Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Sunday, May 3, 2026

More Jewish terrorism Against Christians in Occupied Palestine and Lebanon

Netanyahu lies all the time by saying that the "Democracy-for-Jews-only" - a.k.a. the Zionist colony in Palestine - not only respects and welcomes all faiths, but it is the ONLY ONE in the entire region where Christians and Muslims are protected. My A$$. Netanyahu is like Trump - always believe the opposite of what he says and immediately translate every accusation into a confession. Zionist propaganda keeps lying to people around the world. It is by lying and pretending to be the victims of everyone else, i.e. turning the butcher into the sacrificial lamb, that Israel was created de novo out of Bronze Age fiction out of the rape of Palestine. As a colonial rapist, Israel is the only one in history to ever demand to be protected against its own raped victims.

Alarm over Jewish Zionits attacks on Christians in Lebanon and in Israel

Orthodox Archbishop of Jerusalem, Atallah Hanna, condemned the wanton attack by an Israeli Jew on a nun in Jerusalem and expresses concerns over the future of Christians in Holy Land. The head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Jerusalem has condemned a brutal attack on a nun in the city earlier in the week and warned of growing concerns over the future for Christians living in the Holy Land. 

Jewish man attacks Catholic nun in Jerusalem 

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA22aZs8.img?w=1114&h=479&m=4&q=100 

See the video on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KboMiVTt7A

Israeli soldier hacks a statue of Jesus in a south Lebanon church.



Archbishop Atallah Hanna said on Facebook that “the attack on a nun in the city of Jerusalem comes amid escalating violations against Christian institutions in the city”.

He added that “this reflects increasing concerns about the future of the historic Christian presence in the Holy Land”.

These incidents expose the fallacy of a democratic and liberal Israel and its constitutive violence against non-Jews that is built into the Jewish religion and its Zionist emanation. This is the identical clone of the built-in hatred of non-Muslims by Islamists. It is not because a Zionist terrorist's last name is a German Blumenthal or Tannenbaum that he or she is by definition more "civilized" than an Islamist Abdulrahman or Mohamed. 

I was once interviewed by a Saudi newspaper about the genome project. And primitive xenophobes as Arab Muslims are, particulary the Saudis, their minds are obsessed with insipid conspiracies about their Semitic Jewish brethren. I wouldn't call it antisemitism because Jews are one Arab tribe and all of them are Semites. I reserve antisemitism to Western Europeaqns their inbred American descendants. One question was: Is is true that the Zionists are preparing a genetic bomb that would kill Arabs but not Jews? My answer: Impossible. Israelites and Arabs are one people - Before he became a Jew, Abraham was a nomad Arab who walked out one day of Baghdad in Iraq. Arabic and Hebrew are very closely related languages, which means that Jews and Arabs were once genetically and racially one people, out of whom one tribe diverged to become the Jewish tribe that developed over time its own religion of Judaism, much of whose practices and beliefs remain alive and kicking in Islam today. As a religion, Islam is all but a clone of Judaism. They therefore share the same genetic code, and hard as Zionist scientists might try to make a "genetic bomb" that distinguishes Jew from Arab, that bomb is likely to harm both Semitic tribes equally. The Saudi journalist obviously did not like the answer.

In his post, which was accompanied by a video, the Christian Archbishop of Jerusalem warned that such attacks against Christians in Israel “are no longer isolated incidents, but part of a recurring pattern that threatens the Christian presence,” calling for international action to stop them.

On Thursday, Israeli police released a video showing the attack by a Jewish man on a French nun in Jerusalem on Tuesday.

Video footage showed the man first passing by the nun walking in the opposite direction. Then suddenly, he turns his head back, walks back toward the nun, follows her briefly before forcibly pushing her to the ground, causing a severe injury to her head. He then again, walks away, then returns to kick her repeatedly as she lay on the ground, while Jewish bystanders look on with indifference. According to The Times of Israel, police said they had arrested a Jewish man suspected of assaulting the nun in Jerusalem. He probably will be confined for a few days until the outrage subsides. Never has an Israeli Zionist Jew been prosecuted and imprisoned for causing bodily harm, burning and looting, raping and demolishing or otherwise hurting non-Jewish "goyim". Zionism is indeed racism disguised as a civilizational force, just all western colonial enterprises pretended to be: A White man's burden to civilize the savages.

“The suspect, a 36-year-old male, was identified and subsequently arrested by police,” the police said in a statement on Wednesday, adding it viewed with “utmost severity” any violent act “driven by potentially racist motives and directed toward members of the clergy”. Nice, but I would like to see the report of the incident, the detailed prosecution of the racist Jew, and the extent of his sentence by the "unbiased" and systematic Israeli Injustice system.

Father Olivier Poquillon, director of Jerusalem’s French School of Biblical and Archaeological Research, told the AFP news agency the 48-year-old French nun is a researcher at the institution and did not wish to speak publicly.

Rising attacks on Christians

Attacks on Christian communities in occupied East Jerusalem and Israel have risen in recent years, according to the Rossing Center for Education and Dialogue, which tracks such incidents. Similar incidents have been documented in occupied southern Lebanon where the Zionist militia is not only destroying Muslim villages, it is also ransacking the churches of the few Christian villages in the area and demolishing Christian symbols and statues of the Virgin Mary and the Christ. Meanwhile, Netanyahu keeps parroting that Israel and the Zionists are a western outpost defending western values in the otherwise "barbaric" Middle East. Gee, Thanks!

Churches in Jerusalem have repeatedly called on Israeli authorities to act decisively to put a stop to them. On Tuesday, Israel’s Foreign Ministry called the incident a “shameful act” in a statement on X. “In a city sacred to Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike, we remain committed to protecting all communities and ensuring those responsible for violence are held accountable,” the ministry added in typical conceited and hypocritical propaganda.

Last month, a viral photograph showing an Israeli soldier smashing a statue of Jesus Christ in southern Lebanon with a sledgehammer caused outrage. The military said an investigation had been opened and that “appropriate measures will be taken against those involved in accordance with the findings”.

Israel later said the soldier had been jailed for 30 days, along with another soldier who had been filming him. Six other soldiers have been summoned for questioning. Zionists in America will probably be demanding his immediate release because theyn will claim - as they usually do - that the photo is an AI production, or that it actually shows a Hezbollah terrorist disguised as an Israeli soldier to falsely impugn the Zionist militia. 

When an Israeli sniper who shot and killed the American journalist Shireen Abu-Akleh by deliberately aiming at the only exposed part of her body - her neck - in Jenin a couple of years ago, the Zionist propaganda first said it was a Palestinian who did it specifically to blame the Israeli criminal militiaman. Then it said it was a mistake and that he did not mean to kill her. Finally, after months, the Zionist government still could not admit that the soldier deliberately murdered Shireen, and he was never prosecuted for a war crime and murder. Why would it be different in these recent incidents?

Who Pushed the World's Village Idiot, the Great Moron, to War?

The nefarious choke that Zionists have on the US is terrifying. But when Donald Dumb, the Great American Moron and the World's Village Idiot, was made president, the horror turned into a free-for-all drive-through orgy of violence and theft for his Zionist handlers. He's like a silly puppy and silly putty in their hands. They feed the ignorant and illiterate moron whatever crap he likes to hear and he does whatever the hell they want, including squandering America's blood and treasure on their pointless behalf.

Read the below and decide for yourself whether or not the US is under the undue influence of the Zionist lobby. 

