In their typical propaganda machinery, supporters of colonial Zionist terrorists are claiming that Qatar’s Sheikha Moza bint Nasser, the mother of Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, praised the dead Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar by saying that his name - Yayha - يحيا - in Arabic means "The one who lives".
Besides the linguistic interest, supporters of Zionist colonial terror are actually quite biased in ignoring that Israel's "state terrorism", ever since the first ethnic cleansing of 1948 and still currently in practice across Palestine, is simply terrorism on a much bigger scale than anything Hamas did on october 7.
The Zionist propagandists want you to ignore that what they always conveniently labeled as Palestinian terrorism - from its secular nationalism of the late 1960s to its present cloack of Islamic nationalism, including those "terrrorists" like Yasser Arafat and many others with whom Israel signed peace treaties it later violated - is fundamentally acts of resistance against a foreign settler invader and criminal ethnic cleanser of native indigenous people. Did anyone reproach the Algerian resistance of the 1950s and 1960s against the French colonial occupier for their use of Islam as a rallying ideology? The leaders of the Algerian resistance and their political descendants are after all those who run the country today and receive respect and recognition from the entire world community.
Then, even if I reduce Palestinian resistance to terrorism just to abide by the Zionist Big Brother dictate, isn't the enemy of Palestine, Israel itself, founded on barbaric religious arguments from the Bronze Age, just like Iran and its affiliates like Hamas and Hezbollah? Isn't the present Israeli government made up of ultra-religious torah-thumping terrorists not unlike those of Koran-thumping Hamas terrorists, with the difference that Israel terrorizes innocent civilian populations with sophisticated technology, killing people from a distance, while Hamas terrorists kill people up close, face to face, with knives and rocks? Does the magnificence of a killing tool really mark the distinction between what is terrorism and what is not?
I am supposed to be shocked by the comments of the mother of the Qatari emir. But shouldn't I be equally shocked that a designated war criminal - a fancy title for a terrorist - like Benyamin Netanyahu and his coterie of radical ultra-religious barbarian ministers with weird eatsern european names like Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, are allowed to address the United Nations like some respectable leaders of a decent country? Israel, let us not forget, is an artificial Jewish colony implanted in a land not its own by the western perpetrators of the Holocaust trying to atone for their own crimes against Jews by dumping their remaining Jews on the Palestinian owners of the land.
Netanyahu is a terrorist, just like Sinwar, because they both kill innocent civilians and terrorize entire populations, in the name of their respective barbaric religions from the Bronze Age of humanity. But Palestinians have the intellectual advantage of being the victims of a foreign invading colonial settlers who never owned the land, except according to a bullshit religious text written some 2800 years ago and endlessly edited over the centuries to create self-promoting fiction. You'd have to be an idiot to believe the garbage of the torah-bible, but you have to be a criminal idiot to use its text to justify atrocities and ethnic cleansing, and as some sort of property deed to a land you have no right to.
Enough Islamic terrorism. Enough Jewish terrorism. Enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment