Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Nothing but the truth. Even if against me.

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Early Signs of Blue Tsunami in 2026: Recent Special Elections Results




Key takeaways from Tuesday’s special elections in Iowa and Georgia

Jared Gans
Wed, August 27, 2025



Key takeaways from Tuesday’s special elections in Iowa and Georgia

Democrats continued their winning streak in key special elections this year with another victory in a contested state Senate seat in Iowa.

The party eyed the seat as a pickup opportunity to break up a Republican supermajority in the body and demonstrate further enthusiasm among the Democratic base in an off-year election. The party’s candidate in a Georgia state Senate election also appears poised to advance to a runoff against a Republican opponent in a deeply conservative district.

Here’s what to know from Tuesday night’s results.

Democrats get another notable win

The Democratic Party has been struggling to unify itself and get energized in the aftermath of its devastating loss to President Trump in the 2024 presidential election and other key races last November.

But even amid voter dissatisfaction with party leaders and disapproval with the party brand as a whole, one positive sign for Democrats has been the multiple victories they have achieved in the handful of elections this year.

Democrat Catelin Drey’s win in Iowa Senate District 1 by more than 10 points, as of the latest vote count, over Republican Christopher Prosch is just the latest in a string of Democratic electoral successes this year that is likely to give the party hope heading into the midterms.

The first one came in January in a neighboring state Senate district in Iowa, when Democrats flipped that seat from red to blue, just after Trump took office. They did the same in an equally Trump-friendly state Senate district in Pennsylvania in March.

Trump had carried both Iowa districts and the Pennsylvania one by double digits in November.

Along with a win for a contested seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Democrats have put up impressive wins in these lower-turnout off-year elections. The data is limited as far as being indicative of what’s to come in larger races later this year and next year, even in a statewide contest in a battleground like Wisconsin.

But the results give Democrats some reassurance that they have momentum with voters most likely to turn out. And the Democratic National Committee’s effort to rally voters in the district appears to have paid off.

A race with outsized impact in Iowa politics

Drey’s win will also alter the political dynamic in Des Moines in a small but significant way.

The GOP controls both houses of the state legislature, as well as the governor’s mansion. But Drey will help break a supermajority in the state Senate, which carries an important implication.

Nominees from the governor to state agencies, boards and commissions need a two-thirds vote in the state Senate for approval. With Drey’s win, the split in the Senate will now be 33 Republicans to 17 Democrats, denying the GOP that two-thirds and requiring that nominees from Reynolds need at least one Democratic vote in favor to be approved.

The two-thirds margin is also symbolic in Iowa, as that’s the amount needed to override a veto from the Gov. Kim Reynolds (R). Iowa hasn’t elected a Democratic governor in more than a decade, but Democrats are hopeful that they may have a chance to win the gubernatorial race next year, particularly as Reynolds has struggled with her popularity in office.

If they can win the office, keeping Republican control of the state legislature under two-thirds will be key to protect the governor’s veto from being overridden.
Georgia outcome will likely get punted to next month

Georgia also had a contested state Senate race Tuesday to replace former state Sen. Brandon Beach (R) after Trump chose him to become the U.S. treasurer.

Democrats have a much steeper battle in this district than they did in the Iowa one, but they’ll likely get a second chance to try to pull off an upset. Democrat Debra Shigley appears poised to advance to the runoff against one of her Republican opponents.
Shigley and a half dozen Republicans all competed on the same ballot for the seat Tuesday, and with no candidate likely to win a majority of the vote, the top two will advance to a runoff set for next month.

Shigley appears likely to finish in first, ahead of the rest of the pack, while her Republican opponent will look to unify the GOP behind their candidacy.

Winning in this seat would be likely even more challenging than in any of the other special elections where Democrats won this year. The district, located in the northern Atlanta suburbs, voted for Trump by 34 points, much higher than either of the Iowa districts or the Pennsylvania one.

Still, Shigley consolidated Democratic support behind her and appears on track to perform somewhat better than former Vice President Harris did in November, the sign Democrats are looking for in the deep red areas.

Trump's Daily Senile Rant

President Donald Trump, 79, confounded his audience during an executive order signing Monday in the Oval Office, rambling about an imaginary governor named “Kristi Whitman.” “You know, I did a favor for Kristi Whitman,” Trump said, seated behind the Resolute Desk. “Whitmer,” he added moments later, in what seemed like a fleeting moment of self-correction—though he still appeared to be referring to a nonexistent “Kristi Whitmer.”

He then immediately segued into fish. Referring to a memorandum from back in May that stressed his administration’s commitment to “protecting” the Great Lakes from invasive species of Asian carp, “With the fish, the carp, the China carp —you ever hear of it? China carp, and it’s taking over your Great Lakes.”

Trump may have confused the Michigan governor’s name with that of former New Jersey Gov. Christine “Christie” Todd Whitman, a harsh Trump critic who served as Environmental Protection Agency administrator under George W. Bush.

The blunder adds to the president’s history of fumbling key names, including a time when he confused former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and ex-United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley, a mistake he brushed off as “purposely” interposing names.

Earlier this month, Trump confused Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem with LPGA golfer Cristie Kerr while Noem was standing off to his side.

Trump Changes Mind on Chinese Students: Will Allow 600,000 into US

Forget about China ripping us up. Forget about China's stealing technology through its students in our universities. Forget that China is our main economic rival.

Where has it all gone suddenly?

The deranged unsynapsed brain of the idiot in the oval office has suddenly shelved those risks in the huge bathroom stall comprising his brain, like he did with classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

Out of nowhere, and while the South Korean President was visiting, Trump launches into a chummy rant about China. Perhaps in his ignorant racist mind, "these Asians" all look the same, and he felt that talking about China was kinda like talking to South Korea.

Naturally, after years and years of xenophobia fed into the skulls of his backward followers, Trump’s latest comments about welcoming hundreds of thousands of Chinese students into United States universities - which he has been undermining by cutting research funds and on which he is imposing a monolithic right-wing zionist ideology - is drawing criticism from the MAGA herd of lobotomized sheep.

The man is ill. There is no doubt about it. At the White House on Monday, Trump told reporters that he plans to allow 600,000 Chinese students into the country — a figure more than double the number in the United States now. Suddenly, he declares that “We’re going to get along good with China. I hear so many stories about ‘We’re not going to allow their students’” to come in, Trump said. “We’re going to allow, it’s very important, 600,000 students. It’s very important.”

It’s a sharp departure from what his imbecile dog-eared Secretary of State Marco Rubio said back in May, namely that the US would “aggressively revoke” visas for Chinese students and add more scrutiny to all future visa applications from China.

Is it deliberate ambiguity or simple chaos unleashed from the brain of an old and sick man whose brain cannot control his mouth? 

MAGA butch Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., railed, “Why are we allowing 600,000 students from China to replace our American student’s opportunities?” Extremist MAGA and failed Republican congressional candidate Laura Loomer decaalred that the Chinese students are “Communist spies.”

In a couple of days, there will be explanations from the Bimb-in-Chief Karoline Leavitt, declaring that Trump knows exactly what he is saying and that his far-reaching visionary prophecies are part of his "America First" policy.  Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick went further in suggesting that Trump's  move was an economic one. The genius of it is that Trump will be stealing the top and smarter students from China, which would strike two birds with one stone: Deplete the brain reservoir of China and fill up the American one.
 
But hasn't it been the standing policy of the US for decades, otherwise known as the "brain drain", to bring in the best and brightest from around the world, which has succeeded in far-reaching innovation here at home? And now, after persecuting foreign students for seven months and depleting their potential boon to the US, the senile idiot is now making a 180 and pretends to be re-inventing the wheel. 
 
I think he believes he can always put ICE in charge of hunting those Chinese students down the streets of America when they are no longer needed. For example, a miracle could happen and native US student could suddenly stop being dumb, learn something other than the ten garbage commandments of the bible in their schools, and begin outbeating the Chinese students in science and technology. But the historical record does not point to such a trajectory going forward: The US will still rely largely on the intelligence and knowledge of foreign students than on its own generations of dumbified young people to drive its economy.

There were an estimated 277,398 Chinese international students studying in the United States during the 2023-24 school year. Together with students from India, the group makes up more than half of the international students in the country. In 2023 alone, Chinese students contributed upward of $14 billion to the American economy.

But Republican lawmakers have long attempted to stem the flow of Chinese students into the United States, just as they have historically donw over more than a century with the so-called "Chinese Exclusion Act". In March, Republican congressmen introduced the Stop CCP VISAs Act, which would halt the issuance of student visas to Chinese nationals looking to study at American universities or take part in exchange programs. The bill drew widespread backlash from activists, schools and others, including Chinese students, who called the legislation the “new Chinese Exclusion Act.”

Trump’s latest comments on students come as tensions between the United States and China have eased slightly from earlier this year. Trump backed down repeatedly on imposing tariffs on China, with the latest cooling off of a 90-day trade truce through November.

 

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Trump is Planting the Seeds for Future Discord

The Atlantic

Trump Is Sending a Terrifyingly Clear Message
The president is going after his enemies and undermining the American system.

By David Frum

August 25, 2025

"Any aftermath of the Trump presidency seems more likely to resemble the aftermath of the Civil War: The reactionary losers who tried to overthrow the U.S. Constitution may acknowledge themselves beaten, but they won’t acknowledge themselves wrong."