===============================================


Tucker Carlson Claims Billionaires Rupert Murdoch, Miriam Adelson Pushed Trump Into War With Iran
Mary Whitfill Roeloffs, Forbes Staff
Updated Sat, May 2, 2026

Topline

Tucker Carlson, former Fox News reporter turned conservative podcast host, said he believes "constant calls" from "donors and people with influence," including billionaires and longstanding supporters of Israel Rupert Murdoch and Miriam Adelson, pushed President Donald Trump into the ongoing war with Iran despite a relative lack of support for the conflict within his own administration.



U.S. President Donald Trump presents Miriam Adelson with the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Friday, Nov. 16, 2018.NurPhoto via Getty Images
Key Facts

Carlson, in an interview published Saturday by the New York Times, said his "strong impression" is that no one within the White House was pushing for the U.S. to go to war.

Carlson, who publicly broke with the president over the Iran conflict, said he had several private meetings and phone conversations with Trump in which he says the president "never seemed enthusiastic about” war with Iran and, in the week before the U.S. started to attack the country, “felt he had no choice and that he was resigned to it.”

The podcaster, who heavily campaigned for Trump, said he thinks outside influences including the billionaires, as well as radio personalities Mark Levin and Fox News host Sean Hannity, were "pushing the president to do this and telling him that you will be a figure out of history, you will save and redeem Israel or something."

Carlson said he “didn’t hear of anybody making the case that this would be good for the United States,” but that those pushing for the conflict were doing so in Israel’s best interest.

Both Murdoch and Adelson, longstanding advocates for Israel, attended Trump’s inauguration and Adelson donated $111 million to pro-Trump super PACs during the 2024 Presidential campaign, making her the campaign’s second-largest supporter.

Hannity and Levin denied Carlson’s allegations to the New York Times, while Murdoch and Adelson did not respond to the Times’ request for comment (Forbes has also reached out).

Key Background

Trump has been supportive of Israel in his second term, defending the country against allegations of genocide and backing Israel while helping to broker a ceasefire deal between the country and Hamas. Trump co-chaired the 2025 Gaza peace summit—which said it aimed to "end the war in the Gaza strip" and "enhance efforts to achieve peace and stability in the Middle East"—and Trump was given Israel’s highest civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Honor. In late February, the U.S. joined Israel in launching airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. Since then, Trump has been intermittently using military force, including strikes and a naval blockade, to weaken Iran and pressure it into abandoning its nuclear program. Trump has faced a wave of criticism, including from former MAGA supporters, for the war from those who claim it’s a violation of international law; that the president doesn't have the authority to go to war without Congressional approval; that it's damaging the American economy; and that it’s a direct violation of the “America First” message Trump pushed during his campaign.

Tangent

In October, during an address to Israel's parliament, Trump praised Adelson as a "great woman" and said she and her late husband influenced his policy decisions surrounding Israel, adding the couple “had more trips to the White House than anyone else I can think of.” In his speech, Trump said Miriam and Sheldon Adelson, who died in 2021, got him “thinking about Golan Heights,” a reference to the United States’ 2019 recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights territory near Syria. Trump spoke about Adelson, who was in attendance during his address, for nearly two minutes about an hour into his lengthy speech, following his claim he “kept his promise” to work on peace in the Middle East: “Isn’t that right, Miriam?” he asked.

Contra

Trump last month rejected reports that Israel influenced him to go to war with Iran after the New York Times reported the Israelis made a video presentation to convince him Iran was well-positioned for regime change and would be so weakened by a joint attack it would be left with no missile program. Other reports also suggested Israel played a prominent role in convincing Trump to attack Iran, to which Trump responded via Truth Social: “Israel never talked me into the war with Iran, the results of Oct. 7th, added to my lifelong opinion that IRAN CAN NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON, did."
 

Forbes Valuation

Miriam Adelson and her family had a net worth of $36.4 billion Saturday, ranking them at No. 57 on Forbes' billionaires list. Miriam Adelson’s late husband Sheldon was the former CEO and chairman of casino company Las Vegas Sands, which is listed on the New York Sock Exchange and has casinos in Singapore and Macao. The Adelsons have also given hundred of millions of dollars to pro-Israel organizations and initiatives over the last several decades, including to the Birthright Israel program, Friends of the Israel Defense Forces and the Maccabee Task Force. Murdoch and his family, who made their money through his media empire, are worth an estimated $23.4 billion. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described Murdoch as a close personal friend and political ally, and in 2009 he was honored by the American Jewish Committee.



The Orangutan and his howling bobobo buddy


This article was originally published on Forbes.com


Trump's JCPOA Exit Enabled Iran to Amass More Enriched Uranium

 
Iran Sure Has Amassed a Lot of Enriched Uranium Since Trump Pulled Out of Nuclear Deal
Nikki McCann Ramirez
Fri, May 1, 2026


[Iznogood's caption: Flat-headed moron elected to the presidency by a herd of middle American buffalo morons]

Congress grilled Pete Hegseth this week over the lack of progress ending the war in Iran — and things got ugly.

The defense secretary was repeatedly pressed about the Trump administration’s ever-changing, contradictory rationale for their decision to initiate the now-months-long conflict, particularly the claim that the Middle Eastern nation was on the verge of producing a nuclear weapon.

“Do you know how much enriched uranium was [created] after you ripped up the JCPOA?” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) asked Hegseth, referring to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the nuclear deal the Obama administration struck with Iran that restricted the nation’s nuclear development capabilities.

Hegseth claimed the information is classified, but according to a new report from the The New York Times, there are fairly good estimates about how much enriched uranium Iran began producing after Trump pulled out of the nuclear deal during his first administration. Now, nearly a decade after pulling out of a negotiated agreement, Trump is once again facing the long tail of his own recklessness.

According to the Times, in the eight years since Trump scuttled the JCPOA, Iran has accumulated 11 tons of enriched uranium — up from the 660-pound limit imposed by the previous deal. In 2018, when the president pulled out of the deal, Iran did not have enough materials to produce even one bomb. Now, it has not only increased the amount of enriched uranium in its stockpiles exponentially, but the grade of enrichment has also skyrocketed to levels just short of the necessary grade to create a nuclear weapon.

Still, the Trump administration’s claims that the current conflict was necessary because Iran posed an imminent nuclear debt remain dubious. There is no evidence that the Iranians have developed a nuclear weapon. The argument that Iran was weeks away from having a nuclear weapon when the U.S. and Israel attacked in February have been contradicted repeatedly by the Trump administration, which has said the nation’s nuclear capabilities were “obliterated” during a series of targeted strikes last year. Hegseth repeated this to lawmakers this week, adding that Iran’s “ambitions” to develop a nuclear weapon remain.

The primary problem is not just that Iran has this stockpile of uranium, but that amid the conflict with the U.S. and Israel, they may have moved it to new locations unknown to the U.S. and international monitors.

On Friday morning, during a routine Pentagon briefing, Hegseth lashed out at his former Fox News colleague Jennifer Griffin — a veteran Pentagon reporter and chief national security correspondent at the network — when she asked if the Pentagon had “certainty” that “none of that highly enriched uranium was moved,” from the Iranian nuclear facilities that were attacked last year.

Hegseth deflected, instead attacking Griffin. “Jennifer, you’ve been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally,” the secretary said.

It’s how the Department of Defense and the Trump administration have handled virtually all questions about the war. They are right, everyone else is wrong, victory is in hand, and yet the war must continue.

Ultimate Proof of US Electorate Abysmal Voting Patterns

We knew it and you knew it: Trump is a lying crook and a criminal. All you had to do was to not listen to the media of either side. All you had to do was to look at the man and his past and present behavior and decide based on your own criteria whether he can be trusted with the presidency. 

But in general you are an acerebral voting block, which is why you earn the much-deserved "dumb" qualifier: You don't think for yourselves. You listen to the two sides and instead of measuring their words according to your own moral compass, you fall for the one that bullshits you with promises that appeal only to your base instincts: hatred, xenophobia, racism, cruelty, vulgar attacks against opponents, demonizing all others, undermining the rule of law, displaying testosteronic grand-standing like a silverback mountain gorilla, etc. rather than to your higher principles of justice, fairness, fair play, compassion, rule of law, etc. You fell for the criminal TWICE. No one would have guessed that you can be that dumb. Friend and foe alike around the world cannot believe how dumb you were to elect such a moron. They ask me to explain, and the only explanation I have is that people get rulers they deserve: Dumb voters elect dumb rulers. It's that simple.

So now that he displays exactly what you voted for - hatred, xenophobia, racism, cruelty, vulgar attacks against opponents, demonizing all others... - BUT with an economy on the verge of collapse and a decline in your standard of living, etc. you go crying on spilled milk. 

How can the likes of Megyn Kelly, Ftucker Carlson, and others have the gall NOW to suddenly pretend to have just discovered how bad and dangerous Donald Dumb can be? All the MAGA morons in the media (e.g. Fucks News) and in Congress should be walking down Pennsylvania Avenue flogging themselves in repentance for the sins they have perpetrated against the country by protecting the dangerous hybrid of vicious criminal-cum-incompetent moron from prosecution and impeachment, then electing him again and again. It's almost like you too are dangerous hybrids of incompetent stupidity and criminal intent.

As you see the apocalypse unfurling on you in November, you suddenly discover Jesus and start praying for forgiveness and redemption. I certainly hope that the smart half of the country won't forgive you for what you, the dumb half, did. Next time you vote, don't listen to promises of lower egg prices and a wealthier country (sinking now under a Trump-induced $40 trillion national debt in which taxpayers money is squandered on giant narcissistic projects in praise of the dick-tator). Judge the candidates based on their humility, integrity and character. History shows us that no candidate ever delivers on much of the promises they make during their campaigns, and that is because we know they have to work with others and make compromises. So why do you still believe easy-to-make stupid promises? Again, don't listen to the promises; judge the candidates based on their history, their steadiness on principles, their integrity and character. You voted for the a-hole twice. Don't do it again unless you are some sad masochists.

========================================================


Megyn Kelly Says Americans 'Gave Trump A Year And A Half,' As New Poll Shows Democrats Lead On The Economy For The First Time In 16 Years
Adrian Volenik
Sat, May 2, 2026


Megyn Kelly Says Americans 'Gave Trump A Year And A Half,' As New Poll Shows Democrats Lead On The Economy For The First Time In 16 Years

Megyn Kelly reflected on recent polls that show voters have run out of patience. “They feel like they gave Trump a year and a half,” she said on her recent podcast. “He’s done nothing other than make things worse.”

A recent Fox News poll showed that 52% of registered voters think Democrats would handle the economy better, while 48% say Republicans. It's the first time since 2010 that Democrats are ahead on this issue, after years where Republicans had the advantage.


Economic Frustration Is Driving The Shift

The frustration appears to center heavily on cost-of-living concerns. In the Fox News survey, 26% of respondents said inflation, prices and affordability were the most important issues facing the country, while another 17% pointed to the economy and jobs.

President Donald Trump's approval ratings on these issues remain weak. Only 34% of respondents approve of his handling of the economy, while 66% disapprove. His handling of the conflict with Iran is also underwater, with only 37% approval.

Kelly emphasized that independent voters, often decisive in elections, are turning sharply against Trump. “You got 80% of the independents against you,” she said. “You’re effed. You need to adjust something ASAP.”


War And Economic Concerns Collide

Kelly argued that the economic pain is being compounded by foreign policy decisions. “We launched a war of choice that was not necessary and their gas prices went up,” she said, warning that global supply disruptions could worsen conditions.

The economic fallout may not be immediate but is likely unavoidable, Kelly added. “The delay in pain is just that, a delay,” she said. “It will come our way because the world economy is connected.”

Despite Republicans maintaining advantages on issues like border security, crime and immigration, the economy remains the dominant concern for voters. That imbalance is starting to show up in broader electoral projections.

Still, Kelly said that Democrats aren’t without their own vulnerabilities, adding that “Democrats in Congress are actually more underwater with a net negative rating of minus 23% than their Republican counterparts” and warned of low approval ratings and internal concerns about being out of touch with voters.

Saturday, May 2, 2026

Guess Who's Appointing Goons Whose Policies Would Benefit Him Financially

When Kevin Warsh takes over at the helm of the Federal Reserve, he will lower interest rates because Trump wants him to. Trump has been harassing Jerome Powell to lower interest rates, but Powell wouldn't have it. Now why would Trump want lower interest rates? Because when interest rates go down, bonds go up. So Trump and Warsh help one another: I appoint you in exchange for you lowering interest rates. Warsh is saying he does not have a deal with Trump. But would you believe another sold-out Trump goon?

Just before Warsh takes over, Trump has been buying bonds. When Warsh lowers interest rates, Trump makes a fortune. 

The second article says that if Warsh lowers interest rates in this unusual environment, lower interest rates, while raising bond prices would crash the stock market. So not only are Trump and Warsh making a profit out of Warsh's appointment, they are gambling with a stock market crash.

=============================================== 

 

Trump has quietly bought up to $337 million in bonds — and his Fed pick Kevin Warsh could send their value soaring
Vawn Himmelsbach
Fri, May 1, 2026


Nathan Howard/Getty Images, Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Unlike in his first term, President Trump has been quietly buying corporate and municipal bonds since he returned to the White House in 2025.

In March alone, Trump reportedly carried out 175 financial transactions, most of which were bonds issued by states, counties, school districts and public agencies, according to disclosures required by the Office of Government Ethics.

It's estimated that the total value of bond purchases in his portfolio is around $337 million — many of which are in sectors that could benefit from his policy decisions.

Trump also acquired Intel bonds after directing the federal government to acquire a 10% stake in the chipmaker, Reuters reports. And he purchased up to $2 million in Netflix and Warner Bros. Discovery bonds shortly after the announcement of an $83 billion merger.

These purchases, while not illegal, have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, though the White House has stated that these investments are managed by independent third-party financial institutions.

With Trump showing such a strong interest in bonds, should you, too?

A Federal Reserve regime change

Trump's pick for Federal Reserve chair, financier Kevin Warsh, is expected to take over from current chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends on May 15. And while Warsh was handpicked by Trump, Warsh said he didn't make any promises to get the job.

"The president never once asked me to commit to any particular interest rate decision, period," Warsh said when being questioned by the Senate Banking Committee. "Nor would I ever agree to do so if he had."

Since the start of his second term, Trump has berated Powell for not cutting interest rates more quickly. Doing so could help to boost economic activity, but it could also fuel inflation.


Warsh is considered hawkish, meaning he's in support of stricter monetary controls. But he's also become more open to cutting rates under specific conditions — like an AI boom that increases productivity.

As a long-time critic of the Fed's large balance sheet, Warsh has said he wants "regime change," which would include changing the way the central bank measures inflation — though he'd need internal support to do so.
Warsh, however, will likely be under intense pressure from Trump to cut interest rates despite the crisis in Iran that's slowing growth and fueling inflation.

"Fed Chair nominee Warsh will probably be hamstrung delivering Trump the rate cuts the president wants because oil prices and inflation will remain higher than hoped for a long time," Rob Morgan, senior vice president and market strategist with Mosaic, told CNBC.

The Fed held interest rates steady in its latest policy decision, maintaining the target range for the federal funds rate at 3.5% to 3.75% .
 

How this could impact the bond market

Higher inflation could lead to a Fed rate increase, which aims to slow consumer spending in an effort to combat inflation. This increases the cost of borrowing, raising the rate on mortgages, auto loans and even credit card APRs.

While the rate has been coming down since pandemic-era highs, the crisis in Iran has added uncertainty into the mix. Skyrocketing fuel prices and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz create upward pressure on inflation, which then puts pressure on central banks like the Fed to keep rates elevated.

Interest rates also directly impact the bond market

When you buy government bonds and hold them to maturity, you receive a regular stream of interest income (often referred to as a coupon). But returns tend to be lower than other types of investments because you're taking on a lower level of risk compared to corporate bonds or stocks.

Bonds have an inverse relationship with interest rates, meaning they move in opposite directions. In other words, lower rates cause bond prices to rise, making existing bonds more valuable. So when rates fall, bondholders — including Trump — see capital gains. However, in this type of environment, new bonds are issued with lower coupon rates, so new investments may be less lucrative.

If the Fed were to keep lowering rates, it could potentially be a good time to lock in higher, longer-term coupon rates, but it's not certain that will happen with the ongoing crisis in Iran. And, considering the uncertainty around a potential Federal Reserve "regime change," investors are currently in a bit of a holding pattern.

Despite this uncertainty — and despite the fact that stocks typically offer higher long-term returns than bonds — there are other reasons to include bonds in your portfolio. For example, they provide regular income, liquidity, diversification and tax efficiency.

Bonds can also serve as a hedge against a potential stock market correction, but if inflation remains sticky or ticks upward, it could hinder bond price appreciation.

Some may perceive this uncertainty as a risk, while others could see it as an opportunity. To make sure your portfolio is meeting your needs, it could be worth sitting down with your financial advisor to discuss your options.

==================================================

Motley Fool

The Likelihood of a Stock Market Crash Under President Donald Trump Is Rapidly Rising -- and There's One Undeniable Catalyst to Blame

Sean Williams, 
The Motley Fool

In case you missed it, Wall Street history was made a little over one week ago. The benchmark S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) and growth-stock-dominated Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) both soared to record-closing highs on April 24, with the ageless Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI) one good day away from joining its peers.

Wall Street's major stock indexes hitting new highs and delivering outsize returns is nothing new under President Donald Trump. During his first term, the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite gained 57%, 70%, and 142%, respectively. Although the Dow or S&P 500 has finished higher in 26 of the previous 33 presidential terms, annualized returns for these indexes have been higher under Trump than under most other presidents.

While several factors are fueling this rally (not all of which have Trump's fingerprints on them), one undeniable catalyst is threatening to ruin the party. One decision made by President Trump has shifted the puzzle pieces enough to put the possibility of a stock market crash squarely on the table.

Stocks have outperformed with Trump in the White House for five years (and counting)

But before digging into the spark that could light this match, it's imperative to understand why stocks have outperformed with Donald Trump in the White House.

The first thing to note is that not every upside catalyst is related to President Trump or policies his administration has enacted. Arguably, the premier growth driver for Wall Street is the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), which has been ongoing for years.

Empowering software and systems with the tools to make split-second, autonomous decisions is a potential game changer for most sectors and industries. AI can revolutionize supply chains, production lines, and innovation, and represents an addressable opportunity of more than $15 trillion by 2030, according to PwC analysts.

Additionally, corporate earnings growth has consistently outpaced analysts' expectations. To be fair, the bar tends to be set low, enabling public companies to easily step over consensus profit forecasts. Nevertheless, having most S&P 500 companies exceed expectations is a recipe for stock market gains.

However, President Trump has played a role in fueling the Dow's, S&P 500's, and Nasdaq Composite's rise. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), signed into law in December 2017, permanently lowered the peak marginal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%.

The lowest peak corporate income tax rate since 1939 has allowed businesses to retain more of their earnings. While some companies have used this extra capital to hire, acquire, and reinvest in innovation, the most notable impact of the TCJA has been a significant uptick in share buybacks by S&P 500 companies. Research from The Motley Fool indicates that share repurchases reached an estimated all-time high of more than $1 trillion in 2025.

While upside catalysts do exist, a decision made by President Trump threatens to wipe out these gains.

Image source: Getty Images.

The ingredients for a stock market crash under Trump are firmly in place

Although Trump has overseen double-digit annualized stock returns during his time in the Oval Office, he's also presided over two crash events: the five-week COVID-19 crash in February-March 2020, and the "tariff tantrum" during the first week of April 2025. Short-lived elevator-down declines have become somewhat commonplace under Trump -- and the next one may be brewing.

A little over two months ago, on Feb. 28, Trump gave the order for the U.S. military, along with Israel, to commence attacks against Iran. Shortly after this conflict began, Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz to commercial vessels, disrupting the flow of 20 million barrels of liquid petroleum per day (roughly 20% of global demand).

Though there have been advances in ending the Iran war, including a two-week ceasefire that's been extended indefinitely by President Trump, as of this writing on April 25, the damage of the president's decision to attack Iran has already been done.

While wars are known to heighten uncertainty and can lead to the incalculable loss of life, their effects are felt far from the battlefield.
The inflationary impact of the Iran war is the catalyst that can upend Trump's bull market.
US Inflation Rate data by YCharts.

Before the Iran war began, trailing 12-month (TTM) U.S. inflation was inching ever closer to the Federal Reserve's long-term target of 2%. In February, TTM inflation clocked in at 2.4% -- a level consistent with a healthy economy.

But thanks to the largest energy supply disruption in modern history, crude oil prices and energy expenses are soaring. In March, TTM inflation jumped 90 basis points to 3.3%. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland's Inflation Nowcasting tool, inflation is estimated to rise by another 26 basis points to 3.56% in April. Even if the Iran war ends soon, the inflationary effects of energy supply disruption should persist for several quarters.

Typically, a 116-basis-point, two-month increase in inflation wouldn't be a death knell for the stock market. But the stock market doesn't often enter a year at its second-priciest valuation over 155 years, based on the S&P 500's Shiller Price-to-Earnings Ratio.

Wall Street and investors have been looking for nothing short of multiple interest rate cuts in 2026. These rate cuts were expected to support an expensive stock market by fueling aggressive investments in AI data centers.

With Trump's decision leading to a meaningful increase in inflation, rate cuts are effectively off the table. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's Market Probability Tracker, there's a higher probability of an interest rate hike by June 17 than a rate cut, as of April 23.

President Trump's actions have put the ball firmly in the Federal Reserve's court. If America's foremost financial institution alters its language about inflation/rate hikes, or moves to raise the federal funds target rate, a stock market crash may be the logical response on Wall Street.

================================================

48% of retirees can't sustain their lifestyle, and Kevin Warsh's expected Fed rate cut could make it worse

Mike Crisolago
Fri, May 1, 2026

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Kevin Warsh came one step closer to becoming the next chair of the Federal Reserve on Wednesday after the Republican-majority Senate Banking Committee rubber-stamped his nomination, which was put forward by President Trump.

The former Fed governor, presidential economic advisor and Morgan Stanley executive has signalled his desire for "regime change" should he take over as Fed chair (1) — namely, managing inflation and employment while shrinking the Fed's balance sheet along with its "footprint in financial markets (2)."

Many also expect that he could move to cut interest rates (the first Fed rate cut since December) if he takes over when current chair Jerome Powell's term ends on May 15.

That latter expectation has raised concerns, however, given that Warsh appears to be a hawk who turned into a dove, once advocating for higher interest rates but now championing lower ones in a policy shift that more aligns with the wishes of the same president who attacked Powell multiple times for not lowering rates.

Though he insists that he'll be "an independent actor if confirmed," Warsh's shift on interest rates and his refusal to acknowledge that Trump lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden earned him the moniker of Trump "sock puppet" from Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren (3).

And while a Fed shake-up concerns all Americans, one cohort in particular could see their financial fortunes shift dramatically: retirees.
How Fed changes could impact retirees

While Federal Reserve interest rate cuts can help lower borrowing costs, stimulate business activity and placate a president desperate to boost his poll numbers, retirees counting on income from investments aren't as bullish.

In January, 64% of retirees surveyed by Clever Real Estate said that the U.S. "faces a retirement crisis," with 48% reporting that they can't "financially sustain their current quality of life for the rest of their lives." Almost a quarter of retirees said that they can't sustain it for another year (4).

In a separate survey by retirement expert John Stevenson, 58% of retirees polled said "lower interest rates are detrimental to people who have saved responsibly" while 45% "fear inflation will outpace their income if rates fall and yields decline (5)."

An interest rate cut paired with the current 3.26% inflation (6) and the skyrocketing costs of energy and gasoline — as well as food, medical expenses and housing that remain up year-over-year (7) — would likely erode purchasing power for many retirees, worsen the affordability crisis and, broadly, prove concerns about stagflation correct.

Still, J. Sebastián Leguizamón, the director of Western Kentucky University's Center of Applied Economics, told AARP that the effects of a rate cut on retirees is "mixed and very portfolio-specific" and that "it's better to think in terms of trade-offs that depend on debt levels and how a retiree's assets are allocated (8)."

For example, they note that while those with money in CDs, savings or money-market funds will more likely see declining yields with a rate cut, those paying down mortgages, lines of credit or loans — or with a stock-heavy portfolio — could get a boost.

The question of Warsh and his ability to maintain Fed independence also looms large for retirees, especially those with little savings. History shows that world leaders meddling in the independence of their nation's central bank often results in soaring inflation and even currency collapse (9). In the U.S., for example, after Trump attacked Powell publicly last April, the value of the U.S. dollar, S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq all dropped (10).

How retirees can help protect their pocketbooks and portfolios


For retirees worried about the uncertainty ahead, it's a good idea to consider adjusting your personal budget to increase savings while also taking advantage of as many income streams as possible. A rate cut could also provide an opportunity to refinance or consolidate higher-interest debts (11).

Other recommendations include securing higher interest rates for some investments before any potential rate cut (12), and even considering a laddered portfolio of bonds that can weather future headwinds (13). High-yield bonds, in particular, can specifically protect against lowered interest rates and generate better returns, albeit with more risk attached (14).

The Kentucky-based Dupree Financial Group specifically suggests that retirees concentrate on "common sense investments in recognizable companies" and "dividend-focused strategies," including "favoring income-producing assets over growth speculation (15)."

And, of course, keeping an emergency fund in cash or liquid assets is always advised as a pivotal line of defense in tough financial times.

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

Forbes (1),(13); The New York Times (2); The Washington Post (3); Clever Real Estate (4); John Stevenson (5); U.S. Joint Economic Committee (6); U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (7); AARP (8); Capital Group (9); BBC (10); Equifax (11),(14); Gainbridge (12); Dupree Financial Group (15)

This article originally appeared on Moneywise.com under the title: 48% of retirees can't sustain their lifestyle — and Kevin Warsh's expected Fed rate cut could make it worse

Two Months at Most to Avoid Trump-made Global Recession

Here's yet another reason Trump is desperately trying to end a failing war he began in his capacity as Netanyahu's useful village idiot: Skyrocketing national debt. Yes, midterms are looming. MAGA resentment against Trump's lies growing. Epstein Files scandal still haunts the pedophile friend. Economy in shambles. Oil prices through the roof. Unbridled national debt. Pain at the pump and in the grocery store. Inflation stubbornly rising...All the cost-cutting the Great Moron and his DOGE criminals did by pruning the country of its hard-working civil servants amounted to pathetic savings compared to the hundreds of billions he is squandering on quixotic windmills of testosteronic wars.

Everything he deceptively told his MAGA herd of morons was to blame on - and continues to blame - Democrats for has been a lie at worst, or an abysmal failure at best. The only thing that may stand out as a "success" is all the xenophobia-, racism-, and white-Christian-supremacy-driven policies. "Fighting Illegal Immigration" for Trump's racist white fascists was never more than code word for let's have an orgy of hate and cruelty against anyone who is not an immigrant of White Aryan Anglo-Saxon Evangelical stock, despite the fact that both legal and illegal immigrants are the biggest drivers of the US economy: all the way from picking strawberries to establishing high-end technology startup companies. 

But racism often blinds itself to the complex realities of this world, which it reduces to hurtful but useless slogans while it thrives inside ignorant backward environments of no education, illiteracy, drunkenness and violence. 

==================================================
 

The global economy has a month—eight weeks at most—to avoid a recession, warns top economist
Eleanor Pringle
Updated Thu, April 30, 2026


Mohamed El-Erian during a Bloomberg Television interview in London on Sept. 25, 2023.(Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg - Getty Images)

The countdown is on: The global economy has four weeks, eight at most, if it is to avoid plunging into a recession.

That’s the warning from Mohamed El-Erian, the former CEO of Pimco, who served as chair of President Obama’s Global Development Council. This week, El-Erian said the globe will “avoid a recession, provided—and here’s the important thing—provided the straits are reopened in the next four to eight weeks. If they’re not reopened in the next four to eight weeks, it will look very different.”

El-Erian’s focus on the strait is the same as the rest of the world’s: wondering when the global oil supply will return to normal, easing prices as a result. But El-Erian is one of the few who has stepped further, by placing a time frame on when the discomfort may dip into a full economic contraction.

On the question of when the strait might reopen, there’s little evidence of a swift resolution. It’s worth remembering that when the conflict between Iran, the U.S., and Israel broke out, Wall Street was widely of the opinion that it would be resolved in a matter of weeks. Instead, the standoff has rumbled into a third month, with Iran (which borders the Strait of Hormuz) threatening ships that pass through the waterway, suffocating oil supply out of the vital Middle East region.

“Investors are pricing in a more protracted conflict,” observed Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid this morning, referencing that longer-dated futures have moved up to their highest levels of the conflict so far.

Consumers are feeling the sharp end of the conflict, El-Erian said, particularly in Europe and Asia. As well as strategic stockpiling of oil reserves, consumers are also beginning to panic buy: In Japan, for example, shoppers have returned to the COVID-era habit of toilet paper hoarding.

“If the war goes on, [the U.K.] will become and Europe will become as vulnerable as Asia is right now,” El-Erian said to LBC. “If you go to Asia right now, they’re not just worried about the price of fertilizers, the price of energy. They’re worried about physical availability. They’re worried about running out. There was a warning last week that Europe only has six weeks of aviation fuel left in terms of storage decisions.

“The irony in all this is that the U.S., which started the war, does better in relative terms than anybody else because of its energy supplies. It’s totally energy independent, and it has a very agile economy.”


The U.S. isn’t invincible

Whether a recession in Europe and Asia would be enough to tip the U.S. into a similar contraction is a hypothetical question, but economists on home turf are already concerned about the fundamentals for American growth.

Even though the U.S. is relatively shielded from oil inflation (it became a net energy exporter in 2019), last year it still imported 17% of its domestic energy supply, per the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That comes on top of an already diverging picture on the domestic consumer: the emergence of a “K” shaped economy where the gap between those on the higher and lower end of the income spectrum is growing.

Moody’s chief economist, Mark Zandi, has been warning about the effects of such a split. In a note this week, he wrote that U.S. growth is “fragile,” explaining: “Growth, yes, but less than the economy’s potential growth rate, and not sufficient to support any meaningful job growth. Unemployment is still low, but it is steadily drifting higher, and the labor force participation rate is falling. Of course, this is not sustainable.”

The outlook at the start of the year had looked rosier, he added, courtesy of stimulus from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and bets on Fed rate cuts to stimulate economic activity. The latter is looking all the more unlikely.

Stimulus from the OBBBA is also likely to be canceled out because of the Middle East conflict. Research from Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley both found that the Iran war’s knock-on effect on oil prices has almost entirely canceled out the biggest consumer tax windfall in years, and for lower-income Americans, the ledger may be in the red.

“Even if the Iran war winds down and oil prices recede quickly, the fallout will ensure there is no GDP pickup or job growth this year. Unemployment will rise further, and already considerable recession risks will worsen,” Zandi added.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

====================================================

And the Great Moron wants to double the US Military Budget to $1.6 trillion 

==================================================== 

 

US national debt is now bigger than the economy for first time since World War II




Friday, May 1, 2026

Tiny Lebanon Squeezed Tight by Trump-Netanyahu

By far, the largest majority of Lebanon's complex social structure wants Hezbollah gone or dead. No one is really complaining about Israel's savagery, even though the Lebanese put Israel and Hezbollah on an equal footing as the most detested ultra-religious, supremacist and violent behemoths. In fact, the Lebanese are celebrating - mostly in silence so as not to be accused of inciting violence - the fact that their sworn enemies, Iran and Israel, are at each other's throats. When confronted with the scenario of two ugly bullies, for whom they don't care much, fighting it out, the Lebanese repeat the saying, "خلّÙŠ الخرى يخبّØ· بعضو" - literally, let the shit beat the shit.

Fine, and one has to understand that they do not enjoy the never-ending violence unfolding, again and again, on their soil. But after some 60 years (since the late 1960s) of every ethnic and religious barbarian experimenting their warfare on Lebanese soil, for equally barbaric ideologies spawned during the Stone and Bronze Ages, including things like God's Chosen Ones, or God's Ultimate Message, or the arrival/return of the Messiah (Jewish, Christian) or the Mahdi (Islam) to humanity, the Lebanese have become jaded and watch war like a live movie, a reality TV moment, with popcorn and beer. The "art" of war has become their "life", and not just an imitation. 

As they watch Israel erase the south of their country, with perhaps the likelihood of a predictable invasion by ultra-religious Jewish settlers and a Zionist annexation of that part of their country, the Lebanese present a symptom similar to a rotating Stockholm's syndrome. As hostages of Hezbollah and Iran, some Lebanese fall in love with the romanticism of a fin-de-siècle resistance bullshit that draws its roots back to the 1960s times of revolution. As Israel bombs right and left, eardicates olive groves and essentially kills land with phosphorus bombs, some Lebanese cannot help but fall in love with the Israelis and sustain the thought that, perhaps, this will be the last time and they are willing to see it through despite the barbarity and the loss of land.

Many Arabs have signed treaties and made pseudo- and superficial "normalization" agreements with the genocidal colonial Zionists, all without any serious peace. The resentment across all Arab peoples is still very deep in regard to the continued rape of Palestine, despite their governments cavorting to idiots-on-Zionist-Netanyahu's-leash like Trump. That is why no one is really banking on a "new Middle East" proclaimed by the Great Moron Trump, which promises to keep the region on the same sinusoidal up-and-down cycle of real wars and fake peaces, while the Zionists keep pilfering land from their neighbors and westerners secute their access to oil.

Granted that Hezbollah and Iran's Ayatollahs have given the Zionists ample pretexts to wage their wars, and the two Shiite criminal organizations are to blame. As you can tell, the Lebanese are caught between two devils, and hard as they try to manintain a semblance of normal life amidst the horror, the movie goes on with a vicious circular plot that is exactly like the snake eating its own tail: Israel raped Palestine. Arabs tried to restore their "honor" (a big thing in the region) in several wars, but failed to restore honor and regain lost lands. So they bent down, kissed the ring and signed. Not really convinced, but what choice did they have when fighting Israel amounts to fighting the American father of the bastard child? Then Iran stepped in and decided to try its hand at restoring honor and land, and as we call can see, they are failing like imbeciles.

And that is exactly the price the Lebanese have been paying for more than six decades. 

Again, if Israel does - and it's a big if - eliminate Hezbollah, the Lebanese know there is a dear price to pay. You see, Zionists and their American poodles are not known to freely give: They will exact a price. 

To those Lebanese who are still stupid enough to believe that Israel and/or the US are doing them a favor: Beware. For those six decades, Lebanon has been the cheapest chip on the table, and after much confrontations between the big guys around them, Lebanon ends up being the bargaining chip. Every US administration since Eisenhower has fucked the Lebanese from behind in order to remain cordial with, of course its bastard child Israel, but also its Saudi, Kuwaiti, Egyptian, Syrian ... oily and mildly Israel-friendly clients. Lebanon does not have oil, and even if oil is discovered in the waters across its shoreline, it would be too late and in puny quantities that do not amount to "an interest".

This is what the Lebanese have never really understood. They live in a world of semi-liberal fiction, and are still deeply religious, just like their Jewish and Muslim neighbors. It's just that they are so small and weak that they refrain from warmongering (except the idiots of Hezbollah). De Gaulle once told the Lebanese, "countries don't have friends, they have interests". But the Lebanese continue to believe that Saudi Arabia and Iran are the friends of Lebanon's Muslims, and that the US and Europe are the friends of Lebanon's Christians, even though all of these "friends" have sold and bought them when necessary and convenient. 

The bottom line of the ongoing war - the umpteenth one in six decades - is that Lebanon is being driven to suicide by everyone else. And suicide, the Lebanese have proven themselves capable of it many times in the past. It's just that they suck at suicide, which makes living more depressing because they keep failing at killing themselves once and for all. The US is pushing the Lebanese President Joseph Aoun to wage a war against Hezbollah with a divided and badly armed army and then sign literally anything with Israel, just so Trump and Netanyahu can claim that they fought a war for peace (Trump) and land (Netanyahu). 

The Lebanese have been there many times before: With Eisenhower who disptatched 10,000 US Marines to Beirut in 1958; with Nixon and Kissinger who assured Israel's safety by making a deal with the Syrian dictator in 1974: Abandon the Golan to Israel and take Lebanon instead (which Assad did between 1974 and 2005); with George Bush Sr. who literally asked the Stalinist regime in Damascus to put down a rebellion by the freedom-minded Lebanese against the Kissinger-instigated Syrian occupation; with George Bush Jr. who decided to ask the Syrians to leave Lebanon (because they were not helping him with Iraq's Saddam Hussein) but re-installed the criminal Lebanese warlords to the helm; and now Trump who, I think will again, sell Lebanon and "pacify" it by giving the new Damascus friend Al-Sharaa and the old Tel Aviv friend Netanyahu "shares" in his new investments in Lebanon.

Not once did the Americans or the Europeans really try to shield this tiny country from the bullies. They did it for Bosnia. They did it for East Timor. They did it for Kuwait. But never for interest-free Lebanon. 

For now, all the Lebanese can do is watch Israel battle it out with Hezbollah, perhaps maybe "liberate" Lebanon from Hezbollah and Iran, but steal the southern third of the puny country as payola. Jaded the Lebanese are. They don't give a damn anymore. Finish the 60-year old masturbatory exercises between Muslims and Jews and let us move on with an amputated but peaceful country.

The big question in my mind is: When will the Lebanese learn De Gaulle's lesson?

Pimp Trump's Arab Gulf Girls Distraught as They Face "No-Client" Prospects

You may want to check: https://lebanoniznogood.blogspot.com/2026/04/when-s-it-hits-fan-pimp-trumps-arab.html

=============================================


‘Take the money and run’: Johns Hopkins economist Steve Hanke on why the UAE quit OPEC
Shawn Tully
Updated Wed, April 29, 2026 


A pipeline in the UAE. The country announced it would be leaving OPEC in a surprise move.(KARIM SAHIB—AFP/Getty Images)

The decision was shocking. But the announcement April 28 that the United Arab Emirates was leaving OPEC caps years of tension where the desert state chafed under the cartel’s quotas, and recently, encountered severe strain in its relationship with Saudi Arabia, the group’s most potent force by far. Though it had felt strains before, it was the war in Iran that pushed the UAE over the edge. “The war suddenly made job one for the UAE: ‘Take the money and run,’” says Steve H. Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University. “First, OPEC stood partially in the way. Now, the Iran war poses a much bigger danger for a long time to come.”

The UAE didn’t mention the Gulf conflict in its public announcement. Its press release stated: “The decision reflects the UAE’s long-term strategic and economic vision and evolving energy profile, including accelerated investment in domestic energy production.” Included was a confirmation that the UAE seeks to lift production beyond OPEC strictures—framed by understatement apparently designed to avoid freaking out the oil market. The UAE pledged to bring “additional production to the market in a gradual and measured manner, aligned with demand and market conditions.”

One observer the move didn’t surprise was Hanke, who served on the UAE’s Financial Advisory Council from 2008 to 2014. Years earlier, he had developed an economic model that addressed how fast an oil-rich nation should produce assuming different rates of decline in the “real,” or inflation-adjusted, price of crude. That projection specified the rising “discount rates” at which the reserves lost value the longer they stayed in the ground. The faster the projected decline in the dollars a barrel fetched on the world market, the quicker a nation should pump to maximize its profits. Hanke shared his work with the UAE’s economic leaders. “The system showing those optimal pumping rates made sense to them,” says Hanke. “If you think future prices are going higher, you slow down and wait to produce. If you think they’re going lower, you ramp up fast.”

Starting around 2021, the UAE began pushing hard for a much higher share of OPEC’s output. For Hanke, the reason was obvious: Its Abu Dhabi–based government was increasingly concerned about the rise in green energy that threatened a long-running slide in “real” fossil fuel prices. In fact, sustainable technologies looked so promising to the UAE that it invested heavily in projects ranging from solar farms to sustainable aircraft fuel to low-emission hydrogen. “That led to the strategy of ‘pump like hell today,’” says Hanke. In that vein, the UAE greatly accelerated its oil investments, and sought to put all that new capacity to work by pressing OPEC to lift its limit around 50% to roughly 5 million barrels per day. Those demands soured its relations with Saudi Arabia, and the two nations also clashed in their support of warring sides in both Yemen and Sudan. The UAE’s tacit recognition of Somaliland, and its role in moving Israel towards being the first nation to officially take that stance, have further antagonized the Saudis.

The haymaker, however, landed when fellow OPEC member Iran unleashed its drones and missiles on UAE’s oil and gas complex, an offensive that seemed unimaginable before the U.S.-Israeli attacks—even though the Emirates had antagonized Iran by courting both nations, and joining the Abraham Accords in 2020. Iran inflicted severe damage on at least five major UAE facilities, including a drone strike that ignited fires at Ruwais, one of the world’s largest refineries, and another at the key Port of Fujairah oil export hub. While the UAE still manages significant shipments via its pipeline to the Gulf of Oman, the war has crippled its freedom for moving crude and gas from its wells to world markets.

“The problem’s gone from a long-term decline in the real price, to the possibility that in the future, they won’t be able to sell all, or can only sell much less, because Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz, or periodically takes out part of its infrastructure,” says Hanke. The upshot: The UAE’s discount rate soared overnight. The new math dictates that the “present value” of oil produced in the future will be much lower than before the war. In other words, any opportunity to go, go like hell. “The UAE now has a big incentive to tilt oil production towards the present and away from the future,” says Hanke. Leaving OPEC and its quotas opens that door. This war is full of unforeseen consequences. None bigger than the bombshell on April 28 that this OPEC stalwart for nearly 60 years is bolting.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Trump Needs China's Approval to Rebuild Squandered US Ammo Stocks




America shot its arsenal empty in 2 wars. Now it needs Beijing’s permission to reload
Steve H. Hanke, Jeffrey Weng
Updated Thu, April 30, 2026


Pete Hegseth, US secretary of defense, during a House Armed Services Committee hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, April 29, 2026. The hearing is set to examine the Department of Defense 2027 budget request.(Daniel Heuer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

On Wednesday, the Trump administration finally let the cat out of the bag that Operation Epic Fury, America’s war on Iran, has burned through $25 billion so far. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. The White House has already requested a supplemental budget of $200 billion for its war on Iran.

The inventory math is brutal. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) finds that in Iran alone, the United States burned through 45% of its Precision Strike Missile stockpile, half of its THAAD interceptors, nearly half of its Patriot PAC-3 inventory, roughly 30% of its Tomahawks, and more than 20% of its long-range JASSMs.

That is just one war. Add Ukraine, where, since 2022, the United States has shipped roughly one-third of its Javelin inventory, one-quarter of its Stinger stockpile, more than two million 155mm artillery rounds, and thousands of GMLRS rockets. The combined drain is what the Pentagon’s own internal assessments now describe as a “near-term risk” of running out of ammunition.

The fact that the weapons cupboard is bare is one thing. What is rarely reported is the fact that [America's weapons cupboard] will not be restocked without Beijing’s approval.

Four Weapons, Four Periodic-Table Problems

Leave Ukraine aside. Forget the Javelins, the Stingers, the GMLRS rockets, and the two million artillery rounds that were used in Ukraine. Setting Ukraine aside, consider four weapons that the United States just burned through in Iran, and the critical material required for each — which flows almost exclusively through China.

Tomahawk cruise missile. The United States burned through over 1,000 Tomahawks in Iran — ten years’ worth of production. Each one’s fin actuators run on samarium-cobalt magnets. China mines and refines 99% of the world’s samarium and placed it under export licensing on April 4, 2025. To rebuild the inventory, Raytheon must turn to Beijing for samarium.

Patriot PAC-3 interceptor. The seeker uses samarium-cobalt (SmCo) to slew its guidance head; the radar’s traveling-wave tubes use SmCo to focus the microwave beam; yttrium-iron-garnet phase shifters tune the array. Replenishing the 1,200-plus interceptors expended in Iran requires roughly 1.2 to 2.4 tons of high-temperature SmCo, plus yttrium oxide. Between 2020 and 2023, China supplied 93% of U.S. yttrium imports.

JASSM-ER stealth cruise missile. The fin servos and seeker run on neodymium-iron-boron magnets (NdFB) doped with dysprosium and terbium for thermal stability. Strip out the heavy rare earths, and the magnet demagnetizes in flight. Roughly 1,100 missiles expended translates to between 1.5 and 3 tons of NdFeB feedstock. China refines the vast majority of the world’s dysprosium and terbium.

F-35 Lightning II. For a decade, the Department of Defense itself has repeated that each F-35 contains 920 pounds of rare earths. The strategically critical content is the high-temperature SmCo and dysprosium-doped NdFeB in the engine actuators, electric drives, and radar. These are precisely the materials Beijing has placed under license.

Across these four weapon systems, the back-of-the-envelope replenishment requirement is between five and ten metric tons of finished defense-grade rare earth magnets, more than 95% of which will arrive from the People’s Republic of China.

Beijing’s Hand

China holds all the cards and knows how to play them. Gallium and germanium controls came in August 2023. Antimony controls came in August 2024, with a full ban of shipments to the United States in December 2024. As a result, antimony prices surged by 134%. Tungsten restrictions were imposed in February 2025; the price skyrocketed by over 557% per metric ton. Then MOFCOM Announcement No. 18 of April 4, 2025, placed seven medium and heavy rare earths under discretionary licensing. Chinese rare-earth magnet exports were curtailed by 74% the following month. In October 2025, Beijing extended the regime extraterritorially to any product, anywhere in the world, containing as little as 0.1% of Chinese-origin rare earths.

Trump in Beijing

This brings us to May 14, 2026, when President Trump is scheduled to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping. Not surprisingly, critical materials sit at the top of the meeting’s agenda. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated in early April that the goal of the meeting is “to ensure we can continue to get rare earths from the Chinese.”

There is only one thing worse than being unprepared for the war you started. It is being unprepared for the next one, because your adversary controls the periodic table.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com



Who? What? When? I don't Know...An Ignorant and Senile President....

... please wake me up when it's time for bed, says Dozy Don. I haven't heard. Don't ask me, I only work in this Out House. What is this about? Supreme Court decisions, War Powers Act, .... big decisions engaging the country, and yet the narcissistic moron is entirely focused on himself, on making money and building vanity reminders of his legacy as the Dumbest President in US history.

==============================================

‘When did it come out?’ Trump remains disengaged as events unfold around him
Steve Benen

Thu, April 30, 2026


President Donald Trump[sleeping] in the Oval Office of the White House on April 23, 2026.(Will Oliver / EPA / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

For proponents of voting rights and racially diverse democracy, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais was a brutal gut punch. University of California at Los Angeles law professor Richard Hasen wrote in a Slate analysis that the decision, written by Republican-appointed justices, “will go down in history as one of the most pernicious and damaging Supreme Court decisions of the last century.”

Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissent that the ruling renders Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “all but a dead letter” and that the consequences “are likely to be far-reaching and grave.” She added that in states “where that law continues to matter — the States still marked by residential segregation and racially polarized voting — minority voters can now be cracked out of the electoral process.”

With this in mind, it’s easy to imagine Donald Trump reacting to the ruling with delight, not just because of his record of radical animus, but also because the Republican-appointed justices just delivered a ruling that will almost certainly benefit the president’s party.

And yet,
when a reporter asked Trump about the high court’s decision several hours after its release, he appeared to have absolutely no idea what had happened.

Tell me, when did the ruling come out?” the president asked, adding that he’d “been with contractors” talking about his ballroom vanity project. After talking about the ballroom initiative for a bit — once he gets started on the subject, it’s generally tough for him to stop — he eventually told the press corps, “Tell me about what happened.

No one asked the obvious follow-up question: Shouldn’t he know what happened?

A similar exchange unfolded a week earlier, when a reporter asked whether the president could confirm recent reporting about his administration taking steps to send 1,100 Afghans to the Democratic Republic of Congo. “
I don’t know,” he replied.

The week before that, amid reports that Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei had met with administration officials for an important closed-door discussion, a reporter asked Trump whether Anthropic did, in fact, have a meeting at the White House.

Who?” he replied, apparently confused. When the reporter repeated the question, he again said, “I have no idea.”

The frequency with which this comes up is an underappreciated element of the Republican’s presidency.

At a White House Cabinet meeting in November, for example,
whenever Trump was asked a question of any substance, he’d ask someone else to answer. The same week, the president was pressed to defend his scandalous pardon for Changpeng Zhao, founder of the crypto exchange Binance, who helped finance the president’s stablecoin and put money in the Trump family’s pockets.

I don’t know who he is,” he replied.

This wasn’t the first time. In March, after Trump pardoned one of his donors, he was pressed for an explanation. H
e again appeared clueless: “They” told him that the criminal had been treated unfairly, which was enough for him to sign a pardon.

The frequency with which this comes up is unsettling. Days earlier, Trump appeared lost when asked about developments in Israel. Two weeks before that, when asked about a possible suspension of habeas corpus, the president initially thought that was a reference to a person [-
The idiot thought that Habeas Corpus is the name of some dude -]  before telling a reporter, “Oh, I don’t know.

Around the same time, Trump was forced to reverse course after he discovered that he had cut off counterterrorism funds to New York City days earlier.

Last September, as part of a half-hearted last-minute attempt to prevent a government shutdown, Trump welcomed congressional leaders to the White House for a meeting. After it failed to produce results, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters that the president was apparently “not aware” of the key elements of the Democratic position.

A month earlier, Trump said 
he didn’t “know anything about” a failed top-secret mission in North Korea in 2019 that he reportedly authorized. At a White House event in July, a reporter noted the Trump administration had paused a shipment of military aid intended for Ukraine a week earlier. Asked who approved this, the president replied, “I don’t know. Why don’t you tell me?”

In May, during a Q&A with a White House press pool, Trump was asked about his administration’s new student visa policy, and he responded in a way that suggested
he had no idea what the reporter was talking about.

Weeks earlier, less than 24 hours after he nominated Dr. Casey Means to serve as the nation’s next surgeon general, the president conceded that
he didn’t know Means. The day before that, amid reports that the administration was planning to expand its deportations agenda to Libya, Trump was pressed on the policy. “I don’t know,” he responded.

The same week, Trump appeared on “Meet the Press,” and when NBC News’ Kristen Welker asked whether everyone in the United States is entitled to due process, the president replied,
“I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know.” When Welker reminded her guest about the Fifth Amendment, Trump again said, “I don’t know.”

As part of the same exchange, Welker went on to ask, “
Don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?” Once again, Trump answered, “I don’t know.”

Around the same time, fielding questions in the Oval Office, Trump was asked whether he agreed with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s comments about possible tariff exemptions for certain family consumer goods.
“I don’t know, I’ll think about it,” the president said. “I don’t know. I really don’t.”

Last spring, Trump was asked about four U.S. soldiers who had gone missing during a NATO training exercise in Lithuania, and
the president was clueless. Asked about the apparent assassination of a Russian general, Trump again had no idea what the reporter was talking about.

When the Republican was asked about the Signal group chat scandal and whether he believed classified information was shared, he replied,
“I don’t know. I’m not sure, you have to ask the various people involved.”

No one appeared to be trying to trip up the president with unexpected inquiries into obscure topics. In all of these instances, Trump should have been able to respond to the questions with substantive responses. But he didn’t. Instead, the Republican effectively said, over and over again, “
Don’t look at me; I just work here.

Most objective observers would probably agree that if Joe Biden had repeatedly said “I don’t know” in response to simple questions about his own administration, it would have been front-page news — and the Democrat’s responses would have played on a loop for hours on end in conservative media.

Similarly, Trump has personally invested considerable time and energy in accusing Biden of having been a doddering old “autopen” president who was unaware of events unfolding around him. Given the frequency with which President Bystander clings to “I don’t know” responses, he should probably consider a new line of attack.

Finally, let’s not forget that Trump’s authoritarian tendencies are rooted, at least in part, in the idea that governmental power must be concentrated in the president’s hands, to be executed as he sees fit.

It makes
Trump’s apparent cluelessness that much more alarming. As The New York Times’ Jamelle Bouie noted in a column late last year, “There is a presidency at work in Washington, but it is not clear that there is a president at work in the Oval Office.”