The Christian American Taliban, otherwise known as MAGA-Evangelicals, have been pushing for American women to shun working outside the house, and instead stay at home cooking, having babies, cleaning the house and preparing for the return home of their macho adulterous alcoholic husbands whose errings should be forgiven by Jesus the Savior. That is the God-mandated tradition of "real" patriotic Americans that Donald Dump has been promoting as a way to gain more votes from the dumb morons of the American hinterland.
But Donald Hump has appointed several women, generally blondes and bimboesque like him, to powerful jobs. How can these women be simultaneously at home cooking, cleaning and having babies, AND in the office persecuting downtrodden defenseless lesser humans like migrants and immigrants?
Keep in mind that white Americans virtually all descend from poor, rural, uncultured, illiterate, ignorant peasants from the boonies of Europe. In Emma Lazarus's words, those are "the tired, the poor, the huddled masses, the
wretched refuse, the homeless, the tempest-tost..." to which she could have very well added a verse emphasizing, "the inbred, the morons, the undeveloped, the primitive, the criminal, the poachers....". People who are doing well in their homelands have no compelling reason to migrate to a land of violence. Those inborn traits have percolated down the genetic chain over the past 400 years, which should help you understand why the entire world refers to white Americans as dumb and ugly, and as importantly why it is so easy for creepy Zionists to brainwash white Americans into believing the garbage of the bible and, by extension, to be the only ones in the world who support a criminal colonial enterprise like Israel.
The charm of MAGA is its intrinsic stupidity that has been cultivated and genetically selected for ever since the first Radical Right extremist ultra-religious morons - a.k.a. pilgrims - landed at Plymouth. Not even their interactions with nobler civilizations (African slaves, indigenous Amerindians) made any improvement in their inbred incestuous genetic pool that shines through much of the Trump administration.
Even when MAGA women pretend to be able to juggle home-bound submissiveness to their husbands AND work outside the home, they do it "by the tail" so to speak. Erika Kirk, we are told, holds a master’s degree in American legal studies from Liberty
University: Sounds like Christian Sharia Law to me: How they can reconcile "legal" with the calcified biblical obstruction of knowledge, is beyond understanding. Liberty University is one of trashiest ultra-religious universities that helps students walk back from the modern world into Bronze Age lives. Liberty should hire a few Taliban jurisprudents to learn from them how to reconcile the modern world with ancient garbage. Kirk is also a doctoral student in biblical studies - still more garbage to compost her brain - whose degree she is assured to obtain because of pity over her Radical Right husband's murder. Erika Kirk is exploiting her husband's death to promote her own brand new career as a traditional wife and mom with great professional and political ambitions.
========================================================
MAGA Christians Want Wives To Stay At Home — But There's An Ironic Hypocrisy
Brittany Wong
Updated Thu, October 2, 2025
[Iznogood: Prototypes of American modern-day unevolved dinosaurs. Left: Decerebrated Zio-Nazi bald primate Stephen Miller. Right: Hillbilly Vice-President of the United Scams of America]
In an April 2025 episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” Erika Kirk, the wife of the slain conservative pundit, gave her thoughts on submission and the role of a woman in a “Biblical marriage.”
“Your husband has to be the one that goes out into the world and builds and battles and comes home. Conquers,” she said as Charlie Kirk sat next to her. “[He] comes home and is like, this is my nest egg, this is what I worked so hard for, and the wife is like, ‘Welcome home, babe, whatever you need, we’re here.’”
There are occasions when a man has to step in and stay at home ― she admitted that her own father did so briefly and that it was a “really sweet and really special” time in her childhood. Still, she said, her parents divorced, which proved her point: Generally, a marriage is stronger when the man is the provider.
Now, Erika Kirk is foisted into the provider role. A week after Charlie Kirk was gunned down during a speaking event at a Utah campus, Erika Kirk was announced as the CEO and chair of the board for his company, Turning Point USA.
The board “unanimously elected” Erika Kirk, explaining that “in prior discussions, Charlie expressed to multiple executives that this is what he wanted in the event of his death.”
In a speech days after his death, she spoke directly to her husband’s murderer: “You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife.”
On this week’s episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show” this week, the mom of two smiled and assured the couple’s legions of fans that her “husband’s voice will live on. The show will go on.”
In many ways, Erika Kirk is very much aligned with Phyllis Schlafly, balancing motherhood with political advocacy. Illustration: HuffPost; Photo: Getty Images
But some may wonder: How will Erika Kirk, 36, reconcile her new role as CEO of his super PAC with the messaging she’s promoted at her late husband’s side ― that women are meant to be “the guardian of your home” and shouldn’t pursue their own careers while raising children?
For conservatives, the contradiction goes down easy: From the anti-suffrage era to modern politics, women have long played an instrumental role in the conservative movement, through a loophole: Having it all ― a political career and a tradwife life ― is possible, but only with the blessing of your husband or your father.
In Erika Kirk’s case, she’s continuing his career, not taking hers to new heights.
“Conservative women claiming not to be career women while being in the public eye in politics or business is nothing new,” said Shauna Shames, an associate professor of political science and women’s studies at Rutgers University–Camden in New Jersey.
“Erika Kirk is a modern incarnation but not different in kind to [gay rights opponent] Anita Bryant, televangelist Tammy Faye Bakker and certainly Phyllis Schlafly.”
Erika Kirk and tradwife influencers owe a lot to one woman: Phyllis Schlafly.
Perhaps no one has pulled off this public balancing act with as much dexterity as Phyllis Schlafly. The conservative activist enjoyed a thriving, decades-long career in politics ― she famously led a successful campaign against the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s ― while reminding the women of America that security and home and hearth was preferable to a job and equality.
A mom of six ― and wife to Fred Schlafly, a lawyer ― Schlafly argued that it was possible to balance submission at home with a certain kind of political advocacy: letter-writing campaigns, speaking before women’s clubs, debating feminists (and in some cases, rattling them) while framing oneself as the voice of the “traditional” American woman.
In a 1978 profile in Time magazine, Schlafly spoke of how she squared her career ― a law degree, two runs for Congress ― with her stay-at-home rhetoric: “My husband lets me do what I want to do,” she said. “I have canceled speeches whenever my husband thought that I had been away from home too much.”
In speeches, Schlafly joked about her balancing act and how her wifely subservience irked her opponents. “First of all, I want to thank my husband Fred, for letting me come — I always like to say that, because it makes the libs so mad!” she’s quoted as saying.
Phyllis Schafly identified as a stay-at-home mom while leading The STOP ERA group and opposing the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The acronym STOP stood for "Stop Taking Our Privileges". Bettmann via Getty Images
In many ways, Erika Kirk falls into the Schlafly mold: They’re both highly educated. While Charlie Kirk argued that college “is a waste of time” to an audience at the Turning Point Action’s Young Women’s Leadership Summit in August, his wife holds a master’s degree in American legal studies from Liberty University, and is currently pursuing a doctorate in biblical studies, according to her website.
Since having two kids, she’s continued to host a podcast and run a Christian clothing line and ministry.
Still, “boss babe culture” is “toxic,” she told the couple’s fans at the same summit in 2021.
“When you meet the right man, everything shifts, everything changes. When I met Charlie, that was it. I could care less about the career,” she said at the summit this summer. “Motherhood is not a pause — it’s a launchpad.”
For conservatives, there’s no contradiction in Erika Kirk’s dual roles.
Those flocking to Erika Kirk ― like those who flocked to Phyllis Schlafly in the ’70s and ’80s ― don’t see anything hypocritical in any of this, said Donald Critchlow, a professor of history at Arizona State University and the author of “Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism: A Woman’s Crusade.”
“Kirk and Schlafly believe women’s primary obligations should be to their families and children, while being civically engaged,” he told HuffPost. “Involvement in school boards, for instance, charities, temperance, abolitionism, and a full range of other activities.”
As Critchlow sees it, the separation between family, work outside the home, and civic engagement are “false dichotomies created by second-wave and postmodern feminism.”
Amy Binder, an SNF Agora Institute professor of sociology at Johns Hopkins University, sees the contradiction. But for conservatives, having dual roles is not as paradoxical or ideologically inconsistent as progressives might think.
“Kirk’s role as career woman is less of a contradiction because it is in service to traditional gender norms, encouraging women to be wives and mothers first,” the professor told HuffPost. “Where liberals might see contradiction in career vs. family, I suspect that Erika Kirk’s followers see womanly devotion.”
The late Charlie Kirk with his wife Erika Kirk at the Turning Point USA Inaugural-Eve Ball at the Salamander Hotel on Jan. 19 in Washington, D.C. Samuel Corum via Getty Images
“All in all, I’ve found that conservative women believe they are advocating optionality for women, whereas liberal feminists devalue all options except career and are trying to make women more like men, which is against their essential nature,” said Binder, the author of “The Channels of Student Activism: How the Left and Right Are Winning (and Losing) in Campus Politics Today.”
Popular podcasters like Christian conservative Allie Beth Stuckey and tradwife influencers are reaching apolitical audiences with that exact message.
The idea that women “need to be liberated” and “go into the workforce,” rather than stay at home and have kids, “has actually led to a lot more misery than freedom,” Stuckey told the Atlantic magazine in a 2024 profile where they dubbed her “the new Phyllis Schlafly.”
In Washington, D.C., Republican senators like Katie Britt (Ala.) and Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett do it all, too ― granted, probably with a lot more child care help than the average mom.
Last year, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt returned to work just four days after giving birth when Trump announced his candidacy. “I would reject that you can’t be a good mom and be good at your job,” Leavitt said on a recent podcast. “It’s not for everybody. And it takes a lot of work and will and faith and prayer, and it’s hard. But it can be done.”
The economics of staying it home or “having it all” are almost impossible, unless you’re wealthy.
What these women don’t dwell on is how limited your options are if you’re not a multimillionaire podcaster or a member of the political elite.
Though both Democratic and Republican parents (86% and 88%) say that being a parent is either one of the most important or the most important aspect of their identity, few have the luxury of having one parent stay at home. According to a Pew Research Center report on parenting in America today, nearly as many Republican mothers (67%) work outside the home as Democratic mothers (70%).
“We all face the simple economic truth that few families or even couples can afford to live fully on just one person’s salary anymore,” Shames said. “Women’s labor force participation has gone up, up, up, although they tend not to work as many hours as men, and still get paid a lot less, though often because of job segregation rather than direct discrimination.”
[Smarmy-looking] President Donald Trump and Erika Kirk during the public memorial service for the right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona. PATRICK T. FALLON via Getty Images
There are real grievances both men and women have today about current economic, social and political conditions around parenting: The cost of child care continues to rise, with the average cost of a week of day care going up 13% between 2022 and 2024, for instance. Families today are spending an average of 24% of their income on child care — that’s more than triple the 7% the Department of Health and Human Services considers affordable.
Still, Shames said, none of that is the fault of feminism.
“Feminism is a convenient scapegoat for anger about deep structures that are hard to see and name, chiefly globalization, democratic erosion, and exploitative capitalism with disappearing social safety nets.”
Will today’s conservative women bring in the “end of feminism”? Probably not.
During her eulogy at her husband’s memorial event at State Farm Stadium in Arizona, Erika Kirk forgave her husband’s murderer and called on his followers not to let his assassination silence the conservative movement.
Many were moved by the speech. Catholic writer and YouTube commentator Taylor Marshall tweeted, “Erika just ended the Feminist movement.”
Some disagreed. “[Erika Kirk] has 3 university degrees, she’s a businesswoman and ceo, she got married in her 30s (to a man 5 years younger than her), had kids in her mid 30s,” one woman wrote. ”[Her] entire life is the result of feminism.”
And feminism is probably here to stay, much to the chagrin of religious activists like Marshall. Ever since it’s existed, people have been claiming to kill the movement, Shames said.
“Schlafly did not ‘end feminism,’ nor will Erika Kirk,” the professor said. “All of it, I think, actually emphasizes the power of feminism and the continuing challenges we face.”
“In fact, we’re at what is probably a high point of feminism historically, with more women in the world having more choices than ever before in terms of how to structure their own lives and pursue their own dreams,” she said.
No comments:
Post a Comment