Photo-illustration by The Atlantic. Sources: Anna Moneymaker / Getty; Aaron Schwartz / CNP / Bloomberg / Getty. 

After Donald Trump left the presidency in 2021, he was indicted for retaining dozens of government documents, including some containing nuclear secrets. He was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. His company was convicted of criminal tax fraud.

When Trump returned to the presidency this year, he sought payback by accusing others of the crimes for which he’d been indicted or convicted. The political ally Trump appointed to head federal housing programs—Bill Pulte, heir to a large home-building fortune—has called for a mortgage-fraud investigation of Letitia James, the New York attorney general who won the 34 convictions against Trump. Pulte has also urged investigations of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, and legal actions against Senator Adam Schiff and Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

On Friday, the FBI raided the home and office of former National Security Adviser John Bolton, a prominent Trump critic, reportedly in an investigation of improperly retaining classified documents like those for which Trump was indicted.

Trump has denied advance knowledge of the raid on Bolton’s home and office. Yet his denial included a smug hint that maybe he knew more than he cared to admit: “I don’t want to know about it,” he said, but later added, “I could know about it. I could be the one starting it. I’m actually the chief law-enforcement officer.”

Trump has been demanding the jailing of Bolton for half a decade. The president’s ultra-politicized law-enforcement team—Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino—would not need a direct order to understand what Trump wanted them to do. Patel in particular was mistrusted by colleagues in the first Trump administration as someone willing to do anything Trump wished, no matter how improper.

In this second Trump term, things keep happening that would have seemed outrageous—impossible—just a few months before. Every day, there’s a new movement away from the rule of law, toward arbitrary and corrupt personal rule. Among the fearful questions pressing upon the country: How does America ever turn back?

After the first Trump presidency, the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress made a collective decision about what to do next. Individuals who broke the law on January 6, 2021, would face prosecution for their crimes. Congress would investigate Trump’s role in those crimes and publicize the findings. Congress would also revise the Electoral Count Act to clarify beyond even bad-faith doubt: No, the incumbent vice president cannot overturn a federal election, as Trump pressured Mike Pence to attempt in 2021. Beyond that—and unlike after Watergate or Teapot Dome—Congress passed no major reform legislation. It did not, for example, move to stop future presidents from directing Secret Service funds into their own pockets, or from ignoring conflicts-of-interest laws.

After the discovery that Trump had retained government records, the National Archives quietly negotiated with him for 17 months before at last resorting to legal action in August 2022. The federal government hesitated for nearly two years before commencing legal action against Trump for the January 6 attack. He faced aggressive legal actions from state governments and from wronged private individuals, but the federal executive-branch response to his misdeeds and crimes was slow and reluctant. The federal courts were more reluctant still. The Supreme Court invented—more or less out of thin air—a new doctrine of presidential criminal immunity to protect Trump against legal risk for his January 6 actions.

There was a certain logic to this widespread loathness to act. From the perspective of, say, 2022, Constitution-respecting Americans could congratulate themselves that their system had withstood and overcome the Trump test. Trump’s party lost control of the House of Representatives in 2018. Trump was then himself ejected from office in 2020. When his abuses of his authority came to court, federal judges—including those appointed by Trump’s own party—struck them down. Trump was dissuaded by his own appointees from dissolving NAFTA and quitting NATO. His scheme to overthrow the 2020 election failed. He sabotaged the Biden transition every way he could, but he ultimately did exit office on January 20, 2021.

Despite possessing only a thin Democratic majority in the House and Senate, Joe Biden enacted an impressive mass of programs and policies. Meanwhile, Republican donors raised hundreds of millions of dollars to nominate Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and put the Trump era behind them. Why look backward?

Those cheerful calculations look sadly wrong from the perspective of 2025. Trump was reelected in 2024, this time as the unquestioned leader of the Republican Party and with the support of aides and officials ready to implement his most outrageous whims.

Here’s an example of the contrast between then and now: In his first term, Trump attempted to retaliate against Bolton. Trump fired Bolton in September 2018. Bolton then wrote a book that, among other things, revealed details about Trump’s extortion of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Over three months in early 2019, career officials reviewed Bolton’s book for possible misuse of classified materials. Bolton edited his manuscript as directed and scheduled publication for June 2019. At that point, Trump political appointees ordered a second review to demand excision of hundreds of pages to which the previous reviewers had not objected. Bolton refused to comply with the second review. The Trump administration sued to block the book altogether. It lost, in a decision handed down by Judge Royce Lamberth, a Ronald Reagan appointee and one of the most conservative judges on the federal bench. Lamberth warned Bolton and his publisher that if the book were later proven to contain classified information, they might forfeit any profits from the book. Five years later, no such showing has been made.

Bolton prevailed in 2019 because relevant parts of the U.S. government were still staffed by nonpartisan officials who honored their oath to the Constitution even when that conflicted with the president’s wishes.

But in Trump’s second term, the government is changing fast. In his first half year as president, Trump has systematically purged the federal law-enforcement apparatus of rule-obeying public servants. He is replacing them as quickly as he is able with people chosen for their loyalty, without regard for their other qualifications. At the FBI, Trump forced out his own first-term appointees to replace them with absurdly unqualified loyalists chosen for their record of complying with any Trump wish, no matter how glaringly unlawful. Over at Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Trump is building an enormous paramilitary force staffed by people hired for pro-Trump zeal—and who may ignore written law. The administration has claimed an emergency to collect hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue without the approval of Congress. Post-Watergate ethics rules have collapsed beyond recovery as Trump and his family collect hundreds of millions of dollars in gifts, gratuities, and payoffs.

Even if the House changes hands in 2026—even if a president is elected in 2028 who possesses a healthy respect for the rule of law—Trump’s second-term perversion of the government will not be easily undone. Yes, of course the next president must immediately fire Patel from the FBI—but will Trump supporters understand the difference between the firing of Patel for the abuse of his office, and Trump’s firing of his own appointee Christopher Wray for resisting the abuse of that same office? Trump is teaching his many supporters that public office is just a game of revenge, that there’s no difference between the government pleading with an ex-president for 17 months to return stolen secret documents and a serving president using claims about documents to target a critic for retaliation.

The American system depends upon public understanding that law is bigger than politics, that right and wrong exist independent of who screws whom. Trump’s life and career are based on discrediting the distinction between right and wrong, and on convincing himself and others that the only reality is who screws whom. As of right now, he’s winning that messaging debate, regardless of what happens to him personally. After Teapot Dome, after Watergate, the supporters of the implicated president accepted that he had done wrong, that the guilty should be punished, and that these misdeeds should never be repeated. Any aftermath of the Trump presidency seems more likely to resemble the aftermath of the Civil War: The reactionary losers who tried to overthrow the U.S. Constitution may acknowledge themselves beaten, but they won’t acknowledge themselves wrong.

If they won’t acknowledge that, what confidence can anyone feel that they won’t try again if they get the chance?

How Zionists Manipulate the Foreign Policies of Countries

When French President Emmanuel Macron announced a couple of weeks ago that France, alongside Great Britain, Canada, Australia and others, will recognize a Palestinian State at the UN's general assembly in September, the wanted Zionist war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu declared that France is an antisemitic country.

Pay attention to the nuance here because the "amalgamation" of Jewish identity with Zionist colonial ideology and the Israeli citizenship is at the core of this whole debate. This amalgamation is the bedrock of all Zionist propaganda that exploits the sympathy for the Holocaust victims of European antisemitism to justify nefarious and criminal policies by a state like Israel.

Let’s do a Socratic exercise in logic:

Are all Israelis Jews? – No

Are all Jews Israelis? – No

Are all Jews Zionists? – No, many Jews in fact reject the ideology of a colonial Zionism claiming a return to the promised land.

Are all Zionists Jews? – No, there are Christian Protestant Zionists who, while not Jews themselves, do support the colonial rape of Palestine by European Jews. The US president Joe Biden repeatedly said he was a Catholic Zionist.

Are all Zionists Israelis? – No. Many Zionists live outside of Israel and do not carry the Israeli passport.

Are all Israelis Zionists? – No. Many citizens of Israel, including Orthodox and secular Jews, refute the Zionist premise of the existence of Israel. Many Israelis are non-Jews like indigenous Palestinian Muslims and Christians who, by circumstances of history, became de facto citizens of Israel. It is a monumental fallacy to argue that any Israeli citizen who lives in Israel is by default a Zionist. The real Zionists are the radical terrorist settler kind of Zionist who, unfortunately at the present time, make up the government of Israel.

Therefore, the amalgamation of Jew=Zionist=Israeli does not stand. But the convicted felon US ambassador in PAris continues to drill this Zionist propaganda canard.

Let’s now deconstruct Ambassador Kushner’s declaration that recognizing Palestine is an act of antisemitism.

The definition of “antisemitic” is simply to express or have opinions about Jews on the basis of non-factual made-up barbarian Medieval stereotypes (blood libel, thieving, charging interest, conspiring against Christians, rejecting Jesus as the Messiah, etc.….).

Antisemitism has nothing to do with whether one disagrees with the Zionist tenets of colonizing other people’s lands and killing them.

Antisemitism has nothing to do with criticizing the Israeli government for its starvation, killing journalists and doctors, destroying hospitals and schools, and terrorizing an innocent population and the genocide of the entire nation of Palestine.

The definition of antisemitism has, however, been so broadened in recent years by the Zionists that it essentially elevates Israel to the level of an infallible entity that is constitutively shielded against any criticism by anyone, which is an absurd proposition unless one falls into the trap of real antisemitism: If Israel is infallible, which is contrary to the norm of equality between all peoples, then some people might begin to believe the antisemitic bullshit of a conspiracy by Jews. By declaring Israel to be infallible, Zionsist are in fact encouraging antisemitism. No country can be shielded against criticism, so if Israel is officially indirectly declared infallible by defaulting all its acts as justified, then there must be something wrong, and hence imagine conspiracies, plots, propaganda, control, etc.

Antisemitism is rampant in England, in Germany, and in Hungary for example. So why haven't the US ambassadors to these countries accuse the respective government of these countries of antisemitism?

Acts of antisemitism in France or elsewhere in the US and Europe are of two types:

- 1- Acts generally perpetrated by White Christian nationalist Europeans who have inherited their antisemitism from centuries of European Jew-hatred based on the disgusting stereotypes mentioned above. Ironically, it is those very antisemitic Europeans who rise in defense of Zionist Israel. Guess why! By supporting Zionist Israel, they keep the Jews of Israel in Israel. Those Jews who make up the bulk of Israel's Jewish population are relatively recent migrants from Nazi antisemitic Europe. In other words, the Europeans got rid of their Jews by murdering millions of them and dumping the rest in Palestine where they have terrorized the native Palestinians and the entire region. Israel's creation is one gigantic act of GREAT REPLACEMENT. Despite hating Jews, the Europeans are happy to see them away in Palestine. Should Israel one day fall, all those Jews, who by the way all carry second passports to countries like Germany, Poland, Ukraine, France etc., would return to Europe. And the antisemitic Europeans don't want them back.

- 2- The second type of antisemitic acts is one in which the acts target Jewish symbols and institutions (cemeteries, schools, etc.) but not based on the stereotypes that drive the above category of acts. This second type of antisemitism is itself caused by the deliberate Zionist amalgamation of Jew=Zionist=Israeli which is forced in the public discourse by the Zionists themselves. If Israel kills 20 innocent Palestinians, some people might be so revolted by the brutality and impunity that they act according to the Zionist amalgamation, i.e. because the Zionists force me to accept that a Jew is automatically a Zionist (which he is not necessarily) then my violent act against the Israeli government must obligatorily target Jews (who may or may not be Israelis ort Zionists) as a way to protest Israel’s brutality, savagery or genocide in Palestine.

Therefore, when the US ambassador in Paris singularly attacks the French government as antisemitic, he is interfering in the internal affairs of France. He cannot be defending Israel or Zionism, which are not American by definition. He is responsible for speaking on behalf of his country, the US, and not on matters pertaining to other countries with whom France has relations, including Israel, Palestine and whoever else.

Antisemitism exists all across Europe, and not only in France. If Ambassador Kushner’s move is to be acceptable, then the US ambassador to every European country should accuse all these other countries of antisemitism. So why single out France? Because France has decided to recognize the state of Palestine! That is how Zionists slander those who dare criticize Israel's policies and government.

In accusing France of antisemitism, the convicted felon US ambassador Charles Kushner is essentially doubling down as the second Israeli ambassador in Paris. That is not his job. 
==========================================================

Jared Kushner’s Dad Suddenly in Trouble at His Cushy MAGA Job

Malcolm Ferguson 
Mon, August 25, 2025


Charles Kushner—U.S. ambassador to France, father of Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, and convicted felon—has drawn the ire of French President Emmanuel Macron over his allegations of rampant antisemitism in France.

Kushner published “A Letter to Emmanuel Macron” in The Wall Street Journal on Sunday.

“I write out of deep concern over the dramatic rise of antisemitism in France and the lack of sufficient action by your government to confront it,” Kushner wrote. “Antisemitism has long scarred French life, but it has exploded since Hamas’s barbaric assault on Oct. 7, 2023. Since then, pro-Hamas extremists and radical activists have waged a campaign of intimidation and violence across Europe. In France, not a day passes without Jews assaulted in the street, synagogues or schools defaced, or Jewish-owned businesses vandalized.”

Kushner continued, presenting Macron with a call to action.

“In today’s world, anti-Zionism is antisemitism—plain and simple. President Trump and I have Jewish children and share Jewish grandchildren. I know how he feels about antisemitism, as do all Americans.... I urge you to act decisively: enforce hate-crime laws without exception; ensure the safety of Jewish schools, synagogues and businesses, prosecute offenders to the fullest extent; and abandon steps that give legitimacy to Hamas and its allies.”

Kushner’s letter came just days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote a similar letter to Macron, condemning him for announcing that France would recognize Palestinian statehood. France refuted Kushner’s allegations just hours after his article was published—and summoned Kushner to appear before Macron and the French foreign ministry.

“France firmly refutes these latest allegations,” the foreign ministry stated. “The Ambassador’s allegations are unacceptable.”

Why is the U.S. ambassador to France more focused on lobbying on Israel’s behalf than the United States? Does he think the so-called French “Hamas allies” are so obtuse that they can’t criticize Zionism two years into a genocide without condemning all Jewish people? Does he know that there are French anti-Zionist Jews who’ve been vocally supporting Palestine since the genocide began?

Kushner shouldn’t even have this job to begin with—he’s a reverse nepo baby and criminal who spent two years in jail for tax evasion, illegal campaign donations to the Democratic Party, and witness tampering. He even retaliated against his own sister—who was a cooperating witness against him—by paying a sex worker to seduce her husband and film it, likely for blackmail material. Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who investigated Charles Kushner as district attorney, described his case as “one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes” he’d encountered. Kushner was pardoned by Trump in 2020.

Kushner shouldn’t be here. He’s just lucky his son happened to marry Trump’s daughter. Now, Kushner’s blatant Israeli agitprop risks further fraying an already strained relationship between the United States and France.

Monday, August 25, 2025

RFK Jr. Cancels Promising Research on mRNA Cancer Vaccine




RFK Jr. Cancels Promising Work on Cancer Vaccine
Noor Al-Sibai
Sun, August 24, 2025


About 10 weeks before his assassination in 1968, Robert F. Kennedy — better known as Bobby, and the father of our current health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. — delivered a rousing address at Vanderbilt University that came to be known as one of his greatest speeches.

Quoting his presidential uncle John, who had himself been assassinated less than five years prior, Kennedy told those Vanderbilt students that they were the people who had "the least ties to the present and the greatest ties to the future" — a future that seemed, thanks to the Vietnam War and civil unrest stateside, dangerously close to not happening at all.

Bobby Kennedy's hopeful promise to the United States' young voters couldn't seem further away in 2025, as his son's anti-scientific turn at the Department of Health and Human Services has led to all manner of hasty research cancellations that put their futures at risk.

Perhaps most damningly, the younger Kennedy has elected to "wind down" the development of mRNA vaccines and cancel $500 million in research contracts because of his vaccine skepticism, particularly as it relates to COVID-19 vaccines.

Along with its incredible efficacy at staving off further death from the coronavirus pandemic, researchers working with mRNA believe they may be close to achieving a monumental milestone: creating a universal cancer vaccine using the promising biotechnology.

Starting in 2016, virologist Rick Bright headed the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) — the agency that pioneered mRNA research in the US — until he was illegally ousted by president Donald Trump in May 2020 for a whistleblower complaint about his first administration's promotion of hydroxychloroquine as a COVID treatment.

In an alarming piece for the New York Times this past week, Bright likened American supremacy on mRNA research to a military advantage — one that RFK Jr. is throwing away with his ill-advised anti-vax policies.

As with the COVID vaccines, which were primed for success by years of prior research from BARDA, the US has been leading the charge on mRNA cancer vaccines. With the health secretary's errant and dangerous "skepticism," Bright wrote, that lead is at great risk of slipping.

"If the United States abandons mRNA, it will not simply be forfeiting a public health advantage. It will be ceding a strategic asset," Bright wrote. "In national security terms, mRNA is the equivalent of a missile defense system for biology. The ability to rapidly design, produce and deploy medical countermeasures is as vital to our defense as any military capability.

"Adversaries that invest in this technology," he continued, "will be able to respond faster to outbreaks, protecting their populations sooner than we can."

The former BARDA head is not alone neither in his concerns nor his view of American mRNA research as a military asset. In an interview with Politico, Johnathan Kagan, the cofounder of a biotech startup called Corner Therapeutics that works with novel mRNA applications, suggested that America could be poised to lose the vaccine war.

"I get the impression that many people in Washington don’t realize we’re in the middle of a new arms race," Kagan told the magazine. We’re not in the middle of a nuclear arms race anymore. We’re in the middle of a biomedical arms race."

Kagan named China as our greatest "arms race competitor," and cited a recent visit to the country where COVID was first detected as proof.

"China is in an incredible position to take advantage of this," he said. "I was in China for a conference in May, and the enthusiasm for science, the enthusiasm for innovation and for mRNA-based investment could not be higher."

While our impressive mRNA arsenal is still intact for now, Bright, the BARDA virologist, said it's only a matter of time before we lose that "decisive advantage."

"In an era when biological threats can be engineered," he wrote for the NYT, "losing this competitive edge would leave the United States vulnerable and dependent on others for lifesaving tools."

More on RFK Jr.: Trump's Crackpot Secretary of Health Admits That Literally Nobody Should Be Taking Medical Advice from Him

JD Vance Renews Trump Administration's Sympathy with Russia's Putin

Think real estate. Russia is much much larger that Ukraine. Hence, it is a better investment for real estate morons like Trump and Witkoff and their ilk. So they approach the Ukraine-Russia war from that perspective: What can I get out of this conflict? Siding with the Russians is a financially safer bet than with the Ukrainians.

As ignorant stupid merchants, they blank out everything else: geography, history, national identities, international law, and of course something they don't have, ethics. 

Putin is playing them for the fools they are. They think they can re-invent the wheel by simply wishing for something then using their "charm" to get it. Putin is by far a much smarter man than Trump, although they both are raging self-centered narcissistic dictators whose only objective in life is to be recognized by history as "Great men", like all the bloodthirsty criminals that wreaked havoc in the world with their invasions and conquests: Xerxes, Alexander, Julius ceasar, Genghis Khan, Umar ibn al-Khattab, Napoleon, Hitler..... Why do we as humans celebrate these monsters and thus encourage other criminals to follow in their footsteps?

Bottom line: Vance and Trump are afraid of Putin and know he's a bloodthirsty dictator. But they keep hoping beyond hope that he somehow can be converted. Deep down, they want Putin to keep undermining Europe and perhaps even to control all of Europe so they - Trump et al. - make a deal with him and detach him from his friendship with China. But in the process, they risk losing both Europe and Russia. Their wager is a stupid short-sighted hope, and as someone said, hope is not a plan.

======================================================== 

NBC’s Kristen Welker Asks JD Vance Point-Blank if the Russians Are Stringing Trump Along

His reply? Putin has "made significant concessions" to the U.S., Vance insists, and has "been willing to be flexible" on "core demands". Yet no one has yet to see or hear what those concessions are, given that Trump has repeatedly publicly conceded to all of Putin's demands on Ukraine.

Stephanie Kaloi
Sun, August 24, 2025


JD Vance (Credit: Meet the Press/NBC)

Russia is “not at all” stringing President Trump along, Vice President JD Vance insisted to NBC’s “Meet the Press with Kristen Welker” in an interview published Sunday.

Vance sat down with Welker for a lengthy interview and one of the first topics the NBC host tackled was ongoing war in Ukraine.

“I had the opportunity to speak with the Russian foreign minister,” Welker began. “He says as of right now there’s no meeting planned between President Putin and President Zelensky, and he added there needs to be an agenda first saying ‘This agenda is not ready at all.'”

At that Welker then asked Vance point-blank, “Are the Russians stringing President Trump along?”

“No. Not at all. I think the Russians have made significant concessions to President Trump for the first time in three and a half years of this conflict,” Vance said. “They’ve actually been willing to be flexible on some of their core demands. They’ve talked about what would be necessary to end the war.”

Though he admitted Russian officials “haven’t been completely there yet,” he said the U.S. is “engaging in this diplomatic process in good faith” and “trying to negotiate as much as we can with both the Russians and the Ukrainians to find a middle ground to stop the killing.”

Vance continued, “I think what the president has tried to do here is try to engage in very aggressive, very energetic diplomacy because this war is not in anyone’s interest. It’s not in Europe or the United States’s interest. We don’t think it’s in Russia or Ukraine’s interest to keep going. So we’re going to keep on pushing for a diplomatic solution.”

Despite Republican insistence to the contrary, the Aug. 16 meeting between Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin has been largely seen as a failure for the United States. “It is painfully clear that Trump is doing this to boost his tough guy image with his base. But that is going to be a challenge,” John Oliver told “Last Week Tonight” viewers.

“Because it is a tough sell for the man who was friends with a child sex trafficker, brought about this mess” — an image of the Jan. 6 insurrection appeared onscreen at this moment — “and on Friday got steamrolled by a bloodthirsty warlord, to convince Americans that he is keeping them safe, when I would argue, if anyone is making things too dadgum dangerous in this country, it’s probably f–king him right now.”

As if his assessment of Russia’s intentions was not enough, Vance also offered a history lesson of sorts.

“If you look historically, whenever you have a complicated war with a lot of death and destruction, it kind of goes in fits and starts. There are hills and valleys to the negotiation,” Vance said.

“We sometimes feel like we’ve made great progress with the Russians, and sometimes, as the president has said, he’s been very frustrated with the Russians. And we’re going to keep on doing what we have to do to bring this thing to a close,” he added.

Vance notably admitted the goal may not be to stop “the killing” — but to make sure the two countries find “middle ground.”

Sunday, August 24, 2025

Dire Warnings on Trump's Economy by Fed Chair Jerome Powell

The combination of tariff-driven inflation and a downturn in hiring has posed a “challenging situation” for the U.S. economy, according to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

Delivering an annual address in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Friday morning, Powell underscored that the economy was engaged in a “curious kind of balance” from a slowdown in both the supply and demand for workers.

“This unusual situation suggests that
downside risks to employment are rising. And if those risks materialize, they can do so quickly in the form of sharply higher layoffs and rising unemployment,” Powell warned.

Powell pointed to the July jobs report, which revised employment data from the previous two months. The updated numbers moved the three-month growth average to 35,000, the lowest three-month period since 2010 (other than the pandemic). It was a stark contrast from the growth felt during 2024, when the measure showed an increase of 168,000 jobs per month. The July report’s downsizing also suggested that while some sectors, such as health care and social assistance, gained jobs,
the vast majority of the market lost employment.

“This slowdown is much larger than assessed just a month ago, as the earlier figures for May and June were revised down substantially,” Powell continued. “But it does not appear that the slowdown in job growth has opened up a large margin of slack in the labor market—an outcome we want to avoid.

“Indeed,
labor force growth has slowed considerably this year with the sharp falloff in immigration, and the labor force participation rate has edged down in recent months,” Powell said.

The Federal Reserve chair also noted that
the effects of Trump’s tariffs on consumer prices are “now clearly visible,” and that the country’s central bank expects the price increases to “accumulate over the coming months.”


Overused Words that Lose Their Meaning: Woke and Antisemite

As John Stuart Mills once said, “Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives", there is occasionally a smart conservative that sprouts here and there among the MAGA herd. The word "woke" has been so overused that it has lost its meaning, which applies also to the word "antisemite" that Zionist extremists slap on anyone who criticizes Israel even as it is perptrating the most barbaric genocide of the 21st century in Palestine.

With some 175 countries now declaring a Free State of Palestine, the imbecile ultra-religious fanatic Jewish Zionists of the Jewish Concentration Resort on the Mediterranean see no problem declaring that the whole world is "antisemitic". "Le ridicule ne tue pas", says the French proverb, meaning ""There is no shame in being ridiculous!"

When a Lebanese sheep strays into occupied Palestine across the border, the Zionists accuse the sheep of being an antisemite. When you're already "stupefied" by reading over and over the same Bronze Age garbage parchment made of stinking goat skin, there is really no shame left for you to be an idiot.
========================================================


Conservative Reporter Calls Out MAGA’s Overuse Of 1 Word: ‘Losing Its Meaning’
Lee Moran
Updated Fri, August 22, 2025

Caroline Downey, a columnist for the conservative National Review, said Thursday that conservatives themselves are to blame for the word “woke” losing its meaning.

“Not everything is woke,” Downey said during a panel on CNN’s “NewsNight,” in response to Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) on social media blasting restaurant chain Cracker Barrel’s new logo as a “woke rebrand” amid a wider MAGA meltdown over the switch.

“I think we’re abusing the term a little bit too much where it’s losing its meaning,” she continued. “That’s really important because some things actually are woke and we should call it like it is.”

The term “woke” originally referred to someone or something that was aware of and attentive to racial and other social justice issues.

Cracker Barrel recently unveiled a simplified logo that drops the image of an old man and a barrel.

Downey ripped the redesign.

“Who at that roundtable was thinking to themself, ‘Ah yes, let’s go back to the minimalism of five years ago that is sterile and bland and neutered and let’s rob this iconic, timeless company of all of its character and charm and fun history and country vibes,’” she asked.

“That’s not super smart,” Downey added. “Maximalism is the moment.”

Thursday, August 21, 2025

Israel Prepares for Grand Genocide Fiesta of the 21st Century

It will be the sequel to the very successful First Genocide Fiesta of the 20th century with the colonial invasion by illegal European migrants (1920-1940), the forced expulsions of the indigenous Palestinian population from their ancestral lands by rape, killings, massacres, terror, and home and village demolitions (1940-1947), followed by the grand finale of dismembering historic Palestine with the creation of an artificial colonial entity known as the State of Israel (1948).

Millions of indigenous Palestinians were expelled from their lands, both within Palestine and outside where they have been living in squalid refugee camps. The aftermath of that catastrophe has been an unending series of a massive campaign of repression by the colonial authorities of attempts by the indigenous Palestinians to oppose and resist the slaughter, the dispossession, and the continued rape of Palestine by more and more European settlers. More lands were seized by the Europeans by either wars or under Israeli occupation in a programmed systematic campaign of demonization (All Palestinians are terrorists), dehumanization (All Palestinians are savages, subhuman animals, etc.), dispossession (home demolitions, villages razed to the ground, olive groves uprooted or burned), denial of identity (Palestinians, we are told by the colonial propaganda, are all "Arab" squatters who moved to Israel from Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Lebanon; The colonial prime minister Golda Meir, who was herself an illegal migrant to Palestine from Ukraine, once said, "there is no such thing as a Palestinian people").

The colonial European atrocities against the indigenous Palestinian population are too many and diverse, but the entire colonial project is premised on two absurd propositions, one religious, the other political-colonial:

1- RELIGIOUS: The land of Palestine, the colonial settlers say, belongs to them because their god, Yahweh, gave it to them some 3,000 years ago when their supposed ancestors were a band of stinking nomads wandering the Arabian desert. Indeed, if one is to believe the mythology and garbage written by these supposed ancestors on their goat-skin parchment, they claim to have been chosen by Yahweh as his favorite pet people who gave them license to invade and massacre all the indigenous Palestinian Canaanites that lived in Palestine back when the Bronze Age was turning into the Iron Age.

If people were to believe such garbage mythology, they should also believe the garbage of the Epic of Gilgamesh or the Scandinavian Sagas or the Hindu Vedas, Itihasas and Puranas, or the Greek Illiad and Odyssey or any other now-abandoned mythologies from around the world. In our time, only the Hebrew garbage mythology of the Torah is still considered "the word of the divine" by millions of people. Why? Because all three garbage mythologies of Judaism, Christianity and Islam are related by the cultural inbreeding of Semitic people in the Near East under the banner of monotheism, the belief in one god only rather than a multitude of gods. 

Many idiots consider this evolution to be a major achievement when the fact itself of believing in any "gods" is a mark of primitiveness: As human cultures better understood the world thanks to the growing intelligence embedded in the human cerebral cortex, their thousands of gods (very ancient cultures) became hundreds of gods and demi-gods (Phoenicians, Greeks, Romans etc.) who were then gradually winnowed down to a handful and eventually stopping at one. Those of us who use their brains can already predict the next step in this trajectory: No god, which is the truth that is already spreading across all human cultures, as knowledge and science make us understand the real world and dispense with garbage myths from our past.

The Epic of Gilgamesh is a series of adventures and stories from Mesopotamia that is antecedent to the garbage of the Torah, the books of the colonial ancestors known as Hebrews whose wanderings in the desert started from the heart of Mesopotamia in what is today Irak. In writing the Torah and developing its fantastic fictional self-serving stories, some of the contents of the Epic Gilgamesh were palgiarized by the hallucinating shamans of the nomadic Hebrews.   

Along with stories from the Epic of Gilgamesh, the wandering Hebrew bedouins also carried other myths and fictional fantasies from around the region. In the Torah, Yahweh - who had many names like El and Baal, is said to have demanded that one of his so-called prophets by the name of Abraham sleep with his maid, miraculously impregnate his 100-years-old wife, take her son and slit his throat as proof of loyalty. Stories like Cain who killed his brother Abel because El-Yahweh favored Cain who offered him meat while disapproving of Abel who offered his vegetables. I guess El-Yahweh was a carnivore and not a bio-oriented vegan. El-Yahweh then decided to kill all people on earth, except a few of his favorites, so he caused a flood that drowned all life. Then Yahweh splits an ocean to allow his pet people to flee their enemies on whom he rained frogs and killed thousands of their innocent babies. The relevant story in all this garbage is that Yawheh ordered - like Donald Trump today orders - that his pet Hebrew people go massacre another innocent people, the Canaanite Palestinians, and take their land. 

The religion of Judaism organized the garbage of the Hebrews into a religion. Then a Jewish sect, the Christians, emerged to say that it has found a new prophet called Jesus who is Yahweh's son, who was mysteriously conceived without physical semen or penetration inside the uterus of a virgin, and whom Yahweh sent to be tortured and killed, only to resurrect him from the dead. All of this is because, hear this, humans are creations of Yahweh himself in his own image, i.e. who look like him, but who for some reason are also filthy sinners. (Is yahweh then a sinner, would ask a Socratic Greek?). Then Yahweh deliberately sent this mythical son to be tortured and killed, then resurrectied from the dead to save us from his own creation, ourselves. Despite millennia of this garbage running around in human cultures, nothing has changed. We still kill and steal and cheat despite all the claims that religions will make us better. We still have not seen one evidence of eternal life, much promised to those who believe the garbage. Religions never made us better and they never will. In fact, religion poisons everything; it is used to brainwash people into hating other people; and is more often than not the direct cause of atrocities and wars.

Then a third manifestation of the same monotheistic crap emerged in a third religion known as Islam. Here, the self-proclaimed prophet Mohammed came out of the city of Mecca, not far from Ur and Jerusalem - I tell you this monotheistic trash was all composted in the desert, in a small restricted area of the world. What a coincidence! Mohammed thought 'Ok, all these prophets who preceded me are fine. I believe in them. I get their garbage. But I'm gonna improve on it' and he launched his new religion which was more of a military-political campaign to conquer and subdue by force of arms. There is less mysteries, metaphysics, supernatural, miracles and fantasy in Islam than there are in its Jewish and Christian siblings, although it does claim that Mohammed rose to the heavens on a winged horse from Jerusalem. 

Sociologically, Islam is a copycat rebranded version of the Jewish religion: It kept intact all the rituals and beliefs of Judaism (one god, circumcision, no pork eating, dual texts - Torah-Talmud in Judaism, versus Koran-Hadith in Islam, memorizing scriptures while bobbing one's head.... etc.) The reason is that Mohammed himself grew up in an environment where all people were Semites belonging to different tribes, but who believed the same things. He might as well have been a Hebrew himself or at least he grew up bathing in a Hebraic-dominated culture. Pre-Islam Arabs were essentially Hebraic in their traditions: They did not eat pork, they circumcized their sons, etc. Islam altered very little in the lives of these otherwise Hebraic "Jewish" people. 

Mohammed particularly hated the new religion, Christianity, because he felt it departed too far from its Hebraic roots, including its "association" of God with other deities, i.e. a return to polytheism. He couldn't accept that God had now a wife, a mother, a son and a whole court of saints and disciples. In fact, he was right: Christianity is what it is because it escaped the Semitic world. It was born inside, but on the fringes of, the Roman empire and was quickly exported to the political capital of the empire, Rome, where it was westernized by adopting the polytheisic structure of the Roman religion. As he saw it from the middle of his Arabian peninsula, Mohammed felt that these polytheist "Mushrikun" (i.e. "associative" in that they associate other deities with the one God) of the Christian Byzantine empire were encroaching on his territory and threatening his Judaic-Hebraic traditions. Note that there already was a Christian Bishop in Mecca at the time, circa 600 AD, which explains in part that Mohammed's mission was less on dogma and more on politics. Islam is thus a political return to Judaism which Mohammed felt was threatened by the new Christian religion.

Enough of this history of the monotheistic garbage.

2-  POLITICAL: The political genesis of the colonial project in Palestine begins with wealthy bankers in the late 19th century central Europe. It was fashionable at that time for a wealthy European to join in the orgy of colonizing the rest of the world with the mission of "civilizing the primitive savages". Wealthy bankers lived in the midst of Empires: the French Empire, the British Empire, the Belgian Empire, the Dutch Empire, the Spanish Empire, the Turkish Ottoman Empire... Leopold II of Belgium absconded with the entire country of the Congo in central Africa and turned it into his own hunting ground and sadistic playground: He'd kill elephants, then cut the hands of the indigenous Africans who wouldn't obey. The wealthy bankers met in the Swiss city of Basel and decided to have their own little colony somewhere in that uncivilized third world: Not only could they run amok with the natives but they could steal their resources and make lots of money. They hesitated between Argentina, a huge largely uninhabited expanse in South America with lots of land, but which was far and had no indigenous people to mistreat, Uganda in central Africa with lots of people to torment and lots of resources to steal but there were too many colonial competitors, and lastly Palestine which was densely inhabited by lots of indigenous people to torment but not many resources, except that it was a few hundred miles away from the recently disovered oil fields in the Arabian peninsula.

And the cudgel fell on Palestine. At the time Palestine was occupied by the declining Turkish Ottoman Empire. Soon, however, the Ottoman Empire collapsed, and the British colonial crooks took it over. During the 1914-1918 war, the British needed money to fund their war machine. The wealthy bankers from Basel made a deal with the British: We'll give you money, you give us Palestine. And so a crook minister by the name of Balfour declared in 1917, one year before the final Ototman retreat from Palestine, that Palestine will be given to the wealthy bankers from central europe. And the invasion began, mostly illegal migrants arriving by boats and landing on the shores of Palestine. On the surface, the British pretended to interdict these illegal migrations while encouraging them in secret per the deal. The indigenous Palestinians began a movement of resistance, which led to a civil war between the natives and the illegal colonial settler terrorists for most of the 1920s and 1940s. But the bankers had lots of money and were sophisticated upper class crooks with means and weapons, and they had the backing of the occupying British. The civil war ended in 1948 when the illegal migrants perpetrated a wholesale massacre of the indigenous Palestinians and sent millions of them into refugee camps inside Palestine and outside Palestine in the neighboring countries of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt. 

Unlike all these countries that had obtained their independence from the Turkish Ottomans, the Palestinians were denied that independence and their country was ravaged by the incoming colonial settlers who created the Jewish colony in Palestine known as Israel. 

