Saturday, May 3, 2008

Bravo Jumblatt, but where are your allies?

Walid Jumblatt, the chameleon of Lebanese politics, says he has a secret document that shows Hezbollah is setting up telecommunications networks across Lebanon and is observing Beirut’s International Airport. “By observing the airport, they could be preparing for sabotage, the kidnapping or the assassination of any figure, whether Lebanese or not,” Jumblatt said in a press conference while hinting at Hezbollah. Jumblatt also said that Hezbollah is importing weapons from Iran through the Beirut airport, and has called for expelling the Iranian Ambassador from Beirut.

That is all fine and dandy. We love those revelations, except they are not new. We knew them all along for close to 28 years now, including 25 years during which Jumblatt supported Hezbollah's "resistance" and was a staunch ally of the Syrian occupiers. We all know that Hezbollah smuggles weapons from Syria across the Lebanese-Syrian border and is financed by Tehran. Hezbollah controls so-called "security zones" where the government cannot enter.

But Jumblatt is an ally of the Siniora government and a top member of the so-called March 14 Cedars Revolution, and there are so many things that the Lebanese government can do to counter Hezbollah, but which it refuses to do. For one it should officially rescind its official Ministerial Statement which contains an endorsement of Hezbollah's "resistance" platform. Prime Minister Siniora only yesterday was still calling for "special relations" between Lebanon and Syria, a euphemism for granting Syria rights and privileges to interfere in Lebanese affairs and which transcend the boundaries of what normal relations should be between two sovereign nations.

Such "special relations" was the term that Siniora himself and his former master Rafik Hariri, as well as Jumblatt, used to use to justify their support for the Syrian occupation and Hezbollah's violation of every law in Lebanon. The March 14 Cedars Revolution bunch of corrupt cronies speak with both sides of their mouth: One day they demand exchanging embassies between Lebanon and Syria, and the next they demand that "special relations" be granted to Syria. "Special relations", again in the doublespeak of the Syrian occupation, meant that Syria did not have to ask permission to send its troops, kidnap innocent Lebanese, bomb Lebanese cities, etc. ...All of that was very "special" when Jumblatt, Hariri, and Siniora were in bed with Hassan Nasrallah, kissing the ass of Bashar Assad, a mere 3 years ago.

The Lebanese government - and Mr. Jumblatt - should ask their ally, the United States, to run monitoring flights over the Lebanese-Syria border. They should ask their allies, and their own banks, to interdict the transfer of money to Hezbollah through Lebanese banks which are supporters of the Hariri business empire.

Siniora and Jumblatt know that it is their past actions and positions that have brought us to the marsh of scum where we stand today. They - and their patron the United States - have allowed Hezbollah and Syria to build their empire in Lebanon after supporting them and their rape of Lebanon for close to 30 years. So we cannot reasonably expect the Siniora government to ask for "serious" military assistance to the Lebanese army so it can counter and stand up to Hezbollah, because the United States does not want the Lebanese army to become strong. The United States wants Lebanon to continue to be the arena for settling its own scores with its enemies elsewhere, in complete disregard for the 40-year long suffering of the country and the people of Lebanon.

In fact, we cannot demand that the world community support a really strong Lebanese government and army because over the years and decades, Hezbollah has infiltrated the Lebanese army and the security services through military and security appointments made under the Syrian occupation. In fact, General Michel Suleiman - the prime "consensus" candidate for the presidency in Lebanon, endorsed (all of a sudden, one might add) by the US and the March 14 degenrates, was appointed to head the army at the same time as a number of pro-Syrian generals and high ranking officers. To name but one, Major General Wafic Jezzini, Director General of General Security who probably in the least knows who was behind all the assassinations of Lebanese politicians, journalists, and military leaders, is a Hezbollah operative who did jail time once for smuggling hashish.

So what does Jumblatt and Siniora want? If they want to stand up to Syria, then they ought to do it well and not just for show. Lebanon cannot keep playing the virgin prostitute, or the whore with high moral standards. We cannot be with Syria and against Syria at the same time. We cannot be against Syria and Hezbollah and also be against peace with Israel. We cannot demand the normalization of relations with Syria, and be against a normalization with Israel, because Syria has caused hundreds of times more casualties, deaths and damages to Lebanon than Israel has. We cannot demand the delineation of borders with the outlaw regime in Syria which never recognized Lebanon's right to wexist as a sovereign nation, and be against settling the stupid dispute over the Shebaa Farms with Israel with whom we have a standing Truce Agreement since 1949 over an internationally-recognized borders.

The United States for its part cannot demand only that Syria cease interfering in Lebanese affairs. It should pressure its degenerate allies of March 14 and the Siniora government to come clean on uncoupling Lebanon from the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which requires the permanent pacification of the Lebanese-Israeli border. It should force the Siniora government to purge the military institutions and the Lebanese administration of all pro-Hezbollah pro-Syrian cronies, then provide all the military support to the Lebanese army so it can stand up to Hezbollah and exert real effective control over Lebanese territory. It should force the Siniora government to dispatch fully armed brigades to the Syrian-Lebanese border (a mere 200 Km long) to interdict all weapons and criminals from crossing it.

Enough doublespeak and deceit.

Hanibaal

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hannibal, your argument was solid all along - that is, until it hits 'normalising relations with israel'. Your type of discourse is precisely what weakens the logic of being against Syria and Iran - why should 'being against them' translate into being in favour of Israel? Since when has Israel deserved any agreement with Lebanon? why should we make ANY move towards normalisation with Israel? It is because of such suggestion that people are wary and scary of anti-syria and anti-iranian rhetoric - because it usually implies being close to an enemy as bad - if not worse - than iran and syria. sabah el gheir.
sophia

Anonymous said...

I don't understand this theoretical enmity to Israel. I have no more in common with Israel than I have with Syria or Iran, so why can't I stand at an equal - and neutral - distance from both Syria and Israel? Like Egypt and Jordan, Lebanon should have stable and neutral relations with both Syria and Israel, no more no less. Why can the Egyptians and the Jordanians do this, and not the Lebanese? What are we? Some sort of lower class people that have to feel inferior to others?

Israel occupied Lebanon twice (1978 and 1982), and it withdrew. Israel never challenged the fundamental right of Lebanon to exist as an independent country. Syria invaded once, stayed 30 years, killed, bombed and kidnapped, ran the government, imposed elections, tortured, stole money, etc. and to this day refuses to recognize Lebanon as an independent country.

Israel says it is willing to settle all border disputes with Lebanon through the UN. Syria refuses to do this.

Israel does not arm militias and dictate government on Lebanon. Syria does.

No one is more in favor of Israel or Syria. All that we advocate is for a neutral stable condition vis-a-vis the Palestinian-Israeli problem so that Lebanon is not always dragged into other people's wars. Look at Jordan and Egypt: They are advancing their economies, building their countries, engaging in tourism and living well. Why should Lebanon be the idiot who wants to fight when others don't want to fight?

Ultimately, it is your sort of argument that always puts Lebanon in one camp versus the other. This is more likely, as the past 40 years have shown, to keep Lebanon chained by wars and backwardness.

Hanibaal

Anonymous said...

Well, you see, i harbour no special sympathy for palestinians because they are muslims or arabs - i do have sympathy for them because they are unwilling victims, full stop. The nasty occupation that subjects Palestinians to live like that makes many a holocaust survivor ashamed of having survived. I am not against a deal or a rapprochement with Israel because they are jews, and i am rather aghast at your use of "theoretical" enmity. I am myself an enemy to whoever oppresses and humiliates people and those who deny others their own dignity - the same thing that makes me loath countries like Saudi Arabia. In those countries, like in South Africa, racism and inequality were institutionalised, and part of their basic constitution - so no, i dont see why we should befriend a country that embarrasses anyone who has a bit of intelligence and sense of morals.
Sophia

SAMIR KENAAN said...

Hannibal I heard your argument and I feel with you and our cause to save our country from all foriegn intervantions from Syria, iran or esraeel???? I am sure you know your roots as you name yourself Hannibal , but I do not agree with you of naming (LEBANON IZNOGOOD), If you have any love to Lebanon you may change that (WHAT IS GOOD FOR LEBANON). As you mention Masr & urdun in your argument I say with what is good for them should be the same for our Lebanon.
Long live Lebanon Yehya LIBNAN
DAMOUR FROM SAMIR KENAAN

Anonymous said...

This reads well in the beginning ,but the conclusion is somewhat strange. It reminds me of Rabita thinking (students pro Kataeb at AUB) in the early seventies .
True Syria has done huge damage to Lebanon ,but no where near as bad as Israel which created the Palestinian refugee problem in the first place.
So yes Lebanon can not continue playing the virgin whore game anymore and must stand up together against all foreign intervention .
The problem is finding the consensus in a representative government the puts its motto as Lebanon First.

Nasser

Anonymous said...

To Sophia,
Again, I am advocating a pragmatic approach to solving Lebanon's problem, and reject getting entangled into theoretical love and hatred for oppressors and victims. We are all, at some level, victims and oppressors. I just want the Lebanese to stop enjoying being the Masochist victims of others, then turn around and oppress each other and themselves as a reaction.
Our destiny is not to solve other people's problems, especially not at the cost of ourselves, our lives, and our country (which is what we have done for 40 years now).
We - as Lebanese - are not responsible for the plight of the Palestinians, any more than we are obligated by any higher moral standard to loathe oppressors beyond our means.
We should not lose ourselves in causes that are bigger than us and beyond our means.

To Samir,
I called the blog Lebanon iznogood, because right now Lebanon is NOT GOOD - it is sick - I will change the name when Lebanon is healthy again. And then, what's in a name? Let's focus on the substance.
Should we have lunch at Mal'a al-nahrain? or up on the marah? or down in the sehel?

Anonymous said...

You do write well but you used three words that were "rude" and that made you loose credibility though what you are saying sounds smart.