How Long do Colonial Rapes of Indigenous Nations Last? A Brief Overview

This is how colonial empires civilize the conquered natives

Though Rome existed during the middle of the first millennium BC, the Romans ruled an empire all around the Mediterrenan (Mare nostrum = our sea) from 27 BC to AD 476 in the West, and continued in the East as the Greek Byzantine Empire until 1453. Where are the Romans and their empire today? In the trashbin of history. They were kicked out and their empire dismantled by German tribes of the time whom they refer to as "barbarians".

The Arab Muslim Moors invaded and took Spain and southern France. They settled in their "Andalus" colony and stayed nearly 800 years (711 AD until the fall of Granada in 1492). They pilfered the country of its resources and waged many wars agaisnt the indigenous Spaniards, but then they were kicked out.

The Europeans, led by the French, invaded and conquered Palestine between 1095 and 1291.  As they marched across southeastern Europe to reach Palestine, they looted, raped, and massacred the people of many cities, including other Christians (of the Orthodox faith) as well as the Muslim population of Jerusalem. They created kingdoms, counties and principalities. They founded settlements and bred with the locals. But they were kicked out after 200 years. 

The French colonial creeps conquered Algeria (among other north African countries). They settled in their "Algérie Française" and stayed 130 years (1830 until 1962). They pilfered the country of its resources and committed racist massacres against the indigenous Algerians, but then they were kicked out.

The British colonial crooks invaded India (beginning in 1608) and traded and settled in what they called the "British Raj", which was the period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until 1947. But then they were kicked out after pilfering the resources of the country. 

The Germans Germans first arrived in Namibia in 1884, when the territory was declared a protectorate of the German Empire, known as "German South West Africa". They massacred and pilfered, but luckily not for long. They left Namibia after World War I in 1915, when their colony was captured by Allied forces. 

The Dutch colonized South Africa by establishing a trading colony at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652. They slowly expanded into a larger colony as Dutch farmers, known as Boers, began massacring and displacing indigenous African communities. But the crooked British got jealous so they captured the Cape Colony in 1795 and finalized its seizure in 1806. But the British were sticky bastards. White apartheid South Africa did not gain independence from the UK until 1931 and finally got rid of white European rule in 1994.

Vietnam, China, and many other countries had to fight to kick their European colonizers out. 

The colonizers ALWAYS claimed to be bringing civilization to the savages 

Yet, rarely have invading colonizers succeed in permanently controlling their conquered victims and causing an actual GREAT REPLACEMENT of one population by another. When this did happen in history, it is usually because the numbers of invading thugs and thieves were insufficient to dominate. 

One example that comes to mind of a partially successful Great Replacement is the Turkic invasion of southeastern Europe. It was partially successful because they arrived in great numbers that outnumbered the indigenous populations. Turcomans began invading Europe in the late 13th century. They became known as Ottomans (after their Sultan Osman) and their expansion and seizure of formely Greek-Byzantine-Eastern Roman territories culminated with their conquest of Constantinople (whose name they butchered into today's Istanbul) in 1453. They reached Vienna but were repelled by a Polish king. Ultimately, they began retreating from Southeastern europe, leaving behind them Islamized regions like Kosovo, Bosnia, Albania, though they failed at islamizing Greece. Eventually, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1918 led to the creation of modern-day Turkey over what were Greek, Armenian and Kurdish territories. In other words, they were kicked out from most of the territories they had conquered during 600 years of occupation, except Anatolia and Western Thrace which constitute most of today's Turkey. Is this an instance of a partial success of a Great Replacement of indigenous peoples by a foreign invader? Perhaps. But I wouldn't dismiss the possibility of a Greek re-invasion and reconquest at some point in the future.

Now, please compare all of these colonizing enterprises with the divine Israel, incepted by virtue of primitive Bronze Age writings - known as the Torah or Old Testament. The numbers of conquering Zionists is pathetically small (6 million?) compared to the 400 million Muslim Arabs that surround them. Give them 100, 200, 300 ...let's be generous with 800 years... Will they still be there? What chance do they have, really? No amount of technology, deceptive propaganda and sophisticated wizradry can compensate for the demographic disadvantage and the historical precedents. Israelites ruled Palestine some 300 years under David and Solomon, but then other nations conquered it from them (Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, etc.). The "return" of the Zionists to Palestine is like the return of the Pink Panther - a farce of history that was enabled by favorable circumstances. Once the circumstances change - and they are bound to change - the Zionists will have to leave like all the conquering colonizing bastards before them were kicked out of the places they colonized. They don't belong to the Near East any more than the British belonged to India or China, or that the Arabs belonged to Spain.