From Syria with Love: The Children of Ghabey [Archives]

The piece below was written on April 10, 2005 as the barbarian Syrian army was being evicted from Lebanon after 30 years of occupation. Now (in 2023) that the Lebanese army is beginning to evict some of the 2 million so-called Syrian "refugees" (who, unlike real refugees, commute daily between their host country and the country they supposedly fled from, with loads of smuggled goods and their European-gifted US dollars to keep them from going to Europe), the criminals and thugs of both Bashar Assad and his enemies of the Free Syrian Army are spewing their Baathist venom on this Lebanon that will always reject their racist and Fascist Arab nationalism.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Syria with Love: The Children of Ghabey

Gone are the shabby checkpoints and the haggard Syrian soldiers manning them. Gone are the ‎green arches made from pine and palm trees downed to raise the portraits of the Assad ‎dynasty: from Hafez to Basel and Bashar. Gone are the statues of the dictators erected “in your ‎face” of the Lebanese people, for nowhere at their checkpoints or the office buildings they ‎confiscated or the dungeons they ran did Syria's men – over thirty years in their host country – ‎have the decency to raise a Lebanese flag next to the Syrian flag. What more did the Lebanese ‎people need to understand that Syria was in Lebanon not to liberate, protect or defend, but only ‎to subdue, erase, and eliminate by repression and oppression?‎

Gone are the drab green Soviet-vintage trucks. Gone are the civilian-dressed Mukhabaraat men ‎lounging at Beirut Airport and casually checking their registers for the names of the “wanted” ‎Lebanese who dared a homecoming. Gone are the cars with shaded windows, the vulgar and ‎sadistic killers, murderers, kidnappers, hoodlums, vengeful men who hated Lebanon and its ‎people to the bone. Gone are all these men who were trucked in from remote desert villages of ‎the Syrian interior, after being brainwashed to hate Lebanon as a renegade and decadent ‎province that needed to be “re-educated” into the fold of true Arabism. A strayed province of a ‎once glorious Arab Syria that, truth be told, never really existed except inside the ‎megalomaniacal minds of the Baathist criminals whose only source of pride in this world in ‎which they utterly failed is their delusional nostalgia for an antiquated fantasy. For the Syrian ‎reality remains a terribly miserable one, and the only escape from the Syrian Gulag is to feed off ‎the illusions of a past that has been mythicized and exaggerated in logarithmic proportion to the ‎misery of ‎‏20‏th century Syria. They are all finally going home to that land beyond the green ‎Lebanon mountain range and the barren hills of the Anti-Lebanon range where the Syrian desert ‎begins. ‎

To those of my generation, however, the departure of the Syrian men from Lebanon will never ‎erase the pain, the fear and the hurt of three decades. From the jewel of the Middle East, ‎resplendent in the glimmer of its joie-de-vivre by the Mediterranean, where East met West ‎around every street corner and in the myriad of cafes and restaurants, clubs and theaters, ‎beaches and mountain retreats, Lebanon was brought down like a calf to the slaughter by the ‎Arabs – every one of them, the Palestinians, the Saudis and the Kuwaitis, the Libyans and the ‎Egyptians, the Somalis and the Sudanese, and most of all the Syrians – because it stood as a ‎thorn in the side of the totalitarian drab of the Arab World. Lebanon violated every taboo and ‎every norm of that Arab World. It had Christians, Druze, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Armenians, ‎Shiites who intermarried and lived as equals side by side next to Sunnis. Worse yet, it had ‎Westerners living with all those people – not in walled compounds – but anywhere they wished. ‎It had church bells that tolled next to the Muezzin at the mosque. It had mini skirts in the ‎streets and bikinis on the beaches. It had Arak-drinking Zajal poets dueling with words on ‎television. It had a free press that poked fun at kings and queens, presidents, sultans, and Emirs ‎alike, often with the pens of the same Arab writers and intellectuals who had escaped from their ‎home countries to the refuge of Lebanon. ‎

This was too much decadence and diversity to handle for the pan-Arab Baathist nationalists who ‎preferred homogenized compliant societies to diverse and rebellious free people. Lebanon had ‎too many colors. It had Arab, French, American and Lebanese universities. It had a British High ‎School, an American International College, a secular Lyçée Français and a religious French Jesuit ‎school, and German, Italian and other schools, all coexisting next to a plethora of Lebanese ‎private religious and secular schools, as well as a full-fledged Lebanese public school system. It ‎had veiled women who watched streakers cross Hamra Street in the early ‎‏1970‏s. It had a red-light district where wealthy Arabs – from the kingdoms and emirates of the Gulf – mingled with ‎equally drunken sailors from around the world to defuse their repressed libidos. In the words of ‎a young Kuwaiti student I met once at Brown University, when Saddam occupied and was ‎brutalizing Kuwait, as I tried to compare his Kuwait under Saddam to my Lebanon under Hafez, ‎‎“We went to Lebanon to f--- your sisters and your mothers...You deserve to be occupied by ‎Syria, but we do not deserve to be occupied by Iraq”. Such was the gratitude of the Arabs for a ‎country they claimed as one of them, often against its own wishes, a country to which they ‎escaped from the boredom and repression of their own countries, and then only to turn around ‎and spit at it in hatred. ‎

And so, thirty years ago, as Lebanon was moving forward into the modern world by keeping its ‎doors open to the world, money, mercenaries, and weapons began flowing in from Egypt, Libya, ‎Syria and elsewhere in the Arab World. A rabid Arab media turned against small Lebanon ‎because it dared to say no to Arafat and his PLO. Never mind that the Palestinians had been ‎muzzled, massacred, and locked up in their camps in every other Arab country, and all the Arab ‎rulers wanted was to contain the Palestinians inside Lebanon for fear of a revolution at home. ‎And never mind that the Palestinian Cause was merely a commodity in the market of Arab ‎principles for the dictators to maintain their grip on power and their boots over their people. ‎

Maggie Abou-Jaoudeh's death in the Spring of ‎‏1976‏‎ epitomizes what the Arabs did to Lebanon. I ‎personally witnessed this one of many untold atrocities during the mis-named “civil” war between ‎the Syrian-Palestinian Arab cabal and the Lebanese people, when the war moved from the streets of Beirut ‎along the fortified PLO terror camps to the Mountain. Maggie was a ‎‏5‏‎-year-old with curly blond hair ‎who was killed by a single shell fired by the Syrian paramilitary Al-Saika organization from the ‎other side of the mountain facing Broumana on a glorious spring day of ‎‏1976‏‎. A single shell. Not ‎a volley. Not a battle. Not an artillery exchange. Just one mortar shell. There had been no ‎clashes for weeks, and spring on the hills was erasing the memory of the misery of that cold ‎winter we spent in Ghabey near Broumana as refugees from Beirut. It was not hot enough yet ‎for the cycads to begin their daytime rap on the trunks of the pine trees, but the air was light ‎and sweet. The war had followed us from Beirut, and the Battle of the Mountain was underway. ‎But we were enjoying a lull in the fighting. The children of Ghabey, a small village down the road ‎from Broumana going south towards Salima and Qornayel, were playing in the village square up ‎the hill from our house, and I could hear them from my room as I lay on my bed reading. My ‎mother was having coffee with Sayydeh, Maggie's mother, in the living room. The voices of the ‎children filled the village.‎

Then, there was a thud. One mortar thud in the distance. The echo quickly reverberated across ‎the valley beneath the Knaisseh peak, and I knew the mortar was launched from the other side, ‎as we had grown accustomed to instinctively listen and gauge the origin and direction of shells. ‎It took several seconds for the shell to fly overhead, with the nervous roar of its tail vrrrooming ‎over the house. And it took us a split second to realize that the shell was going to strike near us. ‎And then the blast. Fifty yards from the house, up the hill in the middle of the village square ‎where the children were playing. The children's voices went silent, like a school of sparrows on a ‎tree when their singing frenzy is disturbed. From the living room, Sayydeh's scream rose in a ‎fast crescendo, the primal scream of a mother's heart who knew her child had been ‎harmed...MAAAAGGGIIIEE.... and my hair stood on my neck before I could jump out of the bed. ‎We all ran up the hill. I ‎was one of the first people on the scene, as everyone was converging on the square. Maggie's sisters – Nana, Hamo, Zeezee – were there....The crater, and the little grey bodies melded into the ‎blackened rubble and pavement...the colors of their clothes muted...mixed into the monotone ‎shade of burned explosives and ravaged asphalt...motionless...just lying there...I don't recall ‎seeing the faces...just these still little bodies...like Guernica's children, and I recalled a Joan Baez song that ‎says, “and God filled their bullet holes with candy”... A single shell fired by the heroes of the ‎Arab Cause on the children of Ghabey on a spring afternoon...for no other reason but to kill the ‎children...for no other reason but to inflict deep pain...For the road to Palestine and the Golan ‎and all the lost Arab causes, as Syria still wants the world to believe even today, had to go ‎through every Lebanese village, all the way from Beit Mellat and al-Qaa in the north, through Damour and ‎on to the Shebaa Farms in the south, and over the dead bodies of Lebanon's children. The death ‎of Maggie and the children of Ghabey sums up the agony of Lebanon at the hands of the Muslim Arabs. ‎Wanton and barbaric, driven by hatred, jealousy and the frustration at their impotence against Jewish Israel. And so, ‎they chose Lebanon as the substitute enemy because on the scale of their racist view of the ‎world, Christian Lebanon ranks pretty high in the degree of its “otherness”. Lebanon was the proxy ‎‎“Crusader”, the isolationist, the Arab who does not want to be an Arab, the renegade, the whore ‎who went astray. ‎

What purpose, I ask today, as we near the thirtieth anniversary of the start of the Lebanese War ‎in April ‎‏13‏‎, ‎‏1975‏‎, has the Lebanese War served the Arabs and the Palestinian Cause? How can ‎anyone find a shred of credibility in Hezbollah's claims to resistance and liberation when that ‎organization's objective has been, and still is, to fight a war that the majority of the Palestinians ‎themselves abandoned more than ‎‏13‏‎ years ago in Oslo and Madrid? I say to Hezbollah, Palestine ‎belongs to the Palestinians, and the Lebanese should no longer die for Palestine. Like Jordan, ‎the Lebanese people have chosen a “Lebanon first” policy. The Lebanese of the South have been ‎led like sheep to the slaughter, first by the PLO between ‎‏1970‏‎ and ‎‏1982‏‎ and, after the PLO was ‎evicted from Lebanon in ‎‏1982‏‎, by Hezbollah which was created, armed, and financed by Syria and ‎Iran specifically to replace the PLO as the instrument of destabilization in the hands of the Assad ‎regime. Hezbollah has never served Lebanon. It has served Iran and Syria, and like these two ‎countries, Hezbollah has spilled Lebanese blood for the sake of other causes except the cause of ‎Lebanon. And to disguise its objectives, Hezbollah has assumed the cloak of a social welfare ‎organization after hijacking those functions from the Lebanese State to whom it continues to ‎deny access to the land of the Lebanese south. The Lebanese people have to wake up to the ‎truth and understand the Big Lie and the sham liberation ideology of Hezbollah that has been ‎shoved down their throats for close to two decades. Why, I ask Hezbollah, isn't there a Syrian ‎Hezbollah fighting the Israeli occupation – worse, the annexation – of the Syrian Golan Heights?‎

And now, as another April ‎‏13‏‎‏‎ comes to remind us of when, thirty years ago, that “uncivil ‎War” between the Lebanese and the Palestinians broke out, now that Lebanon is ending that era ‎of its history, I will never forget Maggie and the children of Ghabey, and will remind myself that ‎their death, in its inhumanity, was also the death of my country. If Lebanon is becoming alive ‎again, it is because all the children of Lebanon who were made to die for many years, like ‎Maggie and the children of Ghabey, have finally decided to come out and play on all the village ‎squares of Lebanon, including that big square in downtown Beirut. They no longer fear that their ‎voices will ever again be silenced by the shells of hatred or the drab totalitarian regimes of the ‎Arab World.‎

Hanibaal Atheos 

Monopoly of Victimhood: What Exactly is Anti-Semitism?

The Semites are a group of peoples and nations scattered around the Near and Middle East. According to the fictional garbage of the bible, the Semites descend from one of Noah's sons, Shem. Today, Semites include residents of the Arabian Peninsula who speak Arabic, Amharas and other East African countries, speakers of Syriac in today's Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, in addition to the ancient Phoenicians, Hebrews, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Babylonians who spoke varieties of Semitic languages such as Aramaic. I am no expert, but do your own research to find out more about the Semites and Semitic languages.

The point of this piece is that an estimated half a billion people on earth today are considered Semites who speak any of a number of Semitic languages, of which only 6 million (i.e. 0.000001%) speak Hebrew. Yet, Anti-semitism is generally understood to be a strictly anti-Jewish animus. How can that be? 

One can imagine several answers:

1. As a result of the confusing stories about who is really responsible for the crucifixion of Jesus, Anti-semites blame Jews for the killing of Jesus. Pontius Pilate, the governor of the Roman province of Palaestina at the time, apparently did not find Jesus guilty of any crime, washed his hands of the affair and handed Jesus to the Jewish leaders to decide. In turn, the latter handed the decision to their own people who voted by acclaim to liberate the criminal Barabbas and crucify Jesus. According to this version of events then, the Jews themselves essentially decided to kill Jesus, blaming him not for declaring himself a prophet or the son of God, but because he declared himself King of the Jews. The inscription on top of the cross, INRI, is in Latin, not in Aramaic or Greek - hence it was effectively an execution carried out by the Romans - "INRI" being an abbreviation of Iesus Nazarenus, Rex Iudaeorum, or Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews. Regardless of whether or not this whole story is a fallacy made up by those who wrote the Gospels, the killing of Jesus was more of a political decision than a religious one. Still, the Romans did not shed any tears and were happy to get rid of Jesus because he posed a threat to their military occupation and stability in Palestine, but the Jewish leadership also did not want a competitor. In the end it was the Romans who implemented a Jewish decision by crucifying Jesus on behalf of the Jews. That is, both were equally responsible for killing Jesus.

2. European Jews had lived in small numbers in Europe for centuries, but during the 18th century,  Eastern Europeans (Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Poland, etc.) - which is where most invading Israeli colons come from today - converted en masse to Judaism. Within a century, some time during the 19th century, with the Elightenment and the Industrial Revolution, followed by the rise of nationalisms, Jews began moving out of their ghettos and into the worlds of academia, commerce, banking, and other professional circles. Fanatic Protestants and Catholics saw a threat to their monopolies and began persecuting and discriminating against their Jewish partners and colleagues who invented the term Anti-semitism to describe this hatred they suffered from at the hands of these barbarian Christian Europeans. This all culminated with the pogroms, the two world wars, the Holocaust, and the monumental crime of the creation of Israel over the ashes of historic Palestine and the near annihilation of the native indigenous Palestinian people.

Consequently, the majority of adherents to the Jewish religion today are not Semites. They are Eastern Europeans (blond, red-haired, blue-eyed..., i.e. not at all the prototype of the dark-haired, brown-eyed people of the Near East, East Africa and the Arab world) who wear strange Russian hats and long furry coats that are needed in the sub-freezing temperatures of the Eastern European and Russian plains, but are otherwise unknown in the Near East. Hence, most Israelis who claim the land of Palestine as their own, because supposedly God gave it to them some 4,000 years ago according to biblical garbage, are not genetic or cultural descendants of the Hebrews. In addition, there are black African Jews, Indian Jews, North African Jews, Chinese Jews, European Jews, etc. all with very different genetic and cultural legacies and traditions, which further indicates that Judaism is just a religion, it is neither a culture nor does it represent a scientifically classifiable ethnic group. In other words, there is no such thing as a Jewish "people", and more to the point, there cannot be a scientific or legal claim of ownership by all the holders of the Jewish faith around the world to the land of Palestine. 

The creation of the State of Israel cannot therefore be justified in any way, except on the sole criterion of a colonial European project established at the Congress of Basel in 1897 to emulate the brutal colonial project of Belgian King Leopold II who made Congo his own personal colony, or the German colonization of Namibia, or any of the other long-standing European (French, English, Portuguese, Dutch, Spanish...) colonies around the world that brought immense wealth to the old continent by plundering the resources of the colonized countries. European Jews, as a result, saw in colonialism an opportunity to create their own colony somewhere around the globe, more as a source of wealth than to escape anti-Jewish hatred. Like their other fellow Europeans, they couldn't care less for the welfare of the native indigenous "sub-human savages" they were colonizing and whose countries they were raping for captitalist greed. In fact, the Jewish conferees at the Congress of Basel were secular, atheists, and socialists who ultimately founded the infamous Kibbutzim after erasing some 600 Palestinian ancestral villages. The impulse was not religious. It was social and economic, a sort of 19th century Jewish "me-too" capitalism that wanted its own colony. Indeed, Argentina and Uganda - not Palestine - were the first targets for establishing a Jewish homeland. It was later with the collusion of the racist supremacist British monsters who obtained a League of Nations mandate over Palestine, that the convergence of British interests and Jewish colonialism focused on Palestine, belatedly adding the bullshit argument of the "return" to the Holy Land to butress the colonial claim with a religious one.

Therefore, as they were the direct victims of European hatred and pogroms, and being ignorant (or arrogant) of the existence of other Semites, European Jews convinced themselves and others of being the only Semites around. By coining the term "Anti-semitism", they naively or deliberately hijacked the term to present themselves as the victims of Christian European racists, when in fact, a better term would have been "Anti-Jewishism" or "Anti-Judaism". By equating a narrow Anti-Judaism with a sweeping Anti-Semitism, they monopolized what is not entirely theirs.

Buried and suffocating under a constant flood of propaganda, no one today thinks of Arabs, Africans, and others when one hears the word "Anti-semitism". The definition of the term has become restricted to hatred of Jews, when Anti-Semitism should either be broadened to comprise hatred of all Semites, like Arabs, some Africans and other Semitic peoples, or it should be abandoned and more appropriate terms like "Anti-Jewishism" "or "anti-Judaism" be used instead. The term "Anti-semitism" can no longer be used exclusively to describe the horrible treatment that Jews suffered at the hands of Christian Europeans.

Alternatively, more specific terms should be coined. For example, "Islamophobia" refers to hatred of Muslims, regardless of their national identity. But such terms as "Anti-Arabism" could be used to describe hatred of Arabs, regardless of their religion, for example. 

I am a Semite and I am neither Muslim nor Christian. Religion is not part of my identity. I was raised in another of those backward monotheistic religions, which I have discarded from my life. Yet, I experienced racism in Europe and America. So technically, I cannot be a victim of Anti-Semitism because I am not a Jew, nor can I be a victim of "Islamophobia" because I am not a Muslim. Yet, I went through terrible experiences because ignorant dumb Western racists make suppositions as to my background.  I should either be able to use the term "Anti-semitism" to describe my experiences (though Jews might not accept me into their prestigious and exclusive Victim Club), or linguists should establish a lexicon of specific terms to be used to describe discriminatory attitudes against every single human group. Anti-Turkism, Anti-Kazakstanism, Anti-Chinesism, Anti-Africanism, etc.  

Finally, and according to a broadened and fairer definition of Anti-Semitism, Israeli Jews - who, again, are NOT genetic Semites - are themselves Anti-Semitic because of the hatred and barbarity they inflict daily on genuine Semites, namely the Palestinians. In fact, today's Palestinians are the direct descendants of the ancient Jews who, following the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD by the Romans, having stayed in Palestine (no evidence of a massive Jewish flight from Palestine has ever been discovered by Israeli scientists), became Roman Christians (Byzantine empire) for about two centuries (mid-400s to mid-600s), then became Muslims with the Arab-Muslim conquest in the 7th century. Racism is so stupid. It is always wrong when examined under a scientific lens. 

For more see: [https://lebanoniznogood.blogspot.com/2020/09/the-genetics-of-racism.html]

Poles Turn Right: Back to Stupid with King Jesus [2016 Archives]:

[Posted in 2016]

The Polish people have long been suspected of stupidity. We all have heard Polish jokes in the US and Europe. Regressive right-winging is fashionable again - you know, the degenerate British numskulls and their Brexit, the backwoods Neanderthals of the American South and Midwest and their election of Donald Dumb, and many others... in a global domino effect taking the planet back to early 19th century.

And the Polish people are, of course, in the vanguard of idiocy. What have they done now? Well, they have done what the primitive Hebrews of Bronze Age Palestine refrained from doing: They have declared one Jesus Christ - an obscure Jewish rabbi from said Bronze Age Palestine who mounted a failed rebellion against the Roman occupation - THE KING OF POLAND. You got it. Catholic Poland now has a Jewish Palestinian king from the Bronze Age. Too bad Jesus wasn't mummified like Egyptian pharaohs.


Mind you that the Vatican was opposed to the idea. It wasn't the senile Bishops' idea to begin with, so they wouldn't have it. But says "father" Paul McDonald in his Rorate Caeli BlogSpot: "This was done in the official presence of the President of Poland, Andrzej Duda. Many pilgrims were present in Poland for this event. The act will be repeated in all the Polish cathedrals and parishes. This took place yesterday, Saturday, at the Church of Divine Mercy in Krakow."

And "father" McDonald (no relation to the infamous Canadian child molester priest whose blog would more aptly be entitled "Rorate Braccis" [drop your pantaloons]) continues in his nonsensical theological garbage: "The providential and proximate origin of the act is to be found in revelations received, or said to be received, by the Servant of God Rosalia Zelkova. The Lord -- she said -- demanded that He be enthroned as King by the Polish Nation as such, and not just in the hearts of the Poles, in a particular manner, and this would have saved Poland in the war that was coming." Sounds almost Socratic in its logic.