As we write these lines, the colonial settlers of Palestine are preparing for a final onslaught on the remaining indigenous Palestinians who have continued to resist the theft and occupation of their ancestral lands by foreign migrants. After bombing Gaza and exterminating 65,000 Palestinian men, women and children, then starving the remaining 2.2 million hemmed inside a large concentration camp, Benjamin Netanyahu is about to launch yet another war of extermination, which he hopes will be the last since he is also plundering the West Bank. 

The Grand Genocide Fiesta II of 2025 will be aired lived, unlike its first 1948 version. Back then the European settlers had a monopoly on the information: Pro-settler newspapers turned savagery and extermination into a civilizing mission: They said the Palestinians were uncultured peasants who did not take good care of their land, but we the European settlers will develop the land and turn the desert green. Netanyahu to this day continues to claim that his genocidal colony's ultra-religious Jewish barbarity is somehow better than the ultra-religious barbarity of the Palestinians, and he is doing a service to the Christian West by "civilizing" the backward Arabs with missiles, bombs, starvation and other refined Jewish peace traditions. 

It is unfortunate that all those countries, nations and organizations that enabled the rape of Palestine over the past 100 years are only now taking action. Why wasn't a Palestinian state recognized by France, the UK, Canada etc. 10, 20 or 30 years ago? Why show some courage only now, when it is almost too late, in the face of the vicious moral blackmail that Zionists have perpetrated by investing all their barbarian marketing ploys in the Holocaust. 

It is indeed too late, and the time for making a difference no longer exists.

Palestine will soon be erased from the maps, the Palestinian people will be a shredded nation dispersed in hundreds of refugee camps, and the world will spend the next 100 years hypocritically and academically discussing if the rape of Palestine by the last colonial criminals was technically a "genocide". Will Israel at some point admit to the genocide? Or will it, like Turkey, continue to reject claims that it caried out the Armenian genocide.?

Wednesday, August 20, 2025

Marjorie Taylor Greene is Now a Humanistic Altruistic Christian Nationalist Racist

Instead of charity, Palestinians need recognition of their identity and humanity, which the US has always refused to do as it complies with the criminal Zionist dictates.

If sincere, MTG should call for recognizing the State of Palestine, and cutting off relations with Israel if it doesn't stop the war. She should endorse sanctions against Israel, including joining the BDS movement. Only pressure will force the Zionist criminals to end this genocidal war against a defenseless civilian population.

Then again, maybe she is after centrist voters at the next elections. You never know with those hypocrites so-called Christians.
=======================================================



Greene rips State Department move to halt visitor visas for people from Gaza
Ashleigh Fields
Tue, August 19, 2025



Greene rips State Department move to halt visitor visas for people from Gaza


Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Tuesday ripped the State Department for halting visitor visas for people from Gaza.

“We need to be the America that allows war torn children to come here for life-saving surgeries and the America that never releases a foreign child sex predator that our great LEO’s caught,” Greene wrote in a post on social platform X, referring to Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, an official in Israel’s National Cyber Directorate who was arrested Monday in connection to a Las Vegas child sex trafficking sting.

“Would it be antisemitic to drag [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu’s Cyber Executive Director back and prosecute this pos to the full extent of the law and at the same time let Palestinian kids who had their limbs and bodies blown apart receive surgeries in America?” she added.

Among the groups halted from obtaining U.S. visas last Saturday were those seeking temporary medical-humanitarian visas for children.

Greene, in recent weeks, has joined a chorus of other lawmakers who have railed against the Trump administration and Israel over the humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

“I’m not saying bring in refugees or use tax payer dollars, not at all, but when did America’s heart grow so cold to refuse innocent children privately funded surgeries and then they return home after they recover?” she added in her Tuesday social media post.

“Wouldn’t we allow Israeli children if they were the ones needing surgery? Or war torn children from any other country?” she continued.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the Trump administration’s decision to halt visa processing for visitors from Gaza during a Sunday appearance on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.”

“First of all, it’s not just kids,” Rubio said. “It’s a bunch of adults that are accompanying them.”

“Second, we had outreach from multiple congressional offices asking questions about it, and so we’re going to reevaluate how those visas are being granted,” he continued. “Not just to the children, but how those visas are being granted to the people who are accompanying them and, by the way, to some of the organizations that are facilitating it.”

Rubio suggested some of the visitors had ties to Hamas.

“And so we are not going to be in partnership with groups that are friendly with Hamas. So we need to — we’re going to pause those visas,” pending further review, he told host Margaret Brennan.

But Greene pushed back on the administration’s movie, invoking religious rhetoric.

“I know God does not discriminate in his love for children. Why would we?” she asked on Tuesday.

To African-American "Uncle Tom" Voters for the Moron: He Thinks Slavery Was Good

... The white christian nationalist racist may even want to reinstate slavery because it provides free labor which made the country GREAT back in the 18th-19th centuries. Imagine running corporations and companies without having to pay nagging employees who always want more. Employee compensation typically accounts for 40% to 80% of a company's gross revenue, which includes salaries, benefits, and training costs, hence slavery would provide free labor and those 40-80% costs would disappear and go straight into net profit.

Donald Dumb wants the US to be rich, then what is better than herding millions of people and enslaving them to build this country and make it even richer? I am surprised the dumb asshole is not directing his ICE-GESTAPO to round up all these illegal migrants and immigrants and put them to work for free to Make America Great Again. The country was great because of slavery's free labor. With the slaves freed and emancipated, the country degraded. It's so simple that an imbecile like him could understand it. But he has first to understand that museums deal with the PAST, not the FUTURE!
======================================================


Trump Attacks Smithsonian For Focus On 'How Bad Slavery Was'
David Moye

Wed, August 20, 2025



Donald Trump was the subject of much internet mockery on Tuesday after he griped in a Truth Social post about the Smithsonian Institution (checks notes) portraying slavery as a bad thing.

In the post, the president lashed out at America’s museums for being “the last remaining segment of ‘WOKE,’” before singling out the Smithsonian as “OUT OF CONTROL” for discussing “how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been,” but nothing about “Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future.”

TruthSocial post: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115056914674717313 TruthSocial.com

Trump’s animosity toward the Smithsonian is nothing new.

Back in March, he issued an executive order that targeted the research institute for content he claimed promoted so-called “divisive ideology.”

But one person’s “divisive ideology” is most people’s idea of accurate historical representation.

So naturally, people blasted Trump for complaining about the Smithsonian putting slavery in a bad light.

Trump says the Smithsonian is “out of control” for discussing “how bad slavery was.”

Insane. pic.twitter.com/8ywUS2Q6ly
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) August 19, 2025

Ummm...What were the good parts of slavery, MAGA? pic.twitter.com/oSNkXvWPib
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) August 19, 2025

Trump wants to cover up slavery like it’s in the Epstein files.
— Sam Youngman (@samyoungman) August 19, 2025

Slavery WAS bad, Donald. It’s absurd that this even needs to be said. 
We don’t whitewash history; we learn from it. 
You keep trying to rewrite the past— @TheBlackCaucus won’t let you get away with it. https://t.co/CoVc7LqY5b— Congresswoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove (@RepKamlagerDove) August 19, 2025

Trump supports slavery. 
Prove me wrong. pic.twitter.com/Lz53O21cM9 — Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) August 19, 2025

Donald Trump is reviewing museums because they talk too much about how bad slavery was.
Also, why would museums talk about the future? pic.twitter.com/tZN1BRLoAr — Aaron Parnas (@AaronParnas) August 19, 2025

1. We have normalized having a toddler in the White House who types in caps and uses random quote marks. ("HOTTEST"?). How is any of the below normal? How are we okay with this?
2. He wants to celebrate our current country in a museum? His brain is too broken to understand what a… https://t.co/UzvfeQHxa0 — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) August 19, 2025

Breaking: Trump thinks we've done enough remembering about how bad slavery was
If you've doubted his racism and inhumanity - you can stop doubting now pic.twitter.com/1uwM0AeTvo
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) August 19, 2025

Yep. He wants to whitewash history. Slavery never happened. Woman and minorities always had the right to vote. Nobody ever sang a song about what a horrible person Fred Trump was. Nor was his dad arrested at a KKK rally. In fact the KKK is a hoax concocted by the dems... What?
— J.C.'s Thought Dump (@jcsthoughtdump) August 19, 2025

Imagine being so fragile that teaching slavery makes you feel attacked. The country isn’t bad because museums teach slavery. It’s bad because people like Trump refuse to learn from it. pic.twitter.com/dY54UnGKyP — Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) August 19, 2025




Tuesday, August 19, 2025

Shooting, explosives, sleepless nights: Life in Israeli Jewish Society

Israel has never known peace. From its violent genocidal inception in the 1940s, it continues to live in constant fear, anxiety and violence. Every Israeli citizen is a soldier, except the ultra-religious morons who are exempted. But even the liberal Europeans of Tel Aviv know their life is always on a knife's edge, given the resilience of the Palestinian victims of their Zionist barbarity - why don't the Palestinians just die already or vanish and leave those poor Holocaust victims alone?

Israelis know deep down that they are harvesting now what they sowed in the 1930s and 1940s and beyond: Violence breed more violence, and unless a solution to the Palestinian tragedy is found, the future looks horribly bleak for Israel. The stupidity of ultra-religious Jewish barbarians makes them believe that the ultra-religious Muslim barbarians of the Arabian Gulf - their partners in the Abrahamic Accords - will peacefully live and prosper with them. 

Israel always says what it doesn't want. It never says what it wants. Ask any Israeli what he thinks Israel's 5 million Jews should do with the 5 million Palestinians they torment and occupy, and you'll get a blank stare. The extremist Jewish terrorists like Ben-Gvir and Smotrich and their herd of barbarian ultra-religious numskulls do, in contrast, say what every Israel wishes but dares not say: Kill as many Palestinians as possible and ethnically cleanse the rest (as was done in the 1948 Catastrophe War). 

The mantra of Israel's existence remains extant and valid as we speak. Israelis officially say they are against a Palestinian state, but they never say what alternative they have because their only alternative for a pure Jewish supremacist Israel is a barbaric act of genocide and ethnic cleansing that the world will surely condemn (unlike in 1948). 

Do they want to live in one state together with the Palestinians? Again, those pseudo-liberals in the Tel Aviv bubble, will say yes but deep down they know this goes against their dream of a "democracy for Jews only". 

No two-states, no one-state, so what gives? The strategy so far has been to get rid of the Palestinian natives (those they could not kill or massacre) by gradual, slow, incremental, cumulative genocide and ethnic cleansing that the Zionists hope will not be noticed as such by the international community. 

But the horrific terrorist attacks by Hamas on October 7, 2023 have shuffled all the cards and exposed the embedded colonial criminality and fallacy behind the existence of Israel. By watching live how Israel is "dealing" with its indigenous Palestinian problem in Gaza and the West Bank, the entire world has discovered how Israel was created in 1948. Back then, Israel got away literally with murder because - the press was monopolized by world Zionism, the indigenous Palestinians were unsophisticated, and the world felt guilty for what the Germans had done to their own Jewish citizens. But things have changed: There is no more monopoly on the information, the Palestinians are more sophisticated, and the world no longer feels guilty for the Holocaust and has no pity for violent racist criminal Israeli settlers mass murdering a defenseless indigenous civilian population. 

As we speak, inside Israeli society, crime is rampant. Security forces are more concerned with the starvation and mass murder campaign in Gaza and the West Bank than with the creeping crime inside Israel proper. Security inside Israeli cities and settlements is at an all-time low, with violence emanating from the lower and poorer rungs of Israeli society. Just like any "western" country, the lower strata of society are essentially composed of Jewish illegal migrants from Iran, Arab countries, Africa and elsewhere in the Third World, in addition to the second-class citizens of Israeli Palestinian Arabs and Druze. There is no question that the "White" European Ashkenazi Jews make up the ruling class of Israel. 

The White European Israelis were the first illegal migrants to arrive in Palestine between the 1920s and the 1940s and organize themselves into terrorist organizations whose objective was to terrorize the indigenous Palestinian villagers and townspeople, to force them to leave their ancestral homes, killing and raping when necessary, and thus make way for more illegal Jewish migrants to come and partake in the rape of Palestine.

It was later, after 1948, that the Jewish Zionist organizations around the world - including for example the Jewish Agency - began terrorizing and enticing Arab, Iranian and other non-European Jews otherwise happily living for millennia without discrimination to leave their native countries and emigrate to Israel, not to be protected as Zionists claim, but to artificially increase the numbers of Jews and justify the existence of the artificial Jewish colony in Palestine. The White European Jews needed bodies to settle the plundered Palestinian villages, to enroll in the army and essentially build up, still artificially, a new militaristic colonial state witth expansionist ambitions.

As you can see on a map of Israel, you'll notice that besides the north - which is essentially Arab Palestinians - and the south - which is essentially the Arab nomad Naqab Desert - Israel proper is the thin sliver of territory along the coast where the illegal Jewish terrorist migrants from Europe first landed. Notice too that the capture of Jersualem in 1967 is reflected by the land arrow pointing from that coastal sliver of land into the Palestinian heartland where Jerusalem belongs.

When you are born in violence, you are condemned to live in violence. And so it is today in Israel. While Israeli soldiers sow mayhem, plunder, killings and ethnic cleansing in the Palestinian heartland, the illegally settled cities along the coast suffer from intra-Jewish insecurity and hostility between the poor classes of African and Arab Jews and their more affluent "white" European Jews. Very typical of a colonial architecture. Not to mention the constant fear of missiles slamming these areas and the risks of Palestinian terrorist-resistance attacks. 

Twenty-one-year-old Sarah Blumenthal, from Tel Aviv, describes her terror when her friend and neighbor was murdered by masked Israeli gangsters while working in his store – a case that remains unsolved. She says the fear of becoming a target has become part of daily life.

“He was my neighbor and my scout leader,” she said. “We were united by our desire to give back to the community. He was murdered for no clear reason, and to this day, no one knows why. It was a complete shock.”

She warned that this level of violence is becoming normalized among youth, with potentially long-term consequences. “My fear is that young people will get used to this reality and lose the ability to be shocked,” she said. “I feel a responsibility to speak out and to guide them toward a better path.”

She also criticized law enforcement for failing to stop the wave of killings, busy as police is by maintaining order in the large anti-Netanyahu demonstrations that often turn violent and cause deaths and injuries. It used to be the case that when a Jewish person is murdered, the police finds the killer within hours. When a Palestinian Israeli is murdered, there hardly is ever any investigation. But now the indifference and incompetence of law enforcement has crossed into all segments of society. There is no deterrence. Murderers act without fear.

Yuval Ryan, founder and CEO of the Zion Center in Kfar Yehuda, lost his son to gun violence and said he now sees more and more families grieving their children. “My son, who was full of life and dreams, was murdered in cold blood,” Ryan said. “There was no justification for taking his life. Crime here didn’t appear overnight– it’s the result of years of neglect.”

Systemic failures in education, employment, and opportunity in a society strained by decades of conflits, terrorism, state violence and wars, have created a breeding ground for crime. “Our youth are exposed to weapons and explosives because they see them as normal. Violence is a normal way of life in Israel. Unless it begins to rectify the errors of its violent past, Israel, already stained by its violent creation in a hostile region of the world, is condemned to live on a constant war footing.

Sunday, August 17, 2025

Must See This.

 https://www.buzzfeed.com/hannahmarder/photos-that-prove-were-living-in-a-genuine-dystopia?utm_source=yahoo-recirc-links

Violence Begets Violence, but Who Started it?

The Beatles said it best: The love you take is equal to the love you make. Despite their military might, Zionists are losing the hearts and minds battle, and are harvesting what they sowed. They are getting what they deserve for their rape of Palestine.

When two parties are in an endless conflict with violence, retribution and counter-attacks, reason comples one to go back to the initial trigger of the conflict. That is, who began the cycle? Who took that first action that was inappropriate, unjustified, or flagrantly unacceptable, and which, still within reason, justifies a response from the aggrieved party?

By the second, third and all subsequent acts of violence between the two sides, we simply seem to forget the huge responsibility borne by the party that first triggered, without justification, the cycle.

This applies particularly well to Palestine and its conflict with "Israel".  

Who had lived in Palestine for thousands of years and never left? The Palestinians of course. They may have been polytheists as the people of Canaan; they may have converted to Judaism when the Hebrew barbarian invaders arrived to their self-proclaimed "promised land" that did not belong to them (except in the garbage biblical mythology of their own creation) but belonged to the indigenous Palestinian Canaanites; the Palestinians may have then converted to Christianity when the Roman Empire turned Christian and imposed the religion as its official religion; they finally converted to Islam when the Arab nomads arrived in the 7th century, and since that time Palestine has always been part of the Muslim world.

Who is the truly indigenous people deeply rooted in its land, villages, olive orchards, grapevines and traditions they share with everyone else around them in the Mediterranean? The Palestinians of course, like the Lebanese, Syrians, Turks, Greeks, Italians, French, Spaniards, Tunisians, Algerians, Egyptians....

Who never did anything wrong to those false Jewish converts from central and eastern Europe claiming to be the descendants of the murderous biblical Hebrews? The Palestinians. 

Who had lived under a foreign brutal Turkish Ottoman occupation for 400 years (1516-1918)?  The Palestinians.

Who was told by the League of Nations that, as of 1918, they will be free of the defeated Turks and they will be guided by the British colonial crooks as they build their own institutions and their own state? The Palestinians. 

That was the same deal made by the League of Nations with the Lebanese, just north of the border. France was mandated to indeed assist the Lebanese in building their own state and institutions between 1920 and 1943, when the French left a functioning and prosperous Lebanon behind them. Why did a very similar plan between the Palestinians and the British fail? Why did two identical pathways in Lebanon and Palestine work in one but failed in the other?

The answer: The colonial European Jewish invasion of Palestine under the hylocritical blessing of the British crooks who had only a mandate over Palestine and did not receive an ownership deed by the League of Nations. Palestine belonged to the Palestinians, not to the British criminals. It wasn't theirs to give away to greedy me-too colonial Jews from Eastern and Central Europe.

One hundred years ago, there were at most 5,000 foreign Jews visiting Palestine as pilgrims or as orientalists and about 600,000 native indigenous Christian and Muslim Palestinians. No Jews had - at least not as a recognizable collective community - lived in Palestine for the past 2,000 years. Those Palestinian Jews who had lived there during the time of Jesus, were forcibly converted to Christianity by the Romans, then to Islam by the Arabs. There is no evidence whatsoever of a massive Jewish migration out of Palestine after the defeat of the JEWISH INTIFADA against the Roman occupation. Rather, the newly Christianized Romans proceeded to forcibly convert those Palestinian Jews, as well as the Phoenician and Canaanite polytheists worshippers of Baal, Ishtar, Adonis etc.) into the Christian religion.

