring the US on a par with all other advanced countries. There is not one country on earth that has not embedded socialist ideas and programs in its policies. And those "socialist" policies that Roosevelt forced on the Republican dinosaurs turned out to be successful at redressing the economy and are still very popular today, despite the disgruntled backward Republicans trying to undo them.

Critics say that whereas Democratic Socialists claim to act on behalf of working-class people and advance working-class interests, they and their supporters are disproportionately affluent and elite-educated, as if this was a blemish and a reason to discount the movement. I would rather trust an educated American with economic, social and political policies than a dumb ignorant illiterate imbecile from the south and the middle of the country whose horizons are limited to corn stalks and pig butts. Our history is replete with intellectuals, engineers, scientists, and academics who saved the country and made discoveries that made America truly great. What contributions the illiterate bums and peasants have made to the country are few and far between. Granted they produce a lot of the food we eat, but that is their place, in the farms, not in the halls of Congress.

Because of its fundamentally peasant-stock country of immigrants, this country has grown hateful of thinkers, intellectuals and smart people. The average American worships physical strength (athletes for example) but denigrates intellectuals as "nerds". But it is the nerds, most of the time immigrants who bring their smarts with them, that have propelled the US forward. Think of Silicon Valley: Indians, Asians, Arabs, Europeans, etc... Not Kentuckians, Tennesseans, or 'Bamans....

The principle of social solidarity is enshrined in every advanced European constitution. There is a conviction there that wealthy people owe their wealth not only to their own individual efforts but to the fact that an organized regulated society is there to provide them with the needed labor, infrastructure and protections. Wealthy people do understand and accept that a redistribution of wealth from them to the rest of society is essential for their own success and perennity and for the welfare of the country.

The truth is always in the middle of two opposing positions. Unfortunately, despite the progress made in the US over the decades with social and economic policies that have propelled the middle class, raw capitalism remains a haven for corruption and for poverty. On one extreme, you have raw capitalists (represented by Donald Trump's corporate and corrupt elite) who thrive on deregulation and the absence of laws to pilfer whatever they can of the common good for their own selfish interest. On the other extreme, the history of Communism is nothing to be proud of because of its totalitarianism and abuses that we saw during much of the 20th century. Therefore a middle road is where to find the most ideal combination of free markets and a regulated environment, and that middle road is what Democratic Socialists are offering the country. Americans are common sense people; they are more likely to follow those middle road rather than adhering to extremist rightwing and often racist ideologies that often promise to take the country back to the Darwinian 18th century of slavery and colonialism. They are not likely either to endorse pure unadulterated totalitarian Communism with its crushing of liberties and ruin of the economy. Successful countries usually take that middle road. Even Communist party-led China operates on a capitalist economy, and that may explain its success and its meteoric rise to challenge the US.

Working and middle class people in Maine, Colorado and New York have shown the country that they wish more progressive economic policies and less savage cannibalistic capitalism like Donald Trump's. The criminal felon who cheated on his tax forms has made 2.2 billion dollars in 2025 while in office. Elon Musk who built his wealth with taxpayers money in the form of grants is now the first trillionaire ever. Is this a middle road? or is this the law of the jungle that corporate-bought Republicans want to maintain as the law of the land in the US? Outsiders are always shocked when they first encounter the US: They generally see the US as the Third World of the First World because it is so far behind in such areas as social justice and equality. 

Economic wealth and money are useless if not accompanied by enabling the working and middle classes from ascending up the ladder. The history of the 20th century is exactly that story. Workers' rights (8 hours a day, 40 hours a week) were literally clawed out of corporations. Women's rights (suffrage and independence) had to be earned with a struggle against the right-wing conservative neanderthals of the early and middle 20th century. The rightwing wealthy conservative elite wants to take us back to those days. The billionaires are making life unlivable for many working and middle class people. 

The fact that educated people are less likely to be members of the working class does not discount their desire to work for the wellbeing of the working class. Many decent billionaires are begging to pay more in taxes, while Donald Dumb is a corrupt billionaire who made his way to power by lying to the working and middle classes, leaving them in much worse conditions than existed before. Critics of Democratic Socialists are themselves condescending snotty snobs who are NOT of the middle class, and much less of the working class. They are themselves the corrupt money-whales elite who fear for their corruption and their scavenging lifestyles while the rest of us are left to worry about egg prices, gasoline prices and healthcare.

The extremism is not on the left. The left is looking for the middle road, the fair road. The extremism is on the right with racism and lawlessness, and guess what? The extremist right-wingers are now blaming "immigrants" for bringing the "dirty" socialist ideas to the US. Another knife to be plunged into the communities that make America great. Yes, immigrants bring novel ideas to this country. They bring wealth and science, progress and development. This country has always done better when immigrants are welcome and not persecuted.

Matt Walsh, who is the typical conservative hateful neanderthal says: "Third world communists are the enemy. They're taking over one of our two major political parties. They hate this country. They hate white people. They hate our heritage and traditions. This is the fight. Get in the game or go away." This is language taken straight out of the the 1920s and 1930s when the economy tanked because of wealthy white criminals on Wall Street. Instead of taking responsibility for their derailing the economy, they turn around and blame the immigrants, the "other", the "foreigner", etc. And they still do. This is what Donald Dumb has done: steal and run the economy to the ground, then blame dark-skinned immigrants. Matt Walsh is intellectually dishonest because he refuses to admit the facts, lies and desperately tries to win the argument on the basis of his own lies.

But these Third World immigrants are also white and do not come from Communist countries. They come to this country because they love this country. But leave it to the barbarians, themselves descendants, one generation removed, of immigrants, to attack the weakest in our society, the immigrants and blame them for all the ills we suffer from.

Robby Soave, writing for The Hill, says, "The point is that this view of socialism as a specifically third world ideology conquering the U.S. because of mass migration is a BIG LIE. Affluent, native-born white and Black people are just as likely or more likely to support left-wing politics than many categories of immigrants, particularly Hispanic immigrants. If right-wing immigration hardliners had their way and restricted citizenship to just people who can trace their lineage back to colonial times, we would be no safer from socialism. In fact, the category most likely to support socialist policies is the highly educated."

If democratic socialism is once again having a moment, it is because working and middle class Americans have had enough of the filth, the corruption, the untax the rich, the corporate scams, the immoral warmongering to drive the economy by selling deadly weapons to both protagonists in conflicts around the world, the ass-kissing to wealthy oil-slick kingdoms and emirates, the cronyism, favoritism, and nepotism as Donald Dumb's hallmark...Yes, it is perhaps the wealthy and elite-educated Americans who are veering into Democratic socialists for both objectives: To stand with the working and middle class against the right-wing cannibal capitalists, and also because without a thriving middle and working class, their own affluence would disappear along with the country's prominence.

Here's One of Many Reasons New Yorkers Voted for Democratic Socialist Mamdani



‘Tip of the iceberg’: nearly 500,000 New Yorkers lose health insurance due to Trump cuts


Healthcare advocates hold a news conference with Democratic lawmakers on 1 April 2026, at the Capitol in Albany, New York. Photograph: Albany Times Union/Hearst Newspapers/Getty Images

Jessica Glenza
Wed, July 1, 2026 

Nearly 500,000 moderate-income New Yorkers will be dumped from their health insurance plans on 1 July – the first of major coverage losses expected as a result of HR 1, the Republican-led law signed almost exactly one year ago.

The law, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, slashed government health spending by $911bn nationally in favor of permanent tax breaks for higher-income families and border security.

"It's an all hands on deck situation," said Maia Dillane, senior director of strategy and implementation at the Arab-American Family Support Center (AAFSC), based in New York, where the bulk of this summer's coverage losses are expected.

The AAFSC is one of 20 community-based organizations working with the Community Service Society of New York to find people new health coverage.

But even as community organizations work against a deadline – people have to find new coverage within 60 days or wait until "open enrollment" in November – they expect many simply will not be able to afford the new costs.

"We're seeing a lot of families still going back and forth on whether they can enroll in one of the qualified health plans – or whether they are just going to opt out of the coverage completely," said Reham Bader, director of the community health and well-being program at AAFSC.

"Families are having to choose how they're going to split their costs when it comes to their healthcare, food, etc."

The July coverage losses are related to the loss of New York's "essential plan", a provision of "Obamacare". In 2023, the federal government approved a pilot program in New York to cover residents earning 200-250% of the federal poverty level, or up to $39,900 for a single person and $66,625 for a family of three.

For reference, both the National Employment Law Project and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Living Wage calculator estimate a living wage for a single person in New York at about $73,000.

The pilot was meant to last until 2028 and, according to planning documents approved by the feds, be deficit neutral for the federal government. More people would be enrolled in very low-cost plan, without premiums or deductibles, and minimal co-pays, for the same amount as the federal government would have paid New York anyway.

But the program was thrown into upheaval soon after the passage of HR 1 in 2025, according to New York State of Health, the agency that administered the program.

In public announcements, the agency said essential plan funding was cut in half, and pointed to an HR 1 provision that ended health insurance tax credits to lawfully present immigrants. Despite calls for the state to step in, in June state lawmakers failed to find state funding for the essential plan, sealing its fate.

The loss of the essential plan is just one piece of a growing puzzle for New York state. As many as 1.1 million people could lose health insurance statewide through 2034 when taking other provisions of HR 1 into account, health policy analysts at Kaiser Family Foundation predict.

"This is just the tip of the iceberg, right – because come January all the other impacts of HR1 start to kick in," said Dr Adam Aponte, chief executive at the East Harlem Council for Human Services, which operates the Boriken Neighborhood Health Center. New York City is expected to be hardest hit, with more than 250,000 city residents expected to lose their insurance, including 200 of Aponte's own patients.

Nationally, the law could cause an additional 10 million people to become uninsured over the next decade. Those losses are largely a result of new work requirements for some Medicaid beneficiaries, which analysts predict will be very challenging to navigate and expensive to administer.

"What do these folks turn to?" said Aponte. "Federally qualified health centers like ours are going to be likely to absorb these individuals as uninsured patients into our organizations."

In spite of the disinvestment in health, HR 1 is expected to add $3.4tn to the federal budget deficit by 2034, according to the congressional budget office (CBO), largely due to reduced revenue from tax cuts.

"It's very unlikely that these individuals will be able to afford a marketplace plan. So many of them are going to be caught with no insurance, at least for a period of time – who knows how long," said Aponte, who expects most newly uninsured people will seek care in the emergency department.

People losing essential coverage will be forced to shop for health insurance through Obamacare marketplaces that require premiums and deductibles, and are experiencing historically expensive rate increases.

In addition to the cuts imposed by HR 1, the Republican-led Congress allowed special government subsidies to health insurers to lapse at the end of 2025, leading to record-high average deductibles of $3,786 per person according to KFF.

Those rate increases are expected to continue in 2027, with private health insurers already requesting double-digit increases, according to analysts at Georgetown University's Center on Health Insurance Reforms found. In New York, insurers are asking regulators for an average 20.7% rate increase. UnitedHealthcare of New York proposed a 52.1% rate increase.

Analysts say most rate increases are the result of sicker people seeking insurance, and otherwise healthy people foregoing coverage they feel they can't afford. Those dynamics tend to make insurance more expensive for everyone.

Analysts' read on rate increases jibes with Bader's experience helping people find insurance. When navigators work with struggling families who want to opt-in, "It's because they are not looking for preventive care – they are looking for treatments for illnesses."

MAGA Morons: Your Grifter-in-Chief "Earned" $2.2 Billion Dollars Last Year






It's becoming clearer by the day. Donald Dumb's number one reason for becoming president is FOR the corruption and grifting he could wield while in power. He lied to his herd of dumb MAGA buffaloes, telling them all sorts of things he knew they'd like to hear, only to be in a position where he could enrich himself. Grocery prices? Hahahaha.

It turns out that the Grifter-in-Chief has made more money as president than he ever made as a private citizen. His personal income in 2025 nearly quadrupled the earnings from his generally failing business ventures in 2024. The biggest chunk of his $2.2bn profits come from cryptocurrency, a still relatively unregulated space where crime and corruption are rampant. This staggering amount of profit is strictly his own personal income, and excludes the many more billions his sons and his buddies are making. The Republicans generally hate regulations because it gives them and their high finance and corporate friends the latitude to cheat and swindle the American people. It is really not a stretch to label the USA as the United Scams of America.

According to Jordan Libowitz, vice-president of communications for the government watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, "In the first term, Donald Trump was bringing in a shocking amount of money, but it all seems small potatoes compared to the amount of money he is bringing in now," said

For instance, Libowitz noted a list of questionable income sources, like the increase in revenue at Mar-a-Lago from $10m in his first term to $77m now, or the millions in transaction fees for the $Trump memecoin.

In addition, Donald Dumb is the only president elected since Nixon not to release his tax returns, which means the exact numbers are unknown and the sources of all this money are still murky, and no one really knows how much he's paying in taxes.

What we do know is that Trump earned the equivalent of about $200 an hour as president during a 40-hour work week – while earning the equivalent of about $1.1m an hour from his private businesses during that same work week.

And unlike his real-estate ventures, where much of the income reflects increasing asset values, much of the crypto income comes from trading a digital asset to someone and receiving cash in return, or money pocketed from investments.

Does the American public really understand that Trump is corrupt? Or has making money by any legal or illegal means become so ingrained in the American mind as a sublime goal that people are inured to the fact that their president is a corrupt swindler? That is at least the opinion of experts: "The general populace accepts at this point that he is corrupt, will be making money any way he can, and the government will let him do so....So I think people have just kind of accepted this is what's going to happen, adding "it's hard for an average American who's struggling to pay for gas and for groceries to contemplate the difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars. It's just more money than they'll never see."

Trump founded World Liberty Financial with his children just three days before re-entering office in January 2025. One transaction in particular set alarm bells ringing in some quarters: a half-billion dollar investment by the United Arab Emirates, buying a 49% stake in the firm. A few months later, Trump authorized the sale of artificial intelligence chip technology to the UAE, despite national security concerns.

"I think that is one of the most glaring conflicts of interest that is visible on this balance sheet," Molly White, a cryptocurrency researcher and anti-corruption activist said.

"I think people just at this point have sort of thrown up their hands and say Trump's a grifter – of course he's grifting, that's what he does," she added. "And you know, that sort of dampens any outcry."


The American Bar Association's website describes in details Trump's flagrant corruption:
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/resources/human-rights/2026-march/trump-administrations-rampant-pay-to-play-corruption-threatens-our-democracy/

AI query response:

President Donald Trump's second administration has engaging in unprecedented levels of "pay-to-play" corruption, characterized by trading official government actions for financial contributions to the President's personal and political interests. Since returning to office in January 2025, allegations indicate the administration has exchanged cabinet appointments, ambassadorships, pardons, and policy favors for donations from wealthy individuals, corporations, and foreign governments.

Key areas of alleged corruption documented by groups like the Campaign Legal Center and RepresentUs include:

Appointments for Donors: Billionaires who contributed millions to Trump's campaign or inaugural fund, such as Elon Musk and Jared Isaacman, were appointed to powerful roles like leading the "Department of Government Efficiency" or NASA.

Financial Self-Enrichment: Financial disclosures reveal the Trump family generated over $2.2 billion in realized profits in the first year back, largely through cryptocurrency ventures and foreign real estate deals, with total asset values potentially reaching $9.7 billion.

Quid Pro Quo Favors: The administration allegedly dropped federal investigations into major donors, awarded no-bid contracts to allies (including a $17 million contract for the Reflecting Pool that resulted in algae blooms), and issued pardons to individuals who made substantial political donations.

Foreign Emoluments: Concerns have been raised regarding foreign governments securing policy favors or negotiations after investing in Trump-branded projects or gifting assets, such as a $400 million jet from Qatar.

Prominent figures like Senator Chris Murphy have labeled the White House a "24/7 corruption operation," while Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton called it the "most corrupt administration in history," citing the firing of 17 inspectors general and the systemic erosion of ethical norms.
====================================================
Soaring revenue at Mar-a-Lago shows how Trump’s business interests and politics intersect
Casey Tolan, Isabelle Chapman, Kevin Liptak, CNN
Thu, July 2, 2026

As President Donald Trump's wealth has soared since retaking office, a new financial disclosure shows his two premier Florida resorts have also delivered record-breaking surges in revenue – a potent illustration of how Trump's personal business and presidential politics overlap.

Trump has visited the properties, Mar-a-Lago and Trump National Doral, more than two dozen times since the beginning of last year, hosting million-dollar-per-plate fundraising dinners, feting foreign dignitaries and welcoming GOP galas as industry leaders and political groups have scrambled to book their own events there as well.

Trump has also supercharged the money coming from Mar-a-Lago by raising the membership initiation fee to $1 million shortly before his reelection. The lavish resort is conducive to impromptu conversations with the president, who often dines on the patio at night, according to people familiar with the club.

Some ethics experts described the confluence of politics and profit as a blatant opportunity for special interests to get a direct line to Trump.

"People are going to Mar-a-Lago because they want proximity to the president," said Robert Weissman, the co-president of Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group. "A whisper in the president's ear is worth an awful lot – more than what they're paying to get in the door."

Anna Kelly, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement that "neither the President nor his family has ever engaged — or will ever engage — in conflicts of interest," and added that "all actions by President Trump and his administration are taken in the best interest of the American people." Trump pledged before retaking office not to involve himself in managing his namesake company, and placed his assets in a trust managed by his children, as they were during his first term.

Trump's personal wealth has ballooned in office unlike any other president, the annual disclosure released Tuesday by the Office of Government Ethics showed. He significantly grew the income he received from his Florida properties, taking in nearly $77.5 million from Mar-a-Lago – more than 50% over what it earned him the previous year, and triple what he earned from the resort in 2020.

The disclosure also shows that the resorts are being eclipsed in the president's portfolio by more than $1.4 billion in income from his lucrative new cryptocurrency ventures, including the $TRUMP memecoin and World Liberty Financial, a company co-founded by Trump's sons.

In total, Trump reported almost three times as much in crypto income last year as he made from his empire of golf clubs, hotels and resorts.

Trump also reported nearly $60 million in income from licensing deals with foreign real estate firms to use the Trump name for hotels, golf courses, towers and other real estate developments in places such as Vietnam and India.

In comments to reporters on Wednesday, Trump attributed his windfall last year in part to a rising stock market that he suggested was good for many others as well.

"You know why I'm profiting? Because the stock market's going up. Everybody's profiting," Trump said. He added that "I never speak to any of the people that run the money."

While they're not as crucial to his overall income as they once were, Mar-a-Lago and Trump National Doral both saw jumps in income compared to previous years.

During Trump's first term, he reported taking in a consistent income of about $20 million to $25 million per year from Mar-a-Lago revenue. That jumped to about $50 million in 2024, and then $77.5 million in 2025.

At Doral, Trump took in around $75 million a year between 2017 and 2019, with that number falling to $44 million in 2020 amid the coronavirus pandemic. The club rebounded, with Trump reporting that he made $110 million in income from Doral in 2024 and about $122 million in 2025.

Part of the growth in revenue from Mar-a-Lago came from hikes in the fees to join the club. The cost was a mere $100,000 before Trump's first election in 2016 – but after several increases over the years, it was hiked to $1 million in 2024, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Costs to visit other Trump properties have also increased, including at the Trump golf clubs in New Jersey and West Palm Beach that he frequently visits. Fees can stretch into the six-figures.

At Mar-a-Lago – which Trump has declared his own primary residence – the membership profile has changed in recent years, according to people familiar with the make-up of the club. There are more members who are seeking business ties to Trump or his administration, they said.

Since his return to the presidency, many of Trump's properties have also become destinations for Republican fundraising events — often with the allure of a potential appearance by the commander-in-chief.

Dozens of federal political candidates and committees have reported making payments to Mar-a-Lago or Doral to host events there since Trump returned to office, according to Federal Election Commission data.

In 2025, Mar-a-Lago hosted multiple $1 million-per-person "candlelight dinners" for MAGA Inc., a super PAC supporting the president, drawing in major figures including Elon Musk. The club has also been the venue for multiple Republican National Committee fundraisers in the lead-up to this year's midterm elections, including a gala in May 2025. In total, the RNC spent more than $1 million at Mar-a-Lago and Doral in 2025 and 2026.

Some companies with business before the federal government have hosted events there. XTI Aerospace, a company that is developing technology for vertical flight and won a few small federal contracts during the Biden administration, hosted a dinner at Mar-a-Lago in November 2025. The Financial Times reported that Pfizer's top executive leadership team held an off-site meeting at the club in January 2025, just before Trump was sworn in for the second time. XTI and Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment Wednesday afternoon.

Trump has also used his clubs to promote his more lucrative new crypto ventures. The president hosted a gala at Mar-a-Lago for the top buyers of his $TRUMP memecoin in April 2026, where he gave a keynote address and attended a "champagne toast."

Other groups that have held events at the club since his return to the White House include Catholics for Catholics, which has supported Republican politics.

Trump has hosted international leaders and other prominent politicians for dinners at Mar-a-Lago, including meetings with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in December. Trump's cabinet members, including Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have also accompanied him to the resort, according to his public schedule.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Democrats on Genocidal Israel: We Need to Continue the Conversation!



US Democrats used to say about Assad's Stalinist Syria, which they themselves placed on top of the State Department's List of State Sponsors of Terrorism in the 1980s: No need to punish Syria. No need to ask Syria to withdraw from Lebanon. No need to antagonize Syria, etc.... We need to continue to talk to Assad and his brutal dictatorship. Remember: The Democrats are supposed to be gung-ho on Human Rights, unlike Republicans.

Now it's genocidal terrorist ethnic cleanser Israel's turn: Some Democrats are reacting to what they've seen at the hands of Zionist colonial settlers in illegally-occupied and tormented Palestine over the past 4 years - mass murder, starvation as a war tool, rapes and torture of Palestinian prisoners, enforced disappearances, bombing hospitals, schools and maternities with the specific aim of "culling" the Palestinian population, attacking and setting Palestinian villages on fire, stealing land, burning olive tree groves.... - exactly as they used to react to demands for punishing Assad for what he was doing in both Syria and Lebanon: with pseudo-civilized jaundice and cowardice. 

"Oh no, we cannot stop sending money and weapons to the criminal Zionists. We need to 'continue the conversation' with them." The Zionists are not even listening to their Dumb unhinged slave Republican Donald Dumb, and Democrats think they can get them to listen to them. Funny if it was not tragic.

I can understand the difficulty for someone whose head has been shoved up the Zionist rectum for decades to suddenly smell the stench, hard as they have been immunized against common sense, justice and ... Oh... those human rights Democrats pretend to care so much for. But they fear that they'll be off AIPAC's payroll when elections time come around. So they re-shove their heads back where the sun don't shine in the safe warmth of Zionist cuddling.

==================================================
THE HILL

Massie bill on Israel funding splits Democrats: ‘Never seen it’

06/30/26 by Laura Kelly and Sudiksha Kochi

House Democratic leadership on Tuesday urged members to vote with their conscience on a controversial amendment to cut U.S. funding for Israel, underscoring deep divisions in the caucus over America’s relations with the Jewish state.

Fiscal hawk Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) sponsored the amendment, seeking to add it to a national security and State Department spending bill that is expected to come up for a vote this week. The text of Massie’s amendment says none of the funds of the act will be made available for Israel and lowers overall spending in the bill by $3.3 billion.

After a Democratic caucus meeting in which Massie’s bill was a focus of debate, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) expressed shock at the fraught conversations around Israel in his conference.

“I’ve been around a long time, never seen it,” he said.

Thompson said conversations centered around Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership, and noted deeply negative views of the long-time Israeli leader among young, Democratic voters.

Many of these voters have adopted a view that Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, launched after the Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attack, amounted to a campaign of genocide against Palestinians living there. Congressional Democrats have also raised urgent concern over Israel’s policies towards Palestinians in the West Bank.

Thompson said arguments centered around, “Do you cut off resources for Israel at this point,” or take a more diplomatic approach and “continue with some conversation.”

Increasing negative views of Israel among Democrats and Democrat-leaning independents was recorded in a Pew survey conducted in March, taken shortly after the U.S. and Israel launched a joint war against Iran. In the survey, published in April, 80 percent of this group had an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 69 percent in 2025 and 53 percent in 2022.

Pew noted that Democrats under 50 are slightly more likely than older Democrats to have a very unfavorable view of Israel (47 percent vs. 39 percent).

Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) said the conversation about Israel in the caucus meeting was “all over the place.” Nadler said he is against the bill and called it “poorly drafted,” arguing it would eliminate funding for U.S. embassy operations in the country, among other unintended consequences.

That argument was echoed by Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.), who called it an “overly broad amendment” that was not written well. She described the conversations as “thoughtful,” and sought to project party unity, despite disagreements.

“We all agreed that, however people vote, we’re all on the same team, and there are reasonable, sorts of reasons, that people vote on all sorts of things.”

Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) came out of the meeting saying that there was no yelling and that “people were very cogent.”

The text in Massie’s amendment takes aim at the $3.3 billion in security assistance, from 2019 through 2028, that is provided by a U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by President Obama in 2016. The MOU also provides for $500 million for cooperative missile defense.

The Massie amendment is expected to fail, as there likely won’t be much GOP support for the measure. Most conservatives have touted their strong support for Israel.

But it will underline the split between progressive Democrats critical of Israel and supportive, centrist Democrats – potentially putting a bullseye on members from activist groups on both sides.

A stark example of that was the ousting last week of five-term congressman Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.) – who has voted in support of U.S. military aid to Israel – by primary challenger Darializa Avila Chevalier, a democratic socialist and staunch Israel critic who drew backing from New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

On the other hand, during the last election cycle, pro-Israel Rep. Wesley Bell (D), backed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), knocked former Rep. Cory Bush (D) out of her Missouri House seat.

Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif), Democratic caucus chairman, said the caucus is aware of the “strong positions” people have on Israel but that the party doesn’t want people to miss the larger goal of combatting Trump’s domestic agenda.

Progressive Reps. Greg Casar (D-Texas) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) have both come out in support of the Massie bill.

“The Israeli government committed war crimes in Gaza and helped drag America into war with Iran. Americans should not be financing more weapons for Netanyahu,” Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, wrote on the social platform X.

“I am aware that the amendment as written may cut off both military weapons (~$3.3 billion) and some diplomatic funding (~$50 million). While I would prefer to vote on an amendment that stripped just military funding, I think opposing the billions in military funding is what’s most important here,” Casar added.

The amendment vote comes after a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas took effect in October last year. Despite the ceasefire, both sides have had several flare-ups and have accused each other of violating the agreement. President Trump’s peace plan for Gaza, enshrined in his “Board of Peace,” has yet to make any meaningful progress on disarming Hamas, strengthening new Palestinian governance or carrying out reconstruction.

Zionist Soldiers Desecrate Christ in South Lebanon; Trump's ICE Harasses Black Catholic Nuns












A Black African-American nun, Sister Leticia Ugboaja, was walking dressed in her habit to Our Lady of Sorrows Church in McAllen, in the backward racist state of Texas, just a few miles from the U.S.-Mexico border when she was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.

The Department of Homeland Security and ICE have refused to provide an explanation as to why she was arrested in a state where every jackass moron redneck walks around with a gun. The nun carried no guns. Which leaves only one explanation: She is Black African, therefore she must be guilty of something in the minds of the ICE-GESTAPO police of white supremacist Donald Dumb.

Parish officials posted a message on social media shortly after the arrest. Congress members, including U.S. Rep. Monica de la Cruz, intervened on Ugboaja's behalf leading to her release yesterday.

The nun is part of the Daughters of Mary Mother of Mercy and volunteered as an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion at Our Lady of Sorrows Church, according to Brenda Riojas, a spokesperson for the Diocese of Brownsville.

Ugboaja is also a registered nurse at South Texas Health System and worked previously for 10 years as a certified nursing assistant at DHR Health in Edinburg, Riojas confirmed.

"We are grateful for the quick response of local representatives who reached out to the Department of Homeland Security to get her released from custody," Riojas added in her statement.

President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown — including at sensitive sites such as houses of worship — has prompted faith leaders to adjust their response to church members who have become too afraid to attend. Some have encouraged online attendance, while others have offered help doing errands such as grocery shopping for people too fearful to leave their homes.

Donald Dumb: Time to Pay up after Squandering Millions of Taxpayers' Money in Frivolous Appeals



They say that crime does not pay. In this case, the guilty must pay the victim, thanks to a  justice system that Trump is trying to undermine.

His own hard-right Supreme Court took his appeal and UNANIMOUSLY threw it in the trash. 
=================================================



E. Jean Carroll attorneys say 'time for him to pay' after SCOTUS rejects Trump appeal

AARON KATERSKY
Wed, July 1, 2026

Attorneys for E. Jean Carroll on Tuesday asked a federal judge to order President Donald Trump to pay her the $5 million judgment a Manhattan jury said she is owed after he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

The U.S. Supreme Court this week, with no dissents, declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict and judgment.

Carroll's attorneys said in a new court filing that Trump's lawyers told them the president may ask the Supreme Court to reconsider.

"Defendant's counsel contacted Carroll's undersigned counsel to inquire whether Carroll would consent to a further stay of enforcement of the judgment in this action so that Defendant can ask the Supreme Court to reconsider its denial of certiorari in her case," Carroll's attorney Roberta Kaplan wrote.

"[A]fter four years of litigation across every level of the federal court system, it is time for this case to end," Kaplan wrote. "And under the Court's Stipulation and Order, Carroll is now entitled to obtain payment of the money due under the judgment."

Cheney Orr/Reuters - PHOTO: The U.S. Supreme Court, June 29, 2026.

In a post on his social media platform after the Supreme Court rejected his appeal, Trump vowed to continue to fight the case.

"I will continue the fight against this Weaponization and Lawfare Case against me, including the ridiculous claim of Defamation, with all of my power and strength," Trump said in the post.

A New York jury in 2023 held Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in the dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s and defaming her in 2022 when he denied her claim, and decided she is entitled to $5 million in damages.

The money has been held in escrow pending the outcome of Trump's appeal.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo - PHOTO: President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, June 29, 2026.

"Defendant Trump obtained a stay of execution pending appeal only by explicitly agreeing that the funds placed in the Court's account would be disbursed upon the conditions set out in the Stipulation and Order. Those conditions were satisfied when the Supreme Court denied his petition for certiorari," Kaplan wrote, adding "It is time for him to pay Carroll."

In his appeal, Trump had argued that the judge in the case should not have allowed the jury to view an excerpt from the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape, in which Trump is heard describing lewd behavior that he downplayed as "locker room talk." 

[In 2005, Trump was recorded as telling Billy Bush (as released by The Washington Post in October 2016): "I moved on her actually... I did try and fuck her, she was married," referring to Nancy O'Dell in Palm Beach, and later added, "I moved on her like a bitch. I couldn't get there and she was married. She's now got the big phony tits and everything," Trump then  claimed: "You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything." When Bush responded, "Whatever you want," Trump concluded: "Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."]

Trump also faulted the trial judge for allowing testimony from two women -- Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff -- who claimed that Trump had sexually assaulted them, which Trump denies.
=====================================================



Lawyers for President Trump asked for writer E. Jean Carroll's consent to delay the $5 million awarded to her by a 2023 jury, and signaled they plan to ask the Supreme Court to reconsider his appeal of Carroll's sexual abuse and defamation case, according to an attorney for Carroll.

Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, wrote in a court filing Tuesday that Mr. Trump's lawyer called her with the request Monday, soon after the Supreme Court declined to hear his appeal. Later Monday, Kaplan wrote, she informed Mr. Trump's team that "Carroll does not consent," and asked whether the president would agree to the immediate disbursement of the funds Carroll has waited years to receive.

In a separate filing Tuesday, Kaplan asked a judge to set a faster-than-normal schedule to disburse $5 million in damages awarded to her by a 2023 jury, which found Mr. Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Kaplan wrote that Carroll is also due an additional $779,783 in interest.

Kaplan said she intends to motion the federal court in New York for the funds' release, and requested "that the court direct [Trump] to respond to the motion within seven days, or by July 7, 2026, rather than the usual fourteen days."

She pointed to a June 2023 filing in which she said the two sides agreed Carroll could collect if the Supreme Court denied a petition to hear the case. The court did so Monday.

Kaplan also cited the cost to Carroll of "further delay in this nearly four-year-old litigation."

CBS News has reached out to Mr. Trump's legal team.

Carroll seemingly triumphed over Mr. Trump Monday when the nation's highest court declined to hear his appeal. The president had spent three years appealing the unanimous federal jury's conclusion — reached in under three hours — that he, more likely than not, sexually abused Carroll by forcibly inserting his fingers into her during a 1990s encounter in a department store.

Mr. Trump, who vehemently denies Carroll's allegations, has claimed he didn't know Carroll and "she's not my type." His denials and claims about Carroll were central to her defamation allegations. The jury watched a moment in Mr. Trump's videotaped deposition when he was shown a late-1980s photo that depicted Mr. Trump and Carroll in conversation with their then-spouses. In the deposition, he mistakenly identified Carroll as his ex-wife Marla Maples. Kaplan argued it was proof Carroll was indeed Mr. Trump's "type."

The $5 million has been held in a court-controlled bank account in the years since.

Carroll celebrated the Supreme Court's decision Monday in a brief note on her Substack blog, writing in all capital letters, "WE WON!"

"THIS WIN IS FOR EVERY WOMAN IN THE WORLD!" Carroll wrote.

Mr. Trump also appealed a separate federal jury's January 2024 decision finding him liable for other defamatory statements against Carroll. That jury awarded her another $83 million.

Lawyers for Mr. Trump have indicated they will also bring that case to the Supreme Court.

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Should Lebanon Trust the Israeli-biased US Mediator?

The US, Republican administrations in particular, have historically sacrificed small and geo-politically insignificant Lebanon to bigger interests in the region. Those have always included the American-breastfed Zionist colony in Palestine, Israel of course, but also other more-or-less friendly countries like Saudi Arabia, Syria and others.

A mediator should in principle stand at equal distance from the two protagonists whose conflict it is trying to arbitrate. But as the US is currently the only mediator between Israel and Lebanon, having strenuously worked on excluding anyone else from the mediator role, France in particular, Lebanon finds itself negotiating with Israel via an Israeli-biased mediator.

The problem for Lebanon right now, as it is trying to fend off yet another Israeli invasion and occupation of its territory on one hand, and to rein in Hezbollah's domestic insurrection against the State and its army, is that it finds itself at the negotiations table facing the hostile Israel and the unreliable and Israel-biased American mediator. To compound the dilemma, official Lebanon is negotiating on behalf of, or despite, its own domestic opponent Hezbollah.

Hezbollah was created by the Iranian theocracy in 1982. It inherited the task of "liberating Palestine" from southern Lebanese territory from its predecessor insurrectionist against the Lebanese state, namely the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) of Yasser Arafat after the latter was evicted by the Israeli invasion of 1982.

Hezbollah refuses to depose its weapons and re-integrate the Lebanese body politic as only a political party beholden only to Lebanese law, and not as an armed militia working at the behest of the Iranian theocracy. The State of Lebanon is torn between two forces: on one hand, US-Israeli pressure to confront Hezbollah militarily when it does not have the means (under-equipped army) or the will (for fear of a civil war) of such a confrontation; and on the other hand, a solid block of opposition by the Lebanese Shiite community represented by Hezbollah and the Amal movement of Parliament Speaker the highly corrupt and mercurial chameleon Nabih Berri.

Without trusting either side, official Lebanon has little choice but to accept the biased American mediator as a guarantor of whatever agreement may be reached between Lebanon and Israel. And even if all the guarantees are given and all the obstacles are ironed out, no one, not even the mediator, can guarantee that Hezbollah (which is not party to the negotiations) will abide the agreement.

In fact, both Hezbollah and Amal are accusing the Lebanese government of President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam of treason, surrender, selling Lebanon to Israel, etc. for simply sitting down at the negotiations table with the sworn enemy Israel. Merely talking to the Israelis is a crime under a Syrian-Iranian inspired Lebanese law, as it breaks the longstanding taboo against ever recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist state: Talking to Israelis is tantamount to a recognition of Israel.

And tensions are building inside the country between those forging ahead with trying to make a deal with Israel aiming at an Israeli withdrawal from occupied territory and those who reject any diplomatic resolution, and the question remains: Can or should the Lebanese side trust any guarantees that the US might offer to ensure Israeli compliance?

On one hand, the historical record says no. The US has always placed Israeli interests on top of its priorities even when those interests are illegal or immoral, and it has always thrown Lebanon under the Saudi, Syrian or Israeli bus depending on the circumstances. On the other hand, the steep chasm that is taking shape between Israel and the US over disagreements over the Iran war and its ricochet on the Hezbollah-Israeli war front does not invite any more confidence that the Americans can deliver on their guarantees. Indeed, it should invite fear of the traditional American backstabbing of Lebanon that has accompanied the tormented country since the late 1960s.

The deal (known as the Framework Agreement) signed last week in Washington DC between Lebanon and Israel is of such complexity in process and time that it is very easy to imagine various points of failure along the way. This, of course, assumes that somehow Hezbollah and the Lebanese Shiites agree to go along, which they have so far categorically rejected. Which means that the deal is certainly likely to fail at the very first test of its implementation, suggesting that the US and Israel have deliberately built "programmed obsolescence" in the deal that could ultimately serve Israel by giving it the pretext of never withdrawing from southern Lebanese territories it currently occupies.
===================================================


Analysis: Lebanon-Israel deal opens long process; with U.S. as Lebanon’s sole guarantor


Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (C) and Admiral Brad Cooper, Commander (2-L) of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) are pictured during a meeting at the presidential palace in Baabda on June 29, 2026. Photo courtesy Lebanese Presidency/UPI

Dalal Saoud
Tue, June 30, 2026

BEIRUT, Lebanon, June 30 (UPI) -- The United States, which brokered Lebanon and Israel's first direct negotiations and framework agreement, is Lebanon's only guarantor for securing a full Israeli withdrawal from its territory and bringing an end to the decades-long conflict between the two countries, official and diplomatic sources said.

The preliminary agreement, signed last Friday in Washington, marked the beginning of a long and difficult process whose outcome would depend on U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration's sustained and unwavering commitment to advancing the talks.

Lebanon took the daring and risky decision to pursue its own negotiating track, distancing itself from Iran's influence and Hezbollah's dominance in the hope of regaining control of the war-ravaged country and restoring its long-lost sovereignty.

Such a move was driven by the devastating war Israel has been waging against Hezbollah since the Iran-backed group opened a front in support of Gaza on Oct. 8, 2023 and resumed fighting -- after 15 months of inactivity to reorganize its ranks -- in solidarity with Iran on March 2.

The costs were staggering, with Israel reoccupying parts of southern Lebanon -- previously liberated in 2000 largely due to Hezbollah's resistance -- reducing more than 70 villages to ruins and inflicting an unprecedented human and material toll.

Another key factor was that Hezbollah emerged greatly weakened from the war. While it has been regaining some strength and continues battling Israeli forces, it has been unable to stop Israeli ground advances, targeted killings, and the destruction of homes and its infrastructure.

However, the militant group insists that maintaining its armed resistance is Lebanon's strength and refuses to disarm. It rejects the U.S.-mediated direct negotiations and framework agreement with Israel, describing them as a capitulation to Israeli and U.S. demands, and insists that Lebanon remains part of the U.S.-Iran negotiation track.

To Hezbollah, Iran is "the path to salvation."

The framework agreement, reached by Lebanese and Israeli negotiating teams under pressure from Washington after four days of marathon talks, provides for a phased Israeli withdrawal from occupied parts of southern Lebanon to allow the Lebanese Army to "restore effective sovereign authority," beginning with its deployment in two initial pilot zones.

The core of the deal is Hezbollah's disarmament and the dismantling of its military infrastructure, with the Lebanese Army set to launch its mission in two designated pilot zones. If successfully implemented and verified, displaced residents would be allowed to return, and reconstruction could begin, paving the way for further Israeli withdrawals.

That should eventually lead to an end to the state of war and military conflict between the two countries and the establishment of lasting peace.

The United States is playing a central role in the process. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) chief Admiral Brad Cooper visited Beirut on Monday, where he met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Army commander Gen. Rodolphe Haykal to discuss implementing the framework agreement.

A Lebanese official source said the talks focused on the two pilot zones, with U.S. forces overseeing implementation in line with the agreement's security annex, but without "U.S. boots on the ground."

The source explained that implementation will begin with Israeli forces pulling out and the Lebanese Army entering the pilot zones to deploy and verify whether any Hezbollah weapons or military infrastructure remain.

"The Army will ensure that Hezbollah does not re-enter the areas with weapons or fire missiles," he told UPI. "The Americans will be the guarantor and will ensure Israel does not strike, while any party obstructing the deal on the ground will be identified."

The pilot zones will be the first major test and just the start of a process that will take time, covering one area after another.

The official said there will be no direct coordination with Israel, only with the Americans, who will liaise with the Israelis.

Despite the strong objection of Hezbollah and its main Shiite ally -- House Speaker Nabih Berri -- both considering that the agreement could not be implemented and acting as if it does not exist, the source hailed the fact that it was the first time Lebanon has negotiated on its own.

He said, however, that Lebanon would not object if "anything good" for it emerges from Iran's negotiations with the U.S. such as consolidating the cease-fire.

Iran has reportedly maintained that it will not finalize any agreement with Washington unless Lebanon is included in broader efforts to end regional conflicts and Israel fully withdraws from southern Lebanon. Hezbollah remains convinced it will not be abandoned by Tehran.

"We have no problem. The Americans are present in both tracks (Lebanon-Israel and U.S.-Iran) ... but Israel's withdrawal and the subsequent steps will be negotiated by Lebanon," the official source said.

Although Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the framework agreement as "a major achievement and a major blow to Iran," he said Israeli forces would remain in the security zone established in southern Lebanon -- as in Gaza and southern Syria -- until Hezbollah is disarmed.

Although the framework agreement "is not perfect and has missed several points," it has put Lebanon on the right track and laid the foundation for Israel's withdrawal, according to Antoine Chedid, Lebanon's former ambassador to the United States.

"Do we have any option other than these negotiations? Does Hezbollah have an alternative after dragging Lebanon into a losing war?" Chedid asked in an interview with UPI.

He said the costs of the war were staggering, making negotiations "the only path," with the U.S. role "a source of strength" and Washington determined to make the process work.

He said Netanyahu and other Israeli officials are "maneuvering to raise the ceiling of the negotiations to get more than they can," but "there will be gradual withdrawals that will lead to their complete withdrawal" from Lebanon.

"That would require a great deal of work and the U.S. putting pressure on Israel," Chedid said. "It would also have to be matched by the Lebanese state assuming exclusive control over weapons and the sole authority to decide on war and peace, which would require resolving the issue of Hezbollah's arsenal."

He dismissed Hezbollah's calls to rely on Iran, saying that involving Tehran in Lebanon's negotiations "would be a pretext for Israel to remain in southern Lebanon forever."

Iran, which has funded and armed Hezbollah for 40 years, turning it into one of its most valuable assets in the region, would not easily relinquish such an important card in its negotiations with Washington.

"It will hold on to the Hezbollah card in order to sell it at the proper time and for the right price," Chedid said.

The biggest challenge would thus be the U.S. keeping the momentum, remaining engaged in the Israeli-Lebanese track, and not shifting course or turning its back on Lebanon, he added.

The Struggle inside the Democrat Party is Not Matched by a struggle inside the GOP

For more details, read my earlier post:

https://lebanoniznogood.blogspot.com/2026/06/democrats-are-jaundiced-cowards.html

=====================================================

Republicans, for the most part, are hardline extremist rightwingers who comfort all manner of extremist and terrorist hard-right organizations and movements, including Trump's MAGA. I have yet to hear one traditional establishment Republican repudiate this racist white supremacist vermin in their midst.

In contrast, in poll after poll Democrats appear to Americans like a weak, cowardly and "go-along" movement rather than a strong political party that is capable of standing up to the far-right extremist lurch into which Trump has taken the GOP.

Now that there are some progressives in the Democrat Party who are challenging the morose centrist spineless Democrat establishment and are scoring big victories in the primaries, the fossilized Democrat dinosaurs are flailing about. They want the Democrat Party to remain the poor cousin of the GOP, approving of its right-wing ideology while challenging it only on personal charm criteria.

Why would anyone vote Democrat these days if Democrats have no ideological foundations. Traditional Democrats react to the right-wing policies of the MAGA-GOP cabal, but never challenge it on its ideological underpinnings. When younger, more educated Democrats challenge this status quo, they are tagged as extremists by both the traditionalist Democrats and the Republican party (whose traditionalists have been ejected by the right-wing extremists of MAGA and its affiliated neo-Nazi militias and organizations).

If Democrats intend to win, they must confront that disequilibrium and, even for the sake of political tactical posturing, they must welcome their own progressives and Democratic socialists into the fold and use them as a counterweight to an extremist hard-right Republican party. There are no moderates or centrists left in the Republican party of Donald Trump. So the belief by traditionalist centrist Democrats that they can sway a radicalized American electorate away from Trump's extremism with a centrist position is misplaced. The electorate is tired and exhausted; it is ready to stand to Trump forcefully. The Democratic Socialist victories show that the electorate needs leaders to fight Trump on ideological grounds, not just on policies.

Monday, June 29, 2026

In the name of White Supremacy, This is What Donald Trump has Done to this Country



From: https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Social_Justice_Studies/Race_and_Ethnic_Relations_in_the_U.S.:_An_Intersectional_Approach/06:_Euro_Americans_and_Whiteness/6.03:_Whiteness-__White_Privilege_White_Supremacy_and_White_Fragility

Instead of Making America Great Again (whatever this bullshit means), Trump has caused Americans to lose faith in their country because the Great White Moron raped the very foundations of the still growing up country.

The White Anglo-Saxon men who still dominate everything in the country have failed to recognize and embrace a changing world and are embarking on destroying the foundations of the country just to stay in control as a demographic tsunami is washing up on its shores. 

Donald Trump is a symptom of that failure. His attempt to reverse the course of history and take the country back to somewhere between the 18th and 19th centuries is as tragic as it is comical.  The problem of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant Americans is THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH that the country is not theirs any more than it is to a 2026 immigrant from Haiti! Y'ALL IMMIGRANTS, MORONS.      

========================================================

Americans' pride in US history and democracy drops, and fewer are proud to be American, polls find


FILE - A demonstrator carries an American flag upside-down near the White House during a protest taking place on the day of a military parade commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary, coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, June 14, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

LINLEY SANDERS, SIMRAN PARWANI and AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX
Updated Mon, June 29, 2026

WASHINGTON (AP) — Americans have grown less proud of their country's history or the way its democracy works over the past decade, according to a new AP-NORC poll.

Americans' pride in the U.S. on several key attributes has dropped since 2017 — including the nation's military and its political influence around the globe — according to the survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. This poll was conducted in April, as the United States and Iran fought over the Strait of Hormuz in a prolonged war that started with the U.S. and Israel launching strikes on Iran.

New Gallup polling also finds that only 53% of U.S. adults are "extremely" or "very" proud to be an American, the lowest reading in the trend dating back to 2001.

The findings point to a broad decline in patriotic sentiment over a tumultuous period that included most of President Donald Trump's first term, the COVID-19 pandemic and rising inflation that contributed to a backlash against President Joe Biden. That timeframe also covers Trump's return to the White House, where he's taken more aggressive actions on immigration and issues abroad.

At the same time, most U.S. adults say that being an American is "extremely" or "very" important to their identity, highlighting an enduring connection, even as some become increasingly critical of the country's past or the government's current actions.
American pride declines on the armed forces and democracy

Americans' pride in the way democracy works in the U.S. has declined 14 percentage points, falling from 42% in February 2017 to 28% now.

In addition, Americans' pride in their armed forces has dropped 19 percentage points since 2017, and pride in the U.S.'s history has declined 14 percentage points. In each case, the drop is largely driven by Democrats, with some movement among independents as well.

Karla Galdamez — a 48-year-old Democrat who used to teach U.S. history — believes America has regressed under the Trump administration. While the Californian is not proud of Trump, she is pleased with how far the U.S. has come in 250 years.

"It's a country that really wanted to be different and really wanted to be better," she said. "Despite some of the very ugly history that we have of segregation and slavery ... if you look at the trajectory of the last 250 years, we've done nothing but get better and move toward a more egalitarian nation."

The AP-NORC poll found that Republicans are especially likely to be proud of the nation's armed forces. About 9 in 10 Republicans say the military makes them "extremely" or "very" proud, compared with about 6 in 10 U.S. adults.

Samantha Fulks, a 40-year-old in San Antonio, Texas, says she's proud to be an American and doesn't hide it. The Texas Republican showcases that pride with an American flag in her front yard — as well as Trump flags in the back yard — and she plans to wear red, white and blue on the Fourth of July. Fulks comes from a military family, and while she believes the country's involvement in Iran is unnecessary, she remains a proud supporter of the military.

"I still support our troops no matter what they do," Fulks said.

Being an American matters more for personal identity among Republicans and older adults

Matt Stafford, a 39-year-old in Massachusetts, is proud of being an American, even if the U.S. political system frustrates him.

He has a bald eagle tattooed on his back to represent the United States, its freedoms and "all the things we're supposed to stand for as a country." But despite that national pride, he often finds himself frustrated by politicians on both sides. Stafford — a centrist who identifies as "politically homeless" — wants Democrats and Republicans to come together to look out for their constituents in middle America.

"I love America, but our biggest problem is how we're pushing both sides — like the left and the right — to the extremes," he said.

For many Americans, their partisanship is often intertwined with their national identity. The poll finds that Republicans are much likelier than Democrats or independents to say being an American is "extremely" or "very" important to their personal identity.

Younger people are also much less likely than older people to say being an American is highly important to their personal identity. About three-quarters of Americans ages 60 and older say being an American is highly important to them, compared with only about one-third of U.S. adults under 30.
Race or ethnicity matters more to many Black Americans

The AP-NORC survey found that the vast majority of Black Americans — 73% — say their race or ethnicity is "extremely" or "very" important to how they see themselves, higher than the share that say that about being an American.

Vincent Harris, a 60-year-old in California, says his identity as a Black man rises above other attributes for him because of how Black men are treated in America.

"A lot of people are scared of Black men just because we are Black and we are male. And that's crazy," Harris said. "People don't even take you for who you are as a person; they just look at your race."

About half of Hispanic Americans say their race or ethnicity is highly important to them, compared with 22% of white Americans.

Black and Hispanic adults are also more likely than white adults to say their family's ancestry or country of origin is highly important to their personal identity.

Harris, who identifies as a gay man, says being an American is "a wonderful thing" because of the freedoms that Americans have, despite the obstacles he's had to overcome.

"It's great to be an American — regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or whatever. As long as you have that freedom of choice as an American, that's a great thing," Harris said. "Right now, I wouldn't live in any other country in the world. I'm here. I love it."
___

The AP-NORC poll of 2,596 adults was conducted April 16-20 using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.
====================================================

Poll: Majority of Americans believe country not adhering to founding ideals


An American flag is held at a rally as more flags wave in the background. Photo: ninjason1 / 

Therese Boudreaux
Updated Sun, June 28, 2026

86% of registered U.S. voters support America's founding principles, but only 31% believe they are being practiced well.

(The Center Square) – American voters overwhelmingly support their country's founding ideals – yet the majority also believe that the U.S. is failing to live up to them, according to new polling.

The Center Square's Voters' Voice Poll revealed that 86% of registered U.S. voters support America's founding principles, among which the poll listed "individual rights such as life, liberty, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, equal treatment under the law, and government by the consent of the people."

Only 31% of all voters, however, believed those principles are being practiced well, painting a gloomy picture of voters' moods as the U.S. approaches its 250th anniversary.

The poll was conducted by Noble Predictive Insights from June 1-4, 2026, surveying 2,585 registered U.S. voters. The sample was comprised of 915 Republicans, 1013 Democrats, and 297 True Independents, the latter of whom chose neither major party when asked about their political leanings. The poll's margin of error is +/- 1.93%.

"Voters are not rejecting the founding ideals, but many doubt the country's political system is healthy enough to live up to them," Mike Noble, founder and CEO of Noble Predictive Insights, told The Center Square. "All of them are pretty pessimistic on how well these founding principles are being practiced today."

The poll found significant support for American principles among all political groups, with 89% of Republicans, 85% of Democrats, and 79% of Independents on board.

Gender and geographic divides over the issue were virtually nonexistent, with 87% of males and 85% of females supportive of American ideals, while support across rural, suburban, and urban areas hovered equally around 86%.

Racially, white voters expressed 90% support, Hispanic or Latino voters 83%, Black voters 73%, and voters of other races 79%.

Support across generations never dipped below 70% and progressively increased with age, with nearly 95% of voters ages 65 and older supporting American ideals.

Favorable views of American values also progressively increased alongside education and annual income growth, with support for American values surpassing 90% among the most highly educated and wealthiest respondents.

The "big disconnect," Noble noted, is not over American principles in theory, but "whether they're being practiced well."

Nearly two-thirds of voters surveyed don't believe those ideals are being practiced well in the country today.

Not even the majority of Republican voters, whose party currently holds a government trifecta, believe the country is upholding its founding principles – 44% think so.

"I was actually a little surprised by it," Noble added. "Remember, Republicans are kind of in the driver's seat right now."

Democratic and Independent voters have less than half of Republicans' confidence – only about 20% of each group – while over 70% in each group believe the country is failing to live up to its principles.

Younger voters were also slightly more hopeful than older voters, with roughly 34% of Gen Z and Millennials believing the country practices its ideals, versus less than 30% of all voters over the age of 45.

While the gender gap reappeared – 36% of males remain positive, compared to 26% of females – the racial divide was almost nonexistent, with 31% of white, Hispanic, and Black voters respectively believing principles are being practiced well.

Higher household income and higher education levels translated to slightly higher beliefs that American principles are well-practiced. Urban voters were also more likely (37%) to hold that view than voters in rural (31%) or suburban (28%) areas.

Only 17% of voters who voted for 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris held a hopeful view, compared to 47% of those who voted for President Donald Trump.

Noble believes the principles versus practice disconnect is "a symptom of the hyper polarization that's happened" with nearly all political issues – many of which are directly tied to America's founding principles.

"If you were to take freedom of speech, for example, there's some questions on that, or equal treatment under the law, or government by consent to the people, or right to bear arms," Noble noted. "The parties both agree on those in principle, but then when you talk about details, like automatic weapons … are they really staying true to that, or are they getting down into these partisan trenches?"

Republicans and Democrats at the congressional level have frequently clashed over how to protect American ideals and accused the other party of violating them.

Republican lawmakers have accused the former Democrat-led administration of violating Americans' free speech rights by pressuring social media companies to censor politically incorrect speech during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have condemned what they describe as federal law enforcement's sometimes deadly responses to public protests against the current administration, arguing that the attempted federal crackdowns on allegedly violent protests suppressed protestors' free speech rights.

Similarly, both parties oppose unequal treatment, but disagree on what that looks like. Republican lawmakers, for example, believe DEI policies in federal workplaces violate the principle of equal treatment, while many Democrats believe such policies are equitable.

By contrast, many Republicans see no problem with federal law enforcement arresting illegal immigrants without judicial warrants, while Democratic lawmakers view the practice as contrary to the equal treatment principle.

"These two parties are going after each other, and they've kind of forgotten it's not about the two parties – what about the country and America's founding principles as a whole?" Noble said.

"I think it's just more of a symptom of getting too far into this partisan trench. What about these higher-level ideas? It's not just the red versus blue team – which is kind of what we're sitting at right now."

It Took the Fool-in-Chief to Unravel Decades of Judeo-Christian Love. "Monster" AIPAC Slayed?

I guess that AIPAC (America-Israel Political Action Committee) will give Trump and his MAGA morons a spanking at the November midterms because they deviated from AIPAC's instructions of warmongering ad infinitum with Iran.

For the first time in their history, Israelis feel seriously depressed. They've aways counted on the dumb Americans they've been brainwashing - to AIPAC's credit - for decades with biblical garbage that is a fusion between the Jewish Torah's goat manure with the Christian Old Testament's sheep dung. 

Stories and myths of persecution and redemption, of promised land, of frog rains, splitting oceans, virgin conception and birth, rising from the dead, of NRA's Charlton Heston as liberator Moses, of the barbaric colonization by Hebrew nomads of ancient Canaanite Palestine with ethnic cleansing and genocide just as their pretend-descendants are doing today to Arab Palestine, of Jewish actors serving as heroes of American Independence.... All of it a distortion of the deceptive Judeo-Christian "loving relationship" that is in fact two millennia of western antisemitism and Jew-hatred. All of it, thanks to AIPAC that buys and sells US representatives and senators and bends them into submission to the Zionist colonizers of Palestine and their subscription to the ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

It took an even dumber fool like Donald Trump to unravel all that crap. Since he came onto the political stage, American Jews and Israelis have adulated Trump as the savior of colonial Israel. Now, worried about money and gasoline prices, the white supremacist and of course cryptic antisemite Donald Dumb is falling out of love with the rabid criminals running the Zionist colony in Palestine. In reality, it doesn't matter why Donald Dumb is being the fool that he is. What matters is that he, as a Republican, has gone farther than any Democrat in screwing Israel. Let's see if AIPAC can repair this damage by buying Donald Dumb back into the warmth of Judeo-Christian love!

But I have a better idea for the Fool-in-Chief: Why doesn't he "rescue" the Fascist racist white supremacist Zionists by giving them - all 5 million of them - asylum and favored treatment in the US, just as he did with their alter egos, the Fascist neo-Nazi white supremacist Afrikaners of South Africa? Maybe he is just waiting for Israel's Zionists to become a minority victim in a liberated Palestine before he does that, because that is what happened after Nelson Mandela liberated South Africa from the white supremacist colonial juggernaut: The neo-Nazi Afrikaners became a minority and Donald Dumb has offered to rescue them from Black African persecution with express green cards to the US.

The two situations -Palestine and South Africa - are nearly identical. By giving asylum to the 3 million Israeli Jews (excluding the half a million Jews with black and brown skin from Ethiopia or Iran or North Africa because their skin color clashes with Trump's "beautiful white skin",  and minus the 2 million Palestinians who reluctantly were made "Israeli citizens"), he could win the Nobel Prize for radically solving the Palestine question, while significantly increasing the white Anglo-Saxon-Protestant-Jewish-love-fest population to the detriment of all the darkies from slavery times and immigrants from shithole countries. He could thus really save white America. 

What about Israelis' reaction to Trump's turnabout on Iran?

Some of the commentary below was obtained from an AI search:

After hailing him as a savior of Israel for allowing Israel to carry out its genocidal war on Gaza and for turning his gaze away from the Zionists' terrorism in the Palestinian territories, many Israelis feel betrayed and angry by President Donald Trump's peace deal with Iran. They see it as a capitulation that endangers their national security while saving his ass in the looming midterms and otherwise prioritizing American interests like reopening the Strait of Hormuz and reducing gasoline prices at the pump in the US. Israeli public sentiment describes the agreement as a "big mistake" that leaves Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs intact and releases frozen assets to Tehran without resolving the supposed Iranian nuclear threat to Israel as well as the threat from Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Political and public criticism focuses on the perception that Israel was sidelined in negotiations and forced into a fragile ceasefire it did not want.

Israeli-Zionist settlers and officials express shock that Trump, previously seen as Israel's strongest ally, signed a deal they believe empowers their "genocidal archenemies."

Critics also argue the deal fails to address Iran's nuclear capabilities or its support for proxies, with one citizen calling it the "worst agreement that could ever be done" for Israel's safety.

Despite the agreement that prohibits Israel from continuing its daily assaults on Lebanon, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has defied Trump and ordered his occupation forces not to withdraw from Lebanon and to continue to act independently and against US demands.

Blame by the radical ultra-religious terrorist right-wing Zionist leadership (the Jewish cognate of the Afghan Taliban, the Saudi Wahhabis, or the Iranian Ayatollahs) against Trump does not spare prime minister Ben-Yamin Netanyahu who, they say, misread Trump's idiocy and was derelict in milking America's dumbness to the last drop. Opponents accuse Netanyahu of misjudging Trump's appetite for war and failing to secure Israel's interests. 

While some pundits note that the U.S. naturally acts in its own interest regarding energy markets, Israeli politicians like Yair Golan describe Netanyahu as "weak, ill, isolated and lacking influence" for allowing a deal that allegedly makes Israel weaker. To add insult to injury, the US Vice-moron J.D. Vance has dismissed the Israeli reaction as a "freakout," urging Israel to face regional realities rather than blame Washington. I wonder what he meant by "regional realities" because at some point those "regional realities" will have to find a permanent solution to the Zionist rape of Palestine, otherwise the Muslims and Arabs who have walked against nature with the US, and who have been scared shitless by the US-Israeli-brandished Iranian scarecrow, may suddenly discover that the US will dump them just as easily as it dumped the Israelis.