And to buttress this solid argument with even more obtuse trash, McDonald expounds: "But the social kingship of our Divine Lord is absolutely founded in necessary and dogmatic truths about Christ. It is not merely an element of private revelation. St. Gregory the Great said that they were heretics who denied that Christ is the King of and over everything." Case closed. McDo nailed it. Excluding those Polish-like idiotic Christians, about 7 billion people on earth don't think that Jesus is King, therefore they are heretics and won't be able to take a SpaceX ship to paradise!

Not one history book from the contemporaries of the said renegade Jewish rabbi Jesus mentions him. There are serious doubts as to whether he actually existed. His fame was built up out of nothing by some of his followers whose rebellion against the Romans was crushed. The Romans subsequently destroyed the Jewish temple in 70 AD. Soon Jesus was made to be the son of God, then he was made to have been born out of a virgin who was impregnated by God without breaking her hymen - the angel Gabriel apparently stealthily "beamed" the sublime sperm across her hymen, and she didn't even feel anything. She had to be told later that she was knocked up - and mystery of mysteries, she remained a virgin even after giving birth to the rebellious baby in a stable with donkeys around. Then he was made to have risen from the dead and ascended to the Big Zombie in the sky. Speak of project-creep!

The stories told by his "disciples" a century after the death of the rabbi became fertile ground for exaggerations and mystification, so much so that the credulous mother (Helena) of a Roman Emperor (Constantine) facing extinction at the hands of the northern barbarians (the Polish people's ancestors, to be exact) became a secret follower of the Jesus movement and convinced her son to dump Jupiter for Yahweh, Juno for Mary, and Apollo for Jesus and embrace the new religion. Roman practices did not change much with the switch and adoption of Jesus as the new hero: They still built statues to worship, lit candles, intoned hymns, sacrificed slaves, ate flesh and drank blood (figuratively, but still), enslaved other peoples.... all the way to about the 19th century, with genocides and inquisitions in between, when reason, humanism, and secularism opened the eyes of a few enlightened humans who liberated us from the barbarity of Christianity, and for that matter that of Judaism and Islam as well.

In any case, the regression of the Polish people back to the Bronze Age is astounding. "King Jesus", as far as I can tell, cannot form a government or enact budgets etc. to manage the country. All he can do is "miracles" - rare events, often intended as brief suspensions of natural physical laws, and of reason of course. Obviously, none of Jesus's disciples and the thousands of other super-human Christian heroes known as saints was ever able to regrow a severed limb, for example. That would actually be enough to convince me to return to the faith. Unfortunately, all Catholic miracles are cryptic, invisible, sudden and unproven claims of healing that only an idiot with half a brain can believe. No saint has ever resurrected a dead person, for example. Why? After all, Jesus is claimed to have done it with Lazarus and himself. So if a saint or an apparition of Mary can heal cancer or quadriplegia, why can't they bring back the dead? Or grow a severed limb?

I used to like the Polish people - not for having given us a Pope by the name of John-Paul II - but for having stood up to dictatorships and for always being victims of oppressive Russians and Germans. I admit, I used to like the Polish people also because of an impenetrable (meant only metaphorically, of course) Polish woman I met long ago by the pseudonym of Lidia who, in between fantastic voyages to the twilight zone, said she proofread scripts for Roman Polanski. I didn't believe her. Now, I don't know anymore. I think Polish people, like all stupid people, almost always deserve their predicaments. The Lebanese people are one outstanding example.

So, after congratulating Aoun in Lebanon, Trump in the US, and soon Marine LePen in France, let me extend my heartfelt congratulations to the right-wing extremist, anti-refugee, isolationist, white supremacist Palestinian Jewish King Jesus of Poland who once uttered the incongruous and idiotic advice that we must love our enemies and lend our hand to the needy. Yup, this divine command has never, and is not now, obeyed across the Christian world. To the contrary, massacres, wars, genocides, racism, hatred, etc. seem to be the hallmark of Christianity. 

But then again, with King Jesus on the throne in Poland, perhaps Latin might catch up again, and King Jesus might ban anyone who is not Catholic from illegally entering the Christian paradise orbiting above the clouds upon their death. After all, jackass King Donald Dumb, himself a descendant of euro-trash German-English peasants, wants to ban anyone who is not a white anglo-saxon protestant from entering the trigger-happy earthly paradise called the United Scams of America.

Hallelujah, brothers and comrades. Ad Majorem Dei Ignominiam.