As such, no modern member of the Jewish religion can make a collective claim of ownership of the land of Palestine. It is even more troubling that all those Europeans who claimed to be Jews in the 20th century were recent converts to Judaism and have no ties, neither cultural nor genetic, with the Hebrews of biblical Palestine. They can no longer can claim ownership of the land as a collective Jewish community "returning" to the land. 

If the world is to accept the Zionist argument of a "return", then the precedent can be used to justify a slew of horrific international conflicts: Greeks and Romans should claim all of Turkey because they ruled it as the Eastern Roman Byzantium for centuries. Let's see, Great Britain should reclaim all of India and Pakistan: They took them by force and ruled them for centuries. The Hebrews took Palestine in an orgy of genocidal barbarity as related in the bible, so they are land thieves to begin with. Who the fuck was Yahweh to give them the land back in the Bronze Age? Who the fuck were the British to give the modern Jews the land in 1917? For some recent adherents to the religion of Judaism to show up 2,000 years after the Hebrews and claim the land as theirs, and engage in a second orgy of violence (the creation of "Israel") against the native Canaanite Palestinians, is absolutely absurd and ridiculous.

Therefore, when the European Zionists decided to steal Palestine on the basis of the biblical garbage, they took that first step toward triggering the endless cycle of violence we see today in Palestine. THEY (European fake Jews) started it. Up to the 1920s, the Palestinians had done nothing to those European fake Jews. They had no reason to fight them or to be antisemitic like the European Christians. But when someone you don't even know illegally lands on your shores and tries to strip you of your land, of your identity, of your humanity, what are you supposed to do? Watch and allow it to happen? No, you fight back.

The Palestinians emerging from 400 years of a brutal Turkish occupation lacked the sophistication and wealth of the fake European Jews. In fighting back, the odds were against them, especially when those who were supposed to protect them and guide them - the colonial British crooks - betrayed them and sold their country to the European fake Jews. 

The Palestinians have been fighting for 100 years. Their resilience is to be admired in the face of terrible odds. And they continue to fight, even after being raped, killed and chased out of their lands, villages and towns by Jewish terrorist organizations (Haganah, Stern, Irgun, Lehi...), even after being abandoned by an international community brainwashed into guilt by Zionist propaganda for what European Christians, not Palestinians, did to the European Jews. 

Who started the conflict in Palestine? The fake European Jews. They are responsible for the tragedy unfolding before our eyes. The Palestinians are refugees in their own land and across the region, because they were expelled by Jewish violence itself emanating not from an act of retribution - the Palestinians had done nothing to those European colonial settlers who therefore were not invading Palestine in the 1920s and 1930s seeking revenge. Jewish violence against Palestinians was a pure unilateral act of colonial ethnic cleansing, warranted only by the desire to expel the indigenous Palestinians from their lands and replace them - ONE VERY SUCCESSFUL GREAT REPLACEMENT EPISODE - with European colonial settlers. 

Have you ever asked yourself why do we refer to places where Palestinians live as "villages" and "towns", while we refer to places where European Jews live as "settlements" and "colonies"? 

======================================================== 

Tens of thousands Demonstrate in Manhattan calling for a "global intifada", a phrase that invokes great liberation revolutions and uprisings against brutal colonialism.

The American revolutionaries of 1776 engaged in an intifada against the British colonial crooks.

The French Resistance during WWII (1941-1945) was an intifada against German Nazi occcupation.

The Front de Libération Nationale in the Algeria of the 1950s was an intifada against a 130-year-long French colonial occupation and brutality.

The Vietcong in Vietnam was an intifada against French colonial occcupation, then against the dumb American invasion of the 1960s and 1970s. 

Every conflict in our time has roots in the disgusting primitive impulses that human civilizations continue to practice: Raids, exclusive religions, forced conversions, missionary work, razzias, invasions, conquests, colonization, rapes, pillaging, plundering, genocides, ethnic cleansings, etc. (e.g. Jewish Zionists in Palestine, German Nazis in Europe, Hutu barbarians in Rwanda, Spanish Catholic conquistadores in Latin America, English Puritan primitives in north America....) have been going on for millennia. 

But explorations, science, discoveries, inventions, etc. have also been the product of decent human beings. Which side do you belong to?

The Palestinians have been engaged in a 100-year long intifada against foreign european invading colonial settlers who happen to claim Judaism as their religion. The Palestinians are not antisemitic, the Christian Europeans are. The Palestinians never invaded anyone. They just want to recover land stolen from them by barbarian colonial settlers intent on exterminating and wiping them out. Can you blame them? 

Thousands of pro-Palestine demonstrators rally in New York

Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine freedom demonstrators holding signs denouncing Brutal Zionist Israeli colonialism and genocide flooded midtown Manhattan Saturday afternoon, calling for a "global intifada," a slogan the entire world has come to equate with justified resistance against colonial violence against local Palestinians communities across Palestine.

The Stand with Gaza protesters, carrying signs seeking to "end all aid to Israel," clanged cowbells while chanting "free, free Palestine" and "Palestine will live forever."

Since the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas in southern Israel, the phrase "globalize the intifada" has been a call for the international community to finally admit the tragic error of the creation of the arificial and brutal Jewish colony in Palestine known as "Israel", and to begin repairing and compensating the untold harm done to the indigenous Palestinian population for the past 100 years. 

Zionist propaganda and its mouthpieces claim that the word "Intifada" is a call to violence. The word "Intifada" literally means "Uprising" in English. And uprisings, inluding the Jewish uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto, and the Algerian uprising against the French colonial autorities, and the French Resistance uoprising against German occupation, and the too many others to list here, are by defnition violent. But their violence is aimed at the colonial authorities and nothing else. 

Would you call a French Resistance member fighting the Nazis a Germanophobe terrorist? No, you wouldn't because that person is fighting the German occupation, and not the German people. Did the French resistance kill German civilians? Naturally, if they were serving the German military occupation.

Would you call an Algerian resistance member fighting the French colonial army a Francophobe or Anti-christian terrorist? No you wouldn't because he is not fighting neither the French people nor their Christian religion, only the French colonial military authorities. Did the Algerian resistance kill French civilian settlers? Naturally, because they were one component of the occupation.

So the Palestinian resistance against the Zionist occupation of Palestine is not an anti-Semitic movement aimed at Jews per se. In fact, many pro-Palestine demonstrators in Manhattan are themselves decent human beings who happen to be Jews because, unless psychology is itself distorted by Zionist propaganda, Jews cannot by definition be antisemites.

New York City Democratic socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, recently sparked controversy among pro-colonial Zionist circles because he failed to publicly condemn the use of the word "intifada".

People gather during the Stand with Gaza protest at Bryant Park in New York Aug. 16, 2025.

U.S. Representatives (Zionist Jews) Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and Rudy Yakym, R-Ind., denounced the term "Intifada" as "a call to violence against Israeli and Jewish people across the world," which is a stupid and abused propaganda language Zionists learned from their mentors the German Nazis. The term "Intifada" is not to incite violence against Jews, first because many Jews accept it as a justifiable resistance against Zionist brutality in Palestine and cannot therefore be supportive of violence against themselves. Second, it is the right of every person living under an illegal, brutal and inhumane foreign occupation to fight back, to resist, and yes, to mount an uprising - an Intifada - against the colonial rapist.

Zionists, who hold the American people a captive audience brainwashed day and day out into the garbage Zionist lies and deception, are trying to ban words. Banning words is what Nazis and Fascists do. They are afraid of a word! Imagine the depth of their fear of a simple word. If "Intifada" should be banned, then let us create a lexicon of words to ban, like resistance, liberation, freedom, uprising, etc. because they all harken to movements against authoritarian and colonial violence.

The Zionist legislation submitted to the House would denote the word "INTIFADA" as a call to violence against Israeli and Jewish people throughout the world, putting their safety at risk. It also discourages (why not altogether "prohibit") leaders from signing songs using the word INTIFADA. It also cites violent attacks against Jewish people in the U.S., including the fatal burning of pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, and the deadly shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in D.C. 

But the American people, especially the educated East Coast, are not dumb ignorant peasants from the middle and the south of the United States whose barbaric faith makes them an easy prey to biblically-inspired bullshit propaganda. They can see it every day on their screens: when compared to the 65,000 Palestinians killed by foreign colonial Zionist violence in occupied Palestine against starving indigenous women and children, these few and far in between acts of violence against Jews do not match, even if reprehensible. By extension, any act of violence - thousands every day in the US - is reprehensible, and the two attacks cited above by Zionist shills as a justification for brutality and violence ten thousands miles away and to repress free speech here in the US, smack of desperate and ridiculously vain attempts at winning the hearts and minds of a Zionist-exhausted and -fatigued American audience. Zionist Israel is the aggressor, the colonial, the foreign, the brutal, the occupier.... Palestinians are the natives, the indigeous owners of the land defending themselves against it, and have been for 100 years. Banning one word is so stupidly desperate that it exposes the dynamic of the conflict and its inevitable outcome: Freedom for Palestine.