Zionist Racist group ADL Upset with Wikipedia's Labeling it ‘Unreliable’ Source

The leading Zionist organization in the US, misnamed "Anti-Defamation League" (ADL), is upset that the highly respected online encyclopedia Wikipedia declared ADL as “generally unreliable” to provide information on the Israel-Palestinian conflict. This finally exposed the decades of lies and misinformation that Zionists like ADL have been disseminating to justify Israel's rape of Palestine.

Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of ADL accused Wikipedia - of what else? - "antisemitic" bias, the tired old  Zionist scarecrow to scare away any dissident opinion against Israel, the now-officially recognized "Genodical" colonial monster in Palestine.

“In a moment when we need to be educating millions of people on how dangerous anti-Jewish hate is, we are being silenced and our research is being marginalized,” Greenblatt said. “Just let that sink in.” Perhaps the world no longer needs to be educated by a bunch of racist Zionist agents. Greenblatt should let sink in his dense skull the obvious fact of Jewish barbarity on display in Palestine, barbarity that he spent his lifetime trying to hide under the guise of fighting racism. Is there anything more racist than Zionism, the project of ethnically cleansing the Palestinian people out of their ancestral homeland by sheer terrorism (Haganah, Stern Gang, Lehi group, etc.) in order to create the Bronze Age fantasy of Israel and invite a widely diverse population united only by religion to settle the raped ravaged Palestine and its demolished villages and cities?

The decision by the reputed Wikipedia last week to add ADL to its list of banned or partially banned sources, puts it in the same company as Russian state media and the National Inquirer. ADL is now officially a rag spewing falsehoods in service of an ideology and not the truth. This means that ADL should not be cited in articles on the Israel-Palestinian conflict “due to significant evidence that the ADL acts as a pro-Israeli advocacy group and has repeatedly published false and misleading statements as fact,” says Wikipedia on its site. ADL’s unreliability extends “to the intersection of the topics of antisemitism and the Israel/Palestine conflict,” the statement said.

Wikipedia’s review of ADL’s reliability began in April and involved more than 120 volunteers who participated in discussions about the organization’s coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, antisemitism and its hate symbols database, said Maggie Dennis, a vice president at The Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit organization that operates the online encyclopedia but does not determine what content is included on the site.

The online encyclopedia is volunteer-run and non-profit, and goes to extremes to be transparent and unrelenting in verifying and vetting citations and attributions behind the information it publishes. Any reader can see the discussions and debates. The crowd-sourced encyclopedia has over 60 million entries and is often the internet's most accessible and reliable record of people, places and events. In 2023, the English-language version of Wikipedia had about 92 billion views. The fact of Wikipedia's universal reach is what is terrifying Zionist mouthpieces like ADL that have generally relied on biased sources to propagate lies, misinformation and anti-Palestinian and anti-Arab bias.

Wikipedia editors have concluded that "ADL is heavily biased in favor of Israel and inaccurately labels legitimate criticism of Israel as antisemitism". One editor said, “The ADL no longer appears to adhere to a serious, mainstream and intellectually cogent definition of antisemitism, but has instead given into the shameless politicization of the very subject that it was originally esteemed for being reliable on."

Another editor said the ADL often acts as a “pro-Israel lobbying organization,” which “can and does compromise its ability to accurately report facts regarding people and organizations that disagree with it on this issue.”

As an example of virulent Zionist pro-Israel bias, the Zionist leader of ADL Jonathan Greenblatt has often said that anti-Israel protesters on college campuses are "Iranian proxies.” This Zionist con artist Greenblatt has also said that the Palestinian keffiyeh head scarf is equal to the Nazi swastika. He later tried to walk back from his statement by making convoluted and unintelligible comments, such as “I’m certainly far from perfect, but it is stunning that someone would take comments that were intentionally misrepresented and use that to slander and undermine an entire organization and to suggest that the body of our work is somehow no longer made of integrity.” I let the reader decide what that means.

The Wikipedia decision is problematic for ADL because it raises questions about the organization’s credibility, said James Loeffler, a professor of modern Jewish history at Johns Hopkins University.  Loeffler tries to split hairs by arguing that there is a difference between ADL's research team and ADL's leadership, just as when westerners try to separate a political wing of a terrorist organization (Hamas, Hezbollah) from its military wing. Loeffler said. “The problem [with ADL] is that there’s one message coming from the leadership and one coming from the research team. The leadership statements are much less disciplined and raise questions about exactly how rigorous their measurement is and their standards for defining antisemitic acts.” Loeffler is obviously being kind in the language that he uses.