Zionist Evangelical Propaganda: Inbred Christian Radical Mike Huckabee

You should not challenge the God-mandated Christian evangelical criminal morons who are puppets in the hands of the Zionists. Yahweh's wrath will hunt you down for the rest of your life, like Cain and his descendants. 

Mike Hucakbee is a Christian evangelical moron from Hillbilly moonshining Arkansas now serving as the US Ambassador to the Zionist colony in Palestine. He does and says everything his Zionist masters want him to do and say. He hopes one day, when his much desired End of Times takes place and Jesus descends from the clouds, to convert all the Jews of Israel to Christianity. Those who don't will have to be slaughtered: They had a chance 2,000 years ago to follow Jesus and they didn't. This will be their second and last chance. If this is not antisemitism, I don't know what is.
====================================================



CBS reporter fired in wake of firestorm over Gaza interview with Mike Huckabee now looking to sue
Alexandra Steigrad
Thu, October 30, 2025



Ousted CBS News journalist Debora Patta — whose interview with Mike Huckabee on Gaza landed her in a controversy months before she got laid off this week — is looking to sue the network, The Post has learned

The South Africa-based foreign correspondent is “speaking to lawyers” after CBS News slashed her job just months after she came under fire from Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, who claimed an Aug. 7 interview he gave her was heavily edited and misrepresented his views on the situation in Gaza.

Patta’s exit was part of a round of roughly 100 cuts orchestrated by CBS News president Tom Cibrowski. Sources speculated that the network’s new editor in chief Bari Weiss, who’s known for her staunchly pro-Israel views, played a role in the decision to ax the 61-year-old reporter.

Ousted foreign correspondent Debora Patta is “speaking to lawyers” after she was terminated by CBS News on Wednesday. CBS

Patta signed a new three-year contract in August, according to a source with knowledge of the matter, who added that CBS is not giving her a full payout.

A former CBS staffer said the network may not have an obligation to do so. That depends on what her contract stipulates — which may make a breach-of-contract claim unlikely.

“She is probably looking to sue over her Middle East coverage,” the person said.

CBS News declined to comment. Patta did not return multiple requests for comment.

It’s unclear whether David Ellison, CEO of CBS News parent Paramount Skydance, played a role in Patta’s firing. He previously voiced a commitment to unbiased journalism to Federal Communications Commission chair Brendan Carr — a condition for the agency to OK this past summer’s $8 billion merger between Skydance and Paramount.

Both Carr and President Trump have accused CBS News of liberal bias. In July, the network paid $16 million to settle Trump’s lawsuit accusing CBS News of “deceptively” editing a “60 Minutes” interview to make his 2024 opponent Kamala Harris look better.

Sources speculated that CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss played a role in the decision to lay off Patta. Getty Images for Uber, X and The Free Press

Huckabee put Patta on blast when he accused CBS News of intentionally editing his four-minute sitdown with her to craft a “different story than the one they had.” The former Arkansas governor claimed on X on Aug. 8 that his comments on reports of starvation in Gaza were misrepresented.

“Ever wonder how the media edits an interview to give you a different story than the one they had?” Huckabee wrote.

Patta’s interview with Mike Huckabee drew criticism with the US ambassador to Israel claiming it misrepresented his views on the conflict in Gaza CBS News

He then added a link to the full transcript on the US embassy website, showing what was edited out of the CBS News interview. For instance, Patta asked Huckabee whether he is “deeply troubled by images of starving children.” Huckabee replied, “I’m moved when the photos are verified.”

In the unedited exchange, Huckabee answered: “I’m moved when the photos are verified. I mean, we’re all moved when you see someone, especially a child who’s starving. But the New York Times published a picture on the front page of what was purported to be a starving child. Turns out the child had a birth defect and had not been starving.”

He continued: “There were other pictures, for example, that were published of starving children in Gaza. Turned out one of them was from Yemen. One was from 2017. There was another photo that appeared to be somewhat staged, with photographer all set up to get pictures of a few people herded into a small area.”

The interview closed with Patta asking Huckabee about claims that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza.

Patta was given a new three-year contract in August, according to a source. CBS News

“If Israel is attempting genocide, they’re really, really bad at it. They could have had genocide on October the 8th,” Huckabee said in the aired piece.

In the full exchange, he said: “They could have dropped a few bombs and have annihilated all Gazans, it’s not that big an area. They certainly had the capacity to do it, and saw that in the 12-day war with Iran. It is the most ridiculous thing in the world to say that Israel is committing genocide. That’s absurd. On its face, it’s absurd. If they were trying to commit genocide, it would not have taken them 22 months.”

Still, Patta’s exit after 12 years at CBS News came as a shock inside the network.

CBS News was hit with a round of roughly 100 cuts on Wednesday. AFP via Getty Images

“Top CBS News executives were appalled by the decision,” a source said, noting that the hard-charging Patta has reported in conflict zones including Syria and Ukraine, in addition to the Israel-Hamas war.

Patta has also led many of the network’s best investigations in recent years, the person added.

Her exit leaves a gaping hole as many correspondents in Europe “refuse” to set foot in conflict zones, the person said.

“It will be very challenging to cover the news,” the source added.

The Price Non-Anglos Pay to Become "Real" Americans: Lose Identity and Dignity

Martin Sheen 'Deeply' Regrets Changing His Name for Hollywood Career, 'Begged' Son Emilio Estevez to Keep His

When Sheen started as an actor, he said, “to have a Hispanic surname at that time was not an advantage”
Jack Smart
Fri, October 31, 2025


Phillip Faraone/Getty; Jason Mendez/Getty Martin Sheen; Emilio Estevez

When Martin Sheen first launched his acting career, he picked that name as a professional moniker over Ramón Gerard Antonio Estévez

When Sheen was asked about that decision in a recent interview, the actor said, “I regret it deeply”

He also “begged” his actor son, Emilio Estevez, to keep his real name

Ramón Gerard Antonio Estévez — better known as Martin Sheen — regrets his name change.

The 85-year-old actor appeared on Josh Horowitz’s Happy Sad Confused show on Friday, Oct. 31 to discuss his legendary career.

“You know, officially I’ve never changed my name,” explained Sheen. “I’m still Ramón Gerard Antonio Estévez. And I love my name. I just arrived at a time and a place where it was hard enough to get a job as an actor. When I started in 1959 in New York City — to have a Hispanic surname at that time was not an advantage.”

The Emmy winner explained that “because unfortunately there was great prejudice in the city against the Puerto Rican community” at that time, “I kept my name but I realized I had to kind of step outside and be more anonymous in terms of nationality.”

Mark Sullivan/WireImage (Left-right:) Emilio Estevez, Ramon Estevez, Martin Sheen and Charlie Sheen in 2011

When Horowitz asked about his late father Francisco, an immigrant from Spain, the West Wing star said that changing his professional moniker name to Martin Sheen “did bother” him. “He didn’t express it as such,” he recalled, but upon seeing Sheen’s name on the marquee for 1964 Broadway play The Subject Was Roses, “he did not recognize the name. He never said anything but I knew from the look on his face and so forth.”

As for the rest of his family of entertainers, Sheen said that he “begged” his eldest son, Emilio Estevez, to stick with the clan’s Spanish roots. “I remember when my children started coming into the profession and they were deciding whether or not to use Estevez or to change it, Emilio was on the verge,” he said. (Of Sheen's other kids, Ramon and Renée kept the name Estevez, while Charlie Sheen opted for the Anglicized change.)

“Then he saw [Sheen] in print,” recalled the Apocalypse Now star with a laugh. “It just doesn’t fit. And frankly, I begged him to keep it.”

Mathew Imaging/WireImage Martin Sheen and Emilio Estevez in 2011

The Breakfast Club star, 63, “made his own decision to keep Emilio. And I was very proud of him,” added Sheen. “I still am.”

Sheen appeared recently as a guest star on The CW's series Wild Cards, and has drama film The One among his upcoming projects.

Read the original article on People

Are JD Dunce and St Charlie's wife Erika Lusting after one another?

JD might see in Erika, now an available widow, the white Christian blonde he feels he failed to conquer. Usha, as discussed in a previous post, is a dark-haired, dark-skinned Hindu DEI wife to a white christian conservative, which is not a good recipe for success and doesn't make her a favorite to the racist MAGA crowd.

But now that dumb blonde, christian fundamentalist Erika is available, JD might be having second thoughts about his marriage. 
=======================================================


Erika Kirk’s Comment About JD Vance and Her Late Husband Charlie Kirk Breaks the Internet
David J
Sat, November 1, 2025


Erika Kirk and Vice President JD Vance in a "very thight embrace"

During a Turning Point USA event held at the University of Mississippi on October 29th, Vice President JD Vance delivered a political declaration at the invitation of the widow of the deceased conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk, named Erika Kirk.

The photo, in which Vance appeared calm in his navy suit and Erika radiant in her tribute tee inspired by her late husband’s style, went viral quickly. However, this embrace was more than just a hug; it was an intimate one, extended and, apparently, a little too cozy for comfort for some viewers.

Coming only after the assassination of Charlie Kirk in Orem, Utah, the event shocked the entire right-wing camp. The perpetrator behind the assassination, Tyler Robinson, who is only 22 years old, is still waiting for trial for a murder charge fueled by politically-charged motives.

And now, as Erika takes on her new role as the CEO of TPUSA in her late husband’s stead, the photos of her proximity to the Vice President have sparked everything from conspiracy theories to predictions from the Republican ticket in 2028.

‘NO ONE WILL EVER REPLACE CHARLIE,’ BUT DID SHE JUST SOFT-LAUNCH JD VANCE?

In front of a sea of over 5,000 spectators, the ‘Voice’ star delivered an emotional yet very composed performance. She played back Charlie’s voice and wore clothing inspired by him as a small act of honoring his legacy.

But it was her words that made the headlines:

“No one will ever replace Charlie, but I do see some similarities of my husband in JD, Vice President JD Vance.”

Erika Kirk: “No one will ever replace my husband, but I do see some similarities of my husband in JD”pic.twitter.com/Gm4PHz4D3c
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) October 31, 2025

Cue the collective gasp heard on political twitter. In minutes, the hashtag #ErikaAndJD became a trend, and the event quickly went from a political rally to the premiere of ‘House of Cards’ Season VII– ‘MAGA Edition’!

AMERICA’S NEW FAVORITE DRAMA: ‘THE VP, THE WIDOW, AND THE HAIR TOUCH

When the photos of the embrace made it back to X (formerly Twitter), the reaction was a storm of posts, and what may have started as a possible statement of solidarity became the biggest scandal since hand-holding in the Reagan administration.

They are sleeping together pic.twitter.com/fLDaFZF1zo — Haters_gonna_hate (@princess_kim_k) October 30, 2025

A poster summarized the hectic online creativity thus:

‘JD Vance will divorce his Indian wife, disassociate from his family, marry the widow of Charlie Kirk, and run for the 2028 presidential election in the United States.’

Others went darker:

“Boy, wait until the truth comes out about Erika Kirk, folks are gonna be mind blown! Poor Charlie just found out who he was really married to! These people are among the weirdest group of folks ever! I feel for JD’s wife

��


And then came the frame-by-frame examination of the hug, the hand in the hair, the lingering gaze, and the body language that the politically attentive Twitterati have been dissecting, much like the Zapruder film.

“Obviously, this is speculative, but on what planet did they think this public display was appropriate? Yikes all around.”

“Oh, yeah. Definitely. Not new, either, although it’s pretty deep for her to be so comfortable reaching her hands into his hair like this.”

‘’Touching the head of a married man like that, it’s diabolical work,’’

‘‘I don’t speak maga,’’ Patricia wrote, ‘‘but you don’t run your fingers through a man’s hair and hold them like THAT unless there’s intimacy involved.’’

“Erika Kirk didn’t waste any time. Poor Charlie.”

The Kim Jong Trump Regime Has no Tolerance for Any Dissent

Defiling SAINT CHARLIE KIRK in the Kim Jong Trump regime is a blasphemy. Punishment, for now, is losing your job, but as the regime consolidates its power across all the nation, punishments could grow into jail and even worse.

Like the King of England who heads the fornication-adultery-divorce-spawned Church of England, Trump is now the unofficial head of the Evangelical Church of America. Some even believe that Archbishop Donald Trump is the Messiah in person. 

Just as they persecuted lonely and old unmarried women as "witches" during the glorious dark age of Christianity, I am not suprised that the witch hunts have begun in 21st century America. Dare you say the wrong word about Saint Charlie, and your life will be turned upside down. You can even mock Jesus himself and no one would be upset, but not Saint Charlie. Muslim fundamentalists go on rampages of plunder and mayhem if someone draws a cartoon of Mohammad. Now cartoons of Saint Charlie might lead to riots in the backward moron states of the Union.

==============================================



State employees fired over Charlie Kirk posts inundate courts
Zach Schonfeld
Fri, October 31, 2025

State government employees are taking to the courts after being fired over social media posts criticizing conservative activist Charlie Kirk upon his assassination.

More than a dozen employees, from a Tennessee high school science teacher to a landscape supervisor at Auburn University, have sued over allegations their punishments violate the First Amendment.

The challenges raise questions of the line between official and private speech and states’ ability to police employees’ social media while off the clock.

Kirk, 31, a prominent conservative activist who founded Turning Point USA, was fatally shot last month while speaking at Utah Valley University. His alleged killer is in custody and faces criminal charges.

As the assassination reinvigorated a national reckoning over political violence, prominent influencers and Republicans pressured employers to fire people who responded to Kirk’s assassination by criticizing him. Even Vice President Vance joined in, encouraging people to “call them out, and hell, call their employer.”

Many of the terminations involve media companies, airlines and other private companies not subject to the First Amendment. But state governments are, and their firings are now inundating the courts.

In one of the most recent lawsuits, Auburn University landscape supervisor Kevin Courtwright is seeking reinstatement after being fired over a post and comments he made on Facebook.

“One fascist down; a whole socio-political movement go. FAFO nazi trash,” Courtwright wrote the night of Kirk’s killing.

Courtwright says he took down the comments after an Auburn official encouraged him to do so. The school later fired him.

“However ill-considered Defendant perceived Plaintiff’s comments to be, his comments did not render him unfit for his job as a Landscape Supervisor,” the lawsuit reads.

Explaining why he took aim at Kirk’s pro-gun rights stance, Courtwright’s lawyers emphasized a student in 2014 intended to shoot up his son’s high school. Police chased him to a nearby parking lot where Courtwright was working as a landscaper, the student shot himself in the head, and Courtwright was tasked with cleaning up his splattered human remains.

It left an “unshakable horrific impression on him,” said Courtwright’s lawyers, who emphasized Kirk’s previous comment that “it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”

Courtwright wasn’t the only employee punished as Auburn President Christopher Roberts vowed to take action in response to growing pressure.

“It has come to our attention that there are Auburn employees who made social media posts that were hurtful, insensitive and completely at odds with Auburn’s values of respect, integrity and responsibility in violation of our Code of Conduct. We are terminating the employment of those individuals,” Roberts wrote in a Sept. 17 announcement.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who is also Auburn’s former football coach, commended the school for firing “sick people who mocked” Kirk’s assassination.

Courtwright was terminated five days later. Auburn also faces a lawsuit from lecturer Candice Hale, who was placed on leave.

The day after Kirk’s death, Hale had written on Facebook, “I do not mourn oppressors. I do not show them empathy. I don’t give a damn about evil racist, fascist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, mediocre white men who claim to be Christian individuals and then do everything Christ would not do on Earth.”

“I’ve said worse things,” Hale said in an interview. “And for them to pick that for me, I think they were only doing that at the request of Sen. Tommy Tuberville.”

Hale is separately suing Auburn and the University of Alabama, where she was terminated as an instructor in the school’s gender and race studies department. Auburn declined to comment, and the University of Alabama did not return a request for comment.

Hale started a GoFundMe that has raised more than $2,500. She said she has received a barrage of profane messages online since filing the lawsuit.

“I feel sad for them, that they are so ingrained with ignorance that they think this highly of a man,” Hale said.

The Supreme Court has long held that public school teachers do not surrender all their free speech rights, and in some circumstances the First Amendment protects teachers speaking as a citizen addressing “a matter of public concern.”

“Of course, none of this means the speech rights of public school employees are so boundless that they may deliver any message to anyone anytime they wish,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in a 2022 opinion favoring a high school football coach fired for praying on the field after games.

“In addition to being private citizens, teachers and coaches are also government employees paid in part to speak on the government’s behalf and convey its intended messages,” Gorsuch wrote.

Judges use a balancing test that asks whether the state had an adequate justification for treating the employee differently from any other member of the general public.

Joy Gray, chief of the Arkansas Department of Health’s tobacco prevention program, sued after being fired over Facebook comments, including one that read, “Oh no, what if he’s ok?” Gray also raises due process arguments and claims she was entitled to a hearing to clear her name.

“The Complaint only alleges that Ms. Gray’s speech consisted of ‘political commentary on matters of public concern,’ without providing sufficient facts to allege a constitutional violation,” the state responded in court filings last week.

In Florida, biologist Brittney Brown is contesting her termination from the state’s Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Brown monitored imperiled shorebirds in a wildlife area near Panama City, Fla.

She shared on her Instagram story a whale-themed satire account’s post that read, “the whales are deeply saddened to learn of the shooting of charlie kirk, haha just kidding, they care exactly as much as charlie kirk cared about children being shot in their classrooms, which is to say, not at all.”

The repost gained attention after it was amplified by Chaya Raichik’s Libs of TikTok social media account, which called for Brown to be terminated.

Brown claims she was fired “after consultations with senior officials in the DeSantis administration.” GOP Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’s office did not return a request for comment.

In another case, a judge has grappled with issues of parental rights. Emily Orbinson was suspended as a high school science teacher in Franklin, Tenn., after posting “don’t mourn his death.” Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) had called for her termination.

Orbinson’s suspension prohibited her from contacting any school system employees or students, but she has a 5-year-old daughter enrolled. A federal judge granted Orbinson’s request to contact her daughter’s school and participate in volunteer opportunities as the lawsuit proceeds.

Orbinson and many of the other lawsuits remain in early stages. But one has already been resolved.

The University of South Dakota dropped its bid to terminate art professor Michael Hook for writing on Facebook, “I don’t give a flying f‑‑‑ about this Kirk person,” after a judge temporarily reinstated him.

Unlike some of the other cases, Hook had removed his post within hours and apologized before the school punished him.

“I hope the State now understands that the First Amendment prohibits it from punishing anyone for speech about public issues — no matter how much State or national leaders or others disagree with it,” Hook said in a statement.

JD Married Usha to Exploit her as a "DEI Wife" and Pretend to be Tolerant

Imagine you're a stupid hillbilly from Appalachia. You have political ambitions. You yourself were a DEI-admitted student at Yale, since the prestigious university needed Appalachian imbeciles to parade itself as a people's university and not a snotty elitist place.

Starting out as a conservative bum from Appalachia, Vance called Trump "America's Hitler" during the 2016 elections, in the thought that Trump would never succeed because of his radical and vulgar views. Like many pre-Trump republican you saw your political ambition within the hardline republican mainstream, but you knew you had to distinguish yourself by "appearing" as a moderate to independents and perhaps even Democrats.

You may have thought: "I am a Christian conservative, and like Charlie Kirk I'll camouflage my radical racist xenophobic views under a veneer of acceptability. Kirk did it by hiding his racism behind a mantra of civility, soft conversation and politeness. But if I marry a dark-skinned woman born in the US to conservative Hindu immigrant parents, I'd be well perceived by all the moderates in the center and also on the left."

Thus, Vance chose Usha because she fulfilled this political marketing mission. It is hard to imagine a conservative Christian marrying and having children with a polytehist Hindu who gives a sh - - about Jesus, JD's savior. Should we imagine their house with portraits of Jesus and Vishnu-Krishna side by side? Do they pray together or each one goes to his/her corner to pray for their respective gods? How about the children? How are they raised? As Christians? Or as Hindus?

Usha: You have no idea what snakepit you have placed your life in. Fundamentalist Christians are a clone of all religious conservative movements, inclusing fundamentalist Muslims and fundamentalist hindus. Just like they expect Jews to convert to Christianity when (and if) Jesus ever beams his divine self back to earth, to occupied and raped Palestine specifically, at the End of Times, JD will expect you one day to convert from your polytheist indifel Hindu religion to his brand of Christian religious fundamentalism.

Bottom line: I think JD married Usha for as a lever for his political ambitions, not out of love. She's a matrimonial DEI. Hindus are strict practitioners of "arranged marriages", and if Usha was raised a conservative Hindu, she might as well have married JD without love at first, in the hope that she could grow to love him. For him it was a marriage of political convenience, and for her it was like an arranged marriage with which her culture conditioned her to deal. 
===========================================

JD Vance Slammed After Telling Right-Wing Crowd He Hopes Wife Will Be 'Moved' By His Christian Faith
Pocharapon Neammanee
Fri, October 31, 2025 at 8:06 PM GMT+2·3 min read

Vice President JD Vance received major backlash after telling a crowd of young conservative college students Thursday he hopes “eventually” his Hindu wife, second lady Usha Vance, is “moved” by the same thing that drew him to his Christian faith.

“As I’ve told her and I’ve said publicly and I’ll say now in front of 10,000 of my closest friends, do I hope eventually that she [Usha] is somehow moved by the same thing that I was moved in by church? Yeah,” Vance admitted at a Turning Point USA-sponsored event at the University of Mississippi. [Iznogood: Turning Point USA is a.k.a. Turning Stomach USA]

“I honestly, I do wish that, because I believe in the Christian gospel, and I hope eventually my wife comes to see it the same way, but if she doesn’t, then God says everybody has free will, and so that doesn’t cause a problem for me,” he continued.

The vice president’s remarks were in response to a multi-part question about immigration raised by a guest, asking, in part, “How are you teaching your kids not to keep your religion ahead of their mother’s religion?”

The guest also raised concerns over the relationship between MAGA conservatism and Christianity.

“Why are we making Christianity one of the major [things] that you have to have in common to be one of you guys to show that I love America, just as much as you do?” the guest asked. “Why is that still a question? Why do I have to be a Christian?”

The vice president told the guest that while his wife grew up in a Hindu family, it was “not a particularly religious one” and that they would have both considered themselves agnostic or atheist when they first met.

Vance told the crowd his wife is now coming to church with him most Sundays and that they decided to raise their children under his faith.

Vance’s comments about his marriage and family drew some backlash online.

Nirmalya Dutta, an editorial consultant at The Times of India, called the vice president a “hypocrite.” He posted a clip from Fox News where the second lady said she “grew up in a religious household” and noted that her faith inspired Vance to explore his own.

JD is a class A hypocrite. What he said about Usha's faith in the past and now... pic.twitter.com/LTnVvkoSP2— Nirmalya Dutta (@NonsensicalNemo) October 30, 2025

“I’m sorry, they have been married for 11 years and he is somehow still hoping she will change religions? And saying it in public?” Democratic strategist Ally Sammarco wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “If I’m her, I’m PISSED.”

“It’s weird to throw your wife’s religion under the bus, in public, for a moment’s acceptance by groypers,” Canadian media personality Ezra Levant said in a post that now appears to have been deleted.

Vance called Levant’s post a “disgusting comment” and also responded to the criticism he’s received as a whole.

He called his wife the “most amazing blessing I have in my life” and clarified that she encouraged him “to reengage” with his faith many years ago.

“She is not a Christian and has no plans to convert, but like many people in an interfaith marriage―or any interfaith relationship―I hope she may one day see things as I do,” Vance wrote. “Regardless, I’ll continue to love and support her and talk to her about faith and life and everything else, because she’s my wife.”

What a disgusting comment, and it's hardly been the only one along these lines.

First off, the question was from a person seemingly to my left, about my interfaith marriage. I'm a public figure, and people are curious, and I wasn't going to avoid the question. Second, my… https://t.co/JOzN7WAg3A — JD Vance (@JDVance) Oct 31, 2025

=================================================

JD Vance slammed for saying he hopes his Hindu wife Usha will ‘join Christianity’ at Charlie Kirk event
Andrew Feinberg
Thu, October 30, 2025


JD Vance slammed for saying he hopes his Hindu wife Usha will ‘join Christianity’ at Charlie Kirk event

Vice President JD Vance is facing sharp criticism after he told a group of college students in Mississippi that he hopes his Hindu wife, second lady Usha Vance, will give up her own faith and become a Christian.

The vice president was speaking at the University of Mississippi at an event sponsored by Turning Point USA, the group founded by slain Christian conservative activist Charlie Kirk, when a questioner invoked his wife’s religious background.

Vance replied that his wife grew up in what was “not a particularly religious” Hindu family and said they had always had an open dialogue on religious matters when it comes to how they are raising their three children — two of whom attend a Christian school with all three being raised in the Christian faith.

After noting that Usha often attends church with him, he said he hopes she will someday be “moved” by the same things that brought him to convert to Catholicism as an adult.

“I honestly do wish that because I believe in the Christian gospel, and I hope eventually, my wife comes to see it the same way,” he said.

Second Lady Usha Vance is a Yale-educated attorney and practicing Hindu (AFP via Getty Images)

“If she doesn’t, then God says, everybody has free will, so that doesn’t cause a problem for me. That’s something you work out.”

Vance’s comments, which were broadcast on Fox News and online by Turning Point, struck a nerve with some users on X.

An Indian-American commentator named Deep Barot also weighed in, mocking Vance’s suggestion that his wife was once “agnostic” when she has admitted having been raised in the Hindu tradition.

Lol 😂 Usha Vance is Hindu not agnostic this is not very hard for you to follow. They even had a Vedic Hindu wedding and one of his kids name is Vivek. The biggest hypocrite of them all is JD Vance, which is why he isn’t going for if nominated in 2028. pic.twitter.com/0rEoibWttv — Deep Barot (@deepbarot) October 30, 2025

“Usha Vance is Hindu not agnostic this is not very hard for you to follow. They even had a Vedic Hindu wedding and one of his kids name [sic] is Vivek,” he said.

Barot added that Vance was “the biggest hypocrite” for downplaying his wife’s background and would face problems in a potential 2028 presidential run as a result.

Another Indian commentator, Nirmalya Dutta, called Vance “a class A hypocrite” for the same reason and noted that the vice president had credited his wife’s faith with reinvigorating his interest in his own.

JD is a class A hypocrite. What he said about Usha's faith in the past and now... pic.twitter.com/LTnVvkoSP2 — Nirmalya Dutta (@NonsensicalNemo) October 30, 2025

Transgender activist Ari Drennen, suggested that his remarks could lead to the end of his marriage.

“He’s going to be the first Vice President to get Divorced while in office,” she said.For her part, Usha Vance has stated that she has no intention to abandon her family’s faith in favor of her husband’s.
He’s going to be the first Vice President to get Divorced while in office https://t.co/JaZH5XAfEs — Ari Drennen (@AriDrennen) October 30, 2025

In an interview with conservative commentator Meghan McCain in June, Vance said she and the vice president had “a lot of conversations” about faith when he was considering whether to convert to Catholicism and noted that his decision came with “several important obligations, like to raise your child in the faith and all that.”

She said at the time that she was “not intending to convert or anything like that” and told McCain that she and her husband have given her children “each the choice” of experiencing both of their respective religious traditions.

“The kids know that I’m not Catholic, and they have plenty of access to the Hindu tradition from books that we give them, to things that we show them, to the recent trip to India, and some of the religious elements of that visit,” she said.

How MAGA Trump-voter Morons Deal With Trump-Induced Savaging of SNAP

I can hear them cussing in silence at the Moron-in-Chief. They voted for him because he served them a salad of bullshit promises that they believed because they're morons like him. But now that his real intentions are clear, and they see that he lied to them only to get elected, they are mad at themselves and at him.

His unintented genius was to draw these idiots out of their rat holes. He exposed that half of America that we all knew was backward and primitive but was at least humble enough to know it was not fitting into civilized society. For decades, the morons of the hinterland stayed out of the scene, hiding behind their pigs, their backwoods, their guns, their rusted trucks, their fake religiosity, their corn husks and their inability to evolve. 

But Trump legitimized them with his lies and promises, and his attacks on the other, more civilized, more advanced half of the country. He drew his so-called "base" out of the sewers like coackroaches, promising them a seat at the table with the adults that do in fact make America great.

They're distraught. Upset. To be taken for who they really are: fools. We used to hear about them occasionally with David Koresh in Waco, Texas, or Ruby Ridge with Randy Weaver, or Theodore Kazinski in his cabin in Montana,  or Cliven Bundy, or Timothy McVeigh who bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City, the KKK's David Duke, the NRA's Charlton Heston... Trump's MAGA in power today are the representatives of that savage fringe of American society, plus those imbecile independents who fell for the lies of Trump.

All of these underground racist, gun-toting, imbeciles and the organizations that followed them (Proud Boys, Oath Keepers...) have been inspired by Trump and his Radical Right Fascist MAGA movement. Whereas they were all by principle anti-government, Trump's accession to power made them the custodians of the very government they reject. And what an orgy of incompetence and cruelty their prosecution of power has been!

The astronomical rise of the Radical Right, White supremacists and assorted anti-government militias began dramatically in earnest immediately after the election of Barack Obama, the country’s first  African-American president. I personally witnessed and experienced this tectonic shift in American politics: The sudden open and public racist hatred they expressed vis-a-vis Obama, the rallying of mainstream republicans to the movement when traditionalist GOP senator Mitch McConnell declared in 2009 that his priority is to make sure the Obama administration is a failure with obstruction. Not because of policy differences, not because of liberal vs conservative differences, but simply because the country had just elected an African American to the presidency and the GOP could not fathom that fact.

White America had always felt entitled to power, keeping African-Americans, hispanics, Jews, various immigrants, women, and anyone who was not a white anglo-saxon protestant male at a safe distance from power. How am I to believe that John F. Kennedy was not assassinated by white protestants because he was Catholic, as well as his brother Robert F. Kennedy? How am I to believe that Martin Luther King Jr was not assassinated by white protestants because he was Black? 

Now that Obama became president, they were incensed deep, very deep into their identity image. Those Blacks whom we brought as slaves, they thought, and whose emancipation we continue to reject today as some sort of rape of white supremacy, are now our president?  

These groups and organizations of white protestant supremacy always recede go back into the shadows of their sewers when a Republican becomes president. The bursts of their terrorism activities coincide with a Democrat (Clinton during the 1990s) and Obama (during the 2010s). But Obama was the straw that broke the camel's back. He is Black. Oh the horror! A former slave is now my president?

Then the supreme moron Donald Trump burst on the scene, for no other reason than Obama's election: Trump challenged Obama's American birth, and hence his eligibility to be a president. Trump dragged in his royal golden coattails all the white supremacist protestant cockroaches out of their backwoods cabins in Appalachia and the bible-stupefied south. And when Hillary Clinton declared herself a candidate, that was too much for them: A black African, and now a woman? Oh no. They wanted a white male, protestant, blond, bleached skin, with an anglos-saxon last name, even if he were a complete conman and moron, to reassure them that they can still hold on to power despite the demographic tsunami of darker and darker immigrants, accession of women to power, and the emancipation of all oppressed communities.

The American Dream was turning against them. Their former leaders invented the bullshit of the American Dream with promises of equality before the law, opportunity for everyone, etc. and now they are turning on those who believed the fallacy of the Dream. Just as colonial France and England promised their darker-skinned, gobal south, colonized people around the world that they were "citizens" of their empires, only to see those "citizens" migrate in droves to the capitals of their empires and begin a demographic and political drift whose consequences they are grappling with as we write these lines. 

Black African David Lammy is the UK's Foreign Secretary. The current leader of the Conservative Party (Tories), Kemi Badenoch, is a Black African. She succeeded the Hindu Rishi Sunak. In the UK there is rising anger from the primitive racist whites. In the US, we see the same phonomenon, but at least the UK they seem convinced, whereas in the US the MAGA-GOP morons are rejecting this shift. The sophistcated British have an edge over the dumb Americans when it comes to civilized conduct

================================================
A MAGA Mom On SNAP Is Going Viral After She Blasted Her Family For Refusing To Lend Her Grocery Money Because Of Her Trump Vote
Michaela Bramwell
Fri, October 31, 2025

A Facebook post from a MAGA voter on SNAP is going viral after she called out her mother-in-law for refusing to lend her grocery money because she decided to vote for Donald Trump.

Sopa Images / Getty Images

Here's the full post:


u/peaches_and_drama / Via reddit.com

"I'm so anxious about this whole shutdown. My husband's [a] veteran using his GI bill for school. We get food stamps since I'm disabled and he's in school," the post read.

Lee Lawson / Getty Images

"We have two kids, one is two, and we're waiting to get her tested for autism. She's a picky eater. I've tried other foods, but in the end, I give up because I don't want any more screaming. My 6-month-old is starting purees. Yes, we get WIC, but still. I don't know how we're going to pay rent, let alone our other bills, and get food."

Bjelicas / Getty Images

"I do cook everything from scratch, and I've been adding rice, beans, or noodles to stretch it out. I'm just at my wits' end and overwhelmed. Plus, we're almost out of formula."

Sgaphoto / Getty Images

"He asked his mother to buy a can until our WIC comes in. Her response was, 'We voted for this.'"

Tom Williams / Getty Images

People in the comments had a range of opinions, with one user claiming that since the woman voted for Trump, she was "fine when other people were going to suffer."

r/LeopardsAteMyFace / Via reddit.com

Other users sympathized with the woman, calling the mother-in-law "cold-blooded" for refusing to help.

r/LeopardsAteMyFace / Via reddit.com

Many users questioned the woman's decision to vote for Donald Trump, given her use of numerous government-funded programs.