... because they're either not white enough or they do not comply with his totalitarian regime.
The bimboesque dumb blonde White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said yesterday that the her Daddy's Donald Dumb administration will be "investigating" the Democrat nominee for New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani with the objective of stripping him of his US citizenship. The original idea came from the inbred white republican moron from the backward slavery state of Tennessee. Apparently, Mamdani is too "brown-skinned" and a "socialist". OMG, a socialist? In America? And another brownie in a position of government? Both those features are mortal sins for the racist, extremist capitalists of the conservative neanderthals of these United States of America.
A Justice Department memo from June 11 tells prosecutors of the DOJ’s Civil Division to prioritize the denaturalization of various naturalized citizens over alleged infractions ranging from war crimes to “material misrepresentations” (i.e. lies or flasehoods) in their citizenship applications.
During his failed first term which he ended by a seditious insurrection against the US government, Donald Dumb Trump expanded the existing denaturalization policies. Now the criminal Moron-in-Chief is calling for the use of "civil", rather than "criminal", litigation because the burden of proof in civil cases is less stringent, the individual does not need to have an attorney defending him or her, and it is far easier and faster to reach a conclusion in these cases. Stripping Americans of citizenship through civil litigation violates due process and infringes on the rights guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
Following last week's ruling by the extremist conservative Supreme Court in the birthright citizenship case — which denies the ability of lower courts to stop the executive branch from imposing illegal or unconstitutional policies - pursuing policies of disputed legality — it’s highly likely that the radical hardline Trump administration will begin to target more Americans. If an American disputes the denaturalization process he/she is subject to, no lower court can put a hold on any arbitrary, illegal or unconstitutional decision by the Trump Administration's Department of Justice.
As to what conduct might warrant denaturalization against a citizen, the DOJ memo lists a number of soc-alled "transgressions", including the standard acccusations of torture and human trafficking, but now include "illegally procured" naturalization by "concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation" and the really disturbingly vague umbrella charge of posing "a potential danger to national security." The latter type of charges and accusations is commonly used by dictators and tyrants who wish to get rid of their political opponents.
For example, Elon Musk could very well be an easy target for denaturalization by the DOJ because he lied on his application for citizenship: He cheated his way into the US by entering on a student visa, but then did not attend university and went to work illegally.
Given that Trump has labeled critics as the “enemy within,” has falsely framed peaceful demonstrators as accomplices to terrorism and has declared his ambition to deport American citizens to foreign prisons, the potential for abuse here seems incredibly high.
The next Democrat Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, is a naturalized US citizen. Trump could very well invent some made-up charge to try and strip him of his US citizenship. Mamdani represents everything that Trump is not: He's an immigrant, he is brown-skinned, of Indian descent, he is a Democrat, and given his charisma as an articulate well-spoken energetic young man who is determined to bring some sanity back to the debilitated US institutions.
==============================================
Trump says he will ‘take a look’ at deporting Musk as feud reaches new height
Andrew Feinberg
Tue, July 1, 2025
President Donald Trump has suggested that the country’s immigration enforcement apparatus could be turned against now-former ally Elon Musk after the Tesla executive renewed criticism of the tax and spending megabill on which the president has bet his legislative agenda.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday as he departed the White House to visit an immigration detention facility in Florida, the president was asked if Musk, a naturalized American citizen who originally hails from South Africa, could be deported in retaliation for his attacks on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act under debate in the Senate.
“I don’t know,” he replied. “We’ll have to take a look.”
The president added that the administration might turn the quasi-agency once run by Musk, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, on his ex-friend.
“We might have to put DOGE on Elon,” he said. “You know what DOGE is? DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.”
Musk spent the first few months of the president’s second term as an unpaid special government employee leading what was initially described as a cost-cutting effort that spiraled into operating more as a roving band of ideological enforcers who at one point fed the country’s entire foreign aid apparatus — the U.S. Agency for International Development — into what Musk called a “wood chipper” in a span of days.
DOGE’s efforts led to the agency largely shutting down, and Musk left the White House in May after being denied a request to remain in that unpaid status for longer.
Since returning to the private sector, Musk has become a vocal critic of the partisan spending package Trump has touted as a vehicle to fund his anti-immigrant agenda and other GOP priorities without making use of the regular appropriations process that would ordinarily require buy-in from Democrats, particularly in the Senate.
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been lashing out on X, the social media platform he owns, to amplify critics of the massive spending bill and threaten to support electoral challenges against lawmakers who vote for the legislation on account of the bill’s negative impact on America’s national debt.
Trump has claimed that Musk’s opposition to the bill is driven solely by pique over the administration’s efforts to eliminate tax incentives intended to promote sales of electric vehicles such as the ones sold by Tesla.
Echoing a post on Truth Social in which he claimed Musk receives “more subsidy than any human being in history” and suggested that the centibillionaire “would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa” without federal support, Trump repeated his claim that Musk is motivated by his own financial needs rather than concerns about debt and threatened once more to punish his former ally financially.
“He's upset ... that he's losing his EV mandate ... he's very upset about things,” Trump said. “But you know, he could lose a lot more than that. I should tell you, right? Elon can lose a lot more than that,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment