Violence Begets Violence, but Who Started it?

The Beatles said it best: The love you take is equal to the love you make. Despite their military might, Zionists are losing the hearts and minds battle, and are harvesting what they sowed. They are getting what they deserve for their rape of Palestine.

When two parties are in an endless conflict with violence, retribution and counter-attacks, reason comples one to go back to the initial trigger of the conflict. That is, who began the cycle? Who took that first action that was inappropriate, unjustified, or flagrantly unacceptable, and which, still within reason, justifies a response from the aggrieved party?

By the second, third and all subsequent acts of violence between the two sides, we simply seem to forget the huge responsibility borne by the party that first triggered, without justification, the cycle.

This applies particularly well to Palestine and its conflict with "Israel".  

Who had lived in Palestine for thousands of years and never left? The Palestinians of course. They may have been polytheists as the people of Canaan; they may have converted to Judaism when the Hebrew barbarian invaders arrived to their self-proclaimed "promised land" that did not belong to them (except in the garbage biblical mythology of their own creation) but belonged to the indigenous Palestinian Canaanites; the Palestinians may have then converted to Christianity when the Roman Empire turned Christian and imposed the religion as its official religion; they finally converted to Islam when the Arab nomads arrived in the 7th century, and since that time Palestine has always been part of the Muslim world.

Who is the truly indigenous people deeply rooted in its land, villages, olive orchards, grapevines and traditions they share with everyone else around them in the Mediterranean? The Palestinians of course, like the Lebanese, Syrians, Turks, Greeks, Italians, French, Spaniards, Tunisians, Algerians, Egyptians....

Who never did anything wrong to those false Jewish converts from central and eastern Europe claiming to be the descendants of the murderous biblical Hebrews? The Palestinians. 

Who had lived under a foreign brutal Turkish Ottoman occupation for 400 years (1516-1918)?  The Palestinians.

Who was told by the League of Nations that, as of 1918, they will be free of the defeated Turks and they will be guided by the British colonial crooks as they build their own institutions and their own state? The Palestinians. 

That was the same deal made by the League of Nations with the Lebanese, just north of the border. France was mandated to indeed assist the Lebanese in building their own state and institutions between 1920 and 1943, when the French left a functioning and prosperous Lebanon behind them. Why did a very similar plan between the Palestinians and the British fail? Why did two identical pathways in Lebanon and Palestine work in one but failed in the other?

The answer: The colonial European Jewish invasion of Palestine under the hylocritical blessing of the British crooks who had only a mandate over Palestine and did not receive an ownership deed by the League of Nations. Palestine belonged to the Palestinians, not to the British criminals. It wasn't theirs to give away to greedy me-too colonial Jews from Eastern and Central Europe.

One hundred years ago, there were at most 5,000 foreign Jews visiting Palestine as pilgrims or as orientalists and about 600,000 native indigenous Christian and Muslim Palestinians. No Jews had - at least not as a recognizable collective community - lived in Palestine for the past 2,000 years. Those Palestinian Jews who had lived there during the time of Jesus, were forcibly converted to Christianity by the Romans, then to Islam by the Arabs. There is no evidence whatsoever of a massive Jewish migration out of Palestine after the defeat of the JEWISH INTIFADA against the Roman occupation. Rather, the newly Christianized Romans proceeded to forcibly convert those Palestinian Jews, as well as the Phoenician and Canaanite polytheists worshippers of Baal, Ishtar, Adonis etc.) into the Christian religion.

As such, no modern member of the Jewish religion can make a collective claim of ownership of the land of Palestine. It is even more troubling that all those Europeans who claimed to be Jews in the 20th century were recent converts to Judaism and have no ties, neither cultural nor genetic, with the Hebrews of biblical Palestine. They can no longer can claim ownership of the land as a collective Jewish community "returning" to the land. 

If the world is to accept the Zionist argument of a "return", then the precedent can be used to justify a slew of horrific international conflicts: Greeks and Romans should claim all of Turkey because they ruled it as the Eastern Roman Byzantium for centuries. Let's see, Great Britain should reclaim all of India and Pakistan: They took them by force and ruled them for centuries. The Hebrews took Palestine in an orgy of genocidal barbarity as related in the bible, so they are land thieves to begin with. Who the fuck was Yahweh to give them the land back in the Bronze Age? Who the fuck were the British to give the modern Jews the land in 1917? For some recent adherents to the religion of Judaism to show up 2,000 years after the Hebrews and claim the land as theirs, and engage in a second orgy of violence (the creation of "Israel") against the native Canaanite Palestinians, is absolutely absurd and ridiculous.

Therefore, when the European Zionists decided to steal Palestine on the basis of the biblical garbage, they took that first step toward triggering the endless cycle of violence we see today in Palestine. THEY (European fake Jews) started it. Up to the 1920s, the Palestinians had done nothing to those European fake Jews. They had no reason to fight them or to be antisemitic like the European Christians. But when someone you don't even know illegally lands on your shores and tries to strip you of your land, of your identity, of your humanity, what are you supposed to do? Watch and allow it to happen? No, you fight back.

The Palestinians emerging from 400 years of a brutal Turkish occupation lacked the sophistication and wealth of the fake European Jews. In fighting back, the odds were against them, especially when those who were supposed to protect them and guide them - the colonial British crooks - betrayed them and sold their country to the European fake Jews. 

The Palestinians have been fighting for 100 years. Their resilience is to be admired in the face of terrible odds. And they continue to fight, even after being raped, killed and chased out of their lands, villages and towns by Jewish terrorist organizations (Haganah, Stern, Irgun, Lehi...), even after being abandoned by an international community brainwashed into guilt by Zionist propaganda for what European Christians, not Palestinians, did to the European Jews. 

Who started the conflict in Palestine? The fake European Jews. They are responsible for the tragedy unfolding before our eyes. The Palestinians are refugees in their own land and across the region, because they were expelled by Jewish violence itself emanating not from an act of retribution - the Palestinians had done nothing to those European colonial settlers who therefore were not invading Palestine in the 1920s and 1930s seeking revenge. Jewish violence against Palestinians was a pure unilateral act of colonial ethnic cleansing, warranted only by the desire to expel the indigenous Palestinians from their lands and replace them - ONE VERY SUCCESSFUL GREAT REPLACEMENT EPISODE - with European colonial settlers. 

Have you ever asked yourself why do we refer to places where Palestinians live as "villages" and "towns", while we refer to places where European Jews live as "settlements" and "colonies"? 

======================================================== 

Tens of thousands Demonstrate in Manhattan calling for a "global intifada", a phrase that invokes great liberation revolutions and uprisings against brutal colonialism.

The American revolutionaries of 1776 engaged in an intifada against the British colonial crooks.

The French Resistance during WWII (1941-1945) was an intifada against German Nazi occcupation.

The Front de Libération Nationale in the Algeria of the 1950s was an intifada against a 130-year-long French colonial occupation and brutality.

The Vietcong in Vietnam was an intifada against French colonial occcupation, then against the dumb American invasion of the 1960s and 1970s. 

Every conflict in our time has roots in the disgusting primitive impulses that human civilizations continue to practice: Raids, exclusive religions, forced conversions, missionary work, razzias, invasions, conquests, colonization, rapes, pillaging, plundering, genocides, ethnic cleansings, etc. (e.g. Jewish Zionists in Palestine, German Nazis in Europe, Hutu barbarians in Rwanda, Spanish Catholic conquistadores in Latin America, English Puritan primitives in north America....) have been going on for millennia. 

But explorations, science, discoveries, inventions, etc. have also been the product of decent human beings. Which side do you belong to?

The Palestinians have been engaged in a 100-year long intifada against foreign european invading colonial settlers who happen to claim Judaism as their religion. The Palestinians are not antisemitic, the Christian Europeans are. The Palestinians never invaded anyone. They just want to recover land stolen from them by barbarian colonial settlers intent on exterminating and wiping them out. Can you blame them? 

Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine freedom demonstrators holding signs denouncing Brutal Zionist Israeli colonialism and genocide flooded midtown Manhattan Saturday afternoon, calling for a "global intifada," a slogan the entire world has come to equate with justified resistance against colonial violence against local Palestinians communities across Palestine.

The Stand with Gaza protesters, carrying signs seeking to "end all aid to Israel," clanged cowbells while chanting "free, free Palestine" and "Palestine will live forever."

Since the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack by Hamas in southern Israel, the phrase "globalize the intifada" has been a call for the international community to finally admit the tragic error of the creation of the arificial and brutal Jewish colony in Palestine known as "Israel", and to begin repairing and compensating the untold harm done to the indigenous Palestinian population for the past 100 years. 

Zionist propaganda and its mouthpieces claim that the word "Intifada" is a call to violence. The word "Intifada" literally means "Uprising" in English. And uprisings, inluding the Jewish uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto, and the Algerian uprising against the French colonial autorities, and the French Resistance uoprising against German occupation, and the too many others to list here, are by defnition violent. But their violence is aimed at the colonial authorities and nothing else. 

Would you call a French Resistance member fighting the Nazis a Germanophobe terrorist? No, you wouldn't because that person is fighting the German occupation, and not the German people. Did the French resistance kill German civilians? Naturally, if they were serving the German military occupation.

Would you call an Algerian resistance member fighting the French colonial army a Francophobe or Anti-christian terrorist? No you wouldn't because he is not fighting neither the French people nor their Christian religion, only the French colonial military authorities. Did the Algerian resistance kill French civilian settlers? Naturally, because they were one component of the occupation.

So the Palestinian resistance against the Zionist occupation of Palestine is not an anti-Semitic movement aimed at Jews per se. In fact, many pro-Palestine demonstrators in Manhattan are themselves decent human beings who happen to be Jews because, unless psychology is itself distorted by Zionist propaganda, Jews cannot by definition be antisemites.

New York City Democratic socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, recently sparked controversy among pro-colonial Zionist circles because he failed to publicly condemn the use of the word "intifada".

People gather during the Stand with Gaza protest at Bryant Park in New York Aug. 16, 2025.

U.S. Representatives (Zionist Jews) Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., and Rudy Yakym, R-Ind., denounced the term "Intifada" as "a call to violence against Israeli and Jewish people across the world," which is a stupid and abused propaganda language Zionists learned from their mentors the German Nazis. The term "Intifada" is not to incite violence against Jews, first because many Jews accept it as a justifiable resistance against Zionist brutality in Palestine and cannot therefore be supportive of violence against themselves. Second, it is the right of every person living under an illegal, brutal and inhumane foreign occupation to fight back, to resist, and yes, to mount an uprising - an Intifada - against the colonial rapist.

Zionists, who hold the American people a captive audience brainwashed day and day out into the garbage Zionist lies and deception, are trying to ban words. Banning words is what Nazis and Fascists do. They are afraid of a word! Imagine the depth of their fear of a simple word. If "Intifada" should be banned, then let us create a lexicon of words to ban, like resistance, liberation, freedom, uprising, etc. because they all harken to movements against authoritarian and colonial violence.

The Zionist legislation submitted to the House would denote the word "INTIFADA" as a call to violence against Israeli and Jewish people throughout the world, putting their safety at risk. It also discourages (why not altogether "prohibit") leaders from signing songs using the word INTIFADA. It also cites violent attacks against Jewish people in the U.S., including the fatal burning of pro-Israel demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, and the deadly shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in D.C. 

But the American people, especially the educated East Coast, are not dumb ignorant peasants from the middle and the south of the United States whose barbaric faith makes them an easy prey to biblically-inspired bullshit propaganda. They can see it every day on their screens: when compared to the 65,000 Palestinians killed by foreign colonial Zionist violence in occupied Palestine against starving indigenous women and children, these few and far in between acts of violence against Jews do not match, even if reprehensible. By extension, any act of violence - thousands every day in the US - is reprehensible, and the two attacks cited above by Zionist shills as a justification for brutality and violence ten thousands miles away and to repress free speech here in the US, smack of desperate and ridiculously vain attempts at winning the hearts and minds of a Zionist-exhausted and -fatigued American audience. Zionist Israel is the aggressor, the colonial, the foreign, the brutal, the occupier.... Palestinians are the natives, the indigeous owners of the land defending themselves against it, and have been for 100 years. Banning one word is so stupidly desperate that it exposes the dynamic of the conflict and its inevitable outcome: Freedom for Palestine.